• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Jinnah or Nehru: Who’s Responsible for India’s Partition?

E-mail Print PDF

India media was in uproar over foreign minister Jaswant Singh’s expulsion from the Bharatiya Janata Party for claiming in his book that Nehru was responsible for India partition in 1947, while Jinnah sought unity. Is Singh shifting blame from Jinnah's shoulder to Nehru's...

"We shall have India divided or we shall have India destroyed."

This is what Jinnah said in the course of India’s independence. And it indeed became a reality.

There was uproar in Indian on Thursday, August 19, over former Indian foreign minister Jaswant Singh’s expulsion from the nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, because his new book holds Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister and freedom struggle icon, responsible for India’s partition in 1947, while praising Jinnah on the issue.

While Singh’s sacking is a different matter, but Jinnah’s above statement, which turned the reality, simply means that Singh shifted the blame for the partition from Jinnah’s shoulder to Nehru’s.

The partition of India had been decided at least in 1930, when Muhammad Iqbal, Pakistan’s spiritual and ideological father, zealously preached in his Presidential Address at the All India Muslim League Meet in Allahabad that ‘The religious ideal of Islam, therefore, is organically related to the social order which it has created. The rejection of the one will eventually involve the rejection of the other’, and then went on two propose the Two Nation theory: ‘I would like to see the Punjab, North-West Frontier Province, Sind and Baluchistan amalgamated into a single state… the formation of a consolidated Northwest Indian Muslim state appears to me to be the final destiny of the Muslims, at least of Northwest India.’ And of course, with the Muslim League’s adoption of ‘Pakistan Resolution’ at Lahore in 1940, it had been sealed; it was only about time.

Any further attempts to keep India united by Hindus and a handful of nationalist Muslim leaders (Abul Kalam Azad and Fazlul Haq etc.) were destined to failure.

Singh’s thesis is based on the argument of Maulana Azad, India’s first Education Minister, who, in his book, “India Wins Freedom”, argued that the partition could have been avoided had Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Patel shown some flexibility over the Cabinet Mission plan.

According to Singh, ‘Nehru believed in a highly centralised polity. That’s what he wanted India to be. Jinnah wanted a federal polity. That even Gandhi accepted. Nehru didn’t. Consistently, he stood in the way of a federal India until 1947 when it became a partitioned India.’

Jinnah was leading the separatist movement as early as 1937, when Iqbal wrote to him: ‘Why should not the Muslims of North-West India and Bengal be considered as nations entitled to self-determination just as other nations in India and outside India are.’ This, according to Iqbal, was need for saving ‘Muslims from the domination of Non-Muslims’.

Just before his death in 1938, Iqbal urged that ‘Muslims should strengthen Jinnah’s hands’ for achieving Pakistan, adding: ‘People say our demands smack of communalism. This is sheer propaganda. These demands relate to the defence of our national existence.’

Efforts to keep India united, continued nonetheless. The 1946 British Cabinet Mission to India released a plan on May 16, calling for a united India, comprising considerably autonomous provinces, formed on the basis of religion. The Congress initially rejected the plan, and the British Mission to release a second plan on June 16, calling for the Partition along religious lines. Jinnah, hoping that power would go only to the party that supported the plan, gave the League’s assent to both plans. But the Congress, eventually, accepted the May 16 proposal, the other.

Jinnah was disappointed for failing to grab all the power. The British Mission, then, advised by Jinnah, proposed formation of an interim government for united India, having equal number of Hindu and Muslim representatives. Muslims, being only about 20% of the population to 75% Hindus, the Congress objected to this arrangement, but agreed to a 12-member cabinet having 6 Hindu, 5 Muslim and another representative from remaining religious groups. However undemocratic, this was a jolly-good deal of Muslims, but Jinnah, who had hoped for all power, would not accede to anything less than 50% Muslim representation, which fitted well with Muslim League’s propaganda that ‘One Muslim should get the right of five Hindus’.

As the new proposal was supported by the British as well, Jinnah condemned the British negotiators of treachery, and quickly washed his hands off further negotiations. He called a Muslim League meet in Bombay on 29 July 1946. Its resolution said, ‘It has become abundantly clear that the Muslims of India would not rest with anything less than the immediate establishment of an independent and full sovereign State of Pakistan’ and urged upon the Muslim masses to undertake ‘Direct Action to achieve Pakistan and get rid of the present slavery under the British and contemplated future caste Hindu domination.’

When Jinnah was pressed on whether the Direct Action would be violent, he ominously replied: ‘I am not going to discuss ethics. We have a pistol and are in a position to use it.’ On his violent instigation, UK’s News Chronicle wrote: ‘…there can be no excuse for the wild language and abandonment of negotiations… Mr. Jinnah is totally wedded to complete intransigence, if, as now seems the case, he is really thirsting for a holy war.’

News Chronicle was prophetic concerning Jinnha’s thirst for “holy war”. There started the Direct Action on 16 August 1946 in Calcutta, the capital of Muslim-majority Bengal (53.4% Muslim), having a Muslim League government. Direct Action was a Jihad for Jinnah and his Muslim League, in the likeness of Prophet Muhammad’s stunning victory at Badr against a much stronger Meccan force; and Jinnah chose the date for Direct Action, coinciding with the day of Badr Jihad, 18th of Ramadan. A Muslim League propaganda pamphlet, read out in mosque sermons, said:

Muslims must remember that it was in Ramzam that the Quran was revealed. It was in Ramzan that the permission for Jehad was granted. It was in Ramzam that the battle of Badr, the first open conflict between Islam and Heathenism [i.e., idolatry, which equates Hinduism] was fought and won by 313 Muslims; and again it was in Ramzan that 10,000 under the Holy Prophet conquered Mecca and established the kingdom of Heaven and the commonwealth of Islam in Arabia. Muslim League is fortunate that it is starting its action in this holy month.

By the grace of God, we are ten cores [100 millions] in India but through our bad luck we have become slaves of the Hindus and the British. We are starting a Jehad in Your Name in this very month of Ramzan. Pray make us strong in body and mind—give Your helping hand in all out actions—make us victorious over the Kafers…

And the rest is history. Excited by inflammatory speeches of Muslim League leaders, the Muslim mob, after the rally, attacked the innocent Hindus and other non-Muslims of Calcutta, unleashing horrible slaughter, rape and arson for one-and-a-half days, before the Hindus and Sikhs (two-third of the population in Calcutta) hit back in like manners. Some 5,000 were dead with ~43% Muslim victims in one count—not as pretty a success as Prophet Muhammad achieved at Badr.

