"Muslims conducted organized raids into Africa to enslave Negroes. These were then sold in the slave bazaars of Mecca, Baghdad, Tripoli and other places in the Islamic world. This trade was only stopped by the European powers in the nineteenth century."


Introduction

Islam, (born out of individual and social orphanage) is the cradle of pan-Arabism and the root cause of not only Euro/American slave trade and colonialism, but also the "allergic reaction" that forced Europe into a technological revolution (compare Japan and the Meji-restauration in the 19th century).

Islam/Arabic language emerged among "desert Vikings" (robbers and traders) who created a pan-Arabic "offensive defense" (i.e. what later became called Islam in the 19th century) based on slavery, colonialism and exploitation. Sex segregation/sexism became an essential part of Islam's expansion.


What's true Islam?

Who's the real terrorist (totalitarian fascist) and who's the real Islamic Muslim? If you oppose totalitarian movements you have to oppose Islam, the ultimate submission under arbitrary human totalitarianism! Islam cannot be "reformed" in a non-totalitarian/non-fascist way without loosing its "infidel" essence, i.e. the truly racist idea that a Muslim is a better person than a non-Muslim/non-believer. Islamic terror hence is three-dimensional: 1) Conventional terror, 2) daily global street terror, and 3) the "moderate" totalitarian "white-collar" racist/sexist Sharia-terror spreading through Mosques, sponsored organizations, universities etc

"Islam is not just a religion. It is a way of life," insists a young and zealous black American convert initially drawn to Islam by admiration for Malcolm X. Reality? "It's specific in the Koran that jihad is about fighting. There is no such thing as innocents. The idea of the Islamic state is terror against anyone who doesn't support Islamic ideology."
 

Hypothesis on the origin of Islam

(a basic understanding of the crucial concept sex segregation is needed for understanding Islam)

It's a real shame in the 21st century that an ideology born from (first slaves were poor Arabic nomads), based on and supporting slavery/Islamic "serfdom" is not forbidden throughout the world! And it's a shame that people seemingly can't read the Islamic slave/POW/trade manual:

Koran 33:50: "Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty"

23:5: "... except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them:..."

And Islam never freed slaves, only confined them in itself. That's why apostasy was made such a grave crime. Arabic Islamists collected slaves by raids, trading etc. and were especially interested in girls. They turned most of Africa and huge parts of SE-Asia into Islamic rape harems for the sexual satisfaction of males and for ideological reproduction of Islam.

Arab slave traders used camels for transportation and Koran as the manual for institutionalizing slavery and rape-ism.

The numbers of slaves are unknown and usually belittled although we know they were high, possibly even extremely high. But the crucial issue here is the detrimental effect Islam had not only on Africa's overall development, but also on how Islam created evil cultural patterns visible even in non-Muslim countries.

African slaves taken by Arabic/Islamic traders and warriors usually ended up (if they were lucky) as servants and sex slaves (remember that Islamic Sharia marriage is institutionalized rape).

Slaves were kidnapped by black slave dealers who sold them to Arabs in an early Islamic banking and finance system.

As a parallel to slave trading via Darfur, Mecca etc. more than thousand years ago, Arabic/Islamic slave traders also begun using transportation by sea to, for example, East-India etc. Bigger ships and a huge demand for slave on plantations meant that Arabic/Islamic slavery reached its peak some 500 years before the Europeans begun buying black slaves from Arabs or Islam influenced slave distributors in Africa.

Great Zimbabwe and other slave centers were born, flourished, and declined in exact correspondence with the Arabic/Islamic slave trade. Furthermore, the Islamic drainage of African outcasts  may have strongly contributed to the fact that tribal systems and religions have, in general, survived better in Africa than elsewhere, due to the "cleansing" effect of selling unwanted humans as slaves.

