www.islam-watch.org

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Muslim Council of Britain Calls for Banning Jake Neuman’s Book ‘Prophet Muhammad: Monster of History’

E-mail Print PDF

After Neuman’s book, "Islam – Evil in the Name of God", was banned in Malaysia, now Muslims in the UK call for banning his book, "Prophet Muhammad: Monster of History".


When my book was banned in Malaysia on July 7th 2011, making it punishable with 3 years in prison plus fine for possessing, publishing or distributing the book, I stated: “Those of you who think that censorship regarding Islam will not happen in the USA because of the First Amendment – dream on… It’s just a matter of time before a lawsuit is filed in the USA stating that all those who oppose Islam are spreading hatred against Muslims and by doing so are threatening the peace.”

One year on, that prediction of mine has come a step closer. UK’s Daily Mail reports that the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has demanded banning my new book "Prophet Muhammad: Monster of History", which is distributed by Amazon.com in the UK. Saying that ‘Freedom of expression should not be unlimited, and publications that cause anti-Muslim hatred, anti-Jewish hatred or homophobic hatred should not be allowed’, the Muslim Council of Britain called on Amazon to ‘take proper responsibility’ for the content of the books on its site.

Adding support to the MCB’s demand for censorship, Richard Mollet, chief executive of the Publishers Association, said: ‘It’s time internet companies did start to take a better look at their practices and behaved more responsibly.

Labour MP Paul Flynn also jumped in to support MCB’s call for censorship by saying: ‘If Amazon is providing the platform for books that wouldn’t be published otherwise, it is responsible.

I agree with the MCB that “anti-Muslim hatred, anti-Jewish hatred or homophobic hatred should not be allowed” to be propagated in the name of freedom of expression. But the content of my book exclusively concerns Islam, its founder and Islamic Sharia Law. In no way does it express hatred toward the Muslim people. Instead, it is Muslims who, inspired by their holy books, openly propagate ant-Jewish and homophobic hatred on the streets of western countries and more so in Islamic ones. If the MCB has any concern for anti-Semitism, then they should be the first to call for banning the Quran and Hadiths, which is are worst source of anti-Semitism extant today, calling for total annihilation of the Jewish people. There is no equivocation to the fact that Islam is anti-Jewish.

ANTI JEWISH TEXT IN ISLAM TRILOGY

Meccan Quran    1%

Medinan Quran  17%

Sira                     12%

Hadith                 8.9%

___________

Total Trilogy       9.3%

Mein Kampf        7 %

The Trilogy of Medina is even more negative about the Jews than Hitler's Mein Kampf.

Islam is also homophobic. It seeks annihilation of gays, and it is implemented in Islamic countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia.

MURDERING GAYS IS NOT A CRIME IN ISLAM

'If you find anyone doing as Lot's people did, kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done' (Abu Dawud, 4447).

Another hadith says that homosexuals should be burned alive or killed by pushing walls upon them:

Ibn Abbas and Abu Huraira reported God's messenger as saying, 'Accursed is he who does what Lot's people did.' In a version . . . on the authority of Ibn Abbas it says that Ali [Muhammad's cousin and son—in—law] had two people burned and that Abu Bakr [Muhammad's chief companion] had a wall thrown down on them. (Mishkat, vol. 1, p. 765, Prescribed Punishments)

 

Islam is also anti- Christian/Hindu/Buddhist witnessed by the carnage been committed against them throughout the Middle East and Asia.

I also state in my book that freedom of speech does not include incitement to violence. The Quran is nothing more than a terrorist manual filled with its exhortations to violence against kafirs (2:190-193, 4:89, 9:5, 9:29, 9:123, 47:4, etc., etc.)

 

Certainly the Muslim Council of Britain would have endless reason to call for banning the Quran and Hadiths, Islam’s sacred texts, which they not only choose to ignore, but instead they propagate those books of hateful messages. On the other hand, I challenge the MCB, the Publishers Association and MP Paul Flynn to show anything in my book that incites specific hatred toward the Muslim people.

---

Jake Neuman is the author of “Islam and Sharia Law Are Treason: Jihad Is Treason” and “Prophet Muhammad (AKA ALLAH): Monster of History.” (free download)

Comments (32)Add Comment
0
More Quranic mistakes
written by Yibel , July 14, 2012
Muhammad was wrong again
'If you find anyone doing as Lot's people did, kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done' (Abu Dawud, 4447).