Nonetheless, this set off chain-reaction of violence from East Bengal to West Punjab leading to eventual partition in August 14-15, 1947. And until July 1947, violence was committed almost exclusively by Muslims, except in Bihar (Oct. 1946), where Hindus retaliated against Muslims, reacting to local Muslim instigations, and to their attacks and massacres of Hindus in Calcutta and East Bengal.

Thereafter, the Sikhs and Hindus hit back in East Punjab, as the partition was eventually agreed upon. The rest we all know: massacre of up to two million (evenly divided between Muslims and non-Muslims), rapes of hundreds of thousands (mostly Hindu & Sikh women), forced conversion of millions of non-Muslims and displacement of some 20 million across the border.

Concerning, who was responsible for the partition, enough evidence is presented above. Sri Aurobindo said, ‘The idea of two nationalities in India is only a new-fangled notion invented by Jinnah for his purposes and contrary to the facts’. Hindu Mahasabha leader, Syama Prasad Mookerjee, told the United Provinces Hindu Conference on October 8, 1944: ‘The sooner Mr. Jinnah understands that Pakistan in any form or shape will be resisted by Hindus and many others with the last drop of blood, the better for him…’

Nehru, for himself, was staunchly opposed to the partition, and blamed in his writings, wrongly and unequivocally, the British for forcing the partition upon the harmonious brotherhood (which never existed) of Hindus and Muslims. We have seen too many evidences of Jinnah’s campaign for the partition, but not a single statement, opposing it.

As concerns Nehru's lack of flexibility in forming the Interim Cabinet, it is absurd on the part of Azad and Singh to suggest that Nehru showed no flexibility. He had flexibility way to much by allowing 5 Muslim representatives in a cabinet of 12, when they deserved only 2. What Nehru didn't do is to be ridiculously flexible.

Even if Nehru did that, it was not going to be sustainable in popular democracy that India had proudly emerged as. The result would have been a recipe probably for greater horror, at a later.

Comments (54)Add Comment
Partition was inevitable
written by Ravi , August 23, 2009
No country with more than 20 % muslim population can rest in peace. If partition wount have happened in 1947 then it would have happened by 1960. A muslim group visted british in 1906, when hindus were demanding independence that they have no problem with British rule, and they want dominion over hindus. Thus 20 % of the muslims will rule over hindus and these 20 % will be under british rule. They wanted to kill , rape hindus as per Islam.
Partition was necessary, unfortunately it should have clean one in which all hindus, christians of pakistan should have been brought in India and all muslims should have been thrown to pakistan. Thus pakistan at that time should be hindu, christian free while India should be made muslim free and all mosques should have been removed from India, like what muslims did in pakistan to temples.
No doubt Nehru and Gandhi betrayed hindus by not making India muslim free.
Indian partition
written by balam , August 23, 2009
Britain always had a soft corner in their heart for Muslims because they were good at being subservient and flaterers.The British were arrogant and preferred the Muslim behaviour.They did not like Ghandi for starting the independence movement for India.So they decided to break india into two.They had no right to do that,because it was not their country in the first place.It was the casting vote of Christian leader Mr.Singha,which helped the formation of Muslim Pakistan.Look at now how the Christians are suffering and paying with their blood and suffering humilation in Pakistan.The Muslims who came as invaders to india,should have been sent back to Afghanistan or to Arab Muslim countries.The late Arch-Bishop Runcci of Britain was told by the Bishop of Serjevo during his visit there:You can live beside Muslims but you can not live with them:Some times it is even impossible to live beside these DEADLY POISONOUS SNAKES called Muslims,whose loyality and frienship is always suspect.It is in their Islamic blood.
A Challenge To Muslims
written by Truth Detector , August 23, 2009
Satan's Bible, you Muslims call it the Qur'an, contains no ethics whatsoever. Satan's Bible is all about hatred.

I challenge you to show just one passage in your stupid Qur'an that teaches one lesson on Morality.

I challenge you to show just one passage in your stinky Qur'an that teaches one lesson on Justice.

I challenge you to show just one passage in your evil Qur'an that teaches about Love of Neighbor.

You Muslims can't because Satan's Bible, you call it the Qur'an, contains no lessons on ethics. And still you cling to the evil Qur'an and call it a Holy Book. How can you Muslims continue to lie, and lie, and lie? You shameless pile of lying scum. How dare you say that the Qur'an comes from the True God, the God of Love, the God of the Christians and Jews, the God of the Ten Commandments.

The Qur'an comes from Allah, i.e., Satan, the god of hatred, the god of Islam, the god of Muslims.

written by to balam , August 23, 2009
It was the big mistake of christian leader Mr,Singha to cast his important vote in favour of Pakistan and to trust Mr,Jinnah.Now the whole christian community paying the price of his mistake.If Mr,Jinnah live longer he might honered his promised which he has with religious communities.Now the Pakistan is in Mullah,s hands.This is one of the reason why the non-muslims religious communities are suffering discrimination in their native land.Mullah teach the Quran to muslim childern which is full of hate.unfortunatly Pakistan have no solution of this problem.
Lessons not learned
written by Shakti , August 23, 2009
Even now some christian leaders in India is actively working with muslims to harass hindus. I cant understand why cant christians not target muslims for conversions, but are cooperating with muslims to demand more benefits and ruin hindus. The best cooperation is in Kerela, there muslims and christians are cooperating within themselves. The 80 % of the state benefit goes to muslims and christians while they constitute 45 % The suicide rate among hindus is very high as they are denied any poor person benefit, while muslims etc are given stiphend and state benefit.
Partition was necessary
written by Salim , August 23, 2009
Being a shia ex-muslim from pakistan and now in US, I would say Partition was good in broader context. With rapidly raising muslim population and muslim absurd demands the hindus would have been made slaves using legal democratic means. If pakistan would never happened then both shia and shunni will always remained united against hindus and made hell out of hindus.
Islamic brotherhood against kuffrs is very strong. The muslim males pakistan even dream of Gori, Ghaznavi, Mughals, khilji etc who had lot of harem and raped Hindu girls. Still muslims dread of such times. They have eliminated almost all hindus from pakistan and now want to do with christians. But christians are better organised and they have better voice, so each rape and killings of christian will get media coverage which hindus were denied.

