It is time to establish a Religious Review Board (RRB.) Is this an outlandishly absurd proposal? Not at all. Serious problems require equally serious solutions. The call for establishing a Religious Review Board may be seen as an attempt to curb Islam. The truth is: it is.
Encroaching Islam with its rule of Sharia presents an imminent threat to subvert and replace the Constitution that governs our lives. Unlike Muslims who practice Taqiyyah—lying or dissimulation—I proudly speak the truth. Truth should never be sacrificed at the altar of any goal. I firmly believe that truthfulness is indeed the foundation of all virtues.
As things stand now, numerous boards at all levels of government, business, and community govern our lives. All these boards are charged with the responsibility of looking after the welfare of the people they serve. The Food and Drug Administration, for instance, must pass on the safety and quality of the food we eat; the Aviation Safety Board works to ensure safe flights; a local school board strives to create the environment that best serves the education and safety needs of the pupils. Boards serve every community and business of any size.
The Food and Drug Administration makes sure we don’t use contaminated food and drugs that can harm our bodies. Yet, there are no oversight boards that would check against things that contaminate the mind and present a clear threat of unraveling our democracy’s social compact as we know and cherish it. Shouldn’t these dangers to our beliefs and way of life be monitored and combated, or should they be allowed a free hand to work their damage?
Religion is a powerful force. And as is the case with any force, it can do work of the good or that of the evil. And, when there is multiplicity of religions at loggerhead with one another, the forces clash and any benefit that religion offers is offset by potentially huge costs.
Given that the formerly vast and largely segregated planet has shrunk into a “global village,” the disparate peoples isolated from one another for millennia are now a village community.
The-thrown-together diverse people are in urgent need of adopting a set of common rules that would allow individuals as well as groups maximum latitude of faith, coupled with responsibility, and free of any practices that infringe on the rights of others or demonize them. Islam, as a matter of belief, considers all non-Muslims, even the so-called people of the book, as infidels—people who are to be subjugated or cleansed from Allah’s earth.
America, with a long history of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the “hands off” practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is in deciding what constitutes a religion and who is to make that call.
The dictionary supplies a sociologically useless definition for religion: “The expression of man’s belief in and reverence for a superhuman power recognized as the creator and governor of the universe.” Just about anyone or any group under this definition can start a religion, and they indeed do—and some do so at significant costs to others.
Muslims, under the banner of religion, are infringing blatantly on the rights of others, not only in Islamic countries, but also in much of the non-Muslim world. By their acts of dogmatic savagery, Muslims are finally awaking the non-Muslim democracies to the imminent threat of Islamofascism keen on destroying their free secular societies.
Islam was birthed by primitives of some 1400 years ago and over time invaded much of the world at the point of the sword. Presently, the Islamists, with their treasuries flush with petrodollars, are in a great position to realize their perennial dream of bringing the world under the rule of Muhammad’s Ummah. On the one hand Pakistan is already a nuclear power and Iran aims to be one before very long. On the other hand, Muslim governments and wealthy Sheikhs are funding Islamic schools, centers and front organizations in the West to work from within at the unraveling of the non-Islamic democratic systems.
The large number of Muslims arrival of recent years is posing a serious problem to this nation of all nations. Bluntly speaking, no one can be a Muslim and an American at the same time. Here are some of the reasons.
1) A Muslim is, first and foremost, an Ummahist—a citizen of international Islam. So, when a Muslim takes the American Pledge of Allegiance, he is either ignorant of the implication of his pledge or is lying willfully. Ignorance is never a valid reason in the court of law, and lying in the process of becoming citizen is a ground for denying the application and even deporting the violator. Sadly enough, taqiyyah—lying, or dissimulation—is not only condoned, it is recommended to the Muslims in their scripture. Hence, a Muslim can and would lie without any compunctions, whenever it is expedient.
2) Muslims, by belief and practice, are the most blatant violators of human rights. We hardly need to detail here Muslims’ systemic cruel treatment of the unbelievers, women of all persuasions, and any and all minorities across the board. To Muslims, human rights have a different meaning, and it protective provisions are reserved strictly for Muslims—primarily for Muslim men. Just a couple of examples should suffice for now.
A) Oppression of women, for one, is so systemic in Islam that to this day women are, at best, second-class citizens under Islamic law. Saudi Arabia, the custodian of Islamdom, denies women the right to drive, vote or hold elective offices—the most basic rights of citizens in democratic societies.
For another, no non-Islamic literature is allowed in Saudi Arabia. A visiting
B) Christian, for instance, is denied to enter the Kingdom with a Bible. Further, severe punishment is meted out to anyone daring to disagree with Islam or espouse a different religion. Iran’s resurgent Shiism often vies with Saudi Arabia in its mistreatment of religious and non-religious minorities. To the fanatical ruling gang in Iran, it is their brand of Islam or disenfranchisement of rights of citizenship and even death for the “sin” of apostasy. And of course, there is no point at all in talking about the savage Islamic Taliban.
3) Respect for the rule of law, as it is understood and practiced by civilized people, is an instrument of convenience to be used to advantage and to be violated when it is not, for the Muslim. A Muslim believes in a different law—the Sharia: a set of stone-age rules. Violation of the non-Muslim laws, therefore, is no violation at all to a Muslim.
What is incredible is the gall and audacity of Muslims in demanding that Western and other democracies legalize Sharia in their societies. Large populations of Muslims, mostly recent arrivals, in countries such as Canada, Great Britain, and Sweden are experiencing the insistent demands by Muslims to have Sharia rule their Islamic communities. This is just the beginning and it may seem relatively harmless to the simpletons in our midst. Yet, once Sharia is recognized to any extent, it will reach out to rule not only on matters that concern Muslims, but also those that may involve a Muslim and non-Muslim. Under Sharia, a Muslim man married to a non-Muslim woman is able to divorce the woman at will, automatically have custody of the children, and literally toss the wife out of “his” home with just about no compensations.
4) As for democracy, the rule of the people, Muslims have no use at all. Muslims believe that Allah’s rule must govern the world in the form of Caliphate—a theocracy. Making mockery of democracy, subverting its working, and ignoring its provisions is a Muslim’s way of falsifying what he already believes to be a sinful and false system of governance invented by the infidels.
To Muslims, Ummah-ism—international Islamism—is the legitimate form of government. Ummah-ism is another form of despotism such as Communism and Fascism, with the added feature of enjoying “divine” authority.
The world has good samples of Ummah-ism in practice to scrutinize in Islamic autocracies. Khamenei of Iran is not called "Caliph". He is called the "Supreme Guide". The Saudi King is just another Caliph vessel of the "divine". These Islamic despots are every bit as vile as the Hitlers, the Stalins, the Pol Pots, and the Mussolinis. The government these Islamic autocrats head is infested to the core with the Islamic disease of oppression, corruption and the absence of accountability to the people.
Democracies believe that government must be of the people, by the people, and for the people. Ummah-ism is anathema to this sacrosanct fundamental democratic ideal.
As more and more Muslims arrive in non-Islamic lands, as they reproduce with great fecundity, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, Muslims gather more power to undermine the democratic rule. A consortium composed of pandering politicians, blinded with short-term self-interest and egoism; attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors; and, bastions of useful idiot liberals, universities, is the witting or unwitting promoter of Ummah-ism.
There is an urgent need for the establishment of a Religious Review Board tasked with a mission to ensure that no "religion" preaches and practices in violation of the United States’ Constitution. Islam is incompatible with democracy and subversive of the way of life that blesses this nation. It is imperative that we fight Islamofascism with the same determination that we fought other enemies of freedom such as Nazism, Fascism, and Communism.
Comments (87)
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by abc , February 04, 2013
No one can be a Muslim and American at the same time?
Is this a quote from your next book "the protocols of the elders of Mecca?"
In one sentance you tar 1.8% of the population with your bigoted brush. Way to go mr Iran. Oh the reasoning just gets better:
1. Let's demonise them and call them liars.
2. Let's imply that they are all Saudis and live by Saudi rules.
3. Get this through your thick Iranian skull. Shariah courts are no different to Beth din courts. Wherever they are applied they CANNOT go against the rule of the land.