Interestingly Koran seems to have been compiled as a response and a strategy to the Nubian resistance. I.e. the sophistication of a combined conquest/slavery/rape-ism system that made it possible to turn male POWs/slaves into lojal soldiers, and females into reproducers of new Muslims - hence the harshness of Sharia.

The whole world is now suffering under the last convulsions of sex segregation, and Islam is definitely not the road out of sex apartheid. Islam IS sex segregation

But the birth of Islam without slavery is as impossible as is the modern spreading of Islam without oil money. And so is a 800 m high oil-dillo now planned in Arab land. But what do people really know about Islam? Except for the confusing veil of mist spread by Islamists themselves? The only thing we hear is the continuing repetition that "it's not Islam's fault". Well, it is!


Islam from desertization to global climate change

Islam was literally born out of that very environmental disaster that its nomadic predecessors had caused. And now the worst (slavery/rape-ism/suffering etc) "religion" has a direct and causal relation to the worst environmental issue of our time Islam's inherent incompetence for progress is today complemented by precisely what Islam couldn't perform, namely technology. The use of oil hence fuels our modern disaster in a way similar to the ancient circumstances where Islam launched its malign and contagious spreading.

Without slaves, oil, robbery, theft, sponging and copying, Islam has no built-in mechanism for progress! Read history with Islam as an analytical tool, and you will see a pattern that reveals an alternative picture of Europe's progress and Africa's stagnation, than those racist ones spread in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

It's not necessarily non-Muslims, but rather the Muslims who need to learn more about Islam! If they have to escape Islam, why then do they take it with them? Of course because everyone says: "It's not Islam that is bad"!

Other religions may make a big mistake in trying to sponge on Islam!

Karen Armstrong (the confused female who first became a nun) says that "the point is to separate out the extremists we have in all of our monotheistic religions from the mainstream”

In fact, she hence offers euthanasia for Islam. And that's good although she could have expressed it more clearly so to shorten the transition from Islam to non-Islam (real Islam only containing lunatic fractions like bin Laden & Co etc) and hence also the unnecessary suffering caused by Koran-Islam. Or doesn't she understand the simple fact that that 1) Islam is a very special form of monotheism (i.e. its pathological symbiosis with Koran that encompasses everyone who may be titled a Muslim - not only a fraction!), 2) that monotheism (outside ancestor warship/tribal/kinship religions) only can exist as individual or totalitarian, nothing in between. Moderate/modern Islam is a tautology because it presumes a non-existing Islam with only a name. Islam is incompatible with uncertainty and it's incompatible with de-sex segregation! To understand this you must understand the roots of Islam:


Islam today - Islam's new conquest follows old concepts

Today in Europe's capital the most common name among newborn boys is Mohammed!
Rotterdam, Antwerpen and other big cities are already on the verge to get Muslim majorities.
15 % of France's (nuclear) military force is Muslim.
Some 20 % of newborn Europeans are Muslims.

Police avoid Islamic neighborhoods, and non-Muslim (and surprisingly often Muslim) girls/women are assaulted and raped by gangs of sexist Islamists just because of being infidels or not Muslim enough, or for violating Muslim dress codes and failing to submit to Islamic/Koranic sex segregation.

When Murray Gordon published his popular book Slavery in the Arab World (1987), he missed the world's largest Islamic country, Indonesia. But he isn't certainly the only one (info & interest have been limited, so far), and at least he tried to address the sensitive issue of Mohammed/Koran/Islam's relation to slavery.

Aceh was the first Arabic/Islamic slave sultanate in SE Asia, and already some 100 years after Mohammed's death Arab slave traders had positioned a stronghold for themselves there.

It's already proved beyond doubt that pan-Arabic Islam is the world's main slave trader throughout history. And it's also proved that Mecca was the center of slave trade. Islamic pilgrimage was simply and mainly about selling and buying slaves. But little has been said about Islam and Arabic slave trade in SE Asia.