Just hope a example is made out of pakistan and I can expect a great secratrian civil war and disintegration of pakistan, which will show to the world that islam cant unite people and millions will leave islam immediately.
Another is Iraq, although kurds are sunni muslims but sunni arabs dont like them and are always ready to kill them. Shia, Sunni and kurd is a good mix for disaster there.
Also in 1998 when Iran a shia government wanted to attack taliban a sunni , why US and western government opposed it. Shia sunni fight is the best hope to end Islam. Yemen is also one example with 50 % each as shia and shunni.
Jinnah and Nehru may be Agent of British
written by SM , August 23, 2009
After taking over India, the british rule was facing a huge revolt. If you scan the names of the revolutionaries they were all hindus or sikhs. The bengal was the main focal point, many senior British generals, judges etc were assasinated. The Congress Party was created to control the masses through debates only. They next did bengal partition in 1906. Then they propped up muslims using muslim league. Still they feared revolutionaries who were killing british. They found Gandhi and made him popular , by accepting his many small requests. They posted Nehru as his helper and main confidente. Nehru never faced any hardship by british. Also Gandhi was pacifist and british found a tool to stop the revoltionary. Gandhi was against almost all well known leaders like Subhas, Bhagat Singh etc. Gandhi and Nehru were treated very nicely. The British coined the term 'mahatma' for him and gave due media coverage of him. Gandhi was encouraged to think that one day British conscience will force them to give freedom.
Jinnah no doubt a athiest and a opportunist was encouraged by british to prop up muslims. He did that and used muslim card very well. Muslims can be very easily propped up like the relatively peacful muslims in kashmir became fanatic when the mullahs from pakistan made the call in 1989 and started killing hindus. Also many western muslims become fanatic after listening to osama or radical maulvis. Just the radicals have to emphasize the teachings of quran and hadith. Jinnah did like that.
All should know that the so called peacful muslims are the ones who havent read the quran well and hardly know all the teachings.
written by Pakistan a living example of I , August 24, 2009
Indians and Pakistanis come from the same group of people. What differentiates them is Islam and non-Islam. Pakistan is founded on Islamic principle and the "very best" Islam can give. They even have a brilliant scholar Muhammad Iqbal.

Pakistan today is almost in ruins. The more Muslim they are the more chaotic the country becomes. This is scientific proof that where Islam is failure is the ultimate result, the outcome is 100% true.
Pakistan, a liive example of Islam
written by Pakistan, a liive example of I , August 24, 2009
Pakistan is a failed state because of Islam
to the evil or a dog called truth dectator
written by Ashraf , August 24, 2009
The holy Qur'an says..9.28. O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.

you people've got cleanless heart n body.. do not understand truth, if u've understood the truth y would u think that your religion is true? christianity is a junk religion only show offs, you talk about love while not knowing the exact meaning of love, u don like to c any begger at street, u cant c indians, love racism and u bastard talking about morality, love for neighbours and justice? u cnclean man listen, we muslims have been told how to walk, talk respect people, love neighbours, do justice and v even've been instructed how to cut our nails.. what do you christians mean what love is? like romeo juliat and love towards girls? our Prophet(P.B.U.H.) said that "YOU SHOULD NOT ENJOY OR EAT FOOD WHEN YOUR NEIGHBOUR IS HUNGRY" that is the way v muslims are asked to love our neighbours, and justice...Qur'an says 2.193. And fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God, but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression
Permission (to fight) is given to those against whom war is being wrongfully waged, and verily, God has indeed the power to aid them. Those who have been driven from their homelands in defiance of right for no other reason than their saying, ‘Our Lord is God.’ 22:39-40
and now answer me u unclean stinky pagan that is this justice and love and morality what you israelions do to palestine people? and u stinky pagans say that "God loves his children" god and children? shame on u..our prophet(P.B.U.H) said "if u die even for your religion being a debtor(no matter even a small amount) Allah will not forgive you and you'l be a loser". and Prophet(P.B.U.H.) again says that "LOVE YOUR HOMELAND AND DIE FOR IT, IT IS HALF OF YOUR IMAAN(faith).. that is what we are taught not terrorism and unlike you people, now do not point at what muslims doing now, may be they are false and doing wrong, but bot ISLAM, ISLAM is a religion of peace.
Now I challenge you to prove that your false, stolen book is true, and its the words of god, prove if u can u stinky bastard...
written by vbv , August 24, 2009
Partitioning of India is the best thing that could have happened to this country ,except that Nehru and Gandhi should have sent more of these muslims packing to their promised land "Pakistan".

