www.islam-watch.org

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Muslim and Proud -- Prophetic and Quranic Style

E-mail Print PDF

It is not uncommon to see someone in the neighborhood, who makes the claim that he/she is a Muslim, and proud of it. Sometimes, I see comments on articles in FaithFreedom.org and Islam Watch website, under the nick “Muslim & Proud”. In this article, I try to understand this statement based on a straightforward look at the basic facts found in the Sirat, Hadith, and Qur’an.

The Sirat

Ibn Ishaq’s “Sirat Rasul Allah” is the accepted authentic source on the life of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). I am not going to go beyond the table of contents, where we can read some interesting titles. Here are some of them:

  1. Allah punishes the mockers
  2. Allah orders Muhammad to fight

Is Allah’s self-esteem so low that he needs to punish those, who mock him? Is Allah’s self-esteem so desperate that he appoints Muhammad to fight others on His behalf?

Let us continue with some of the titles in the table of contents:

  1. The first raid: on Waddan
  2. Hamza’s raid to the cost
  3. Raid on Buwat
  4. Raid on al-‘Ushayra
  5. Raid on Al-Kharrar
  6. Raid on Safawan
  7. The chapter of the spoils
  8. Battle of Badr
  9. Battle of Uhud
  10. Raids… Raids… and more Raids..., etc
  11. Killing of Sallam
  12. Battle of Hunayn

This is only a sample of what is found in the table of contents of Sirat Rasul Allah. One would expect similar titles for a book about the life of Billy the Kid or some terrorist groups that went berserk terrorizing civilians living in towns and villages. It does not take a deep thinker to know that Muhammad was no more than a common gangster and criminal, who was born in an age where might was right.

Hadith

Let us move on and take a look at some hadiths:

Narrated Ibn Aun: I wrote a letter to Nafi and Nafi wrote in reply to my letter that the prophet had suddenly Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the  prophet got Juwairiya on that day. Nafi said that Ibn ‘Umar had told him the above narration and that Ibn ‘Umar was in that army.  (Book #46, Hadith #717)

Why anyone would be proud of following a gangster as per the above hadith is beyond me. There is a sudden attack against other people, killing of men, enslaving of women and children. Above that, there is the rape Muhammad performed with a woman, Juwairiyah. He just killed her adult husband and all male relatives. Now, it is time for him to rape a good looking one amongst the captives.

Let us look at another hadith:

……So, whenever a man from Quraish embraced Islam he would follow Abu Basir till they formed a strong group. By Allah, whenever they heard about a caravan of Quraish heading towards Sham, they stopped it and attacked and killed them (i.e. infidels) and took their properties. The people of Quraish sent a message to the prophet requesting him for the Sake of Allah and Kith and kin to send for (i.e. Abu Basir and his companions) promising that whoever (amongst them) came to the prophet would be secure…. (Book #50, Hadith #891)

The above is just part of a hadith. The prophet (PBUH) had some of his gangsters attack the livelihood of the Meccans by attacking their commercial caravans to Syria. The Meccans ended up begging him to stop his evil acts.

Let us look at one more jewel from hadith:

‘Abdullah b. Umar (Allah be pleased with them) reported that when khaibar had been conquered, the Jews asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) to let them continue (cultivation in those lands) on half of the share of yield in fruits and crop, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: I will allow you to continue here, so long as we would desire. The rest of the hadith is the same, but with this addition: "The fruit would be distributed equal to the half of khaibar. And out of hall of the produce of the land, Allah’s Apostle (may peace be be upon him) got the fifth part."  (Book #010, Hadith #3761)

Khaibar was a Jewish settlement. Muhammad attacked them and took over their property. Here, we see him allowing them to stay in an area that belonged to them all along. In exchange he got his protection tax cut of the deal (20%). What an example this prophet is for humanity. I guess a Muslim should be very proud indeed in following such a gangster and thief

Let us move to the Qur’an. That is a book that makes a true Muslim justly proud. Here is just one of its cherished Jewels:

Qur’an

It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
( سورة الأنفال , Al-Anfal, Chapter #8, Verse #67)

I guess, it is after all the holy duty of a prophet to attack others in war, make sure no prisoners are taken alive. A real prophet should make a great slaughter in the land. Why take prisoners and keep them alive when you can just kill them?

What a great prophet and an example of a perfect human being Muhammad was.

