Within the past few decades, mosques have increasingly dotted the landscapes of American and European cities and towns, with mega mosques often overshadowing adjacent, centuries-old churches in predominantly Christian regions. Islamic schools or academies and a host of Muslim organizations have become omnipresent across the West.
Meanwhile, Americans and Europeans have made countless accommodations to Muslim demands. They have included footbaths; high-decibel, five-times-daily calls to prayer; segregated male-female gym and swimming pool hours; halal food; workplace dispensations for handling pork products and for female head and face coverings; and special, public prayer rooms. Also, shari'ah-compliant financial transactions, the expunging of offensive likenesses of Mohammed or imagined depictions of Arabic characters that connote "Allah," official swearings-in on Korans in place of customary Bibles, the neutralizing of official descriptive language about Islamists and the jihad, the revision of so-called offensive content in movies and television programs, the removal of representations of pigs from the public sphere, and many other acculturations to Muslim entreaties have all been made in the service of respecting Muslim religious beliefs and practices.
To those in Western democracies, these accommodating actions appear, on the surface, to be little more than harmless civil gestures, respecting the needs of a growing religion in their midst and welcoming a new addition to their proud, multicultural tradition. Many Westerners pat themselves on the back for their liberal bent, their tolerance and their open-mindedness.
Little do they realize that this strategic pattern of demands is part of an insidious, 1,400-year-old proscription for Muslims that originates in the Koran and the Sunnah, the deeds of Mohammed. It is the Hijra or doctrine of immigration. Modeled by Mohammed's migration from Mecca to Medina, this immigration is not to a romanticized melting pot wherein newcomers gratefully search for opportunities for a better life in liberty and freely offer their talents and loyalty to benefit their new homeland. This is immigration for Islamic expansionism employing ethnic separatism to gain special status and privileges within the host country. Hijra is immigration designed to subvert and subdue non-Muslim societies and pave the way for eventual, total Islamization.
In their compelling book, "Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration," authors Sam Solomon, a former professor of shari'ah law and convert to Christianity, and Elias Al Maqdisi, an expert on Islamic teachings, explain the migration of Muslims to the Dar-al-Harb, the "land of war," as a religious edict with a basis in Islamic doctrine. They delineate the step-by-step process of this 1,400-year-old strategy of conquest. It is a transitional strategy which they characterize as the most important step in spreading Islam and preparing for jihad. From their carefully delineated treatise on Hijra, it is clear that migration in concert with military conquest comprise the bookends of Islamic expansionism.
Solomon and Al Maqdisi review the phases of the Hijra and its juristic or legal basis in Islamic doctrine. Under the cover of taquiya or deception, the step-by-step methodology of the migration process is designed to subdue, then, subjugate the host culture, culminating in implementation of shari'ah law.
The beginning phase of Islamization usually includes activities pivotal to building a physical presence. It consists of public calls to prayer; founding of schools, libraries and research centers; and the teaching of Arabic -- actions that appear to be reasonable and respectable infrastructure requirements necessary to support the presence of a faith. At this point in the Hijra, it is permissible for Muslims to engage in haram, or forbidden actions, out of necessity to establish and empower the umma or Muslim community. Koranic rules such as the prohibition against friendships with infidels are suspended while the objectives of future Islamization are systematically put into place. In its initial phase, the Hijra passes scrutiny by the West whose citizens erroneously view the migration as mainly economic -- a pilgrimage for a better life.
Solomon and Maqdisi examine the comprehensive strategy that begins with the establishment of the umma or Muslim community. The mosque becomes the locus of power, a strategic base and the center of all activities. They explain how in this embryonic phase, a top priority is the scouting for new arrivals to expand and empower the existing Muslim community. Muslim leaders offer solicitous assistance and helpful suggestions for schools, housing, mosque worship, halal markets and other services to ingratiate themselves with new arrivals and bring them into the local Muslim community. Agents of local mosques, ever alert for new immigrants and potential converts, engage in subtle forms of indoctrination and police local Muslims.