If Jinnah's scheming proposal of a loose federation were accepted ,the muslims would have dominated in different pockets in the present India and Taliban and other muslim fanatics would have gone berseck on a killing spree all over the country decimating non-muslims or forcibly converting them top their barbaric ,uncouth ,filthy savage and immoral cult of islam. Then this would have been a far greater threat to world security than todays Pakistan,Afghanistan,Saudi Arabia,Iraq,Iran, Bangladesh, etc put together having almost 20% of the world's population ,enough cannon-fodder for suicvide-bombing and terrorist activities that will be beyond anyone's control.
The Advanis,Jaswant Singhs of the BJP are a bunch of unprincipled,amoral rascals who want to sift and distort history for political ends . Why? They have lost the previous parliament election, their numbers are declining, and in their desperation of covering up their failures,incompetence and poor governance the rake up non-issues to create an emotional upsurge to curry favour with Indian muslims to garner their votes in the next elections. They are doomed to fail as people can see through their 'dramas' of expulsions,reconcilations,etc.
Therefore , no credence should be given to these rascals hobby of writing their versions of Indian history ,which is fit to be thrown in the dustbin of trashes.
Truth about Mohammad and Islam
written by Balam to Ashraf , August 24, 2009
Your abusive language for Truth Detector was uncalled for.Any way ,you have not been able to reach the stature of your holy prophet,who told one his opponents to :GO AND BITE YOUR FATHER,S COCK and to another:GO and BITE YOUR MOTHER,S CUNT:.Keep trying,you soon will be as good as your HORNY prophet.You quote quran that the Muslims have been promised prosperity.It has not happened so far over the last 1400 years.Can any body in the right mind believe the COCK and CUNT stories of your Quran.That is what quran talks about SEX- a favourite subject of Mohammad.I wonder why ha did not title one sura as SURA COCK and another SURA CUNT.Sorry,Is it cock and Bull or Cock and Cunt? My English is quite bad like Ashraf,s.
To Balam
written by Ashraf , August 24, 2009
Yes our prophet(PBUH) was given a very powerful cock(Bukhari1-5-26smilies/cool.gif and was given permission to have sex with any one he wanted ( Quran 33.50). We love and respect him.
Jinnah\'s Hippocracy
written by Ali , August 24, 2009
Jinnah had never been a religious man,and even made fun of islam in his earlier days. Yet he used religion for political reasons.
to Ashraf
written by Vijay , August 24, 2009
I give you credit for acknowledging that that your prophet was a sex maniac.
Muhammed created islam for sex
written by Allah , August 24, 2009
Muhammed created islam to have sex and his followers increased after he gave them booty.
Muhammed is now enjoying 72 satanic houris in hell or Allah's paradise.
Request to muslims call all your above 15 years old and wage a war against China, they will send all of you to your muhammed's haven, enjoy the 72 houris there and let we kaffirs enjoy earth.
join paltalk, watch christian dissecting islam
written by indian_kufr_100% , August 25, 2009
Am a hindu, and i liked the dissecting of islam and of the mohammadens in his paltalk show "christ is lord islam is false debate room' he himself an arab convert from islam and he is thorough with quran, hadith and all things islamic than 99% of muslims. He attcks islam with the help of quran and hadiths and is a very humurous person. Though i donot like the evangalisation but the thorn has to be taken out by needle. you may join paltalk to join his room and expand your knowledge about islam.
to all pagans-the coward
written by Ashraf , August 25, 2009
beaware of these scums.. these non-mislims using somebodies name n posting bad comments.. this site encourage such things and that is why it is developed.. somebody used my name(Ashraf) to degrade or prophet(P.B.U.H.) some coward, bastard did that to uphold his Qaafir's arguement.. now i request all the people that plz do not belive the people who's against Islam and publish false story of our belove prophet(P.B.U.H.) in this site(like Ashraf - To Balam) coz they themselves know that they are wrong and they can not defend themself and can not prove Islam wring, and theu thats y somebody belong to them used my name and posted that, they must be a group of people using different names of muslims and replying to their own comments oftern.. how shamefull and hollow these uncleans pagans are.. Allah hates them for sure..
written by Ashraf , August 25, 2009
y do u cowards do such things.. accept your defeat of stay quite and stay out our way.. y do u people somebodies name and reply yourself? cowards.. this not men attitude,, it shows that how weak and corrupted tou people are. intentionally, even knowing that you people are wrong and islam is good and peaceful, ur creating all these things.. may be you're not too different from the pagans then at the time of our prophet(P.B.U.H.) who did not belive while our prophet splited the moon when requested.. they said its your magic v don belive u.. thats y Allah says, Surely he(Allah) shows the righteous path upon him whom he likes. it's clear that Allah do not like u.. i can only pity on u people...
to All...
written by Ashraf , August 25, 2009
This not true..
(Ashraf - To Balam |2009-08-24 13:05:28

Yes our prophet(PBUH) was given a very powerful cock(Bukhari1-5-26smilies/cool.gif and was given permission to have sex with any one he wanted ( Quran 33.50). We love and respect him. )

do not belive it... somebody did it to mislead u people.. do not belive it plz...
to all qafirs..
written by Ashraf , August 25, 2009
End of the World Revealed*

[33:63] The people ask you about the Hour (end of the world). Say, "The knowledge thereof is only with GOD. For all that you know, the Hour may be close."

The Followers Turn On Their Leaders

[33:64] GOD has condemned the disbelievers, and has prepared for them Hell.

[33:65] Eternally they abide therein. They will find no lord, nor a supporter.

[33:66] The day they are thrown into Hell, they will say, "Oh, we wish we obeyed GOD, and obeyed the messenger."

[33:67] They will also say, "Our Lord, we have obeyed our masters and leaders, but they led us astray.

[33:68] "Our Lord, give them double the retribution, and curse them a tremendous curse."

[33:69] O you who believe, do not be like those who hurt Moses, then GOD absolved him of what they said. He was, in the sight of GOD, honorable.

[33:70] O you who believe, reverence GOD and utter only the correct utterances.

[33:71] He will then fix your works, and forgive your sins. Those who obey GOD and His messenger have triumphed a great triumph.

Freedom of Choice

[33:72] We have offered the responsibility (freedom of choice) to the heavens and the earth, and the mountains, but they refused to bear it, and were afraid of it. But the human being accepted it; he was transgressing, ignorant.*

[33:73] For GOD will inevitably punish the hypocrite men and the hypocrite women, and the idol worshiping men and the idol worshiping women. GOD redeems the believing men and the believing women. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.
to Ashraf
written by apr , August 25, 2009
Ashraf, How do know, what ever you said is god's words ???
Do you think , God is an idiot, like Mohammed?

[33:73] For GOD will inevitably punish the hypocrite men and the hypocrite women, and the idol worshiping men and the idol worshiping women. GOD redeems the believing men and the believing women. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

See the contrary , GOD is forgiver , Most merciful , But he will punish idol worshiping men and women.

[33:68] "Our Lord, give them double the retribution, and curse them a tremendous curse." Is he a god or evil Spirit

( what the F??? GOD is forgiver , Most merciful ?????)

[33:71] He will then fix your works, and forgive your sins. Those who obey GOD and His messenger have triumphed a great triumph.

Here obeying GOD is ok.But Why to obey a Pedo & rapist ??
Is it not clear that Pedo wanted power and added his words here.

These words are from Pedo MO and not from God. You guys are not able to see this because you are brain dead. Certainly you will be punished for following the pedo, mass murderer,looter,rapist , etc ....

Judgment Day ?? Balls !
Few thoughts on Islam by Indian muslims
written by Indian , August 25, 2009
Infact all Indians and the world has a right to know what the muslim leaders have said for India and Hindus in the light of always blaming hindus for all the problems in India, the latest ICRF of report of US is biased as usual neglecting the role of evangelical missionaries and havoc caused by them everywhere on the name of welfare.