Muslim… Are you still proud? You bet!

Comments (33)Add Comment
0
masahallahhhh good one
written by HARKAT UL JIHAD EI KAFIROOON , September 03, 2012
masahallahhhh good one
0
Ibn Ishaq kafir and kazib: Imam Malik.
written by Reed Wilson. , September 03, 2012
Ibn Kammuna. You write under subtitle, The Sirat, you write "Ibn Ishaq’s “Sirat Rasul Allah” is the accepted authentic source on the life of Prophet Muhammad".

Who accepted? Imam Malik declared Ibne Ishaq a liar Kafir. I consider ibn Kammuna more authenic than the liar and kaffir Ibn Ishaq. You know it very well that II did not leave behind any written memoir or book. He was invented by Ibn Hisham and Tabri to put onus of their lies on this fictitious man who was considered to be of closer period of Muhammad.

It is intelligent of you to confine on table of contents of Sirat Rasool Allah. It is written by Ibn Hisham and not by Ibn Islhaq as you inadveranly mentioned in you erudite article.

0
...
written by Reed Wilson. , September 03, 2012
Ibn Kammuna. You have given a translation of Quran 8:67 as:

It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
( سورة الأنفال , Al-Anfal, Chapter #8, Verse #67)

I give below two more translaitons of same sura.

Yousuf Ali.It is not fitting for an apostle that he should have prisoners of war until he hath thoroughly subdued the land. Ye look for the temporal goods of this world; but Allah looketh to the Hereafter: And Allah is Exalted in might, Wise.

Mufti Taqi UsmaniIt is not befitting a prophet that he has captives with him unless he has subdued the enemy by shedding blood in the land. You intend to have the stuff of this world, while Allah intends the Hereafter (for you). And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

I think it should be like 'unless the encounter was finished'. There is text to verify.
0
Ibn Kammuna. Quran 8:65
written by Reed Wilson. , September 03, 2012
(8:65) O Prophet! Rouse the believers to fighting. If they be twenty of you who persevere they shall vanquish two hundred; and if there be of you a hundred, they shall vanquish a thousand of those who disbelieve, for they are a people who lack understanding.47
يٰۤـاَيُّهَا النَّبِىُّ حَرِّضِ الۡمُؤۡمِنِيۡنَ عَلَى الۡقِتَالِ‌ ؕ اِنۡ يَّكُنۡ مِّنۡكُمۡ عِشۡرُوۡنَ صَابِرُوۡنَ يَغۡلِبُوۡا مِائَتَيۡنِ‌ ۚ وَاِنۡ يَّكُنۡ مِّنۡكُمۡ مِّائَةٌ يَّغۡلِبُوۡۤا اَ لۡفًا مِّنَ الَّذِيۡنَ كَفَرُوۡا بِاَنَّهُمۡ قَوۡمٌ لَّا يَفۡقَهُوۡنَ‏
(8:66) Allah has now lightened your burden for He found weakness in you. So if there be hundred of you who persevere, they shall vanquish two hundred; and if there be a thousand of you they shall, by the leave of Allah, vanquish two thousand.48 Allah is with those who persevere.
اَلۡـٰٔـنَ خَفَّفَ اللّٰهُ عَنۡكُمۡ وَعَلِمَ اَنَّ فِيۡكُمۡ ضَعۡفًا‌ؕ فَاِنۡ يَّكُنۡ مِّنۡكُمۡ مِّائَةٌ صَابِرَةٌ يَّغۡلِبُوۡا مِائَتَيۡنِ‌ۚ وَاِنۡ يَّكُنۡ مِّنۡكُمۡ اَلۡفٌ يَّغۡلِبُوۡۤا اَلۡفَيۡنِ بِاِذۡنِ اللّٰهِؕ وَ اللّٰهُ مَعَ الصّٰبِرِيۡنَ‏ 
(8:67) It behoves not a Prophet to take captives until he has sufficiently suppressed the enemies in the land. You merely seek the gains of the world whereas Allah desires (for you the good) of the Hereafter. Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
مَا كَانَ لِنَبِىٍّ اَنۡ يَّكُوۡنَ لَهٗۤ اَسۡرٰى حَتّٰى يُثۡخِنَ فِى الۡاَرۡضِ‌ؕ تُرِيۡدُوۡنَ عَرَضَ الدُّنۡيَا ۖ  وَاللّٰهُ يُرِيۡدُ الۡاٰخِرَةَ‌ ؕ وَاللّٰهُ عَزِيۡزٌ حَكِيۡمٌ‏
(8:68) Had there not been a previous decree from Allah, a stern punishment would have afflicted you for what you have taken.
لَوۡلَا كِتٰبٌ مِّنَ اللّٰهِ سَبَقَ لَمَسَّكُمۡ فِيۡمَاۤ اَخَذۡتُمۡ عَذَابٌ عَظِيۡمٌ‏
(8:69) So eat that which you have obtained - for it is lawful and clean--and fear Allah.49 Surely Allah is Ever-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
0
Proud to be barbaric
written by Guy Macher , September 03, 2012
The most evil of Nazis, the SS were immensely proud of being savages.