Throughout Mideast, Africa and large parts of Asia and Europe the old custom of slavery was transformed by Islam, from being mainly a sex and labor resource, to a multidimensional institution aiming for the total submission of conquered people. As you may already know, Koran sets a double standard on slaves, they may be both things and individuals. This has to do with the birth of Islam as a "religion" for prospering on the behalf of abducted people. By forcing them to submit under Islam they became easier to handle while still keeping them in a slave position. Typically males were either castrated or used as soldiers etc and girls were turned into Muslim-producing factories in well guarded harems.

If this is really the simple (but pragmatically convincing) logic behind the development of Islam, then Indonesia and other places shouldn't be different. Arab slave traders used the old trade routes and started "slavery metastases" far from home. These metastases followed the well known pattern we have seen in Africa etc, namely that Arabs first dealt with and converted to Islam (when not simply conquering) those who already were in the business. Converted here means that they offered a manual for prospering on slaves, i.e. Koran and Islam, hence still under Arab influence. This is the background of pan-Arabic Islamism and this would explain Islam's tremendous growth and power along the old trade routes far from Mecca (originally an important waterhole for bypassers) , towards which they then had to bow. Arabs were neither good soldiers nor good producers of goods or farmers! But they invented what is perhaps the worst crime ever against humanity. 1400 years of cruel slavery and rape-ism. And one of the grim consequences is that this slavery many times got confused with ethnicity hence encouraging even more of the same. The key to survival under Arab influence was submission, indeed! This is also why Islam's most basic pillar is sex segregation - the biological and cultural reproduction of Islam!

"Moderate" Islam is nothing but an effort in vain to distance oneself from pan-Arabic fundamentalism. Will it succeed? No! What is happening in Afghanistan today - a man facing death penalty for abandoning Islam! And the pan-Arabic Islam slavery is still on.

But although MuslimWakeUp announces that:
"One of the most tragic facts is that Mecca, the geographic heart of the Muslim community, was one of the largest slave markets in the Muslim world all the way up until the Twentieth Century when the standards of the international community, championed by the West, came to inform Muslims that chattel slavery is a violation against dignity, humanity and their own standing in global affairs."
the terrible truth is that it's not the culture but Islam itself that is the real culprit!
Sadly, it's become a fashion (or maybe rather a mechanism of defense) among Westernized "Muslims" to "reveal" Islamic atrocities, while continuing on the evil path with an own private agenda for "peace".

Islam IS segregation and totalitarianism - all in one and nothing in between!
A transition from kinship to kingship that went awfully wrong!

Some Islam etymology: Islam originally meant an Arabic male desert warrior/robber/rapist (pre-Islamic Arab nomads' ultra-sexism is well-known among historians), and Allah was one out of 360 pre-Islamic gods. In Germany Koran is now reported to the police. That means a first small step for mankind against a giant pan-Arabic/Islamic 1400 year long crime against humanity.


Historical background

A pagan moon-god made "monolitheistic" (Monolitheism will be a better word ), "connected" to Abraham (inspired by what was learned from educated Jews in Medina), and made popular by robbing caravans in transit between Mediterranean and South Asia!

Certainly it wasn't the timid hanifiyya tradition that was so successful in killing, raping and subjugating neighbors, hence spreading the "true Islam". Islam's birth (with the help of a woman who got her fortune in pre-Islamic time!) was a very late (and perhaps therefore especially evil) instance of the usual transition from kinship to kingship (compare Buddha, Confucius etc more than 1000 years earlier). And, later, it was precisely during the "peaceful" so called "Golden Age" that Islam lost its potency and eventually had to retreat from Europe. Today Islam's main weapon has been oil-money serving pan-Arabism. Without that money that the West dug up from the sand that the Saudis' nomadic ancestors deserted, Islam would hardly be noticed anymore (especially not by American youth who got Islam via oil-sponsored youth- etc organizations)! Arabs have, through the times, been remarkably incompetent in technology and techniques.