This first step of establishing the mosque as the center of local Islamic life and activities is mistakenly viewed by non-Muslims as merely the benign construction of houses of worship. Its true goal escapes notice, that of firmly establishing a purposeful non-integrated Muslim identity to advance the goal of Islamization.
Once the consolidation of the Muslim community occurs under the radar, the purposeful fight for special status and shari'ah follows. As dictated by the Koran and Sunnah, segregation from non-Muslims is a natural outcome of the advancement of the Hijra.
Visible changes begin to be apparent as the Muslim population achieves more of a critical mass. Over time, the dress code, often beginning with a hijab in segregated enclaves and moving toward the complete covering of a neqab in the public sphere, separates Muslim women from men and from non-Muslim women. Eventually, as the host population becomes familiarized with what they believe to be the requirements of religious piety, demands are made for segregation at public facilities, in the workplace and at schools and universities. Requests for halal food, shari'ah-compliant financial transactions and the addition of Muslim holidays to public calendars further elevate the Muslim community with a special status making them separate and distinct.
All demands are initially presented as benign attempts to accommodate the religious requirements of devout Muslims. Any actions to suppress them are decried as religious discrimination. In the United States, requests for separate swimming and gym hours for Muslim men and women, demands for identification photos for licenses for women wearing hijabs and refusals to handle pork products or don immodest dress in the workplace have appeared. At this point, representatives of the Muslim community are often working cooperatively with the host government to bring about change. As Solomon and Maqdisi explain, the idea is to get the host society accustomed to Muslim buildings, customs, holidays, dress and food. Newcomers are encouraged by Muslim leadership to become citizens, vote and run for political office to increase the umma's influence.
At the university level, students are indoctrinated to become advocates for Islam, engage in interfaith activities and da'wa or proselytization and train for jihad. Non-Muslims professors are solicited through zakat or payments to present courses favorable to Islam and write and speak publicly to promote Islam. The bequeathal by Saudi Prince Al-waleed bin Talal of $20 million dollars for Islamic study centers at Harvard and Georgetown universities, respectively, was a gesture to insure the promulgation of positive research, publications and presentations toward Islam.
In "Modern Day Trojan Horse," Solomon and Maqdisi point out that as Muslims gain power and mass in the host country, consolidation of identity occurs, as well as strengthening of their infrastructure of mosques, schools, clubs, organizations and media. The doctrine of taquiya is firmly in place as Muslims hide behind the dictates of their religious devotion and seek cultural changes in the land of the non-Muslim or kuffar. At this more advanced stage, attempts are made to silence opponents and curry favor. The judicious use of zakat elicits favorable views of Muslims and Islam from politicians, representatives from the media and other organizations. For example, within the last couple of years in the United States, the words, "jihad" and "Islamofascism," have been expunged from the lexicon of government officials and the words, "Islamic" and "terrorism," are rarely paired. In Europe, which is further advanced in this process, a dangerous turn materialized with the murder of filmmaker ,Theo Van Gogh, who produced a film on the subjugation of women in Islam, and with death threats against Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilder for his outspoken criticism of Islam.
As Islamization of the host culture proceeds apace, preparations begin for learning the skills necessary for jihad. Young jihadists may travel to their countries of origin for further indoctrination and terrorist training. This development has been noted within Somali Muslim communities in Minnesota and Tennessee. Young Muslims have disappeared to Somalia to rendezvous with Al Shabaab, a terrorist group linked to Al Qaeda.
As the resident Muslim community becomes more established and begins to wield considerable power in the political arena, pressure is brought to bear on politicians to permit shari'ah law courts in exchange for Muslim votes. This is very much evident in Britain where parallel systems of legal jurisprudence currently coexist. Muslim inhabitants of the host country are pressured to follow shari'ah law in lieu of the prevailing legal system. Several recent legal decisions by non-Muslim judges in Europe have referenced shari'ah law as a standard for verdicts concerning Muslims.
As the intensity of the hijra advances, the appearance of open ghettos or Muslim-only regions occurs. These are areas where non-Muslims are essentially prohibited and where, if they enter, they actually may be physically threatened. Such no-go zones, where even non-Muslim community workers are unwelcome, exist throughout Europe today. Remarkably, Muslim movements are never restricted; they venture freely anywhere in the host country.