Notice the resident liar considers himself a more authentic authority than Ibn Shaq! That is apostasy and surely deserving of the penalty prescribed.
0
Islam is pre-civilisation law!
written by Gnostic , September 04, 2012
Tribes and clans do of course have their own kind of law like the honor codex of the mafia or other criminal organisations such as the chinese tirades. The difference to modern law is that individuals do not have any meaningful rights in islam and other tribal or mafia organisations. The family or clan or tribe is above everything and so is the islamic ummah.

The ummah can force any muslim to join prayer every day, tells him what to eat and what to do in any aspect of life. The community is very strict which each other but protects any member while all people outside of the community are treated as enemies without any rights.

In contrast modern law is universal which means that all people have the same rights and everybody has to show respect and tolerance against any other.
0
Do not exult.
written by Reed Wilson. , September 04, 2012
Ibn Kammuna. You observed "It is not uncommon to see someone in the neighborhood, who makes the claim that he/she is a Muslim, and proud of it."

It may be not uncommon among Muslims but it is forbidden by Allah in Quran.

وَاعْبُدُوا اللَّـهَ وَلَا تُشْرِكُوا بِهِ شَيْئًا ۖ وَبِالْوَالِدَيْنِ إِحْسَانًا وَبِذِي الْقُرْبَىٰ وَالْيَتَامَىٰ وَالْمَسَاكِينِ وَالْجَارِ ذِي الْقُرْبَىٰ وَالْجَارِ الْجُنُبِ وَالصَّاحِبِ بِالْجَنبِ وَابْنِ السَّبِيلِ وَمَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّـهَ لَا يُحِبُّ مَن كَانَ مُخْتَالًا فَخُورًا

Obey Allah and ascribe no partner to Him. Do good to your parents, to near of kin, to orphans, and to the needy, and to the neighbor who is of kin and to the neighbor who is a stranger, and to the companion by your side, and to the wayfarer, and to those whom your right hands possess. Allah does not like proud and boastful people. Quran 4:36

"Do not hold men in contempt, and do not walk with hauteur on the earth. Verily God does not like the proud and boastful." Quran 31:18

لِّكَيْلَا تَأْسَوْا عَلَىٰ مَا فَاتَكُمْ وَلَا تَفْرَحُوا بِمَا آتَاكُمْ ۗ وَاللَّـهُ لَا يُحِبُّ كُلَّ مُخْتَالٍ فَخُورٍ

"There is no misfortune that reaches in the earth or in your selves but is mentioned in a Book, before We initiate it; indeed this is easy for Allah. So that you may not be saddened upon losing something, nor rejoice upon what you are given; and Allah does not like any boastful, conceited person. Quran 57:22-23

I give the text Ibne so that one may mistake as I have done some cosmetics. You know Arabic I know.

I hope the behavior of such Muslims may not be mistaken as Islam.
0
SHAME ISLAM SHAME
written by SALIM GUJJAR INDIAN EX-MUSLIM , September 04, 2012
I was surffing on internet i watch, this site I like this siteyou are displaying reality of Islam.it tue muslim wants to kill non muslims, and wants to rape non muslim women.It is real islam of Mohammad.
0
Why doesn't reed preach to the ummah?
written by Tanstaafl jw , September 04, 2012
Too dangerous. Much safer to talk with the infidel.
0
Islamic authority
written by Guy Macher , September 04, 2012
Who would have thought that the resident liar is an Islamic authority ranking higher than Ibn Shaq? Whatever mental affliction this liar suffers from, it is not lack of chutzpah!
0
Agree and disagree to Reed
written by berq , September 04, 2012
I agree with reed wilson that the book sirat-e-rasool allah was written by Ibn Hisham but Idisagree that Ibn Hashim was a liar kafir.Many Muslim scholars whenever they describe the history of Islam and what Muhammad did they give the references from his book.If he has written fable stories and his statements are not authentic,then why Muslim scholars quote from his book?Please reed read Tefseer-ib-katheer and (late) mulana Mududi,s tefseer tafeem -ul-Quran.Reed be reasonable and accept the reality.
0
Reed
written by Rationalist , September 04, 2012
Ibn Ishaq's book may not be authentic to you, but it an authentic record for more than a billion Muslims. You reject it because it exposes your dirty Prophet.