Give me some examples If you can where shariah has superseded the rule of the land? Anywhere in western Europe will do?
Do you even know what you are talking about at this stage?
God knows what system the Iranians apply to get their supreme leader and or the Saudis. They are not caliphs! Hence no following by the ummah.
Ate you suffering mental meltdown?
Is this a quote from your next book "the protocols of the elders of Mecca?"
In one sentance you tar 1.8% of the population with your bigoted brush. Way to go mr Iran. Oh the reasoning just gets better:
1. Let's demonise them and call them liars.
2. Let's imply that they are all Saudis and live by Saudi rules.
3. Get this through your thick Iranian skull. Shariah courts are no different to Beth din courts. Wherever they are applied they CANNOT go against the rule of the land.
Give me some examples If you can where shariah has superseded the rule of the land? Anywhere in western Europe will do?
Do you even know what you are talking about at this stage?
God knows what system the Iranians apply to get their supreme leader and or the Saudis. They are not caliphs! Hence no following by the ummah.
Ate you suffering mental meltdown?
written by abc , February 04, 2013
67% of adult American Muslims are under 40 years old
67% of the adult American population is over 40 years old3
American Muslims are younger and future of America:
67% of American Muslims have a Bachelor's degree or higher
44% of Americans have a Bachelor’s degree or higher3
The Variance for Advanced Degrees is even greater.
One in ten American Muslim HH has a physician / medical doctor
U.S. Average income is $42,158 per year (U.S. Census 2000)
66% of American Muslim HH's earn over $50,000 / year
26% of American Muslim HH's earn over $100,000 / year
Annual Household Income range for American Muslims:
Yes this sounds like a stealth jihad plot. How come those Muslims are thriving in yanksville?
67% of the adult American population is over 40 years old3
American Muslims are younger and future of America:
67% of American Muslims have a Bachelor's degree or higher
44% of Americans have a Bachelor’s degree or higher3
The Variance for Advanced Degrees is even greater.
One in ten American Muslim HH has a physician / medical doctor
U.S. Average income is $42,158 per year (U.S. Census 2000)
66% of American Muslim HH's earn over $50,000 / year
26% of American Muslim HH's earn over $100,000 / year
Annual Household Income range for American Muslims:
Yes this sounds like a stealth jihad plot. How come those Muslims are thriving in yanksville?
written by Just A Reader , February 04, 2013
This is more needed for India and right now. In US they are less than 2% but in India they are 25% now.
written by Gee , February 04, 2013
There happens to be something called the 1st Amendment. And who will sit on this board?
Am not a huge fan the Islamofascists - but violating the Constitution is a thousand times worse
Am not a huge fan the Islamofascists - but violating the Constitution is a thousand times worse
written by fine , February 04, 2013
30% … The first Muslims who came to America were Black africans snatched to be made as salves in 18 hundreds …
Many Black Muslims who converted to Islam in the sixties THOUGHT THAT ISLAM WAS A BLACK RELIGION CAME OUT OF AFRICA … many black muslims reverted back from Islam, when they found out there is muslims from every color there is and ''Haj'' was the way they found about this little of information .
Also, first when came to America, I met many Black Muslims who told me … some Black men muslims only converted to Islam, to have the chance to marry 4 wives [ anyone surprised ? ] .. but after many who did marry this way, they found out the law does not allow it [ duh ] islam or not …
They had leave their wives and that was another reason why Muslim black man left Islam …
This information was told to me by an old black man who did this … so the reason for increased black conversion to Islam was because of color of skin not because the love for Islam .
Many Black Muslims who converted to Islam in the sixties THOUGHT THAT ISLAM WAS A BLACK RELIGION CAME OUT OF AFRICA … many black muslims reverted back from Islam, when they found out there is muslims from every color there is and ''Haj'' was the way they found about this little of information .
Also, first when came to America, I met many Black Muslims who told me … some Black men muslims only converted to Islam, to have the chance to marry 4 wives [ anyone surprised ? ] .. but after many who did marry this way, they found out the law does not allow it [ duh ] islam or not …
They had leave their wives and that was another reason why Muslim black man left Islam …
This information was told to me by an old black man who did this … so the reason for increased black conversion to Islam was because of color of skin not because the love for Islam .
written by abc , February 04, 2013
You dizzy Arab!
Are you talking about the nation of Islam?
Louis Muhammad Farrakhan is the current leader.
NOI has nothing to do with the Islam the religion.
Are you talking about the nation of Islam?
Louis Muhammad Farrakhan is the current leader.
NOI has nothing to do with the Islam the religion.
written by Kumar , February 04, 2013
Islam, the religion will never stop to spread. The entire world will convert to Islam, this is what I doubt because in our Vedic religion it was mentioned that "Kali Youg" will complete when all human will die, and a very few will left to create another good world.
Thats may comes true, once all people convert to Islam and then fight each others and vanish from earth.
Thats may comes true, once all people convert to Islam and then fight each others and vanish from earth.
written by Ann Onym , February 04, 2013
Yeah, well the muslims concered just about a third of the world starting with one madman.
In Scandinavia we had just about a fraction of a percent of muslims just a couple of decades ago, now in Sweden for example they constitute 10% or more of the people (nobody really knows how many).
A great deal of western Europeian cities have today a majority muslim population. Something unheard of just 50 years ago- when the muslim pop were just about 1.8 % or probably even lower than that.
With it all it comes with demand for sharia constitution, mosques and minarets, special dressing codes, polygami, honour killings, etc, etc.
You in the USA are just behind Europe- trailing Europe with 3-4 decades!
Soo- maybe you won't have to endure muslim supremacy. But your children ceartinly will.
In Scandinavia we had just about a fraction of a percent of muslims just a couple of decades ago, now in Sweden for example they constitute 10% or more of the people (nobody really knows how many).
A great deal of western Europeian cities have today a majority muslim population. Something unheard of just 50 years ago- when the muslim pop were just about 1.8 % or probably even lower than that.
With it all it comes with demand for sharia constitution, mosques and minarets, special dressing codes, polygami, honour killings, etc, etc.
You in the USA are just behind Europe- trailing Europe with 3-4 decades!
Soo- maybe you won't have to endure muslim supremacy. But your children ceartinly will.
written by abc , February 04, 2013
"Yeah, well the muslims concered just about a third of the world starting with one madman"
I'm site you make them feel welcome. With friends like you who needs enemies.
"With it all it comes with demand for sharia constitution, mosques and minarets, special dressing codes, polygami, honour killings, etc, etc"
No different to Beth dins, you have to pray somewhere, what good is a church without a bell tower?, dressing is an individual freedom, why would I want to dress like you?, polygamy if it's illegal in the law of the land then deport them, no honour in killing just cultural stupidity.
I'm site you make them feel welcome. With friends like you who needs enemies.
"With it all it comes with demand for sharia constitution, mosques and minarets, special dressing codes, polygami, honour killings, etc, etc"
No different to Beth dins, you have to pray somewhere, what good is a church without a bell tower?, dressing is an individual freedom, why would I want to dress like you?, polygamy if it's illegal in the law of the land then deport them, no honour in killing just cultural stupidity.
written by Gnostic , February 05, 2013
In Europe, most muslims are working class people with only elementary or basic education from Turkey in Germany or Algeria and Tunisia in France. Many live in ghetto-like downtowns or bidonvilles with high poverty and crime rates.
In contrast, muslims in America are well educated who live in uptowns. Or they come from Suadia Arabia or other gulf countries or they belong to the upper class in their home countries who can afford to pay tuition fees for their sons and daughters (which is free in most european countries).