As Solomon and Maqdisi point out, the Hijra is a comprehensive and direct political attempt to undermine the culture and values of the host country and replace them with Islam and shari'ah. It is an insidious migration seeking transformation of the culture, behaviors, customs, rules and laws of a host society to spread Islam and establish an Islamic state. The stages of the Hijra are very much evident in varying degrees in all Western societies today. Ironically, our open democratic societies with constitutionally mandated freedoms of speech, religion and assembly have facilitated this march toward the very demise of our way of life.
"Modern Day Trojan Horse" should be required reading for all citizens of Western democracies who urgently need to understand the Hijra and the threat it represents. The book sounds the alarm for the cautious evaluation of what may appear to be innocent religious practice in our midst but has sinister motives to transform our societies forever.
This articles first appeared in American Thinker.
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by y.m , August 16, 2009
written by To y.m , August 16, 2009
written by Ram , August 16, 2009
written by Ram , August 16, 2009
written by IK , August 16, 2009
You are blinded by hate toward Christians brother. Not a good thing
written by balam to ram , August 17, 2009
written by vbv , August 17, 2009
Even today what is happening in Iraq is shameful with christian american soldiers gunning down women and children with impunity ( even Chomsky had said that USA invasion of Iraq is a war crime and the crime is being perpetrated till this day with POWs sexually abused,tortured just because of their race and faith).
You have the cheek to talk about castism in India with such a disastrous record of human rights abuses and massacres for centuries. Atleast in India the law of the land has abolished castism . We have had Presidents like K.R.Narayanan,Abdul Kalaam, Chief Ministers like Mayavati, Karunanidhi,Bangarappa,Central Ministers like Jag Jivan Ram, Sushil Shinde,who held important cabinet positions ,not to omit the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India Justice Balakrishnan,etc... the list is very long ,indeed.
Islam and christianity are two sides of the same coin and history is witness to all its attrocities committed in the name of religion ,wars ,jihads ,crusades undertaken in the name of islam/christianity, the practice of slavery,discrimination, intolerance towards other cultures by denigrating them calling them derogatory names such as 'heathens' ,pagans', aborigines,niggers,chinks,etc.
Hinduism has never promioted castism in its scriptures.The author of Ramayana ,Valmiki who belongs to the dalits/sxcheduled trribe class, the author of Mahabharata was himself not a brahmin as his mother was a fisherwoman and father a forest recluse or rishi, so also KabirDas, Raidas, Meerabai,Dr. Ambedkar,and scores of other philosophers,poets,writers,thinkers,etc. over centuries. Even the most popular "Gods" Rama was a Kshatriya ,while Krishna was brought up by Yadavas ,who even till this day are officially classified as 'backward casts' entitling them to concessions in education and jobs. The sheer fact that India with its diversity - with over twenty major languages, over 200 dialects , myriads of customs and beliefs have coexisted for centuries without trying to decimate the other to impose one's own dogma speaks volumes for its credentials as a tolerant and a humane society. And we certainly do not need the certificate of such dubious persons on what/who is tolerance and egalitarianism! And that too from a fanatic christian!
written by Ram , August 17, 2009
written by Kinana , August 17, 2009
The outline of the problem well thought out.
But am I right in assuming though that these fine authors did not propose a solution, however tentative?
This is the tricky part.
The counter jihad movement should coalesce around a few simple demands to save or and at least slow down the oncoming destruction of Western civilisation.
Stop all Muslim immigration now
Because
Migration is only good if the people are needed in this [name country], and for human rights concerns, and if there is a genuine proven track record of certain migrant populations making a genuine positive contribution to the country, in the long haul.