The long and stuttering birth of Islam - and its explosive and violent spreading

By the way, doesn't Medina belong to the Jews as much as Jerusalem belongs to the Palestinians - the "world's youngest people"? The creation of the Koran is historically very pragmatic, and deeply influenced by the Jews who inhabited Medina at the time before they were eventually expelled/killed when the Islamists became powerful enough.

The creation of Islam wasn't a sudden revelation but, on the contrary, an endless development from the moment (610) Mohammad (Islam's penultimate messenger before Bahaullah) realized that his tribe was about to die, to his own death in 632. He was educated by Jews, which led him to the ridicilous idea to "connect" Arabs with Abraham. Furthermore the Koran wasn't anything new but on the contrary mostly repetitions of already established traditions, spiced with alleged connections to Jewish ancestors, and the above purpose (jihad), which, due to its violent and aggressive totalitarian nature, became successful in conquest and subjugation (Islam has never really lived in real peace with anyone weaker than itself. Sometimes in commercial/political terror-balance, but that's about all. Islam is like a net with the spider waiting for the big meal).


A book, "thought" about for some 22-23 years, and written down, long after its (oral) "author's" death, by the help of a Khalifa who was eventually murdered by other Islamists!

It's easy to imagine a tribal leader who, for the last 23 years of his life, exercises and experiences negative and positive outcomes of different strategies, and little by little (aided by the educated Jews) writes them down in what could be described a primitive "supreme court" diary dictated by the dictator himself. This also explains the scattered and inconsistent content of the Koran. And just like the Nazi (National Socialist) party program it also contained some good things (National Socialism is a branch of Social democracy, and its program is, in fact, hard to distinguish from a social democratic party program, given Jews and racism are excluded). But that has hardly been used as a defense for Hitler, has it?

The real strength of Islam was its violence (and now also its racist and sexist message distributed by Saudi oil-money fueling Pan-Arabism. The "true" Islam is Arabic!). Without the rapid and bloody militaristic spreading/conquest in the second half of the 7th century (and early 8th) Islam should never have become a religious issue worth even mentioning! Not to admit this simple fact (which the American youth above clearly understood) is pure hypocrisy and suspicious stealthy acting!

Everyone who knows the essentials of Islam without criticizing it, is either a sexist/racist totalitarian fascist, or just a creepy, hypocritical coward. And it's certainly not about robbing someone's ethnicity, but, on the contrary, to disconnect true ethnicity from true evilness by openly condemning the basic teaching of Islam ("infidels" and non-Muslims as less worthy non-humans)


Islam's slave trade with the Vikings: "Muslims wanted slaves to make their lives easier"

"Moral wasteland of Scandinavia: The sudden irruption (of Viking slave traders) was no accident. It coincided with the devastation of Western Europe by the Islamic hordes coming out of the Middle East The Muslims wanted slaves to make their lives easier"

Arabs preferred white women so that's why they paid so much more for them. Islam's expansion was entirely based on slavery and exploitation, and the so called "peaceful Andalucian co-existence" with Jews, Christians etc was upheld by a slave-economy draining Africa and Europe.

The more you study Islam (from outside the mosques and scientifically) the more disgusting it appears. Is Islam the worst crime ever against humanity? What differed the Vikings from the Muslims was Islam - a fascist recipe for conquest based on institutionalized rape and sex segregation!


The deceptive illusion/projection of "a nice Islam"

In Karen Armstrong's The History of God (1993 - the same year World Trade Center got its first Islamic terror attack!) nothing at all is said about the violent spreading and nature of Islam (see battle/conquest timeline), although she spends 40 pages praising Mohammad and the Koran! This continuing tunnel vision is very typical for our time! Especially many women seem to appreciate the in-built sexism in Islam, perhaps because it offers a convenient excuse for not daring to really step outside (allow others to step outside) a limiting sex segregation. But perhaps the most dangerous deception is how Islam/Islamists, with clear or sometimes less clearly pronounced totalitarian objectives, now abuse naive Christian confidingness.