In contrast, muslims in America are well educated who live in uptowns. Or they come from Suadia Arabia or other gulf countries or they belong to the upper class in their home countries who can afford to pay tuition fees for their sons and daughters (which is free in most european countries).
written by truthseeker , February 05, 2013
Sharia is a real threat. Muslims make up only 1% or so of America's population, yet already they have stolen our Constitutional right to freedom of speech! Yale University publishes a book about the Mohammed cartoons, yet refrains from picturing those cartoons. Muslims freely demonstrate against democracy and for Sharia, yet those who demonstrate against Islam are called "racists" and told they will not be given police protection for said demonstrations. False feminist Hillary Clinton has publicly promised the Ummah that she will use political "soft power" to circumvent the First Amendment.
What happens when the muslim population reaches 5%? Look at the no-go zones of Europe to find out! How long till the Muslim stranglehold on taxi services in major cities forces women to stay home until accompanied by a male relative?
Let's get real. A person who believes that death is the correct penalty for leaving or criticizing his religion is a person who lied when he took our oath of citizenship, is unworthy to become a U.S. citizen and should be deported immediately.
What happens when the muslim population reaches 5%? Look at the no-go zones of Europe to find out! How long till the Muslim stranglehold on taxi services in major cities forces women to stay home until accompanied by a male relative?
Let's get real. A person who believes that death is the correct penalty for leaving or criticizing his religion is a person who lied when he took our oath of citizenship, is unworthy to become a U.S. citizen and should be deported immediately.
written by dead or alive , February 05, 2013
Here in stateside,a judge dropped assault charges agaiint a muslim man after this man in full veiw of children attack a man wearing a costume for looking like Mohammad,at a halloween parade.This man said he was offended by this mocking.Did this 1.8% win over 98.2?
written by abc , February 05, 2013
Get a life. Read the judges words
"Judge Martin dismissed the case because the accused denied assaulting Perce and "there wasn't enough evidence to convict Elbayomy of harassment as it was one man's word against the other's". The American Atheists, however, were evidently outraged that the judge refused to take the word of a white American over that of a "Muslim immigrant.
"Here in our society, we have a constitution that gives us many rights, specifically, First Amendment rights. It's unfortunate that some people use the First Amendment to deliberately provoke others. I don't think that's what our forefathers really intended. I think our forefathers intended that we use the First Amendment so that we can speak our mind, not to piss off other people and other cultures, which is what you did."
Before you spout the judge was a muslim, he wasn't.
Common sense win and bigotry lost!
Kind of like your point.
"Judge Martin dismissed the case because the accused denied assaulting Perce and "there wasn't enough evidence to convict Elbayomy of harassment as it was one man's word against the other's". The American Atheists, however, were evidently outraged that the judge refused to take the word of a white American over that of a "Muslim immigrant.
"Here in our society, we have a constitution that gives us many rights, specifically, First Amendment rights. It's unfortunate that some people use the First Amendment to deliberately provoke others. I don't think that's what our forefathers really intended. I think our forefathers intended that we use the First Amendment so that we can speak our mind, not to piss off other people and other cultures, which is what you did."
Before you spout the judge was a muslim, he wasn't.
Common sense win and bigotry lost!
Kind of like your point.
written by Infidel and MP , February 05, 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...burka.html Veil babies to save from sexual assault however the muppet does not provide solution to dad f**king the daughterhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...tence.html
How will it save the babies?
How will it save the babies?
written by truthseeker , February 05, 2013
So you believe people shouldn't use the First Amendment to "deliberately provoke others?"
What about the scores of deliberate provocations, hate speech, and incitements to violence contained within the Koran, Sura and Hadith? In a sane world, the Islamic verses urging the murder of blaphemers, apostates, and resistant infidels; the murder of homosexuals; the murder of adulterers and rape victims; and the verses permitting parents to kill their children would all be branded as criminal hate speech and mosques which teach these verses would be shut down as criminal enterprises.
Instead, in our new Orwellian newspeak, those who point out the "holy hate speech" of Islam are labeled as haters themselves.
Then there is the question of provocation itself. Islam's definition of freedom includes the right (for Muslims only) of mental serenity. A barefaced woman disturbs a Muslim male's mental serenity? She must be sentenced to life of house arrest! An infidel both refuses to convert and refuses to act like a dhimmi? He must give up his own cultural values and pretend that the very Muslims who receive his charity have a special privilege allowing them to avoid criticism! How absurd. Muslims are free to believe that their under-performing and brutal religion is superior to all others, but they are NOT free to force Americans to accept dhimmitude by acing as though they believed the same!
How would you like it if Christian Scientists were free to force you to forego medical care just because they don't believe in doctors?
What about the scores of deliberate provocations, hate speech, and incitements to violence contained within the Koran, Sura and Hadith? In a sane world, the Islamic verses urging the murder of blaphemers, apostates, and resistant infidels; the murder of homosexuals; the murder of adulterers and rape victims; and the verses permitting parents to kill their children would all be branded as criminal hate speech and mosques which teach these verses would be shut down as criminal enterprises.
Instead, in our new Orwellian newspeak, those who point out the "holy hate speech" of Islam are labeled as haters themselves.
Then there is the question of provocation itself. Islam's definition of freedom includes the right (for Muslims only) of mental serenity. A barefaced woman disturbs a Muslim male's mental serenity? She must be sentenced to life of house arrest! An infidel both refuses to convert and refuses to act like a dhimmi? He must give up his own cultural values and pretend that the very Muslims who receive his charity have a special privilege allowing them to avoid criticism! How absurd. Muslims are free to believe that their under-performing and brutal religion is superior to all others, but they are NOT free to force Americans to accept dhimmitude by acing as though they believed the same!
How would you like it if Christian Scientists were free to force you to forego medical care just because they don't believe in doctors?
written by Gnostic , February 05, 2013
Muslims are ordered to eat meat and to cover their bodies. Women have to stay at home and they are not allowed to do sports. Muslims who cover their bodies do not care that much about overweight and obesity. BTW, sunlight is necessary for the production of certain vitamines, which are necessary for our bones.
Therefore, many muslim women suffer from osteoprosis. But even worse, some arab countries suffer from the highest prevalence rates for diabetes next only to Nauru, a small insula in the pacific.
Millions of arabs are suffering and they get their feet amputated similar to an islamic punishment, they become blind and suffer from kidney deseases. Many die from strokes and so forth ...
It is the islamic sedentary lifestyle. Saudi and other gulf people do not work hard but they let their foreign workers and maids do the work. And there is no islamic law that people should do sports in order to prevent diabetes.
Muslims have to observe the food rules and to eat only halal food that makes no sense at all but there is no rules to eat less fat and more vegetables in islam. Why? Because the quran and hadith were written by somebody who had no knowledge about health.
Therefore, many muslim women suffer from osteoprosis. But even worse, some arab countries suffer from the highest prevalence rates for diabetes next only to Nauru, a small insula in the pacific.
Millions of arabs are suffering and they get their feet amputated similar to an islamic punishment, they become blind and suffer from kidney deseases. Many die from strokes and so forth ...
It is the islamic sedentary lifestyle. Saudi and other gulf people do not work hard but they let their foreign workers and maids do the work. And there is no islamic law that people should do sports in order to prevent diabetes.
