The Bane of Jihad
24 Jan, 2007
Some regional experts
believe that if we must take any action against Iran, there is no
better time than now. Iran’s fascist regime has never been under more
pressure, domestically and internationally; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in
addition to having been isolated internationally, is also facing an
ever widening division within the Iranian society; Tehran, because of
the U.S. moves, finds itself struggling to survive economically;
Shiite extremism is making Arab governments more willing to back U.S.
goals.
Iran’s Arab neighbors,
including Egypt and Jordan, faced with the specter of being besieged
by majority Shiite states and destabilized by the Shiite minorities
within their own territories, find themselves with no choice but to
help the U.S. in containing the neo-Nazism promoted by Ahmadinejad.
Foreign ministers of eight Arab countries issued a joint communiqué
signaling that they supported U.S. goals in Iraq.
U.S. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice believes that rising fear of Shiite extremism is
drawing together moderate Arab governments in a way that would make it
easier for the United States to contain Iran. Rice says Sunni-led
governments fear that they will be put on the defensive against
Shiites at home and in neighboring lands.
But not everyone is in
favor of using the military force. U.S. experience in Iraq has taught
that a military victory doesn’t always translate into a real victory.
The regional analysts argue that if a U.S. military victory against
Iran results in the alienation of the Shiite masses in the region,
then it will be, in fact, not a U.S. victory but the victory of the
anti-American forces and it will definitely have an adverse affect on
the ongoing war on Islamist terrorism.
Experts warn against
using Sunni Arab help without first satisfying the all important
question: Will the Sunni Arabs' help in containing Iran eventually
result in the empowerment of Wahhabi global jihad? This question has
gained critical importance in view of what happened in Afghanistan
during the anti-Soviet Jihad.
Wahhabis in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the Persian Gulf States and
elsewhere used the cover of their alliance with the U.S. to finance
the revival of Global jihad and paved the way for September 11, 2001
by reviving the institution of Jihad in the Sunni world – an
institution that is aimed at establishing the universal Islamist state
(Shariah) by subjugating or murdering the infidels.
September 11 attacks were validated by fatwas (edicts) issued by Sunni
scholars decreeing a pact to fight "Crusaders and Jews."
The military assistance provided by the U.S. was used to create an
army of Holy Warriors which was eventually used to stage attacks on
New York and Washington.
Will
the Arab government’s support for a perceived U.S. cause further
alienate the Arab masses, thereby arming Al-Qaeda passions with more
tools to recruit more holy warriors? Experts point out that Sunni
animosity toward Judeo-Christian values is a part of their psyche.
They can’t be trusted. It is a matter of record that Saudi Arabia
continues to fund and export its Wahhabi brand of Islam, making it a
"strategic threat" to the United States in the worldwide war on
terror. The chairman of the U.S. government commission on religious
freedom reached the same conclusion as far back as 2003. "It is an
ideology that is incompatible with the war on terrorism," said Michael
Young, chairman of the State Department's Commission on International
Religious Freedom.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20031118-113127-4259r.htm
Another question that
has to be answered before taking any military step against Iran is:
Will an attack on Iran be considered an attack on Shiites, thereby
uniting all the Shiites of the world against the American interests
everywhere, which would be a boon for the overall institution of
Wahhabi global jihad? Because right now, Shiites are not supporting
the Al-Qaeda causes. There is a strong feeling among the Shiites of
the world that Al-Qaeda’s global jihad is basically a vehicle to
impose a Wahhabi Sharia on the world in which Shiites will find
neither safety nor security.
There are two things that have to be
kept in mind for all times; Iran’s animosity toward the western world
and Judeo-Christian civilization is not a Shia faith but to a large
extent, only confined to the clerical establishment that rules Iran
today. Whereas Sunni hatred for the West is the direct result of
anti-Semitic interpretations of the Holy book and Hadith, Shia don’t
share their passion for the Caliphate. Iran’s Shia are more concerned
with the historical Sunni animosity toward their faith than with the
Wahhabi fanaticism for the global jihad. They know that a predominant
portion of Sunnis view Shiites as heretics. Top Saudi Arabian clerics
have declared Shiites around the world to be infidels who should be
considered worse than Jews or Christians.
Most recently, in December 2006,
Abdul Rahman al-Barak, one of the top Wahhabi clerics in Saudi Arabia
and considered close to the Kingdom's royal family, urged Sunnis
worldwide to oppose reconciliation with Shiites. "By and large,
rejectionists (Shiites) are the most evil sect of the nation and they
have all the ingredients of the infidels," Abdul Rahman wrote in a
fatwa, or religious edict, that was posted on his web site.
"The general ruling is that they are
infidels, apostates and hypocrites," he wrote. "They are more
dangerous than Jews and Christians," he wrote in the edict. Like most
hardline Sunnis, Abdul Rahman employed the word "rejectionists," used
as a derogatory term to describe Shiites because they opted out of the
Sunni school of Islamic theology. He also said the sect was the work
of a Jewish conspiracy.
International Herald Tribune
A majority of the
Shiites also feel betrayed by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s anti-American
diatribes as they believe that September 11, for the first time, made
the West aware of the evilness of Wahhabi ideology and thus it was a
chance for the Shiites to establish their rightful place among the
civilized peoples. That’s why it is of vital importance for the U.S.
to find a way to eradicate Khomeinism that fuels Ahmadinejad’s
anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism without alienating the Shia. If
there is one force that can destroy the Wahhabi institution of global
jihad it is Shia. The West will one day need them.
Tashbih Sayyed is the Editor in Chief of Pakistan Today and The Muslim World Today, President of Council for Democracy and Tolerance, an adjunct fellow of Hudson Institute, and a regular columnist for newspapers across the world. He is the author of eight books, including: History Of The World, Left Of The Center, Pakistan - An Unfinished Agenda, Mohammad - A secularist's View, Foreign Policy Of Pakistan, and Shadow Warriors - Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taliban.