If we go by your logic even Quran is not authentic because it was compiled from several manuscripts that existed at that time by the caliph. Address this issue first rather than hiding it under your sleeves.

0
To Reed Wilson
written by Archpagan , September 04, 2012
'He was invented by Ibn Hisham and Tabri to put onus of their lies on this fictitious man who was considered to be of closer period of Muhammad.'

What were the motives of Ibn Hisham and Tabri behind spreading the alleged lies? Were they crypto-apostates? You want to turn Islamic history on the head. There will not be a single taker to your theory. Ahadis were written to serve the cause of Islam by supplying much needed context and chronology to verses in Koran. In absence of Ahadis, Koranic verses were just gibberish. If you are ashamed of Ahadis, you should be ashamed of Islam too.
0
Archpagan
written by Rationalist , September 04, 2012
If Ibn Hisham n Tabri wrote negative about Muhammad, they should have suffered a violent death at the hands of angry Muslim mobs. As a result their text would have been extinct by now.

My verdict: To Muslims everything that is bad in the eyes of kuffr becomes
0
contd...
written by Rationalist , September 04, 2012
contd....becomes good. Muslims start thinking with a negative mindset.
0
ibn Ishaq.
written by Reed Wilson. , September 05, 2012
Archpagan. I dont personally know Ibn Ishaq. I have read a research article at http://www.answering-christian...Ishaq.html

I quote a portion of the article for you:

Imam Malik called Ibn Ishaq a liar and an imposter for writing false stories about Prophet Muhammad.

Malik bin Anas Bin Malik bin Abu Amir Al-Asbahi (715-801 C.E.) or Imam Malik-- lived cloest in the time to the life of Prophet Muhammad of all the collectors of the hadith (Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, etc). He was born more than 80 years after the death of the Prophet.
Imam Malik was a complier of a respected hadith collection, called Muwatta. Imam Malik was a hadith scholar. Imam Malik has said that Ibn Ishaq "reports traditions on the authority of a Jew". [9]

Ibn Ishaq was condemned by some of major Islamic scholars.

Shaykh ibn Taymiyyah said:

"Allah has provided evidence (i.e. Isnad) establishing the authenticity or lack thereof of the narrations that are necessary in matters of the religion. It is well known that most of what was reported in aspects of Tafsir (commentaries on the Qur'an) is similar to narrations reporting Maghazi (or Seerah) and battles, promoting Imam Ahmad to state that three matters do not have Isnad: Tafsir, Mala'him (i.e. great battles), and Maghazi. This is because most of their narrations are of the Maraseel (plural for Mursal) type, such as narrations reported by Urwah Ibn az-Zubair, ash-Sha'bi, az-Zuhri, Musa Ibn Uqbah and Ibn Ishaq." [10]

Imam Malik was not the only contemporary of Ibn Ishaq's to have problems with him. Despite writing the earliest biography of Prophet Muhammad, Scholars such as al-Nisa'I and Yahya b. Kattan did not view Ibn Ishaq as a reliable or authoritative source of Hadith. [11] Though some thought his use of collective isnad (chains of tranmissions) problematized his Hadith, several people went so far as to call Ibn Ishaq a liar on matters of Hadith. Others claim Ibn Ishaq included verses in his Sira that he knew were not authentic. Contd.




0
Ibn Ishaq II continued.
written by Reed Wilson. , September 05, 2012
Archpagan. The first part of my post is under review.

What other said about Ibn Ishaq:

Ibn Ishaq being the solitary narrator i.e. there is no chain for it that does not involve Ibn Ishaq. Solitary reports of Ibn Ishaq are not reliable.

Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal was asked about the solitary reports of Ibn Ishaq if they are considered reliable. He said “No!”. See Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, Da’ira Ma’arif Nizamia, Hyderabad, 1326 A.H. vol.9 p.43

There are several chainless stories that exist in Ibn Ishaq's work. We don't know who these missing people are. We don't know if they are Muslims, non-Muslims, hypocrites acting as Muslims and purposely spreading lies, etc. So if we are not sure who the people in the missing links are, how can we apply the principle of embarrassment to the narrations? We can only apply this principle if we were to know that the person is a trustworthy Muslim who would definitely have no motive to lie and make up something derogatory about the Prophet (peace be upon him). However, for all we know, the people in the missing link could be people known for fabricating narrations. You can't apply this principle to these narrations. Since we are not sure who the people in the missing link are, we can't confidently go ahead and apply this principle to this situation.

0
Motives: Vested interests.
written by Reed Wilson. , September 05, 2012
Archpagan. Since Ibn Ishaq is the chief source of Tabri and Ibn Hisham, all of them are not reliable. Some blame Jew lobby and some Zoroastrian lobby. It can be crap.

Regarding the motives, there are various theories. I will not delve into them. It may be possible that wanted to get recognition as first writer about Muhammad. I think they succeeded in this motive.

Since their books are oldest, the so called scholars proudly quote from them.
0
To Reed Wilson
written by Archpagan , September 05, 2012
It seems that it requires a Muslim Dan Brown to unearth the conspiracy and write a parallel 'Da Vinci Code' for Islam. I want you to take up that role as your life mission.
0
...
written by Reed Wilson. , September 05, 2012
Archpagan. Quran says that all apostles of Allah had families. I was wondering about family of Jesus Christ. It is evident even from Bible that 'the only begotten son of god' had family.

I was 76 on May 14. I get tired also. Tip the mission to more suitable person. Thanks.



0
Latest Prophet
written by Curlyhammed , September 06, 2012
All religion, especially Islam, is for the feeble minded who NEED someone else to tell them how to behave. The Quran was excreted from a duck who had some bad Mexican food.
0
Muhammed - Islam's sociopathic 'holy prophet'
written by The Infidel Alliance , September 06, 2012
The claim of Muhammed as a 'holy prophet', some sort of moral beacon for humanity, is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated in the history of mankind.

Factually, as recorded by Muslims in the Islamic 'holy' books, Muhammed was a sadistic sociopath, a mass murderer, a human slaver, a sex slaver and sex trafficker, a perfidious liar, a sexual deviant and serial rapist, a child rapist, a savage torturer, a pathologically obsessed decapitator, a hand and foot hacking amputator, a looting stealing thief, an intolerant bigot, a woman abusing misogynist, a genocidal warlord and a self proclaimed terrorist.

By any objective standard, by any moral standard, by any civilized standard, far from being a 'holy prophet' Muhammed was in truth one of the most vile examples of a man in the pantheon of human history - a gran mal narcissist consumed by unquenchable sexual lust, insatiable material greed, and unending savage violence.

Muhammed, who claimed Abrahamic lineage, violated EVERY one of God's basic laws, the Ten Commandments. He was little more than a Meccan Charles Manson or an Arabian Adolph Hitler, only more successful than either in his evil, brutality and hatred. In word and deed, Muhammed was a, if not THE, literal Anti-Christ.

Like Manson, Muhammed should have been incarcerated, not venerated. And like Hitler and NAZIsm, Muhammed and Islam should be universally despised.

Every pathology that afflicts the Muslim world can be traced directly to this raving criminal Muhammed, and the whole world suffers because of this single evil man.

This is the truth about Muhammed. Please help spread the truth and help destroy the myth of humanities most evil man.

~ The Infidel Alliance
0
Muhammed - Islam's Achilles heel
written by The Infidel Alliance , September 06, 2012
Muslims know that the myth of Muhammed as a 'holy prophet' is a massive lie, and if the truth about Muhammed is widely known, the 'moral' foundation of Islam will collapse under the weight of this lie.

Muslims know they cannot reconcile the actions and teachings of their evil prince with the morals and mores of civilized humanity. They know they cannot defend the indefensible. This is why whenever there is a discussion of Muhammed, an analysis of Muhammed, or even a cartoon of Muhammed - anything that might expose the truth about this evil man - Muslims do not engage in discussion or analysis, but descend into raging, destructive, murdering, violent mobs.