"...the kind of folly we now see in Iraq, which is based entirely on the premise that the problem is not Islam, but only "Wahhabi" Islam..."

"...there is an intensive effort by American Muslims to recruit in public schools, which is going pretty much unchecked in the name of tolerance..."

Grave Islamic indoctrination in Californian schools


Who's a "true" Arab?

A few days back , the Swedish (Islamic?) state radio invited Hans Rosling (allegedly "professor in international health"). He served the listeners with senseless and less than poorly informed pseudo-anthropology (hopefully he is better off in medicine). But what really struck  was that he called the first humans out of Africa "Arabs" just because they (the "Pygmies" belonging to the M130 lineage?!) happened to cross the levant and/or the southern most part of what we now call the Arabian peninsula, i.e. outside Saudi Arabia. And because of Arab-Islamic religious restrictions we don't know almost anything about the human remains on the peninsula from this period.

I do know many Arabs who aren't neither "Pygmies" nor Muslims. Or aren't they Arabs anymore? Just happened to be born there! Or maybe we all should become "Islamarabs"! Reminds me of what I have read about "infidels" in Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Soviet Union, not to mention Pol Pot and others.

Arabs and Arabic are very late phenomenon and the latter, in its written form, contemporary with the birth of Islam (a variant of the Arabs' original religion, Muruwa (i.e. extreme machismo and brutal manliness, even for its time). Arabic is a late branch of Hebrew and the Aramaic language of Jesus.

There are also some speculations about a possible connection between Arab, Erebus (also connected to the death myth of Hades) and Europe (Assyrian darkness).

Unfortunately Islamic revisionism has replaced scientific truth about the "Arabs".
(Also compare the Indonesian case of "Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" who stole (and possibly also destroyed vital parts of Flores 'Hobbit' WoMan").

"The crux of the problem with the Arabs which is mostly due to Islam, is that they haven't grown up"

You may also be interested in: Intelligent design may not be that intelligent after all!


Who are the Muslims and what is political Islam?

A one billion plus "minority"!

There aren't "1,1 billion Muslims". In fact, there are none*! Only a looming & anti-democratic/anti-human rights pan-Arabic**/Islamic sexist loophole!  There used to be some 2-3 billion communists. Most people now consider their worldview more or less extreme. But where are the communists today?

And whereas communism's milder relative, social democracy, may be described as a democracy-sponging fascism/national socialism without weapons, Islam is ALL OF THEM! It sponges on democracy, it abuses human rights, and it keeps its weapons and sexist/totalitarian objectives!

"Lenin's What Is To Be Done?, when it was first published in 1902, was accepted by leading Russian social democrats"

It's also no coincidence that Hitler's NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers Party) supplanted the Social Democrats as the largest party in the Reichstag in the democratic election of 1932!

A system of moral based on negative human rights or fascism? Political Islam, a much meaner relative to parasitic (i e transition of tax money to itself and its own bureaucracy rather to the people) social democracy (see Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs. social state) is today the main threat against democracy. Sadly, democrats seem to bother the least!

Not all of Christianity is fundamentalist, but all of Islam is!

According to a study on the texts of ten main religions the Koran (the book of the "peaceful" Islam) is by far the most warlike and violent, whereas Buddhist (remember the huge, unique Buddha statues the Islamists destroyed in Afghanistan before Bush liberated the country!) texts are by far the most peaceful. The New Testament came second. The Old Testament, although not even close to the Koran, contains some violence, but remember it's also more than 1000 years older! Furthermore, the Koran doesn't even try to problematize its abundance of and encouragement to violence!