Lot (Lut) was the nephew of Abraham (Ibraham). Both Lot and Abraham came from Ur in southern Mesopotamia. They immigrated to the land of Canaan where the Sodomites (people of Sodom) lived. Lot lived in Sodom which happened to be close to where his sheep herds were, but neither Abraham nor his nephew Lot were related to the the people of Sodom; therefore, the people of Sodom were NOT Lot's people. Also Lot was not a prophet or a Muslim. Islam wasn't invented until over 2600 years later. Muhammad included a jew Biblical names in his Qur'an and made up stories to fit his agenda. and the quranic story about Sodom and Lot are just one of Muhammad's inventions.
0
...
written by berq , July 14, 2012
Jake has told the truth about islam in his book.Quran and hadiths contain to much nonsense that is hard to swallow.Muslims have been extensive brainwash since their childhood.They can only handle the quranic hate and violance blunders using the invention of re-interpretation but they are not doing that.In Britian muslims are not only committing social crimes but they are very active in terrorism.British labour party is eqully responsible of these crimes.They are guilty of complicity,of appeasement and of self deception.Muslims need some western appeaser infidels and they have found them in the labour party.present Government spending a lot of money to tackle the problme of terrorism to protect the british public.If muslim council of Britian demand to ban the jake,s book because of hate then how they will justify it to Quran and Hadiths the munuel of terrorism hate and violance.Better not to try to ban any book.Freedom of speech is good thing and in the west you are enjoying equly.Please Muslims do not create any problem in peacefull communities in Britian.
0
don't ban please
written by batul , July 14, 2012
Please don't ban the book. If such books are banned how our childrens will come to know about the greatest devil in the history of mankind.
0
Abc
written by abc , July 14, 2012
Oh do shut up berk!
Stop reading the daily mail and that will make the monsters go away!
0
Yibel
written by dead or alive , July 14, 2012
Anyone who reads the Bible could see Mohammads error right away about Lot.The Muslims should be open minded and study what the OT really said.Even only for history sake and not reliegion.
0
Open-minded muslims
written by Yibel , July 14, 2012
LOL Thanks for the good laugh, dead or alive. I often shake my head in despair where muslims are concerned. The ones posting on this site are so brain dead and brainwashed:

abcs comment to berk is a case in point, and all the abuse that they heap on fineliving56....etc.

If only the monster (Islam) would go away!!!
0
lot's people
written by beowulf , July 15, 2012
Good point. Never saw that before.
0
Lots people
written by To Yibel , July 15, 2012
Yibel, thanks for your info
0
Agian we have to accomodate them
written by nad , July 15, 2012
Why as soon as anything is involved sepaking openly about islam or muslim the world is turned upside down. we can not accomodate them all the time, there is alot of books on all the other religion.. where is the freedom of writers, the freedom of opinion. the world dont turn around them only
0
3 kaffirs abducted in Pakistan
written by Rationalist , July 15, 2012
FOLLOWING MUHAMMAD'S FOOTSTEPS THEY WILL DEMAND RANSOM FOR THEIR RELEASE

Three Hindu traders abducted in Pakistan
IANS | Jul 14, 2012, 05.10PM IST

ISLAMABAD: At least three Hindu traders, including president of a local Hindu council, have been kidnapped by unidentified people in Pakistan's port city of Karachi, Online news agency reported on Saturday.

The kidnapping occurred when the three traders were going from Karachi to Jacobabad city in the Sindh province.

The armed abductors kidnapped Ramesh Lal, the president of Hindu local council, Ashok Kumar, the president of Rice Mills Association, and Hari Ram, a trader while they were travelling in a private car. Driver Babu Lashari was also taken away.

Lal's son said that his father informed him by cell phone that armed dacoits had abducted him along with his friends near Ranipur area.

Police have launched search operation for the kidnapped traders while the driver was found left tied with a rope in a garden, the report added.
0
...
written by vbv , July 15, 2012
By asking a particular book to be banned the muslims are only confirming the facts that the book has exposed. And muslims want to hide facts and lie about their socalled religion. If muslims have nothing to fear or hide then they should expose the author by countering that book with another book; and they can use other media like the internet, TV, print media to state their position with proofs and facts from history and current situation like in Pakistan, Somalia,Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt ,Syria, Palestine, Libya, Tunisia,etc - all of which are deep dark holes of backwardness , misery, violence and intolerance that typifies the cult of islam. These islamic countries do not present themselves as some beacon of hope and enlightenment and freedom; they are a big man-made disaster , an eyesore to sanity, tolerance and human civilisation. No wonder the muslims are so touchy when these facts are exposed.
0
...
written by HenriMaurice (Ex-Muslim) , July 15, 2012
0
@VBV
written by balam , July 15, 2012
I endorse your comments.Islam is the other name of violence.Islam is weak and Insecure ideologically and it has to be protected by Mulims with threats of violence or violence.The Muslims can not counter the arguments through MEDIA. That needs brains which MUSLIMS havn't got.They only believe in SEX AND SAVAGERY.
0
...
written by Reed Wilson , July 15, 2012
Jake Neuman. There is no use banning Jake Neuman’s Book ‘Prophet Muhammad: Monster of History. The sources of such books are hadis literature which ironically sacred for Muhammadans.