Terror is the only way Muslims can reconcile the terror of their holy-hellish prophet.

Please help spread the truth about Muhammed. Please challenge Muslims to defend the indefensible immorality of their evil prince. They can't, and they know it.

~ The Infidel Alliance
0
Reed's apology for Tafsir, hadis, sira and bla bla.
written by Reed Wilson. , September 07, 2012
berq , September 04, 2012
I agree with reed wilson that the book sirat-e-rasool allah was written by Ibn Hisham but Idisagree that Ibn Hashim was a liar kafir.Many Muslim scholars whenever they describe the history of Islam and what Muhammad did they give the references from his book.If he has written fable stories and his statements are not authentic,then why Muslim scholars quote from his book?Please reed read Tefseer-ib-katheer and (late) mulana Mududi,s tefseer tafeem -ul-Quran.Reed be reasonable and accept the reality.
0
...
written by Reed Wilson. , September 07, 2012
Administrator Sir.

You are reviewing too much. Good that the posts appear but after so much water flown under the bridge.
0
Muhammed - Islam's Sociopathic 'holy prophet'
written by The Infidel Alliance , September 07, 2012
The claim of Muhammed as some sort of 'holy prophet', as some sort of moral standard bearer for the world is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated in the history of humanity.

Factually, as recorded by Muslims in the Koran, Ahadith and Sirat Rasul Allah, far from being a 'holy prophet' Muhammed was in truth a sadistic sociopath and a classic evil tyrant who only came to power through violence, murder, intimidation and fear.

As written in the Islamic 'holy' texts, Muhammed was a mass murderer, a human slaver, a sex slaver and sex trafficker, a brutal torturer, a sadistic hand and foot chopping mutilator, a sexual deviant and serial rapist, a child rapist, a perfidious Satanic possessed liar, a woman abusing misogynist, an intolerant bigot, a looting stealing thief, a genocidal warlord and a self proclaimed terrorist.

By any objective, rational, civilized standard, far from being a 'holy prophet', Muhammed was one of the most vile examples of a man in the pantheon of human history.

Muhammed, who claimed Abrahamic lineage, violated EVERY ONE of God's most basic laws of humanity, the Ten Commandments. In word and deed, Muhammed was a literal anti-Christ, if not THE anti-Christ.

Muhammed was a gran mal narcissist, a Meccan Charles Manson, a 7th century Arabian Hitler, only more successfully evil than either. Muhammed was a moral defective, consumed by unquenchable sexual lust, insatiable material greed, and addicted to sadistic violence and terror.

Like Hitler, Muhammed should be reviled, not revered, and like Manson he should have been incarcerated, not venerated.

Every pathology that afflicts Muslim civilization can be traced directly to this barbarian, Muhammed. And the whole world suffers from the 1400 year legacy of this man, Islam's evil prince.

Please help destroy the myth about Muhammed. Simply expose the truth as written by the early Muslims as recorded in the Islamic 'holy' texts. Please challenge Muslims to defend the indefensible immorality of their 'holy prophet'.

For the good of humanity, Muhammedo delende est!

~ The Infidel Alliance
0
curly...LOL
written by Amboyduke , September 07, 2012
Curlyhammad...are you the brother of Mohammad and Larryhammad?

I think I've seen you on TV...you guys are the "Holy Trinity of Islam"...LOL

Woo-Woo-Woo, nyuk,nyuk,nyuk...LOL
0
What surrat 57 actually says
written by Yibel , September 07, 2012
All that is in the heavens and the earth glorify the creator Al-Muhyiy, The Giver of Life (Babylonian god Marduk, the Mighty) Al-Hakim the Wise One
57:2 He is (Malik) the Sovereignty of the heavens; he is Al-Mumit (the Destroyer, the Bringer of Death)
57:3 He is Al-'Awwal (the First, the Beginning-less), Al-'Akhir (the Last, the Endless), Az-Zahir (the Manifest, The Evident, The Outer), Al-Batin (the Hidden, the Unmanifest, the Inner). He is Marduk, the Knower of all Things.
57:4 He it is (Marduk) Who created the heavens and the earth in Days; then He mounted the Throne. He knoweth all that entereth the earth and all that emergeth therefrom and all that cometh down from the sky and all that ascendeth therein; and He is with you wheresoever ye may be. Marduk is Seer of what ye do.
From the Tablet of the Enuma Elish, the Babylonian Epic of Creation

Marduk was known as the Lord of the Great Throne, the Lord of the Worlds, and the creator of humankind from clots of blood. From his mouth came the fire god Al-Malik, the Islamic Keeper of Hell. Qur'an 96
0
...
written by Reed Wilson. , September 08, 2012
Yibel. People believed Marduk as Lord. Quran denied that and told what the God should be.