Muslims have to observe the food rules and to eat only halal food that makes no sense at all but there is no rules to eat less fat and more vegetables in islam. Why? Because the quran and hadith were written by somebody who had no knowledge about health.
written by Infidel and MP , February 05, 2013
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said "If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease." (Sahih Al-Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537)
Malman knows the best
The Prophet said "If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease." (Sahih Al-Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537)
Malman knows the best
written by Max , February 05, 2013
A very sensible suggestion and the time is right to raise the issue before it is too late. Here is something I picked up reading an Indian newspaper:
“They're not happy in Gaza .. They're not happy in Egypt .. They're not happy in Libya .. They're not happy in Morocco .. They're not happy in Iran .. They're not happy in Iraq .. They're not happy in Yemen .. They're not happy in Afghanistan .. They're not happy in Pakistan .. They're not happy in Syria .. They're not happy in Lebanon .. SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY? They're happy in Australia . They're happy in Canada . They're happy in England .. They're happy in France .. They're happy in Italy .. They're happy in Germany .. They're happy in Sweden .. They're happy in the USA .. They're happy in Norway .. They're happy in Holland . They're happy in India . They're happy in Denmark . Basically, they're happy in every country that is not Muslim and unhappy in every country that is! AND WHO DO THEY BLAME? Not Islam. Not their leadership. Not themselves. THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN! AND THEN; They want to change those countries to be like.... THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY
“They're not happy in Gaza .. They're not happy in Egypt .. They're not happy in Libya .. They're not happy in Morocco .. They're not happy in Iran .. They're not happy in Iraq .. They're not happy in Yemen .. They're not happy in Afghanistan .. They're not happy in Pakistan .. They're not happy in Syria .. They're not happy in Lebanon .. SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY? They're happy in Australia . They're happy in Canada . They're happy in England .. They're happy in France .. They're happy in Italy .. They're happy in Germany .. They're happy in Sweden .. They're happy in the USA .. They're happy in Norway .. They're happy in Holland . They're happy in India . They're happy in Denmark . Basically, they're happy in every country that is not Muslim and unhappy in every country that is! AND WHO DO THEY BLAME? Not Islam. Not their leadership. Not themselves. THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN! AND THEN; They want to change those countries to be like.... THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY
written by abc , February 05, 2013
Funny how you left out the fact that the parade incident WAS CAUGHT ENTIRELY ON VIDEOTAPE, which the judge refused to view.
written by dead or alive , February 05, 2013
As you see how fair the judicial system is here in U.S.A.There will never be a need for Sharia law.No?
written by CGW , February 05, 2013
Funny how you left out the fact that the parade incident WAS CAUGHT ENTIRELY ON VIDEOTAPE, which the judge refused to view.
written by youcancallmeV , February 05, 2013
'NOI has nothing to do with the Islam the religion'
Yes it does abc, take a look at their credo 'in the name of Allah'...as converts/reverts they're a part of the growing number of Muslims that you were crowing about.
Yes it does abc, take a look at their credo 'in the name of Allah'...as converts/reverts they're a part of the growing number of Muslims that you were crowing about.
written by youcancallmeV , February 05, 2013
and abc, your 'NOI has nothing to do with the Islam the religion' rant is quite revealing...it indicates your beliefs in takfir and Qutbism.
written by abc , February 05, 2013
Your response clearly shows you don't what you are talking about.
"takfir" and "qutubist" and "NOI".
"takfir" and "qutubist" and "NOI".
written by ExMuslim , February 06, 2013
Sharia should be banned.Look at India, http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl...up-disband
written by abc , February 06, 2013
Since you think you know american law better than an American judge then take it up with the authorities until then the judges word is final
written by CGW , February 06, 2013
Judge was reprimanded:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/judge-in-zombie-muhammad-case-reprimanded/
There is currently an ongoing effort to have the case re-instated.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/judge-in-zombie-muhammad-case-reprimanded/
There is currently an ongoing effort to have the case re-instated.
written by fine , February 06, 2013
Founder of Ground Zero Mosque 'spent more than $3 MILLION earmarked for Islamic charity on lavish trips, luxury sports cars and real estate'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...z2K4AhslVV
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Amazing !!??
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...z2K4AhslVV
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Amazing !!??
written by fine , February 06, 2013
First she was jailed for adultery, now Afghan rape victim is forced to MARRY her attacker to restore family's honour and avoid becoming a social outcast
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...z2K4BYG8OE
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
It's just sicking to no end
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...z2K4BYG8OE
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
It's just sicking to no end
written by Infidel and MP , February 06, 2013
written by Kaser , February 06, 2013
Ahhhhh Afghanistan.
What a fantastic country. Such impressive human rights.
Such respect for women. Such modernity. An example for all other countries to imitate. A reference in terms of human compassion and tolerance. And justice.
I wonder what ideology governs such modern, emancipated humans?
Christianity? Nope. Judaism? Nope. Hinduism? Nope. Atheism (chuckle...) nope, wrong again...
I'm certain I know of a religion well known for "cherishing" women.... Hmmmmm ....Malem, help me out Lad, which religion cherishes women, and happens to be the main religion in modern Afghanistan?
What a fantastic country. Such impressive human rights.
Such respect for women. Such modernity. An example for all other countries to imitate. A reference in terms of human compassion and tolerance. And justice.
I wonder what ideology governs such modern, emancipated humans?
Christianity? Nope. Judaism? Nope. Hinduism? Nope. Atheism (chuckle...) nope, wrong again...
I'm certain I know of a religion well known for "cherishing" women.... Hmmmmm ....Malem, help me out Lad, which religion cherishes women, and happens to be the main religion in modern Afghanistan?
written by fine , February 06, 2013
I really do not know what to do with all the '' cherishing '' that Islam is showering us women, with .
It is too much ..
You know what is the [ faked ] confusion in the little pee brains of Muslims men ?
What Muslim men call Islam's '' cherishing '' of women is this :
taking away the right to choose her husband, her job , her choice of education, her freedom to travel .unless with permission … her freedom to drive … her going out without a man's chaperoning … have all her rightful inheritance … demand the abolishment of the unfair wive staking … the abolishment of 2 for 1 testimonies .. etc …
Muslims men think by making '' all these choices FOR THIER WIVES '' ** they think they are fooling them by thinking they are protecting them and treat them as the genteel sex that they are **
They do not know .. that by taking away all these rights and choices , they are suffocating the women … they are NOT cherishing them, they are humiliating them and do not give them enough credit.
Muslim men know that, of course … but they L I E .. and they say it is " cherishing"
What a cruel joke
It is too much ..
You know what is the [ faked ] confusion in the little pee brains of Muslims men ?
What Muslim men call Islam's '' cherishing '' of women is this :
taking away the right to choose her husband, her job , her choice of education, her freedom to travel .unless with permission … her freedom to drive … her going out without a man's chaperoning … have all her rightful inheritance … demand the abolishment of the unfair wive staking … the abolishment of 2 for 1 testimonies .. etc …
Muslims men think by making '' all these choices FOR THIER WIVES '' ** they think they are fooling them by thinking they are protecting them and treat them as the genteel sex that they are **
They do not know .. that by taking away all these rights and choices , they are suffocating the women … they are NOT cherishing them, they are humiliating them and do not give them enough credit.
Muslim men know that, of course … but they L I E .. and they say it is " cherishing"
What a cruel joke
written by abdR , February 06, 2013
Muslims are plagued with problems. They cannot live and coexist peacefully not only with people of other faiths but even among themselves, plus every single damn thing on this planet:
muslims with Christians - problem
muslims with Jews - problem
muslims with Hindus - problem
muslims with Buddhists - problem
muslims with Bahais - problem
muslims with God - problem
muslims with aposthetes - problem
muslims with democracy - problem
muslims with women and children - problem
muslims with sports and entertainment - problem
muslims with music - problem
muslims with animals - problem
MUSLIMS with MUSLIMS - also problem
muslims with Christians - problem
muslims with Jews - problem
muslims with Hindus - problem
muslims with Buddhists - problem
muslims with Bahais - problem
muslims with God - problem
muslims with aposthetes - problem
muslims with democracy - problem
muslims with women and children - problem
muslims with sports and entertainment - problem
muslims with music - problem
muslims with animals - problem
MUSLIMS with MUSLIMS - also problem
written by youcancallmeV , February 06, 2013
C'mon abc, you know that I know what I'm talking about....you gave us the prefect example of takfir when you claimed that the NOI has nothing to do with Islam.
and... almost all of the garbage that you write here is steeped in qutbist philosophy.
and... almost all of the garbage that you write here is steeped in qutbist philosophy.
written by youcancallmeV , February 06, 2013
I seem to recall that the NOI preaches adherence to the Five Pillars of Islam.
Their main belief is that 'there is no god but Allah'.
They're antisemitist.
Their main belief is that 'there is no god but Allah'.
They're antisemitist.
written by abc , February 06, 2013
I recall that a brother yakub created the white devil race 6000years ago.
There is a crazy story about a space ship too.
Explain that!
There is a crazy story about a space ship too.