By this last point I mean to say that Islam teaches Muslims:
1. To not fit in;
2. To separate themselves from non-Muslims;
3. To push push push for the implementation of Sharia law in all aspects of life in this country;
4. To use our tolerance to promote intolerance of non-Muslims;
5. That their first loyalty is to the umma, the nation of Islam;
6. That they should only marry Muslims;
7. That it is okay to cheat the system in order to promote and live a Muslim life, like a man having more than one wife;
8. That Muslims who leave Islam should be killed,
9. That Muslim men are superior to Muslim women, etc. etc. etc.
So, the first step is to: Stop all Muslim immigration now
Exactly how this can be done in detail is something that is surely not beyond the capacity of Western governments to achieve.
Unless someone can tell me that the list above, the 9 points, is not accurate?
written by kmgy , August 17, 2009
written by london , August 17, 2009
written by RK , August 17, 2009
Also vatican is using a huge amount of money somewhere in billions to convert buddhists and hindus while leaving Islam in those places. The main reason is the huge propaganda which started after 300 AD when constantine came who due to politican reason created the bible and called all previous great civilization as PAGAN. What a shame history starts from 0 AD and all other religions are pagan and only christianity is true how funny.
Muhammed also used the same logic and created islam and called all previous religion and thoughts as Pagan and jahilya.
Christians have to understand buddhism and hinduism are much older than them and they should not try to convert them using money, marketing and other dubious forms. islam is cunningly using christianity and knows its hatred towards jews, hindus and buddhists etc and both cooperating against others, while they are also attacking each other. But due to natural law, muslims are producing a huge amount of babies and its about time they will finish off christianity from europe.
Some fundamentalist christians think that since jews, hindus, buddhists are heathen and need to be eliminated and let muslims do this dirty job of finishing them, then the christians will apepal to there countries and launch a final crusade and jesus will help them and only one monotonous religion will be there.
The christian missionaries get money from europe devout christians and use it to convert poor buddhists and hindus while making a huge profit for themselves.
The maximum number of interfaith dialogue has been done by christians and muslims. How funny?
Christians should come out of materialist believe and concentrate on islam only, better for them and humanity.
written by To London , August 17, 2009
Why cant they give same facility for minorities in there place of origin?
In all muslim majority countries the minorities are selectively targeted and harassed, killed etc.
Dhimmi laws are put to non-muslims. Christians are not allowed to wear cross in muslim countries especially saudi arabia. In muslim countries even non-muslims are forced to wear hijab. Why?
When muslims come and ask for special privileges in west, why cant they give equality to non-muslims?
Now its internet age, and whole world can see the double standards and hypocricy of muslims. A american muslim instead of supporting american soldiers think of causing them harm and have sympathy to other muslim terrorists.
When you say we all believe in one God, thus do you also believe Jesus as God or Buddha or Krishna as God?
After coming to western world why dont muslims dont fight bad laws like sharia, blasphemy or other immoral laws in muslims countries. Why cant the western engineers in saudi arabia cant built a church?
I dont want hate, but when muslims are showing so much double standards , why cant we speak up?
written by JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY/ISLAM IS A , August 17, 2009
man is evoled by nature and and not created by imaginary jehova/allah.
let us expose truth and ban patriacal hate based judeo-christianity/islam altogether.
if anyone things christianity is abt peace pls visit :
www.evilbible.com
www.nobeliefs.com
www.whydoesgodhateamputees.com
written by arvind , August 17, 2009
written by john , August 17, 2009
Someone is bound to notice that legislators are forbidden to legislate religion by the US Constitution.... though I believe there are folks here from several continents... Most modern governments are supposed to be blind to a person's beliefs.
Currently, the US government can't even ASK your religion, leave alone act against it. I'm not sure that actually changing the Constitution to give the government that power would sell with conservative Americans.
You could act against certain countries.. but I can't see how the net could be made so small as to catch a significant portion of Muslims.
Besides... word is, Muslims consciously reproduce at high rates, just to make more Muslims. The trojan horse is already within.
I think our best option is education along with safeguarding whatever aspects of our government are secular. When a government is secular, it's hands off from ANY religion.
Religious law is quite common here in Washington state. When the Muslims come, they will have legal precedent.
All you have to do is to have a majority of voters in a certain area, and you can pass aspects of your religion into law.
I think a very bold move would be to ammend the Constitution so that government is required to be secular at all levels.