I am reproducing entire article for people to judge:-
What Muslim Leaders have said
17/08/2009 04:32:49 (Courtesy: Rashtriya Chetna, Aug. 2006)

Abul Kalam Azad : Abul Kalam Azad, while addressing his students, said “A country like India, which has once been under Mohammedan rule, must never be given up, and it was incumbent on them to strive to regain their lost contol.”
On another occassion, Maulana Azad, who held the responsible position of the president of All India Congress, burst out venomously in an irresponsible manner: “Against the non-Muslim Government, Islam prescribes only sword, protracted battle and the cutting of throats.”

Liaqat Ali Khan : Liaqat Ali Khan was the secretary of the Muslim League. He was the right hand of Jinnah. It was Liaqat Ali, who, during the election campaign in 1946, boasted in Delhi. “The Muslim is a born fighter. He may hesitate to cast a vote for Pakistan, but he would not hesitate to shed his blood.” After the partition, he became the first prime minister of Pakistan. Nature is too strict and stern to spare anybody. Liaqat Ali, who got Pakistan through artifical riots, did not die a natural death. He was assassinated.

H.S. Suhrawardy : Hassan Shahid Suhrawardy was political disciple of Jinnah. He is notoriously known in history as the great killer of Hindus in the Calcutta massacre. While addressing the Muslim League Legislators’ Convention held in Delhi on April 9, 1946, Suhrawardy declared like Hitler that Pakistan was the Muslims’ latest, but not the last demand, and that if the British rulers entrusted the destiny of India to the Congress, the Muslim League would not allow the Central Government to function even for a day. On another occasion he, in his capacity as chief minister of Bengal, threatened: “If the Congress was entrusted with power at the Centre, I would declare Bengal independent.”

Feroz Khan Noon : Feroz Khan Noon, a fanatic leader of the Muslim League, while addressing the Muslim League legislators’ meeting, said: “The havoc, that the Muslims would play, would put to shame what Changez Khan and Halaku did.”

Ghaznafar Ali Khan : Ghaznafar Ali Khan, who was the health minister in the Viceroy’s Interim Government, headed by Pandit Nehru, spoke at Lahore: “If Mohammed-Bin-Kasim and Mahmood Ghaznavi could invade India with armies composed of a few thousands, and yet were able to overpower lakhs of Hindus, God willing a few lakhs of Muslims will yet overwhelm crores of Hindus.” It was he, who openly advised Hindus to embrace Islam to save themselves from the holocaust.

Dr. Ali Mohammed Naqvi : Dr. Ali Mohammed Naqvi was a follower of the Deoband School of Islamic ideology, which totally thwarted the concept of nationalism and democracy. He authored a book, Islam and Nationalism, in which he unequivocally stated: “Nationalism is incompatible with Islam... The concept of a ‘nationalist Muslim’ is as absurd as that of a ‘religious Communist’ or ‘capitalist Marxist’. ..... When the ideology of Islam expands, nationalism is destroyed, and when nationalism grows, Islam is annihilated.”

Hamid Dalwai : Hamid Dalwai, a nationlist Muslim and true son of Hindusthan, rightly reveals the attitude of fanatic Muslims in his book, Muslim Politics in India. He unambiguously states: “In sum, Muslims cannot reconcile themselves with the nationalism of any country, where they are in a minority.”

F.K. Khan Durrani : In the preface to his book. The Meaning of Pakistan, Mr. Durrani boastfully brags: “There is not an inch of the soil of India which our forefathers did not once purchase with their blood. We cannot be false to the blood of our fathers. India, the whole of it, is therefore our heritage, and it must be reconquered for Islam.... Our ultimate ideal should be the unification of India, spiritually as well as politically under the banner of Islam. The final political salvation of India is not otherwise possible.”

Attaullah Suhrawardy : Attaullah Suhrawardy, a senior leader of the National Conference of Kashmir, and former minister and deputy speaker of Kashmir, unquivocally asserted in his speech in the state legislative council: ‘I am first a Muslim and then an Indian. Islam does not need the support of anyone for its spread. It is spreading on its own. At the time of partition, there were only four and a half crore Muslims in the country. However, in spite of the bloody communal riots in Bhiwandi, Moradabad, Aligarh and other areas, killing thousands of Muslims, the population of Muslims has increased to 14 crores, .....As for the question of conversion of all to Islam, it is the fundamental duty of a Muslim to strive for conversion and any Muslim who does not remember this duty, does not deserve to be called a Muslim.”

Syed Ali Shah Geelani: Syed Ali Shah Geelani, a leader of Jama’at-i-islami categorically expresses his political ideology: “The politics of socialism and secularism is totally unsound. I do not like any Muslim to adopt socialsim and secularism as his political ideal.”

Dr. Mushir-ul-Haq : Dr. Mushir-ul-Haq honestly unfolds the inner psyche of the Muslims of India in his book, Islam in Secular India. He candidly states: “The Muslim community of India also welcomed the idea of a secular state, because they feared the alternative would be a Hindu State. Many of them seem to believe that the state must remain secular, but the Muslims should be saved from secularism.”

Syed Ahmad Hussain : Syed Ahmad Hussain, another leader of Jama’at-i-Islami addressed the Muslims in a mosque in Aurangabad on February 7, 1961: “Shall the Muslims with all their ideology merge into sweeping current of secularism or change the current itself and establish the sovreignty of Islam? That is the serious question which confronts the Mussalmans of India today. Islam has been born to turn the whole world into Islamic. We have to change this secular rule in Bharat and establish Islamic rule in its place. The idea of secular rule is itself a contradiction of Islam. We have, therefore, to slowly work for the establishment of the sovereignty of Islam here.”

Syed Shahabuddin : Syed Shahabuddin, MP, the leader of Samata Party, once expressed his venomous views: “Muslims should have ruled India after the departure of the British, and not the Hindus. Population growth helped Muslims to annex a large part of India for creating a separate Islamic State of Pakistan. Such efforts on the part of the Muslims should be continued to gradually convert the rest of India into Dar-ul-Islam (land of the Muslims).”

Syed Abdullah Bukhari : Syed Abdullah Bukahri, the Imam of Jama Masjid Delhi, poured out a poisonous statement in December 1986: “Secularism has no place in Islam. Propagation of Islam is the first duty of Muslim. Muslim youths will propagate Islam with swords in their hands.”