Explain that!
written by dead or alive , February 06, 2013
Do you think the U.S.A. needs Sharia law? yes or no?
written by dead or alive , February 06, 2013
So you say yes?As a good Muslim,you have to say everybody needs Sharia because Islam cannot be separated from Sharia.The judge made a decision based on religion.Under comman law ,the judge is in error.
written by dead or alive , February 06, 2013
Like most of people here in the west.This judge may have never seen the bad side of the city.
written by Infidel and MP , February 06, 2013
abc how to do rate the rule and the law in Saudi?
written by Kaser , February 06, 2013
Since when do individuals "ask" for the application of a legal system?
Sharia, like other legal systems are forced on all citizens.
Difference is sharia is 1400 years old crap from the dark ages nobody wants, except insecure males seeking full control over women.
Sharia, like other legal systems are forced on all citizens.
Difference is sharia is 1400 years old crap from the dark ages nobody wants, except insecure males seeking full control over women.
written by abc , February 07, 2013
You are putting words in your own mouth. Let me make my position crystal.
If a population says they want to live under the shariah code then let them.
What's the issue? Do I think America wants it? NO.
How can it be allowed that 1.8% of a population impose their will on 98.2% of the general population. Stealth jihad and all the stuff spencer and geller come up with have got idiots worried. Rational people look at facts on the ground floor!
If a population says they want to live under the shariah code then let them.
What's the issue? Do I think America wants it? NO.
How can it be allowed that 1.8% of a population impose their will on 98.2% of the general population. Stealth jihad and all the stuff spencer and geller come up with have got idiots worried. Rational people look at facts on the ground floor!
written by abc , February 07, 2013
The Saudis royal family are traitors to Islam. The sooner the people get rid of them the better. They have a lot to answer for!!!
written by Infidel and MP , February 07, 2013
1. So you mean sharia is not working in the place of its genesis (mother and father of Sharia)?
2. As regards to them being traitors is it not the failings of muslims (saudi muslims in this case)?
3. How can you be so sure that it will work elswhere i.e. Egypt, Tunisia, Libya et al. ?
2. As regards to them being traitors is it not the failings of muslims (saudi muslims in this case)?
3. How can you be so sure that it will work elswhere i.e. Egypt, Tunisia, Libya et al. ?
written by abc , February 07, 2013
"Do you think the U.S.A. needs Sharia law? yes or no?"
No
No
written by Infidel and MP , February 07, 2013
Does the world need Sharia law? yes or no
i.e. Chopping limbs and necks..
i.e. Whipping arsz et al.
i.e. Chopping limbs and necks..
i.e. Whipping arsz et al.
written by fine , February 07, 2013
Sharia law is not fit for animals …
the law Sharia made by Animals …
The people who do not care if it is enforced or not … are stooges fools
people who advocating for Sharia law has NO RIGHT to live among peaceful human beings … they have diseased warped brains .
The free world should round up, the people who are advocating sharia law in their own countries and put them in place waaaaaay far from civilized people, to insure never to be infected …
Abc … only say, sharia law is for the people who wanted …**no one in their right mind would wanted ** … he is too chicken to come right out and actually say what he thinks … '' He want Sharia law everywhere on this earth, I know waht he thinks …. he thinks, it is better for western society , it for their own good ….. it insure the safety for all [ as he see it ] by putting FEAR of amputations , beheadings,stoning, and such inhuman acts, to put people in straight line.
I do not buy his words … women do not want Sharia, No Muslim women I know want this inhumane set of filthy laws !!!??? …what in the heck Abc is talking about ? … what a … l i e
If the UK started to install Sharia law … it is not because the people wanted,….
again, no one in their right mind would want sharia law, it would be only enforced … Kaser was right … the only way sharia law would be the law of the land if it was enforced by Evil people … and a lot of Evil people, turing out to be MUSLIMS as they demonstrate everyday with all the terrorist acts .
Here is a reminder ..if people have forgotten or have any doubt what Sharia law is ..
http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/08/top_ten_reasons_why_sharia_is.html
the law Sharia made by Animals …
The people who do not care if it is enforced or not … are stooges fools
people who advocating for Sharia law has NO RIGHT to live among peaceful human beings … they have diseased warped brains .
The free world should round up, the people who are advocating sharia law in their own countries and put them in place waaaaaay far from civilized people, to insure never to be infected …
Abc … only say, sharia law is for the people who wanted …**no one in their right mind would wanted ** … he is too chicken to come right out and actually say what he thinks … '' He want Sharia law everywhere on this earth, I know waht he thinks …. he thinks, it is better for western society , it for their own good ….. it insure the safety for all [ as he see it ] by putting FEAR of amputations , beheadings,stoning, and such inhuman acts, to put people in straight line.
I do not buy his words … women do not want Sharia, No Muslim women I know want this inhumane set of filthy laws !!!??? …what in the heck Abc is talking about ? … what a … l i e
If the UK started to install Sharia law … it is not because the people wanted,….
again, no one in their right mind would want sharia law, it would be only enforced … Kaser was right … the only way sharia law would be the law of the land if it was enforced by Evil people … and a lot of Evil people, turing out to be MUSLIMS as they demonstrate everyday with all the terrorist acts .
Here is a reminder ..if people have forgotten or have any doubt what Sharia law is ..
http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/08/top_ten_reasons_why_sharia_is.html
written by Kaser , February 07, 2013
You know what?
The world needs Sharia like it needs 7th century medicine back.
Sharia is about as relevant today as pulling teeth without anesthetic.
As cutting off a broken limb.
Funny - Sharia actually cuts-off limbs - to this day !!
Only religions are so full of themselves they can claim that scriptures written 1400 years ago still apply today.
In reality, only clerics, imams, mullah, priests, Rabbis and other Religious "pushers" have any interest in these long-obsolete cults.
The world needs Sharia like it needs 7th century medicine back.
Sharia is about as relevant today as pulling teeth without anesthetic.
As cutting off a broken limb.
Funny - Sharia actually cuts-off limbs - to this day !!
Only religions are so full of themselves they can claim that scriptures written 1400 years ago still apply today.
In reality, only clerics, imams, mullah, priests, Rabbis and other Religious "pushers" have any interest in these long-obsolete cults.
written by Kaser , February 07, 2013
Interesting article you posted at the end.
But, abc, Malem, ect... will all discount this as Western anti-Islam propaganda.
But what it boils down to is that Islam's scriptures are it's greatest weakness.
They are there for everybody to read. And they are clear as rain.
abc claims that the Saudis are traitors to Islam?
Really? Saudi Arabia - land of the Quran and Sharia?
I see Saudis as pure Muslims - proudly waving the Quran as divine reason behind the police-state, women-hating country they run.
They are perfect little drone replicas of their lord and Master Mohammed.
Islamophobes like me just need to read the Quran, and looks at Islamic countries to forge an opinion on Islam.
Islam-apologists ignore the vile parts of these scritpures, avoid answering, or full-out claim they are full of love and compassion (Hey Malem?).
And, Islam is so perverted, Muslims cannot even agree themselves on how to abide by it's 7th century rules...
Pathetic.
But, abc, Malem, ect... will all discount this as Western anti-Islam propaganda.
But what it boils down to is that Islam's scriptures are it's greatest weakness.
They are there for everybody to read. And they are clear as rain.
abc claims that the Saudis are traitors to Islam?
Really? Saudi Arabia - land of the Quran and Sharia?
I see Saudis as pure Muslims - proudly waving the Quran as divine reason behind the police-state, women-hating country they run.
They are perfect little drone replicas of their lord and Master Mohammed.
Islamophobes like me just need to read the Quran, and looks at Islamic countries to forge an opinion on Islam.
Islam-apologists ignore the vile parts of these scritpures, avoid answering, or full-out claim they are full of love and compassion (Hey Malem?).
And, Islam is so perverted, Muslims cannot even agree themselves on how to abide by it's 7th century rules...
Pathetic.
written by abc , February 07, 2013
Does anyone have the number for the Guinness book of world records, ripleys believe it or not or even a circus freak owner?
