The last thing Islamists would want you to know is that the practice of Sharia Law is actually outlawed in many countries, and it is opposed by Muslims themselves where they have a voice in the matter. Even among Muslim-majority countries, there are very few that actually invoke the draconian hudud penalties prescribed in the Quran. So while the debate over Sharia Law continues in state legislatures in the United States, it is informative to examine its acceptance or lack of acceptance in different parts of the world.
The standard for applying Sharia Law is made quite clear in the classic manual of Islamic sacred law – Reliance of the Traveler:
It is an act of apostasy punishable by death] to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims is part of Islam, when it is well known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse. (Para. o8.7(14) ...it is clear that there is virtually no country on the face of the earth where a Muslim has an excuse to behave differently than he would in an Islamic country, whether in his commercial or other dealings. (w43.5(c)
One of the clearest commands in the Quran is to amputate the hand of a thief: “As for the man or woman who is guilty of theft, cut off their hands to punish them for their crimes. That is the punishment enjoined by Allah.” (Surah 5:38) This punishment enjoined by Allah is carried out today only in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Sudan, and northern Nigeria – representing only 2 percent of the population of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation countries. This demonstrates quite conclusively that the requirements of Sharia Law are horrific and repulsive, even to Muslims themselves. Given the nature of the countries actually practicing amputation, one can see that it is practiced by autocratic governments to terrorize their subjects, not to promote a moral society for its citizens. Other countries have found lots of ‘extenuating circumstances’ to ignore this clear command from Allah. Even fewer Muslim countries treat apostasy as a capital crime.
Sharia Law was never meant to be a “cafeteria” where governments could pick and choose which elements to implement and which to ignore. It is a complete system of government covering all aspects of religious, domestic, commercial, and government activities. In view of this, it is surprising that countries representing only 16 percent of the total population of the OIC countries have incorporated Sharia Law as the primary source for determining the laws of the country. Many other countries apply Sharia Law to family matters only or to Muslims only in mixed populations. In Malaysia, for example, the Malay Muslims are a protected class representing only about half of the population, but they are subject to much stricter, Sharia regulation than their Chinese and Indian counterparts. They alone are forbidden to comingle with the opposite sex, drink alcoholic beverages, or marry a non-Muslim in the case of Malay women.
While Sharia Law is conveniently subordinated to “man-made laws” in 84% of the Islamic countries, the opposition in non-Muslim countries is growing stronger and more wide-spread. In 2003, Ontario, Canada, was faced with the possibility of Sharia Courts after faith-based tribunals were allowed for Catholic and Jewish communities. The leader of the opposition to Sharia Courts was an Iranian Muslim, Homa Arjomand, who said such courts would push back Canadian law by 1,400 years. The outcry was so intense that even the Catholic and Jewish leaders agreed to abandon their tribunals rather than allow their own precedent to pave the way for Sharia Courts. In May, 2005, the Quebec National Assembly unanimously supported a motion to block the use of Sharia Law in Quebec courts.
Other countries have banned or strictly limited the jurisdiction of Islamic religious courts. In France, the equivalent of the Supreme Court ruled in 2004 that Islamic divorces, where the husband has a unilateral right to initiate a divorce and where his support responsibilities are limited, are in fundamental contravention of French public policy since they infringe on the principal of equality between the spouses. The French court cited the European Convention of Human Rights, Article 5, Protocol VII, which states: “Spouses shall enjoy equality of rights and responsibilities of a private law character between them, and in their relations with their children, as to marriage, during marriage, and in the event of its dissolution.”
In several other European countries, rogue Sharia Courts have popped up, but they do not have government sanction. There is a single court in Amsterdam and one in Antwerp. It is expected that European countries will have to find common grounds within the EU protocols to outlaw these in all countries.
Of the 27 European countries, only one – the United Kingdom – has allowed Sharia Courts to resolve disputes with the full power of the judicial system. The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal system was established in 2007. Today, there are some eighty-five Sharia Courts in the United Kingdom which settle financial and family disputes among Muslims. Increasingly, non-Muslims are using those courts because of the lower cost and faster resolution of disputes. Because of their informal nature and lack of documentation, however, it has been impossible to determine if these courts are administering justice in accordance with British law. Often the victims of this process are Muslim women who are unaware of their civil rights under British law and cannot afford proper legal counsel. Furthermore, there have been complaints that litigants have been choosing between civil and Sharia courts depending on which was expected to provide them the most favorable outcome.