In Islam there is no prophet. Prophet is the one who prophecies. Allah sent his apostles as vehicle of his message. Messengers died.

The book must do good business.
0
Dont ban.
written by Reed Wilson , July 15, 2012
Jake Neuman. There is no use banning your book ‘Prophet Muhammad: Monster of History. The sources of such books are hadis literature which ironically sacred for Muhammadans.

In Islam there is no prophet. Prophet is the one who prophecies. Allah sent his apostles as vehicle of his message. Messengers died.

The book Inhsallah must do good business.
0
Paradox
written by DeDoc , July 15, 2012
Muslims claim that their scriptures are sacred, error free and directly/indirectly inspired from their god, Alllah. It is odd then how they protest and want to cover up things when others point out all the ugly warts in these same religious texts.

I ask any Muslim this: Why are you so upset when people present the truth about Islam, as desribed in its own words?
0
Koran only Muslim
written by 1proudkaffur4life , July 16, 2012
"Reed Wilson" seems to be another "Koran-ONLY" Muslim.

Now without the hadith as a source, how can a Muslim like him know when muahamMAD was called to be the "apostle of stoned-gawd allah? Or when he died?

OK Mr. "Wilson" the kooran says a day is by your demented allah-deity 1.000 years at one place, while at another it is 50.000 years . Again using only the kooraan, how can you explain this ?
0
Explanation!!
written by Reed Wilson , July 16, 2012
1proudkaffur4life. Thank you for "Reed Wilson" seems to be another "Koran-ONLY" Muslim.

You ask "Now without the hadith as a source, how can a Muslim like him know when muahamMAD was called to be the "apostle of stoned-gawd allah? Or when he died?

I need not know that. I am concerned with the message. I know he died 'cos he is not around.

You further ask "OK Mr. "Wilson" the kooran says a day is by your demented allah-deity 1.000 years at one place, while at another it is 50.000 years . Again using only the kooraan, how can you explain this?

It is already explained there that the period is 1000 years in one situation and 50000 years in another. In Arabic language word YAUM is used both for a day and for a 'long period'. If you ponder at the respective verses you will find that it is not the same YAUM in both situations.

I dont explain Quran 1. The explanation given by me here is not my explanation; It is dictionary explanation.

0
no prophets in islam
written by Yibel , July 17, 2012
Reed Wilson writes: "In Islam there is no prophet. Prophet is the one who prophecies."

This is correct - and most of the people mentioned in the Qur'an were not prophets - including Muhammad. However, Muhammad DOES refer to himself as a Prophet numerous times, such as:

Allah shows mercy to “those who follow the Apostle - the Unlettered (gentile) Prophet who can neither read nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which are) with them” (Q.7:157).

It is MUHAMMAD who “commands them what is just and forbids them what is evil; he allows them as lawful what is good (and pure) and prohibits them from what is bad (and impure)” (v. 157).

(BTW - The above QURANIC statement is one of the foundations for the belief in the hadith - the traditions of Muhammad’s words and deeds: Muslims are told to follow what Muhammad commands, and ONLY in the hadith can those commands be discovered.)

This statement is preceeded by a story about Musa/Moses and Pharaoh and Muhammad is comparing himself to Musa/Moses, a leader that people followed, a leader who provided laws. Muhammad says that if the people follow him they too will succeed ("surely triumph").