Government would lose a lot of power as a lot of laws would have to be repealed, so I doubt it would actually happen in the US.... but that would be a very significant stumbling block for Islam.
Of course, if you manage to create a stumbling block for Islam, you just get bombs... so maybe I don't have a solution either.
I think, that before most folks would approve of giving government the power to stop Muslim immigration, the Muslim population would have to be so high that it would be impossible.
... then you still have their prodigious reproduction rate. Islam isn't the fastest growing religion for nothing.
written by Anti Clot , August 17, 2009
written by Kinana , August 17, 2009
Good of you to try to calm the waters.
Could you give us some more details? Your reassurances that all will be well need some padding out a bit.
Specifically:
Could you say what parts of the book review or my 9 points that you disagree with?
You say: ‘Secularism suits muslims just fine.’ For how long will muslims be happy with secularism? Will they defend secularism? Will they reject Sharia and protest against it? Will they do this even when they become a majority in the country?
You say: ‘QURAN says if u are in a foriegn country where u are the minority then abide by their(christians) rules as long as they don\'t force u to do something that goes against islam like eating pork.’ Could you give a reference from the Qur'an for this statement?
Can you back up your reassurances and theology by pointing to a time in history when a Muslim majority country granted equality before the law to men and women, to Muslims and Non-Muslims; freedom of speech to all its citizens; and political and social equality to all, etc.?
To answer these few questions would give more credibility to your soothing words.
Thanks
written by Kinana , August 17, 2009
Good questions and observations.
I can only say that I am hopeful that enough people will wake up in time to solve the problem.
As more people understand the problem the solution will be worked out.
The problem as I see it is:
Islam, per se, is a threat to Western civilization and its values of democracy, freedom of speech, equality before the law, secular government, gender equality, etc. Furthermore, Islam teaches and encourages different values and behaviour that are contrary to these ‘Western’ values.
I think the very first problem we face is paralysis. We must not be frozen by contemplating the enormity of the task.
This quote helps me carry on:
The French historian Ernest Renan said:
“Muslims were the first victims of Islam. Many times I have observed in my travels that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain others in the practice of this religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him.”
written by Bonnie , August 17, 2009
written by Ram , August 17, 2009
written by Demsci , August 18, 2009
May I present the thought that it is great that the ACEA-countries produce so much prosperity and freedom that Muslims are attracted very much? So even many of them, and especially many of their women, both in ACEA and in Iran and other Islamic countries, seem to judge that the Democratic system works better than the Islamic system? The more babies they have, the more of the Muslims wanting to migrate to our societies, the more compliments the ACEA-countries deserve. I would not like it to have been the other way around.
And: Might we not strive in future for CONTRACTS for immigrants? In them we should demand loyalty or at least neutrality to our Democratic, gender-equal system. And we must reserve the right to deport those who are caught in undermining our system, to replace it with some theocratic, patriarchalistic (male chauvinistic) system.
We then must try to enforce this, and so we could also encourage the existence of pure Islamic states, whereto those Muslims who really want an Islamic society can migrate and can be deported to too. We must, in a league of Democratic Nations, endeavour to make treaties with some pure Islamic countries for this. We also can pressure them to release all their citizens who like our Democratic laws more than their Sharia-laws, which we then would receive.
The problem with this plan is that we risk mass immigration, mass deceipt and eventual uprisings. But these risks can then serve to wake up the slumbering masses of the Western world, who, as danger grows, will react more, in favor of protecting its great democratic, gender-equal system. Furthermore it would force Muslims to finally prove that a better system, provided by God, can be applied and practiced. And it would give them the opportunity to live there. Or else live under Democratic rules and not complain about them.