Fineliving can read minds over the Internet not only that but a scholar on comparative religion. She must be rich n famous with her extraordinary power!
Or is she just full of shit???
Fineliving can read minds over the Internet not only that but a scholar on comparative religion. She must be rich n famous with her extraordinary power!
Or is she just full of shit???
written by fine , February 07, 2013
If the shoe fits……. wear it !!
Why beat around the bushes …
you have been saying this kind of thing many times :
'' if the people want sharia let them have it ''…. and we keep saying '' no one want sharia, .not decent, good and non violent people '' …
So …. who is left ? … who would want it ? … no one, BUT The violent, vindictive bad people .. right ? …. so that means … according to you, '' if these violent people WANT SHARIA … LET THEM HAVE IT ? …isn't correct ?
Who in the right mind, would, WANT, these violent bad people, TO HAVE what they want !!! ! sharia law at their disposable ….
Yet … you turn democratic and you want sharia law for whom ever wanted … Do you want to give poison to whom ever wanted !!??? …. how sweet of you ??!!
Why beat around the bushes …
you have been saying this kind of thing many times :
'' if the people want sharia let them have it ''…. and we keep saying '' no one want sharia, .not decent, good and non violent people '' …
So …. who is left ? … who would want it ? … no one, BUT The violent, vindictive bad people .. right ? …. so that means … according to you, '' if these violent people WANT SHARIA … LET THEM HAVE IT ? …isn't correct ?
Who in the right mind, would, WANT, these violent bad people, TO HAVE what they want !!! ! sharia law at their disposable ….
Yet … you turn democratic and you want sharia law for whom ever wanted … Do you want to give poison to whom ever wanted !!??? …. how sweet of you ??!!
written by youcancallmeV , February 07, 2013
'I recall that a brother yacub created the white race 6000 years ago.'
'There is a crazy story about a spaceship too.'
'Explain that'
Ok abc, it's quite easy to do, it's the same type of delusional and superstitious nonsense that Muslims like you spout all the time.
the evil eye
witchcraft
jinn
The quran is full of superstitious nonsense much of it has Muhammad at it's source.
The tragic thing is that religious nonsense often turns dangerous and Islamic exorcists brutalise their victims... they die at the hands of their amil/raqi/spiritual healer.
You don't have to be anyone specially ordained to be an Islamic exorcist, a pious relative, friend or aquaintance can perform the rituals, you can even do it yourself.
That's how Kyrah Ishaq died in tragic circumstances.
That's how Latifa Hachmi was killed, there are many other cases where lives have ended in such brutality.
Where death wasn't the conclusion, victims were severely beaten and tortured as in the case of Asma Hussein.
Such incidents are on the increase.
Your comments confirm your ignorance and denial.
'There is a crazy story about a spaceship too.'
'Explain that'
Ok abc, it's quite easy to do, it's the same type of delusional and superstitious nonsense that Muslims like you spout all the time.
the evil eye
witchcraft
jinn
The quran is full of superstitious nonsense much of it has Muhammad at it's source.
The tragic thing is that religious nonsense often turns dangerous and Islamic exorcists brutalise their victims... they die at the hands of their amil/raqi/spiritual healer.
You don't have to be anyone specially ordained to be an Islamic exorcist, a pious relative, friend or aquaintance can perform the rituals, you can even do it yourself.
That's how Kyrah Ishaq died in tragic circumstances.
That's how Latifa Hachmi was killed, there are many other cases where lives have ended in such brutality.
Where death wasn't the conclusion, victims were severely beaten and tortured as in the case of Asma Hussein.
Such incidents are on the increase.
Your comments confirm your ignorance and denial.
written by youcancallmeV , February 07, 2013
It seems that the NOI might be slightly more sensible than the rest of Islam with brother yacub and his white devils and spaceship..
Or do they throw stones at a rock they think is the devil?
Pee using their right hand only?
Do they religiously set their alarm clock because they believe what Mohammed said about the devil urinating in their ear?
Does satan hang out of your nose ABC?
Do you resemble whichever of your parents climaxed first?
Or do they throw stones at a rock they think is the devil?
Pee using their right hand only?
Do they religiously set their alarm clock because they believe what Mohammed said about the devil urinating in their ear?
Does satan hang out of your nose ABC?
Do you resemble whichever of your parents climaxed first?
written by Athiest&Proud , February 07, 2013
The funny thing is, my wife is Muslim and she would not want to live in Sharia controlled countries like Saudi Arabia. Islam blinds people into believing it is good and not flawed. When I ask her or other Muslims about Islam they cannot answer. Then I ask why they cherry pick Islam, they also cannot answer. Every time some one is sick or in trouble all they do is Ya Allah please heal this person or help this person ameen but the person is not helped! Why do they still take the person to the Hospital not the Mosque? Why haven't any Muslim been able to communicate with Allah or his Angels? Guess what, no Muslim will answer those questions! Only intelligent people question everything even authority! No wonder religions don't want you to question their authority! Knowledge is power and Muslim men are afraid to give women power!
written by abc , February 07, 2013
Since you are married to a Muslim, you must know her pretty well. Can you clear up a few points for the intellectually stunted on this site:
1. Is your Muslim wife wanting to take over the west and implement shariah?
2. Does she receive some kind of command or code to work with another billion people to create an empire?
3. Has she beheaded an apostate recently?
4. Does she hate all non believers?
Your answers will shut up a few around here!
Thanks
1. Is your Muslim wife wanting to take over the west and implement shariah?
2. Does she receive some kind of command or code to work with another billion people to create an empire?
3. Has she beheaded an apostate recently?
4. Does she hate all non believers?
Your answers will shut up a few around here!
Thanks
written by Athiest&Proud , February 07, 2013
My wife is secular, not conservative. She does not wear Hijab. Let me answer your questions:
1. No. She does not believe in Sharia law.
2. I do not know... but she believes everyone should be a Muslim. ha
3. Not that I know of... Maybe I am next... lol
4. Umm YES! Hates Christians and Jesus. Hates Jews and Isreal and their Zionest God. Hates Hindu (even though her grandparents are Hindu, Irony). Why all this hate? Because she was taught to hate them when she grew up. She is some what tolerant to them in front but talks bad when they turn their backs.
Moderate or secular Muslims are good people but they are walking on fence, they do not know if they should cross onto the Muslim side or go for total freedom.
Thanks for replying abc. You are insightful and intelligent person.
1. No. She does not believe in Sharia law.
2. I do not know... but she believes everyone should be a Muslim. ha
3. Not that I know of... Maybe I am next... lol
4. Umm YES! Hates Christians and Jesus. Hates Jews and Isreal and their Zionest God. Hates Hindu (even though her grandparents are Hindu, Irony). Why all this hate? Because she was taught to hate them when she grew up. She is some what tolerant to them in front but talks bad when they turn their backs.
Moderate or secular Muslims are good people but they are walking on fence, they do not know if they should cross onto the Muslim side or go for total freedom.
Thanks for replying abc. You are insightful and intelligent person.
written by Yibel , February 07, 2013
that allows "individuals as well as groups maximum latitude of faith, coupled with responsibility, and free of any practices that infringe on the rights of others or demonize them" already exists in the US. It is the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the judicial system. Alao a "Religious Review Board" would be against Article One of the Bill of Rights - Freedom of Speech, Religion, and Press.
Furthermore, the US does NOT "have a 'hands off' practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion." Religions must obey the law. For example, the Hopi, a Native American tribe, uses Bald Eagle feathers in their religious practices, but they are not allowed to hunt and kill Bald Eagles - a protected species.
This author states that a Religious Review Board would "insure" that "no 'religion' preaches and practices in violation of the United States’ Constitution." Such acts are called SEDITION and TREASON - and Federal LAWS already exist to prosecute such speech and actions. Only ENFORCEMENT of these laws is needed!
Furthermore, the US does NOT "have a 'hands off' practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion." Religions must obey the law. For example, the Hopi, a Native American tribe, uses Bald Eagle feathers in their religious practices, but they are not allowed to hunt and kill Bald Eagles - a protected species.