On another occasion in 1987, he openly uttered: “I consider Islam greater than the country. I am first a Muslim, then everything else.... For me there is no meaning to Independence Day (of India)..... I have told Muslims thousands of time and telling them again to burn down bungalows of Muslim ministers of the Congress Party, cut off their legs and throw them away. Islam is first, nation afterwards.”

Azam Khan : Azam Khan, the then MLA of UP Legislative Assembly burst into vile words against the motherland, Bharat Mata, at a public meeting in Kanpur on March 23, 1987: “Is this our motherland? This is a blood-thirsty mother. This is not mother, this is a witch.”

Salahuddin Oweisi : Salahuddin Oweisi, a member of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly, publicly suggested: “There should be a separate Muslim state within each state of India.”

In sharp contrast to all this, Jagadguru Shankaracharya of Sringeri, in his interview , said that Muslims are our brothers as our forefathers were common. Hence I wish them prosperity and happiness.

This article is long but till now whatever mr khan has said is true even my research agrees with him. May he succeed in his mission to save India and world from dangers of Islam
Further i researched on tips of Mr Khan
written by Indian , August 25, 2009
I searched on the reasons of riots post partition of India , as Mr Khan told many times.
I read a startling book and testimony of petition filed in Calcutta High court regarding Quran - insinuating violence in muslims to kill kafirs, to ban production of this in 1947 by two hindus by Chandmal Chopra of Calcutta.It was he who filed a Writ Petition in the Calcutta High Court on 29 March 1985 stating that publication of the Quran attracts Sections 153A and 295A of the I.P.C. because it ?incites violence, disturbs public tranquility, promotes, on ground of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities, and insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India?. He also prayed for a rule nisi on the Government of West Bengal ?to show cause as to why a writ of mandamus be not issued to it directing it to declare each copy of Quran whether in the original Arabic or in any of the languages as forfeited to the Government? in terms of Section 95 of the Cr.P.C.
The refrences are

The Calcutta Quran Petition, Compiled with an introduction by Sita Ram Goel , Voice of India, New Delhi

Infact the high court admitted the petition
Their are other books which are worth reading on Islam and Niyogi commission reports at this portal

Infact every intelligent person should do the same as done by the above gentleman in the High courts/supreme courts so that atleast awakening should come. This book is worth reading as it confirms what many have said on Islam and it explains everything as per laws
Rebuttal of wishy washy muslim Asfraf
written by Real muslim Ashraf , August 25, 2009
What we real muslims say and believe (like Bin Laden )is based on quran and hadiths. We real muslims are proud that our prophet had a very powerful cock.Wishy washy ignorant muslims like the other Ashraf disputes this fact..All he knows is filthy language and what his PC mullah says, not real prophet and real islam . Real islam calls for killing and robbing kafirs and fking their women and our prophet was sent to do just that, that is why he was given a supercock and super sword (called zulfiqar)....
Here are some of many sahih hadiths that shows that our prophet(PBUH) had an awesome tool

Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:

“Prophet was given the strength (sexual) of thirty men”.

Apostle could make love (continuously) to all his wives (9 to 11) in one night.

Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:

"The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number. Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men)."

Our prophet was allowed by Allah to have sex with any one he wanted to make use of his poweful tool. Here is the aya
PICKTHAL: O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives ,and those whom thy right hand possesseth(captured women) and, your first cousins , and any believing woman if she give herself unto the Prophet and the Prophet desire to have sex with her( word used is nikah which means having sex in arabic and which is mistranslated as marriage by P.C. translaters) .

Our prophet was a real man who could behead a kafir and fk his widow right afterwards. It takes the dick of a superman to perform this feat. Here are two hadiths:
Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:
Narrated Anas:
Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their men killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya (17 year old lovely wife of beheaded Kinana) was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet.

"Sirat e Rasulullah by Ibn Ishaq"

“Safiyah was captured in the Khaibar raid and was claimed by the apostle as his share of booty.. She was then seventeen. She was groomed and made-up for the Prophet by Umm Sulaim, the mother of Anas ibn Malik. They spent the night there. In the early dawn, the Prophet suspected some movement near the tent ( during the night he was too involved to notice ) . He went out to enquire ( lucky for Ayyub that apostle was on the road and did not have a sharp edged arrow handy) and saw Abu Ayyub (apparently Abu Ayyub did not get a captured woman in that raid). He asked him what he was doing near his tent.He replied: "I was afraid for you with this young lady. You had killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives, and till recently she was an unbeliever. I was really afraid for you on her account and was guarding you". The Prophet (either bought the lie or felt pity for the horny man who had put his life on line in the raid yet was without a captured woman and spent the night drooling) prayed for Abu Ayyub al-Ansari.
Now Mr. sanitized Asraf, dont say you dont believe in quran and sunna.
Tol Ashraf
written by Zeke , August 25, 2009
Surely your prophet was quite a stud to bang eleven women in one night. Only a real prophet can do it. I am ready to convert.
Partition - Good for Subcontinent
written by Ex-Muslim from Lahore , August 26, 2009
Neither Jinnah nor Nehru were responsible for partition; it was the separatist poison injected in the Muslim veins by Dr. Iqbal in 1930. Nehru was just smart to know that to save the subcontinent, he needed to get the savage Muslims away from the rest of the country.

That decision turned out to be right! India goes on to become a world power, and Pakistan turned out to be a beggar nation, living on charity and aid of others, submerged in the filth of the religion of Islam and its feudalism.

The separatist, anti-establishment cancer runs so deep in the Muslim veins that now they want to further subdivide Pakistan via My Punjab, My Sindh, etc. movements. After that, there will be My Shia Punjab, My Sunni Punjab, . . . . . stay tuned.
To Ex-Muslim from Lahore
written by Ex-Muslim from Karachi , August 27, 2009
You said it all and you are asbsolutely right. Iqbal, himself an athiest,grandson of a kashmiri brahman (who wrote blasphemous "Shikwa" and after being declared an apostate by mullahs and was given death threats, changed his stripes and wrote "Jawab e Shikwa and was declared Allama by same mullahs) used islam to demand Pakistan . Jinnah another athiest ( who never prayed,loved whiskey, ate pork , married an infidel and made fun of Islam before Pakistan but later prohibited his daughter to marry an infidel and was seen joining congregational prayers ) used jihadi violence to achieve Pakistan.
jinnah was responsible for indias partition
written by aanand kapoor , August 29, 2009
jinnah was totally responsible .
to ashraf
written by Alex , August 30, 2009
No point in calling us 'infidels' "cowards". Muslims are the biggest losers in the world. They have invented nothing , not even the AK47 they tereasure most nor any of the weaponry,gadgetry,the vehicles,etc.