But what is perhaps most astonishing with Islam is that many (and some of them people who otherwise don't use to have problem with reason) seem to defend its extreme sex segregation/sexism by referring to conditions that "used to be even worse"!
The evasions about Islam are seemingly endless and widely accepted no matter how cracked they are. A fanatic and dangerous wish to blink obvious facts! A wish for a personal loophole, that's stronger than the fear of violent and totalitarian fascist ideologies?

From Stalin and the killing fields of Pol Pot to Islamic dictatorship and Arabic racism and the systematic killing and raping in Sudan/Darfur (silenced and belittled by the Bush-condemners who simultaneously support Islam)! Do we ever learn?

Note! To be non-religious or atheist has nothing to do with communism etc. Or the other way round: A true commitment to the Holy negative human rights is a road to a non-totalitarian/non-fascist/non-racist/non-sexist ideological approach between global humans. It's a myth that we need rigid religious systems for upholding moral, law and order. Look around and you will in fact be proven the contrary (see World Values Survey & A formula for a world "religion" based on negative human rights and true attachment)!

It's, in, fact, precisely the black "moral loopholes" in Islam that makes it equally attractive as the German national-socialist working party (a branch of German social democracy) fascism in the 1930's. Whereas negative human rights "only" offer a universal logic for coping with everyone, Islam offers (apart from its main task as pan-Arabism) a variety of possibilities for hatred, contempt and separatism, confined in a repressive and rigid set of rules etc, which, furthermore, are not only open, but encouraged to violence on different levels.

Real attachment or evil gang/group superficiality (sometimes confusingly like ethnicity)?

What is needed on top of the idea of negative human rights is true attachment between kins and friends instead of the superficial gang/member/group-"attachment" offered by suspicious religious and other systems of belief.

Weird children/youngsters who have been raised/fostered by their alikes constitute a fast growing criminal problem for the world. But why are they detached from the rest of us? Because they want to? I don't think so. I think they need both, all the time. And if someone has to go sometimes, it should rather be the weirdies, shouldn't it? But today the reality is almost always the opposite (read more about attachment, delinquency and sex segregation on Childless child psychoanalysts in search for motherhood/femininity!


Looking for extremism in Islam? Stop looking. Just read the extreme hatred, contempt and sexism in the Koran, and consider that it's supposed to be the true heart of this "religion" And consider that Islam's ultimate and totalitarian/sexist/racist goals, Sharia and world hegemony, are woven into a pattern that makes it much more like fascist "world-communism" than you might expect (And please, don't seek comfort in twisted Andalucian myths about "the good Islam" - it's no different than the myths about "the good communist paradise"!)! In fact, it's only its hereto failure for hegemony that disguises its real danger! Isn't that enough extremism for a warning lamp to lit? But some might argue that one should try to "interpret" away those evil parts of the Koran. Well, I for one, think it's easier to "interpret" away Islam as a whole as long as it contains the Koran, and as long as this Koran is tied to this "religion" in a way that makes bin Laden's reading of it equally possible as someone else, just as we used to do with the extreme Utopia of a communist society. No one knows what is "true Islam", no more than what was "true communism" (Pol Pot?). But what we do know is that Islam is full of possibilities and scary openings (including the eager supply of Arab oil-money) for weirdies on all levels! Do we really need to give this faceless and irresponsible ideology, full of evil potential, even the slightest chance? Most other ways of fighting poverty and inequality are probably preferable. Let's start with fair tax/citizen salary/health/education/housing insurance for everyone everywhere. A huge opportunity for UN - if we could only get rid of those anti-democratic Islamic states promoting genocide, rapes etc while hindering real democratic development within the UN!

One of the world's foremost "moderate Muslims" now seems to be king Abdullah of Jordan. Why? Because most Islamists have already realized that lunatic terrorism has become a stupid dead end, and because "moderate Islam" is (like Islam in all forms) essentially a slogan for gaining power. Furthermore it's Islam's total lack of religious authority and responsibility that gives it its real, contourless power, but also its racist/sexist/fascist appearances! This means that while many talk in the name of Islam or name their particular ethnicity Muslim, the only thing they really have in common is that they boost Pan-Arabic Islam (which, in turn, is equally diversified and split)! And much of the sexist/racist (infidels, unbelievers etc)/totalitarian texts in Koran can never be reconciled with negative human rights, de-sex segregation and real democracy, no matter how far the interpretations are stretched.