This author states that a Religious Review Board would "insure" that "no 'religion' preaches and practices in violation of the United States’ Constitution." Such acts are called SEDITION and TREASON - and Federal LAWS already exist to prosecute such speech and actions. Only ENFORCEMENT of these laws is needed!
written by abc , February 07, 2013
Hat tip!
For your honesty and I just wish others would take a step back and do the same.
Thank you
For your honesty and I just wish others would take a step back and do the same.
Thank you
written by fine , February 08, 2013
Hahahaha
No one HERE ever said that ….. ALL … every Muslims and Muslima want or planing to kill apostates .. no one ever said that … ALL Muslims want to have sharia implemented in the west … I even said Most Muslims WOMEN DO NOT WANT it … because it cruel and inhumane to women …
So ….. what are you talking about …
Peaceful Muslims care NOT to do anything about apostates and criticizers of Islam … BUT… it is a fact that …. they do not DO anything when the devout Muslims kill …
you stay silent … or you say '' if people want to do sharia … let them have sharia !!!! "'
I do not see YOU OR ALL YOUR MUSLIMS FRIENDS LIKE YOU … CALL… FOR THE abolishment of such laws like killing apostates … beheadings adulteress … etc …
You are defending Islam and actions of Bad Muslims …
Just because some Muslims DO NOT KILL because of Quran … DOES NOT MEAN others do not do it !! …and you know perfectly well ..they ARE DOING IT
No one HERE ever said that ….. ALL … every Muslims and Muslima want or planing to kill apostates .. no one ever said that … ALL Muslims want to have sharia implemented in the west … I even said Most Muslims WOMEN DO NOT WANT it … because it cruel and inhumane to women …
So ….. what are you talking about …
Peaceful Muslims care NOT to do anything about apostates and criticizers of Islam … BUT… it is a fact that …. they do not DO anything when the devout Muslims kill …
you stay silent … or you say '' if people want to do sharia … let them have sharia !!!! "'
I do not see YOU OR ALL YOUR MUSLIMS FRIENDS LIKE YOU … CALL… FOR THE abolishment of such laws like killing apostates … beheadings adulteress … etc …
You are defending Islam and actions of Bad Muslims …
Just because some Muslims DO NOT KILL because of Quran … DOES NOT MEAN others do not do it !! …and you know perfectly well ..they ARE DOING IT
written by abc , February 08, 2013
I suggest you look in the mirror because the hypocrisy is breathtaking!
written by dead or alive , February 08, 2013
Talk is cheap.You can stroke a guy like Athiest&Pround,who said nothing.But you can not refute fine?You abc have lost creditably on this topic of Sharia law.
written by abc , February 08, 2013
Which are you blind or stupid? The hypocrisy is in plain sight! You want me point it out??
written by fine , February 08, 2013
Abc … is stuck ..
He can NOT say … '' Sharia should be banned all over the world because, that will make him look , he see something VERY wrong with Islam after all, SHARIA IS DERIVED from Islam/ Quran/hadeeth ….. [ I like him to try to disproof this statement … { Sharia IS in fact, derived from Quran / hadeeth / Sira al rasool Muhammad and no where else }
And …
He also can NOT say… '' I endorse Sharia a 100% …it is not popular to say it here … because, if he said that, he is also endorsing '' beheadings for adulterers, apostates and cutting off hands and legs… beating women , killing own kids ..etc … that is not good to admit in IW …
So …
He stays somewhere right in the middle …. '' I support Muslims who wanted sharia ..or '' if Muslims want sharia who are we to say they can not have it "'
So democratically and hypocritically gray
He can NOT say … '' Sharia should be banned all over the world because, that will make him look , he see something VERY wrong with Islam after all, SHARIA IS DERIVED from Islam/ Quran/hadeeth ….. [ I like him to try to disproof this statement … { Sharia IS in fact, derived from Quran / hadeeth / Sira al rasool Muhammad and no where else }
And …
He also can NOT say… '' I endorse Sharia a 100% …it is not popular to say it here … because, if he said that, he is also endorsing '' beheadings for adulterers, apostates and cutting off hands and legs… beating women , killing own kids ..etc … that is not good to admit in IW …
So …
He stays somewhere right in the middle …. '' I support Muslims who wanted sharia ..or '' if Muslims want sharia who are we to say they can not have it "'
So democratically and hypocritically gray
written by youcancallmeV , February 08, 2013
'Good attempt!
the billshit meter went off the scale!'
It's a good thing that you've come to that realization abc. It's Mohammed's billshit, it's Muslim billshit and it's the sort of billshit that keeps Muslims like you wallowing in denialism...
the billshit meter went off the scale!'
It's a good thing that you've come to that realization abc. It's Mohammed's billshit, it's Muslim billshit and it's the sort of billshit that keeps Muslims like you wallowing in denialism...
written by youcancallmeV , February 08, 2013
So, this Sharia law.... it's administered by Imams and spiritual/political leaders.
Khomeini, said that it was Ok to have sexual relations with animals as long as you kill the animal after you've ravished it and don't sell the meat to your neighbour...
Khomeini, said that it was Ok to have sexual relations with animals as long as you kill the animal after you've ravished it and don't sell the meat to your neighbour...
written by youcancallmeV , February 08, 2013
He said it was Ok to have sexual relations with infants too.
written by abc , February 08, 2013
"Hahahaha" I hope that sorts come back and bite you. You spend all day demonising Muslims. Now you say not all! That is funny indeed.
So there are peaceful Muslims now are there?
"I do not see YOU OR ALL YOUR MUSLIMS FRIENDS LIKE YOU … CALL… FOR THE abolishment of such laws like killing apostates"
Every time Muslims say that it's not the case and try to get that message across, what do you do jump up and down and shout liar.
Now there is a thing as a good Muslim? What's one of those?
According to you Muslims who don't kill are bad Muslims and the ones that do are good!
It's a joke!
So there are peaceful Muslims now are there?
"I do not see YOU OR ALL YOUR MUSLIMS FRIENDS LIKE YOU … CALL… FOR THE abolishment of such laws like killing apostates"
Every time Muslims say that it's not the case and try to get that message across, what do you do jump up and down and shout liar.
Now there is a thing as a good Muslim? What's one of those?
According to you Muslims who don't kill are bad Muslims and the ones that do are good!
It's a joke!
written by lw1 , February 09, 2013
Nick Griffin of BNP, a racist party, called Islam a 'wicked,vicious faith'. He was charged for his statement. In his defence, he quoted passages from Quran and said his words were not attacking a race but a religion. Nick Griffin was found not guilty of inciting racial hatred on 10 November 2006.
Nick Griffin got at least one thing right.
Nick Griffin got at least one thing right.
written by Archpagan , February 09, 2013
There in no 'peaceful Muslim', but only 'Muslims running short of ammunition'. You, Mr abc come under this category. Indian Muslims clamor for secularism, but hate the idea of a secular Pakistan or Bangladesh. Their hypocrisy is limitless. Of course there are some Taqiya artists active on internet who want to convert the gullible by means of Taqiya tricks. Fine - officially a Muslimah still, but actually an apostate- is a 'Bad Muslimah' to you but a good Muslimah to us. Do you like to be a 'good Muslim'?
written by Fine , February 09, 2013
You are absolutely right.
It is matter of how you look at it …
It is like the question the doctor ask the patient … '' from 1 to 10, how do you scale your pain ? ''
The doctor has to fallow that sentence with, '' 0 '' being the least pain '' .. or … '' 10 '' being the most pain '' … for the patient to know how to answer.
The answer depends on which end you are looking at … right ?
To Judge '' who is Good Muslim '' and '' who is Bad Muslim '' depends on who is talking ..
To a devout Muslim : '' Good Muslim, is the Muslim who does everything Quran tells him to do, word by every word '' that is seen as GOOD, because Quran is seen as ALL good .
To an apostates … '' Good Muslim is the Muslim who does everything Quran tells him to do, word by word '' … and that is seen as BAD, because Quran is mostly bad .
Abc is trying to muddle things ..