written by vbv , August 18, 2009
You Europeans have abandoned the great 'pagan' culture of the Greeks,Romans,Druids,Celts to adopt some stupid desert barbarian cult lacking intelligence and vision ,except in believing in stupid tales fit for zombies. There is no philosophy of life except believe in the nonsensical amoral and immoral biblical myhths and go to some so-called "heaven" or be shunted to some "hell" for eternity! Hahahahahahahaha! Both Christianity and Islam trace their origins to the Abrahamic cults , and both are jus bigotry spreading intolerance ,hatred and destruction of other civilisations, creating more zombies! No wonder all great scientists and thinkers in the West have rejected Christianity ,like Steven Weinberger,Stephen Hawkins,Einstien, Neils Borg,Richard Dawkins, Richardc Feynman,etc. Even Bertrand Russel ,one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth century has found no merit in judeo-chritian and islam cults and you must read his book "Why I am not a Christian". You couldn't ask for more about the low regard intelligent pweople have for the desert barbarian cults of Isalam, Christianity and Judaism!
written by balam to v.b.v , August 18, 2009
written by Bonnie , August 18, 2009
written by vbv , August 19, 2009
Christian fanatics in the 1990s went crazy with the doomsday expected in the year 2000 ,which never came. Now they are waiting for 2012. What a joke!
There is no 'judgement day' or doomsday , there is no second coming of Christ (he failed to turn up in the year 2000 ,anyway) and there is no judeo-christian-islamic "god" - it is a bullshit invented by the so-called 'prophets' son of 'god' to fool the gullible idiots and live off them with all the power and pelf. Whether it is a pope/ayatollah/mullah - all live like kings with unquestioned power and pelf fooloing the millions of gullible idiots . Hinduism does not have theocracy and papacy or mullahdom. Atleast we are much better off than you idiots!
written by kmgy , August 19, 2009
written by JohanM , August 19, 2009
written by vbv , August 20, 2009
written by kmgy , August 20, 2009
Witnesses said the naked girls in Bihar state plowed the fields and chanted ancient hymns after sunset to invoke the gods. They said elderly village women helped the girls drag the plows. " Search the net Mr vbv and you'll find 18,500 results for this news in item.
written by vbv , August 20, 2009
So you have to open your eyes and inculcate this tolerance and not go about denigrating everything other than christianity/islam. Ofcourse ,I am very critical of these two cults since they intend to destroy all indegenous cultures to impose their bigotry,and history is witness to their misdeeds and wars .
written by kmgy , August 22, 2009
written by vbv , August 23, 2009
The truth is ,only India practices such tolerance_ In India yoyu have all types of religious denominations,Hindus,Budhists, Jains,Christians, Zoroastrians,Bahais,muslims,all types of tribal worshippers, Atheists,agnocists,etc. all guaranteed under the Indian constitution to free practice theier faiths/beliefs. And this is happening only in India. The zorastrians came to India to escape the persecution by the muslims in their country Iran centuries ago and to this date they are freely practicing their faith and peacefully coexisting with Hindus, They have ALSO BEEN ECONOMICALLY VERY SUCCESSFUL AND PROGRESSIVE. NO HINDU EVER PESECUTED THEM FOR ANY REASON.
Only christians and muslims create [problems in India nwith their exclusivist idealogy, denigrating others as 'pagans'./'heathens' in the most derogatory manner and insulting others belief system and claiming themselves to be superior, aggressively "selling" their "religion" with a promise of "heaven" ,otherwise it is "HELL for you". Also destroying local culture with a desert barbarian cult of intolerance and bigotry.
Look what the muslims are doing in tthe West, spreading fast ,claiming converts. And you find it difficult to accept this. Just imagine in India we are attacked doubly by not only muslims but also christians with money flowing from the rich arabs and the westerners.
So it is dubious on your part to make such claims about all the "christian" countries allowing free practice of divergent religions/cults!
written by kmgy , August 23, 2009
(self-identification, ARIS)
Religion 1990 Est.
Adult Pop. 2001 Est.
ADULT Pop. 2004 Est.