What is the problem?
0
The Problem Is....
written by The Infidel Alliance , September 08, 2012
Dear Reed Wilson,

The problem is that 1.2 billion people uphold the criminal sociopath rapist murdering torturing enslaving genocidist terrorist Muhammed as their moral standard bearer.

That is what the problem is.

~ The Infidel Alliance
0
Infidel Alliance
written by Malem , September 11, 2012
They do not look to him as their moral standard bearer you ding dong, leanr about what you are talking to prior to opening your yap lad, otherwise you will sound like a fool as you do above.
0
Dear Malem....
written by The Infidel Alliance , September 11, 2012
Sun·na also Sun·nah  (sn)
n. Islam
1. The way of life prescribed as normative in Islam, based on the teachings and practices of Muhammad and on exegesis of the Koran. Also called hadith.
2. Muhammad's way of life viewed as a model for Muslims.
[Arabic sunna, customary practice, tradition, from sanna, to sharpen, shape, enact; see nn in Semitic roots.]

"Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah. " -  Quran 33:21  

In Islamic theology, al-Insān al-Kāmil (اَلإِنْسَانِ الكَامِلْ, also rendered as İnsan-ı Kâmil انسانِ كامل - in Persian. Turkish, and Urdu), is a term used as an honorific title to describe Muhammad. It is an Arabic phrase meaning "the person who has reached perfection." - Wikipedia

What do these definitions mean Malem?? They mean that in Islamic doctrine and Islamic civilizational consciousness, a slaving, raping, mutilating, torturing, mass murdering, thieving, lying, child raping, amputating, decapitating, sexual deviant, bigoted, misogynist, genocidal warlord terrorist, Muhammed, is the example for all Muslims to emulate.

Could it be any more crystal clear?

I challenge any Muslim to compare the life of Jesus Christ or the Guatama Buddha to the sadistic sociopath Muhammed. There is no comparison.

~ The Infidel Alliance
0
Dear Malem (part 2)...
written by The Infidel Alliance , September 12, 2012
On Sept 6 I wrote:
"whenever there is a discussion of Muhammed, an analysis of Muhammed, or even a cartoon of Muhammed - anything that might expose the truth about this evil man - Muslims do not engage in discussion or analysis, but descend into raging, destructive, murdering, violent mobs.

Terror is the only way Muslims can reconcile the terror of their holy-hellish prophet."

Then, today, Sept 12, we read in the news:
"Protesters angered over a film that ridiculed Islam's Prophet Muhammad fired gunshots and burned down the U.S. consulate in the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi, killing one American diplomat, witnesses and the State Department said. In Egypt, protesters scaled the walls of the U.S. embassy in Cairo and replaced an American flag with an Islamic banner"

But I'm sure in your tiny little mind these Muslim mobs attacking and burning and killing because of a film about Muhammed really had nothing to do with Muslims reverence for Muhammed. It was just purely coincidental I'm sure.

Stop being a blind ostrich Malem and pull your head out of the sand!

~ The Infidel Alliance

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

About the book || Reviews by: Steven Simpson | Abul Kasem | Prof Sami Alrabaa | Ibn Kammuna

islamic-jihad-cover


'Islamic Jihad' in Bangla
islamic-jihad-bangla
Aasma Riaz: "Thank you so much for your book "Islamic Jihad" and showing me the "Big Picture". For 7-8 days, I was glued to your book, absorbing so much information that I did not know existed. You have crisply covered so much in your book and quoted historical references extensively. I am just overwhelmed with different emotions after reading your book..., a priceless tome."

Editor: M A Khan | Site design: Dan Zaremba
Founded on 20 November 2005


Announcements

Sign petition:  Grant Imran Firasat Asylum in the USA

imran-firasat

Proxy Server: To view blocked websites, use this: iwebproxy

Syndication