You gun down innocent ,unarmed civilians , explode ieds ,bombs in public places, stab in the back ,show your frustrations about being so backward and dependent on 'infidels' inventions ,be it pencil,mobile phone,car,articles of comfort ,etc. What is your contribution to human civilisation? Nothing ,but you have an idealogy that would take everyone to stone-age savagery and barbarianism.

No,Ashraf, you cannot call muslims brave , just yellow cowards steeped in green jealousy,avaricious,indolent,good for nothing worst vermins with a lecherous man who invented this cult of criminality of the worsty kind through,murder,looting,rape,slavery.lechery,highway robbery,brigandery of the worst kind, inhumane,cruel and barbaric. Even stone-age people were far more civilised than you muslims - the most cowardly ,immoral and criminal mafia cult!
stop blaming eachother
written by Kristina , September 12, 2009
August 15 1947, presented itself with a massacring of tens of thousands of innocent civilians. Tens of thousands of women were also raped and killed with utmost brutality. The irony lies with the fact that such a brutal day is still celebrated as India’s ‘National Independence Day.’ The partition was soon seen as nothing more than devastating as the riots clamed the lives of many of the innocent civilians. Woman would be seen with their young, crossing borders with severed breasts and broken hearts. Religion had come to its breaking point. India had been lead to hell on earth. Never had India been seen in such a light, and never shall we forget. The aftermath of these disastrous events have not yet healed and are an unavoidable aspect of the Indian society today.

the aftermath will be with us always, and it is something we are unable to change no matter what we do. so why are you still fighting today? there has been an excessive amout of hatred between religions... He said to love your neighbor! stop being so vicious towarrds each other... too many innocent people have died already, simply keep your religion as something sacred to yourself. the rest He (god) will look after.
written by LDD , September 15, 2009

Open the daily newspaper. All the wars, so called "liberation" movements and calls for independence are being made by Muslims. Not Hindus, not Christians.

And you show great hypocrisy when you say you have been shown to do so many things properly in life. If you are true, then it should show in the current position of Indian and Pakistan of today.

India is the fastest developing places in the world, true we have our problems but at the same time we are stable and developing.

Pakistan on the other hand, has gone to the dogs, every territory in Pakistan wants independence, but DIDNT YOU JUST SAY THAT MUSLIMS LIVE TOGETHER AS BROTHERS ?

Then why is Pakistan in such shit ??

Think before you talk ...
written by jaisingh thakur , September 19, 2009
written by Mabus , September 24, 2009
I dont understand why the hell are u featuring only pakistan as an islamic state...there are so many islamic c ountries which are pretty doing well,dubai for example...u are talking about pakistan,country in which militants calling themselves muslims itself destroy muslims....by the way militants dont ve religion.they r just terrorists.and they do exists in all relligions ...i can imagine u r fate after death.....oh allah please forgive these people who question u r identity....guide them rightly...
I love to f**k hindu girls
written by thanda pani , September 24, 2009
Hindu are really mother fuker, they lost the some part of India now pakistan, trying to revenge from Indian muslims in the name of babri masjeed etc etc.

only one thing can solve the problem, fuck as much as hindu girls, have muslim babies to become India a muslim state.
written by mabus , September 25, 2009
every religion is holy to himself...let the god decide who has to be punished and who ti be rewarded..he knows the best...i am lucky..so are u
written by khan , October 18, 2009
the people like u are bastards who try to divide the country. just fuck fff
What we are will define our future
written by Darkstar , November 26, 2009
"As we sow we reap."
Simple as that, we all pay for our sins. Both India and Pakistan are paying for there
sins. I can not judge any of above as not gone through any of it. But as i see if we continue to have grudge against people or religion I see we are doomed.

Best thing is that we all people consider GOD to be most powerful person, one who created heaven,earth and all living beings and control our lives and bless or punishes us as per our deeds. But some where we all have forgotten this an have took upon ourself to fight for him. Best is let God decide.

God made us human being. It seems we are turning ourselves into Evil here. Just think about this if you had a life do you want to be what you are becoming now or to be a good man.

What man is a man, who does not make this earth a better place to live.
ridiculous racists
written by nobody , December 03, 2009
How disrespectable some of the readers are on this article!!!! The lot of you who have written terrible things about religion should check yourselves because we are not here to judge or discriminate religion, or deeply offfend religious beliefs. Read the article for what it is and leave the racist comments aside
written by nobody , December 03, 2009

We're all equal, and it's a shame that people like you haters can't understand that. Watch what comes out pf your mouths, as no matter what religion you are, your religion will surely not allow you to be so damn rude!!!
truely indian
written by iqbal khan , December 15, 2009
jinnah just learnt an age old british policy:

divide and rule

and thats wht he worked on in 1940s... his interest wasnt the muslim well being but to gain popularity..... unlike gandiji we never saw jinnah walking bare feet and taking part in national movements but we always saw him wearing english suit and attending parties with britishers.....

Jinnah or Nehru
written by Dipu , October 12, 2010
In many ways the Hindus are also responsible for this because the hindu leaders of this country only for muslim votes gives advantages only to muslim , such an example are the mother f****r bastards communists of India and Mulayam singh yadav , lallu , Mamata banerjee and the so called congress party , beware of this and be all united in India
India to all of us
Dipu .
the truth
written by amarkov , October 13, 2010
the land of pure is saudi arabia, they have masses of land and sand, would be convenient to go there to live, now they want kahsmir, even though it was already divided, continue, but we know your country is submerged and will soon disintegrate
written by sangeer purayil , November 20, 2010
i am surprised and shocked by seeing so much ignorance and hatred in the comments written by so called human beings. its no wonder partition happened and no wonder, if there is more to come. Shame on those who spread nothing but poison.
To the "Truth Detector" (If possible convert your name to "The lie seeker")
written by Enlighten , May 15, 2011
@Truth Detector: Have u ever read Quraan? I just can smile on ur challange... U named urself "Truth Detector" !! truth can be detected blindly, cant it be?
How many verses u want?
Quran: 26:88-89
Al-Qur’an 7:33
Quran 16:90
Quran 5:8
Quran 5:8
Quran 6:152
Quran 4:36
and it goes on........
I m not providing you the text coz u r Truth Detector, so please go through these verses and I challenge, u will forget the count of lessons about Justice, Love, Mercy, Forgiveness, Truthfulness...
To all the abusers
written by Enlighten , May 15, 2011
To all who abuse Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H) I request to read about him and his life at least once then blame coz blindness is a curse and the curse can not lead u to the truth....
written by steadyfriend , May 15, 2011
Readers here have read the Quran, the Hadith and the Sirat in detail and precisely because of that they are able to judge Muhammad on the nefarious actions he followed throughout his life !