In 2011, the Ministry of Justice launched an investigation into Sharia tribunals, but had to abandon the inquiry when Muslims refused to cooperate. Last year, Baroness Cox introduced a bill in Parliament to ensure that Sharia tribunals and councils operate within the law and do not constitute a de facto parallel legal system within the U.K. Some Muslim rights organizations, like the Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organization, are campaigning to disband the Sharia Courts entirely because the councils are dominated by men and they are making judgments in favor of men.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 5487
Comments (43)
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by Tanstaafl jw , March 27, 2012
It would be similiar to being ruled by the Nazis.
written by lw1 , March 27, 2012
Yahoo Maktoob. 26 March 2012. Kingdom's non-muslim ex-pats warned
A Migrante Middle East (MME) chief has urged Filipino expats based in Saudi Arabia to be cautious when it comes to exercising religion in the country.
A fatwa was issued against religious structure in the kingdom recently.
'The host government and Saudi religious officials are well aware that there are religious activities being held discretely in homes and apartments by non-muslims.'
Last year saw a number of Filipino expats detained by Saudi police for performing religious activities in ways that violated kingdom laws.
No compulsion in religion?
A Migrante Middle East (MME) chief has urged Filipino expats based in Saudi Arabia to be cautious when it comes to exercising religion in the country.
A fatwa was issued against religious structure in the kingdom recently.
'The host government and Saudi religious officials are well aware that there are religious activities being held discretely in homes and apartments by non-muslims.'
Last year saw a number of Filipino expats detained by Saudi police for performing religious activities in ways that violated kingdom laws.
No compulsion in religion?
written by 1proudkaffur4life , March 27, 2012
On such a important topic, how can one be sure that the “Sharia Laws” are indeed the laws of any deity? Based on the writings of men who lived at best a couple of hundreds of years after MuuHAMmel gave up his ghost? Men who NEVER could claim to be messengers since the last one was the lice-ridden profeet. Neither could these men claim to have a Angel come to them and clarify the “laws of the stoned-gawd allah.
written by The Fog Horn , March 27, 2012
I admire what you're doing but I think you need to get to the source of the problem, the source being Judaism. That started off the Abrahamic religions. Judaic Law is the same as Sharia Law. We've just never seen it in action, unlike the poor sods who lived under it in ancient times, as there is no Jewish state or country. There are many Muslim countries so we are therefore able to see Sharia in action.
It is the laws of the Torah/Old Testament that you need to expose. It's not a Musling thing but an Abrahamic thing. If Christians could create a Christian ruled country they would likely stone to death homosexuals, 'witches', apostates, heathens, fornicators, etc. Even Jesus condemned the Jews for not executing the disobedient children.
ISLAM IS AN OFF-SHOOT OF VOLCANIC ACTIVITY WORSHIP.
GET TO THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM.
It is the laws of the Torah/Old Testament that you need to expose. It's not a Musling thing but an Abrahamic thing. If Christians could create a Christian ruled country they would likely stone to death homosexuals, 'witches', apostates, heathens, fornicators, etc. Even Jesus condemned the Jews for not executing the disobedient children.
ISLAM IS AN OFF-SHOOT OF VOLCANIC ACTIVITY WORSHIP.
GET TO THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM.
written by fineliving56 , March 27, 2012
Sharia came from Allah … haha ….. how stupid !!!