Total Pop. % of U.S. Pop.,
2000 % Change
1990 - 2000
Christianity 151,225,000 159,030,000 224,437,959 76.5% +5%
Nonreligious/Secular 13,116,000 27,539,000 38,865,604 13.2% +110%
Judaism 3,137,000 2,831,000 3,995,371 1.3% -10%
Islam 527,000 1,104,000 1,558,068 0.5% +109%
Buddhism 401,000 1,082,000 1,527,019 0.5% +170%
Agnostic 1,186,000 991,000 1,398,592 0.5% -16%
Atheist 902,000 1,272,986 0.4%
Hinduism 227,000 766,000 1,081,051 0.4% +237%
Unitarian Universalist 502,000 629,000 887,703 0.3% +25%
Wiccan/Pagan/Druid 307,000 433,267 0.1%
Spiritualist 116,000 163,710 0.05%
Native American Religion 47,000 103,000 145,363 0.05% +119%
Baha'i 28,000 84,000 118,549 0.04% +200%
New Age 20,000 68,000 95,968 0.03% +240%
Sikhism 13,000 57,000 80,444 0.03% +338%
Scientology 45,000 55,000 77,621 0.02% +22%
Humanist 29,000 49,000 69,153 0.02% +69%
Deity (Deist) 6,000 49,000 69,153 0.02% +717%
Taoist 23,000 40,000 56,452 0.02% +74%
Eckankar 18,000 26,000 36,694 0.01% +44%
Mr. vbv this will refute your allegation. Hinduism has grown by 237% in USA in 10 years time from 1990-2000. You can come to America the beautiful land and worship your Hindu gods freely.
written by Saladin , September 04, 2009
What legislation can be passed to alter the,"facts on the ground"
Prehaps we should force all muslims to wear a yellow crescent badge on their chests,then marshall the cattle trucks.
written by Samuel , September 23, 2009
written by Fellclaw , October 12, 2009
50 years ago the world was ours for the taking- in our arrogance we cannot see our looming destruction
*We must harden our hearts if we have any chance to save our racial identity.
*We must reject multi culturalism
*We must expel or destroy those who are not our people
*we must establish countries or pure heritage
or we will cease to exist.
written by Fellclaw , October 12, 2009
This is the natural order of things
written by Fellclaw , October 12, 2009
Tolerance is weakness
written by Fellclaw , October 12, 2009
written by Fellclaw , October 12, 2009
written by Stephen Harrison , November 14, 2009
1st Floor
Oaklands House
Washway Road
Sale
M33 6FS
Dear Sir/Madam
I wish to enter a Formal Complaint concerning the inaction of the West Midlands Police Force/Authority and West Mercia Police/Authority to this reported serious crime. A police force must be free from political restraint and impartial when investigating crimes of this nature committed frankly by their paymasters politicians who are in power as the Government of the United Kingdom. If the Police are not able or unwilling to investigate and prosecute serious crimes of this nature then who can exactly protect a citizen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. I am genetically English; I have also been displaced by being deprived of my right to my individuality and culture. The Geneva Convention clearly states that displacement by immigration is a crime against humanity. This can be carried out by language, cultural change which is unacceptable to the indigenous person. The selling of a Christian Church would fall under this “crime”, if it were sold to become a place of worship for an alien ethnic culture or religion. Therefore turning Christian churches into Muslim mosques would be an act of ethnocide as its soul intention would be to deprive the indigenous genetic people of their cultural heritage. Further allowing call to prayer would also cause understandable displacement of an indigenous people as it is a direct assault on their right to a cultural identity and to be able to enjoy their right to individuality. Thus any displacement would be Ethnocide.
The crimes I reported to these Police forces were Ethnocide and Gerrymandering, both are serious criminal acts. If the Chief Constables and The Police generally are to dismiss my claims without care, thought or attention then they are guilty of gross negligence. Statistical Factual Evidence and Also Anecdotal and Video Evidence is Available as are Witnesses to the crime of ethnocide, over 80% of The capital cities population is now made up of people other than those of a genetic indigenous race, this is clear evidence of displacement and this displacement is being carried out in many major cities and towns throughout Great Britain, including Birmingham, Wolverhampton, Luton and so the list goes on and on. The fact that politicians who have openly encouraged mass immigration are not investigated for criminal acts suggest that we live within a totalitarian and police state, where law be it international or local are being flouted with the full cooperation of the chief constables
The crimes I am alleging are Ethnocide against the genetic peoples of Great Britain namely the White English, Scottish, Northern Irish and Welsh indigenous peoples of this our homeland.