Then, Muhammad repeats that people should follow him and have faith in Allah and His Unlettered Prophet (Q. 7:158)

After this, the Qur'an is back to the Musa/Moses story - which BTW differs from the Biblical story in a number of significant ways, such as: number and types of plagues, the destruction of edifices and towers of Pharaoh (not in Bible), holding a mountain over the Israelite's heads (not in Bible), and leveling a mountain to dust (not in Bible). Thsi is followed by a vague reference to some town that broke the Sabbath and the statement that Allah "turned Jews into detested apes."
0
To Reed Wilson
written by Archpagan , July 17, 2012
Then, Reed, I think Muslims should clamor for banning of ahadith. Say it once at the mosque where you go to offer namaaz and report to us what happens thereafter..
0
Ban the quran
written by balam , July 17, 2012
Instead of banning this truthful book,It is the quran which should be banned to save humanity.It ias a text book of terror for the terrorist written by a terrorist of 7th century Arabia to terrorise the peaceful world.It is suitable for confused minds who wish to lead a CARNAL life like Mohammad-the paedo pervert false prophet.
0
Call me Al
written by AL Ladidah , July 18, 2012
The more the Holy Book that incites violence against "other" (that is, the unbelievers) is revealed in all its medieval glory to the world, the better able will be those with critical thinking skills (i.e. non -Islamic people) to make up their own minds about this "faith". Whenever I hear that this is the fastest growing religion, to me it means that these people are multiplying lik rabbits. It DOES not mean that any non-believers are being persuaded by its dubious message of peace and tolerance.
0
Call me Al
written by AL Ladidah , July 18, 2012
As a westerner, I am not in favor banning any book, including the Islamic one(s). Banning plays into the hands of such people who like to ban anything that they do not like. When countries like the UK, India, and other non-Muslim majority countries adopt laws that would ban the written word or speech deemed objectionable by a group, then these people have one. Slowly and steadily, the "western" values and and way of life, that attracts people from all over the world, inclouding Muslims, will be eroded and we will become like them, and a new Dark Age will have arrived.

(if those Muslims and others who cannot abide so-called hateful speech or word, they shlould go back to their beloved homelands where they won't be assaulted by such speech and they can assault others who do not agree with them by silencing, stoning to death, and cutting off their arms (all that Sharia stuff).

The liberal values of the West cannot be frittered away so easily. That British MP ought to be voted out of office.
0
Call me Al
written by AL Ladidah , July 18, 2012
I'd like to hear more about Saudi efforts to ban criticism of Islam and its prophet by making it a crime. They've been pushing an effort at the UN for a resolution to ban any such efforts in all member states. Hillary Clinton has spoken out against such a resolution. What are the Saudis and other wahabi-influenced Muslims trying to hide?
0
...
written by Reed Wilson , July 19, 2012
Archpagan. Then RW would be no more to report you.
0
...
written by Reed Wilson , July 19, 2012
Yibel. You have quoted 7:157 which reads:

الَّذِينَ يَتَّبِعُونَ الرَّسُولَ النَّبِيَّ الْأُمِّيَّ الَّذِي يَجِدُونَهُ مَكْتُوبًا عِندَهُمْ فِي التَّوْرَاةِ وَالْإِنجِيلِ يَأْمُرُهُم بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَيَنْهَاهُمْ عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ وَيُحِلُّ لَهُمُ الطَّيِّبَاتِ وَيُحَرِّمُ عَلَيْهِمُ الْخَبَائِثَ وَيَضَعُ عَنْهُمْ إِصْرَهُمْ وَالْأَغْلَالَ الَّتِي كَانَتْ عَلَيْهِمْ ۚ فَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا بِهِ وَعَزَّرُوهُ وَنَصَرُوهُ وَاتَّبَعُوا النُّورَ الَّذِي أُنزِلَ مَعَهُ ۙ أُولَـٰئِكَ هُمُ الْمُفْلِحُونَ

It is usual that one you send a message or messenger you ask the recipient of the messege to honor the message/messenger. This was nothing special with Muhammad. Such instructions were given to all people. Quran says:

"And assuredly Allah took a bond from the Children of Isra'il, and We raised from amongst them twelve wardens. And Allah said: verily I am with you, if ye establish prayer and give the poor-rate and believe in My apostles and support them and lend unto Allah a goodly loan, I shall surely expiate for you your misdeeds and surely shall make you enter the Gardens where rivers flow; then whosoever of you shall disbelieve thereafter, he hath surely strayed from the level way.

What is believing apostle? It is nothing but obeying him. Now where is the opostle to obey him? Naturally the instruction was for apostle's life time.

It not be very important that Ummi is not illiterate in any Arabic dictionary. Bani Israil considered all other than Bani Israil as Ummi or less civilized. Allah means 'out of Bani Israil' there.

Allah never said obey Muhammad. Always RASOOL which means messenger/message. The word RASOOL is used in Quran for ordinary messengers, for some Malaika and for message/messenger.

"BTW - The above QURANIC statement is one of the foundations for the belief in the hadith - the traditions of Muhammad’s words and deeds: Muslims are told to follow what Muhammad commands, and ONLY in the hadith can those commands be discovered".