For the life of him he can not COME out and be truthful and SAY '' I do not condone killing apostates ..how could he, when surly he will look like he is GOING AGAINST Quran …
And he calls me a ... l i a r ...amazing !!?
It is matter of how you look at it …
It is like the question the doctor ask the patient … '' from 1 to 10, how do you scale your pain ? ''
The doctor has to fallow that sentence with, '' 0 '' being the least pain '' .. or … '' 10 '' being the most pain '' … for the patient to know how to answer.
The answer depends on which end you are looking at … right ?
To Judge '' who is Good Muslim '' and '' who is Bad Muslim '' depends on who is talking ..
To a devout Muslim : '' Good Muslim, is the Muslim who does everything Quran tells him to do, word by every word '' that is seen as GOOD, because Quran is seen as ALL good .
To an apostates … '' Good Muslim is the Muslim who does everything Quran tells him to do, word by word '' … and that is seen as BAD, because Quran is mostly bad .
Abc is trying to muddle things ..
For the life of him he can not COME out and be truthful and SAY '' I do not condone killing apostates ..how could he, when surly he will look like he is GOING AGAINST Quran …
And he calls me a ... l i a r ...amazing !!?
written by Fine , February 09, 2013
I like to add to my post
For the life of him he cannot COME out and be truthfully and SAY '' I do not condone killing apostates ….. NO MATTER WHAT IS THE CIRCUMSTANCES .. killing is killing whether apostate talk about Islam or do not talk about islam, but how could he, when he will look like he is GOING AGAINST Quran
Words are not bullets …
I have no respect for people who are unable to say their conscience
For the life of him he cannot COME out and be truthfully and SAY '' I do not condone killing apostates ….. NO MATTER WHAT IS THE CIRCUMSTANCES .. killing is killing whether apostate talk about Islam or do not talk about islam, but how could he, when he will look like he is GOING AGAINST Quran
Words are not bullets …
I have no respect for people who are unable to say their conscience
written by youcancallmeV , February 11, 2013
It's all rather interesting to observe a complete lack of expression of spirituality, love and compassion in abc's diatribes regarding his religion.
written by abc , February 11, 2013
Unlike you I can adjust to the other person and play at their level.
You get nothing from me because you are nothing!
You get nothing from me because you are nothing!
written by youcancallmeV , February 12, 2013
But that's all you are doing abc, you're playing....
In reality, your conceptual identity is way off balance.
In reality, your conceptual identity is way off balance.
written by Yibel , February 13, 2013
The Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, has called for an international early warning system against discrimination and intolerance towards religions by establishing an observer office within the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) of the United Nations.
Ihsanoglu stated that an observer office was established to follow hate crimes due to Islamophobia by the OIC and the Foundation of European Security and Collaboration (AGIT). He stressed there is a need for another observer office to track intolerance and discrimination against every religion on the international level. To achieve that, he called for the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to reach a consensus by putting its decisions into practice for combating discrimination against individuals on the basis of religion or belief.
He added that certain incidents such as the burning of the Quran and films such as “Innocence of Muslims” had raised the level of Islamophobia.
And Mohammad-Ali Esfanani, the spokesman for the Majlis Legal and Judicial Committee has called for the establishment of an independent international Islamic court to examine all cases of genocide, moves against humanity and blasphemous acts against Islam’s holy figures and values.
Esfanani stated that "the so-called advocates of freedom have never launched an assault on any religion as intensely as they have on Islam" and Muslims are on the receiving end of increasing amounts of “derision, mocking, insults, defamation, slander, and people otherwise speaking negatively about Islam.”
According to Esfanani: “The only attack which has been carried out in an organized fashion is the one against Islam and Muslim countries.”
Esfanani thinks Islamophobes are "organized" LOL And the Muslim Jihadiis aren't attacking anyone - anywhere.
Ihsanoglu stated that an observer office was established to follow hate crimes due to Islamophobia by the OIC and the Foundation of European Security and Collaboration (AGIT). He stressed there is a need for another observer office to track intolerance and discrimination against every religion on the international level. To achieve that, he called for the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to reach a consensus by putting its decisions into practice for combating discrimination against individuals on the basis of religion or belief.
He added that certain incidents such as the burning of the Quran and films such as “Innocence of Muslims” had raised the level of Islamophobia.
And Mohammad-Ali Esfanani, the spokesman for the Majlis Legal and Judicial Committee has called for the establishment of an independent international Islamic court to examine all cases of genocide, moves against humanity and blasphemous acts against Islam’s holy figures and values.
Esfanani stated that "the so-called advocates of freedom have never launched an assault on any religion as intensely as they have on Islam" and Muslims are on the receiving end of increasing amounts of “derision, mocking, insults, defamation, slander, and people otherwise speaking negatively about Islam.”
According to Esfanani: “The only attack which has been carried out in an organized fashion is the one against Islam and Muslim countries.”
Esfanani thinks Islamophobes are "organized" LOL And the Muslim Jihadiis aren't attacking anyone - anywhere.
written by lw1 , February 14, 2013
Phobia is ' an abnormal intense and irrational fear of a given situation, organism or object.'
Most terrorists in the world are Muslims -- though all Muslims are not terrorists.
Most terrorist acts are committed by Muslims.
Most Muslims are killed by Muslims.
Allah, Quran and Mohammad are the inspiration for Muslims, and if that leads to all this terrorism, then it is a rational fear and not only for non-muslims, but also Muslims.
Esfanani has a blind spot about terrorism by Muslims.
Islamophobia is the wrong word because both non-muslims and Muslims have a rational reason to fear this 'religion' of hatred.
Most terrorists in the world are Muslims -- though all Muslims are not terrorists.
Most terrorist acts are committed by Muslims.
Most Muslims are killed by Muslims.
Allah, Quran and Mohammad are the inspiration for Muslims, and if that leads to all this terrorism, then it is a rational fear and not only for non-muslims, but also Muslims.
Esfanani has a blind spot about terrorism by Muslims.
Islamophobia is the wrong word because both non-muslims and Muslims have a rational reason to fear this 'religion' of hatred.
written by Yibel , February 15, 2013
Did you hear the one about the violent 53 year-old pedophile?
Isn't he THE ONE who is revered by one fifth of the world's population for starting the world's most intolerant, repressive, misogynistic and violent religion - aka Islam/submit? Ya, that's him - Muhammad - The Highly Praised One!
One day, Muhammed (piss be upon him) heard that one of his wives was leaving him, so he rushed home where he found her on the carpet in front of the tent with her belongings; he sat beside her and said, "I heard you were planning to leave me?"
"Yes," she replied, "I heard your other wives saying you were a pedophile!"
Mohammed (piss be upon him) thinks for a minute or so and then responds, "That's a mighty big word for a 9 year old."
Isn't he THE ONE who is revered by one fifth of the world's population for starting the world's most intolerant, repressive, misogynistic and violent religion - aka Islam/submit? Ya, that's him - Muhammad - The Highly Praised One!
One day, Muhammed (piss be upon him) heard that one of his wives was leaving him, so he rushed home where he found her on the carpet in front of the tent with her belongings; he sat beside her and said, "I heard you were planning to leave me?"
"Yes," she replied, "I heard your other wives saying you were a pedophile!"
Mohammed (piss be upon him) thinks for a minute or so and then responds, "That's a mighty big word for a 9 year old."
Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.
Encroaching Islam or as spencer/geller say stealth jihad is affecting the constitution. Where? Have you got an example? No thought not.
Looks like gellers attorney mr yerushelmi is beating your Iranian ass to it. But his proposals keep getting thrown out. I wonder why? Thankfully not everybody is as stupid as you. You wouldn't recognise the truth even if slapped you in the face.
"infidel is term used by Christians to describe non Christians" is anything accurate in this diatribe?
Ah 1400 years ago people were primitive? What about 2000 years ago or 4000 years ago or even 6000 years ago? That's the time when Christianity, Judaism and Hinduism were around. Your points are so transparently laced with bigotry.
Oh Pakistan has the bomb? So does everybody else and if Iran want it then I'm sure they have the know how to get it.