These examples are not those of a raving lunatic or a racist but of a victim of a criminal act under both the Geneva Convention and The United Nations acts to protect indigenous people from ethnic cleansing.
The fact that No mandate was sort from the people is irrelevant as no mandate can be given for a crime against humanity.
I now wish to move on to my reported crime of gerrymandering again statistical evidence is available to support my allegation that mass immigration is being used to make a significant difference to the voting pattern of an area, by allowing mass immigration the labour government is gaining a substantial sympathetic vote in areas of displacement this is a new form of gerrymandering but is gerrymandering none the less. I understood this to be a crime.
Following is the crime as reported to the Police Forces of The West Midlands and which to date has been ignored.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wish to report to you a case of the most serious crime in the world.
The United Nations acts/edicts on Human Rights; concerning the; Rights of Indigenous people,
to individuality, culture, including cultural heritage.
Under The Geneva Convention; Genocide and Ethnocide.
I also wish to complain that countless people in the Police Force/ Government and Other Agencies, SOCA, Human Rights and equalities commission have conspired to Commit Crimes against Humanity and Ethnocide.
Please investigate this FORMAL COMPLAINT FULLY!
This is a case of Ethnocide and it is happening here and now in the United Kingdom.
Gerrymandering; by the movement of population. Example London is now 80% Ethnic Minorities this is clear evidence of both Ethnocide and Gerrymandering.
Labours plan of uncontrolled immigration policy has come to light and this can be proven in the statistics.
Wikipedia lists and briefly explains exactly the Crime of Ethnocide.
Attacks on Culture, Individuality and Displacement. Positive discrimination could also be seen to be negative to the indigenous peoples so would also be against their human rights. Whilst employment generally has gone up employment among indigenous people has fallen by 62,000 such is the way we the White English are discriminated against.
Put simply it is the cleansing or minoritising of an indigenous population by methods other than mass extermination.
It is a fact that by 2070 the immigrant population will be ahead of the indigenous peoples of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. That year will be the year that the planned for ethnocide is complete.
This is a Crime against humanity according to the Geneva Convention it is an equivalent crime to Genocide and is a form of Ethnic Cleansing. Phillip Dunne MP who is my MP is ignorant as he thinks ethnocide involves being murdered, is doesn’t it involves being made to feel emotion that causes displacement so best you all understand what ethnocide is.
I am reporting this crime to every agency in the UK to expose this crime to the indigenous British People. I am also complaining that the Metropolitan Police and West Midlands Police have ignored this reported crime.
This is the basis of my complaint, which will reveal if our political masters have created a police totalitarian state within a democracy or not if indeed crimes against humanity as alleged exists then legal action against the conspirators should be taken. These crimes are criminal and not civil.
Yours faithfully
written by Crusader , December 03, 2009
written by cheap uggs , January 03, 2010
and attention, all of it.basketball shoes the most frustrating thing i find in all
of your writings is the glaring, horrifying fact that healthcare is a privledge in this country. those that need it the most, cheap u**scan't have it. no matter how desperate and dire their situation. can
MHA (Mental Health America of LA) help you in anyway?basketball shoes your
situtation is SO unique that there most be some work around whatever "rules" are in place. i'm sure you've researched every angle
- it must exhaust you to have people throw out ideas.
2. Create a ministry in each european country which will study the muslims in the country like occupation they do, women participation, hijab wearing women, number of children, education of both male female, how many are in jail and what reason?, welfare fund taken by muslims, integration problems by them, what islamic groups they belong etc.
3. Stop any new mosque construction and all mullahs should have to resgister with ministry and declare that all human beings irrespective of religion and sex are equal and they wount preach any hate against others. If the mullahs are found preaching hate, just send them back with there family out of the country.
4. All dual citizens should be forced to leave country.
5. proposing attractive terms that muslims leave.
6. declare clearly that islam is a hostle ideology to others and thus muslims are unwelcome and will be on watch.