Two points arise:

1) Dissecting and evaluating one's actions is NOT "abusing" him, as you imply in your statement above, and

2) Muhammad brought nothing but misery to all people he came in contact with, starting with the non-muslim inhabitants of Arabia (he and his followers gave them the choice of conversion to Islam or death) and a similar
choice to all other non-muslim people outside Arabia, like in Iran, Egypt, Syria, Turkey etc. Else, no one in his/her right mind would willingly give up his/her existing beliefs and adopt an alien faith bereft of humanity ! For example, the original Zoroastrian religion of the Iranians was much superior to Islam it its outlook, but the Iranians were sadly forced to take up this new inferior Arab faith.
Muslim partitions
written by steadyfriend , May 15, 2011
Wherever muslims are in significant numbers, they call for and strive for partition, viz in India, and in Cyprus. No wonder, the Chinese call muslims "splittists" !

I am afraid the same fate would befall England, France and other western democracies when muslim numbers have risen sufficiently in these places.

Islam is simply unfit to co-exist with other faiths peacefully in a multicultural society ! Their supramacist and exclusivist attitude sets them apart ! Such a society did exist in Mecca, Medina and all over Arabia in pre-Islamic times and see what Muhammad did to that place !!
to all u immature f**ks around
written by INDIAN , August 18, 2011
India and pakistan were the same country once which means v all existed in one society. All u pakistani f**ks learn from great indian muslims how to contribute to a social structure to achieve development. Hindu-muslim-christan r one v are bloody humans. @ 'i like to f**k hindu girls' if u f**kin step in india i'll personally chop ur horny dick off and feed it to zardari. Its time for all indians to stand up to corruption and stand with ANNA. Lets do it people
to all immature f**ks around
written by INDIAN , August 18, 2011
Please dont get emotional u islamic followers. As an indian my brain has been developed to think on the lines of justice to society or think about development or think about corruption. In india v are the worlds largest democrasy and we always think about getting our country into UN permanent member in the security council. We are at this stage of development and i dont expect my islamic friends to understand this cause they're brain runs on the contents of one book but an Indian brain runs on the socio-economic polices of the country... SO PLEASE SHUT THE f**k UP U IGNORANT FOOLS
Nehru and Mountbatten colluded
written by Mozlem , August 18, 2011
Nehru was bedding Edwina. She made sure he got the primemistership and Mountbatten a place in history.
Read Nehrus history. In hindshight it was a good decision.
written by manoj,hyderabad , December 10, 2011
That rump entity breakaway territory of India that calls itself Pakistan needs to be invaded and occupied by either the Hindus or the Christians though it is primarily the responsibility of the Hindus because it is they who allowed the territory to break away and become a center for global terror. We are engaged in a generational conflict in the war on Islam, and like the Hindus have been fighting the Muslims for over 1000 years. Hindus and Christians are natural allies. We need the support of the Hindu religious and political leaders to isolate and destroy Islam from the region. By defeating Islam militarily we can compel the Muslims to accept Hinduism. But this news is a disappointing to say the least! If THIS is the way the way the Hindu leaders compromise and betray the cause then all we can say is we Christians remain committed to carrying forward our cause without their help. We had high hopes from Mr.Modi. Earlier his fight against the Muslims was unrelenting and he had our admiration and respect.. Now he seems to be succumbing to the general compromising attitude adopted in the sub-continent. India allows bits of its territory to break away and become failed states and hotbeds of terrorism. its fights inconclusive military conflicts with its own break away rump entities ; the last being in 1971 when it occupied its own former territory renamed it as Bangladesh and then promptly let it go to become yet another failed state. None of the Hindu leaders not even the religious ones call for the re-integration of these break away entities; none of the Hindu political or religious leaders call for uncompromising support to the USA in its war on Islam. None of the Hindu leaders (not even the great warrior Guru Tackray )congratulate us Americans in our victories against Islam and great battles we fought such as at Falluja in Iraq or in Kandahar delivering a heavy blow to the Muslims. We fight alone and unaided but we want the goodwill and love of the Hindus because their fight is our fight.We hurt when brave committed crusaders like Guru Tackray, and Mr Modi are silent and ambivalent in their support for the USA. But our fight goes on. We will soon be driving to the and lean over to shake Mr. Modi's hand
dnt speak shit when u dnt have a clue.......
written by for truth detector , January 14, 2012
dont u utter shit when u know nothing about Islam....first know the facts about something and then write about it.... am a Muslim and a proud one because in know my religious values and i follow them... and BTW the picture of Islam that is portrayed today by a minor group of illiterate Muslims is not what defines my religion, as they always say 'half knowledge is injurious' and it no knowledge at all.....
@for truth detecto
written by M. A. Khan, editor , January 14, 2012
BTW the picture of Islam that is portrayed today by a minor group of illiterate Muslims is not what defines my religion
Show us how Muhammad's Islam was better than that of today's "minor group of illiterate Muslims".

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.


About the book || Reviews by: Steven Simpson | Abul Kasem | Prof Sami Alrabaa | Ibn Kammuna


'Islamic Jihad' in Bangla
Aasma Riaz: "Thank you so much for your book "Islamic Jihad" and showing me the "Big Picture". For 7-8 days, I was glued to your book, absorbing so much information that I did not know existed. You have crisply covered so much in your book and quoted historical references extensively. I am just overwhelmed with different emotions after reading your book..., a priceless tome."

Editor: M A Khan | Site design: Dan Zaremba
Founded on 20 November 2005


* Aisha and Muhammad, the movie:

Bill Maher: 'Islam is the worst'
• Bill Maher on "72 Virgins"