Persian Mirror: Human rights before Islam and Cultural Genocide in the name of Islam

Guardian: "Defying the view that one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, Rice said, ``No cause, no movement, and no grievance can justify the intentional killing of innocent civilians and noncombatants.'' She added, ``This is unacceptable by any moral standard.'' "

Except one - the Koran, the main tool for pan-Arabism since the 7th century (back then with swords and robberies - now with oil money, mosques, youth organizations, and Koran schools disguised as schools)! Totalitarian and anti-democratic texts that would be immediately forbidden if published by any other political actors! Also read about the Islamists on Chatham House and Islam's real Achilles' heal - sex segregation, on Sex segregation Feminism and Religion

*For those in need of elucidation: According to Roger Scruton no one is really in charge for what a Muslim should do or be.

**Non-Arabic Islamic states may be historically compared to non-Roman Christian states.

Islam - the compilation (with the help of the Medina Jews*** that were later killed for not obeying the leaders of that very "Islam") - of totalitarian, sexist and racist ideas spiced with violent advices for how to kill, rape and humiliate "non-believers"/"infidels" - etymologically means, quite logically, "to surrender and obey". However, Islam as a name of an ideology based on a compilation of medieval ideas, is very recent.

*** Who told Mohammed (an orphan himself) about Abraham's "illegitimate" son Ishmael ("an outcast," "whose hand is against every man, and every man's hand against him" in Gen. xvi.12). The Islamists then used Ishmael as a convenient way to link their new "religion" to the old Judeo/Christian tradition. For more on the topic refer Homo Filius Nullius, Angels of Antichrist, Was Jesus religious? .

Today we may thank Bush, Condi, Blair, the Marines and all the others who have contributed to Afganistan's first, free, true election. But we may also consider the fact that the puzzling fact that oil-wealthy Arab nations gave much more aid to the Katrina victims in the US than to their own "Muslim" brothers and sisters in Íraq after the horrible bridge disaster recently. The number of victims was about the same! Could the promotion of pan-Arabic Islamism possibly be involved?

So who are the Muslims?


Why is Islam both sexist and racist?

The evil roots & nature of the real patriarchy, Islam, revealed in British survey
According to British YouGov's survey:

- one in four (about half a million) British Muslims sympathizes with motives of Islamic terrorists
- more than 100.000 British Muslims are ready to actually support Islamic terrorists
- about 16,000 British Muslims declare themselves willing, possibly even eager, to embrace Islamic violence (For the worldwide spreading of Islam, and to conquer the non-Islamic world?!).

"The responses indicate that Muslim men are more likely than Muslim women to be alienated from the mainstream and that the young are more likely to be similarly alienated than the old."

Interestingly it's also reported that some 80 per cent of the British Muslims think the UN sanctioned attack on the Islamic talibans and the hunt for Islamic terrorists in Afghanistan also was an attack on Islam as a whole!

In many countries fascism and National Socialism are already long since forbidden as inhumane, anti-democratic and totalitarian. No matter if we read Hanna Arendt, the Koran, or different surveys, the emerging picture of Islam is at least equally totalitarian and anti-democratic in its ultimate and pronounced strive towards a world order where it constitutes "the only final ideology". But furthermore it also pronounces a rigid segregation between the sexes (What is sex segregation?) that effectively rules out real emancipation. Although the free world now (the last decade) happens to be in the grip of a desperate sex-distinction (separatism) fashion, this isn't necessarily the situation for our kids or their kids. So why should we assist to lock them up by totalitarian, racist and sexist Sharia-Islam.