For this they will be asked. It is their mistake.

Yibel what were you doing when RW was not around? You have given him so much business.

0
Mistakes!!
written by Reed Wilson , July 19, 2012
Yibel. My above post has many keyboarding mistakes which you please ignore. I give one correction here.

It is usual that WHEN you send a message or messenger you ask the recipient of the message to honor the message/messenger. This was nothing special with Muhammad. Such instructions were given to all people. Quran says:
0
...
written by Atheist , July 20, 2012
Thank you Jake Neuman. I have just purchased this book from Amazon.
0
Reed Wilson
written by Yibel , July 20, 2012
What the Qur'an says about the Children of Israel is CRAP. Muhammad was an Arab and knew nothing about the Israelites. Mu... was an illiterate scoundral and scumbag who wanted to take over the Ka'aba. He didn't even get the Bible stories right. He mixed up the tales, invented conversations, and made up a pack of lies. He even made a prophet out of Alexander the Great - a pagan Greek whose god was the Greek war god Ares.

Allah never took any "bond" or anything else from the Israelites. Allah didn't even exist back then. Mu... made him up. Invented him/IT. Mu...was FULL OF IT!!!

And so is his book. There is NO Truth in IT- either the book or Allah/Muhammad.
0
BOOKS ARE FREE
written by Jack 2000 , July 20, 2012
Dear Atheist;

Books have been changed. Amazon has very old version.

For FREE BOOKS go to: www.islamreform.net
0
...
written by Reed Wilson , July 21, 2012
Yibel . If you have God's message follow that and be comfortable. Quran 2:62 says:

نَّ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَالَّذِينَ هَادُوا وَالنَّصَارَىٰ وَالصَّابِئِينَ مَنْ آمَنَ بِاللَّـهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ وَعَمِلَ صَالِحًا فَلَهُمْ أَجْرُهُمْ عِندَ رَبِّهِمْ وَلَا خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ

If you have lost your book follow Torah

َقَالَتِ الْيَهُودُ لَيْسَتِ النَّصَارَىٰ عَلَىٰ شَيْءٍ وَقَالَتِ النَّصَارَىٰ لَيْسَتِ الْيَهُودُ عَلَىٰ شَيْءٍ وَهُمْ يَتْلُونَ الْكِتَابَ ۗ كَذَٰلِكَ قَالَ الَّذِينَ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ مِثْلَ قَوْلِهِمْ ۚ فَاللَّـهُ يَحْكُمُ بَيْنَهُمْ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ فِيمَا كَانُوا فِيهِ يَخْتَلِفُونَ

You should seek God's message and follow it. Prejudice / bias is old fashioned.

If you are Christian, you are OK.
0
about the message
written by Yibel , July 24, 2012
Are you saying that your Allah is old fashioned?

I have my book. It is the Bible. The BOOK that Muhammad knew nothing about. The one he TRIED to plagarize - and failed miserably!

The Qur'an is a war manual. It has nothing to do with any god but war gods like Marduk (Babylonian Quran 96) and Ares (Greek - the god of Dhul Qarnayn Qur'an 18:86).

Muhammad's stone-gawd talked directly to Dhul Qarnayn (Alexander, the Great)- whose god was Ares - so why didn't he/IT talk directly to Muhammad? Because IT didn't really exist, any more than Ares did, or Marduk. Just figments of human imaginations created to justify warfare against, and enslavement of, other humans.

It is you who should seek enlightenment. Islam is The Heights (The Wall Between Heaven And Hell, Al-A'raf) of prejudice, bias, hate, and MALICE AFORETHOUGHT:

Qur'an 7.24: "He (Muhammad's god) said (to His/ITs first creation): 'Get you down hence, and may your descendants be enemies of each other.'"

You are in denial. Leave Islam. Join humanity.

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

About the book || Reviews by: Steven Simpson | Abul Kasem | Prof Sami Alrabaa | Ibn Kammuna

islamic-jihad-cover


'Islamic Jihad' in Bangla
islamic-jihad-bangla
Aasma Riaz: "Thank you so much for your book "Islamic Jihad" and showing me the "Big Picture". For 7-8 days, I was glued to your book, absorbing so much information that I did not know existed. You have crisply covered so much in your book and quoted historical references extensively. I am just overwhelmed with different emotions after reading your book..., a priceless tome."

Editor: M A Khan | Site design: Dan Zaremba
Founded on 20 November 2005


Announcements

Sign petition:  Grant Imran Firasat Asylum in the USA

imran-firasat

Proxy Server: To view blocked websites, use this: iwebproxy

Syndication