Europe means "the land of sunset/darkness". So what if Islam isn't the rescuer its clerics claim, but rather part of that very darkness?

Fascism, by the way, used to consider one class of individuals as superior to another based upon race, creed or origin! Also compare the Swedish state Islamist and misogynist, imam Leif Karlsson "Abd al Haqq Kielan" and his hypocrisy!


Saudi-British feminist-Islamist supports terror via British research institute

The problem isn't the immigrants, Arabs etc. THE PROBLEM IS ISLAM! Islam denies negative human rights (i.e. the most important ones). Don't let yourself be fooled by meaningless (or totalitarian, if you like) notions of "Islamic human rights"! Furthermore Islam, in all forms (incl. Muslim feminisms), is tied to a rigid sex segregation that makes real emancipation impossible

Islam's totalitarian racist/sexist/fascist "infidel" ideology (Koran) excludes every non-Moslem as being non-human and hence not protected by what Islam states about "real" humans. But, as is shown in Sudan and elsewhere, not even Muslims are safe from rapes, killings etc! And Muslim feminists in London, California etc shut their eyes!

Directory of "expertise" at the "non-political" Chatham House research center, Mai Yamani (Muslim feminist and the daughter of fired Saudi oil minister Yamani) shares the same goals as the London bombers: A hatred against king Fahd & Co, and against the US allies, and a fanatic urge to make Islam a totalitarian world ideology (as do Fahd & Co, but not Bush). No wonder then that her institute concludes that "the London bombings were caused by the Iraqi war".

Interestingly Westernized Muslim feminists hence have a direct coupling to the Islamic terrorists and the continuing "Jihadist" spreading of Islam, albeit they prefer the Western style of living in front of extreme Wahhabism.

Barbara J. Stock: "...the line between a “moderate” Muslim and a terrorist is very, very thin. It seems with only a small dose of “True Islam” a peaceful Muslim can become a mass murderer". Moslem feminists certainly have a considerable share in this pattern. Furthermore one should note that Moslems consider Islam the only true religion of Abraham and that it was precisely the religious tie between Saudi Arabia and the US that in the 1950s constituted the oil-fueled united front against the Soviet "Infidels"/unbelievers.

Definition of (negative) Human Rights + Fundamentalist test.

The meaningless Ijtihad (independent reasoning) reading of the Koran in new historical and social contexts is nothing but hidden private fundamentalism and has nothing to do with real emancipation, but everything with Islamic fascism/racism/sexism!

It's Islam (not Bush) that constitutes the real problem for millions of girls and women in the real world out there! And they are all betrayed by the fanatic Islamists like, for example, Mai Yamani, who has chosen to use her fortune and Western education to empowering a fascist and repressive ideology! Also remember that most (open or stealthy) Islamic terrorists (except perhaps the suicide bombers whose lives they scrupulously abuse and waste) are wealthy and highly educated!

Who is Mai Yamani? A rootless and sex segregated female Islamist who can be described as the opposite to another religious woman, Condoleezza Rice.

She is a little sex segregated girl in Arab Diaspora, living in a technological ivory tower (that her totalitarian fascism supporting Arab/Islamic ethnicity has been unable to produce itself) from where she now makes personal projections in the name of social science and Islam. But in doing so she also contributes to Islamic rapes etc on her sisters in Sudan and elsewhere. Ironically she hence boosts an Islamic ethnicity that she herself long since has lost in favor of Western ideals, whereas the women in Darfur have been forced into Islam and hence name their real ethnicity "Muslim"!

The secular end of Islam and the consecutive freeing of Arabs and Muslims

According to the historian ibn Khaldun Arabs are the lowest of people. They "destroy and ruin everything they conquer" and can only be ruled by "some religious  prophet hood" etc. He also says that Arabs are the people most remote from monarchy.
Well, what does Saudi Islamo-fascist oil-dictator king Abdullah think about that?