Muhammad goes in to cave … Muhammad comes out of cave …...with Islam … Taraaa …
no witnesses … no noise …. no light … just the pathetic Quran that took 23 years to come out … haha
The Quran says Muhammad is Allah prophet and Muhammad says Quran came from Allah …. haha …
nothing to prove anything
No one heard,sow, anything … just Muhammad with his thuggery mind who have a taste for little girls
Muhammad goes in to cave … Muhammad comes out of cave …...with Islam … Taraaa …
no witnesses … no noise …. no light … just the pathetic Quran that took 23 years to come out … haha
The Quran says Muhammad is Allah prophet and Muhammad says Quran came from Allah …. haha …
nothing to prove anything
No one heard,sow, anything … just Muhammad with his thuggery mind who have a taste for little girls
written by fineliving56 , March 27, 2012
When Muslims here, went too far with dirty talk …
your Muslim brothers has filthy mouth as bad any jail low life … mean while they talk to each with Bismi Allah and alhamd Allah and they tell each other it is time for Salat …
as if the supposed words Allah did not sink in far enough or never did … it seems the hypocrisy of these Muslims are displayed for all to see …
they go off on sprees of cussing all over the place like bratty children …
All I see is rude Muslims who have never seen any kind of good teaching or any kind of good manner in their live .
That is shame
your Muslim brothers has filthy mouth as bad any jail low life … mean while they talk to each with Bismi Allah and alhamd Allah and they tell each other it is time for Salat …
as if the supposed words Allah did not sink in far enough or never did … it seems the hypocrisy of these Muslims are displayed for all to see …
they go off on sprees of cussing all over the place like bratty children …
All I see is rude Muslims who have never seen any kind of good teaching or any kind of good manner in their live .
That is shame
written by Amboyduke , March 27, 2012
written by The Fog Horn , March 27, 2012
Even Jesus condemned the Jews for not executing the disobedient children.
Where does it say this in the greek scriptures? (New Testament)
written by Illiterate Watch , March 27, 2012
I often come here to see what is reported; hoping to find some decent rationale with some story that can hold it's own narrative and argument in the context of the so-called prophet Mohammed;
I have read a translation of the Koran as far as I can; only to find the 'tolerance of Islam'; ie. what the Liberal western politicians talk about and what I was looking for in this so-called religion about doesn't actually exist ...
I see nothing but a book built upon hatred for all that is NOT Islam, and a book where anywhere in this vile text has very little to say about what Islam is, all it says tomme is what it is not. Remember tgat hen examining islamic prejudice...
The koran defines not Islam, but rather points fingers at what it is not.. and
Liberal European politics help us less to understand, meaning that more and more of us who examine and utterly reject what Islam is deserve (according to the evil word of Allah) to die.
Nothing more.
Nothing less; we really are tye shit on the shoes of those who take our benefits, pick our pockets and take away our utures, these are those who choose to undermine our society
Wake up to this evil, people...
For Christians, the bible was once chanted in latin to all people, and the majority of illterates understood no latin.
Translations liberated the text.
Try that with the Koran, let everyone judge Islam for hat it is in a language they understand, then lay the challenges at tolenerance at Mohammed's door.
We have today muslims illiterate in their understanding of arabic, and yet spouting death threats to Jews and Christians and non-believers whilst purporting moderate Islam, whatever that is...
In Islam, many clerics will say that the Western translations are mischievious works that twist the wordsof Allah, so it's okay to chant so-called prayer (no matter how illiterate it is) in a language you won't understand, and as Insee it the biggest losers are those liberals of us in the West trying yo find noble reasons to accomodate these well meanings simpletons...
The educated of the simpletons want us dead, want Democracy dismantled and shariah law to,replace it, they want subservient western and democratic values, women first... to,go
I have been shown Allah and reject him..
Check out what the koran says about me and my fate...
I have read a translation of the Koran as far as I can; only to find the 'tolerance of Islam'; ie. what the Liberal western politicians talk about and what I was looking for in this so-called religion about doesn't actually exist ...
I see nothing but a book built upon hatred for all that is NOT Islam, and a book where anywhere in this vile text has very little to say about what Islam is, all it says tomme is what it is not. Remember tgat hen examining islamic prejudice...
The koran defines not Islam, but rather points fingers at what it is not.. and
Liberal European politics help us less to understand, meaning that more and more of us who examine and utterly reject what Islam is deserve (according to the evil word of Allah) to die.
Nothing more.
Nothing less; we really are tye shit on the shoes of those who take our benefits, pick our pockets and take away our utures, these are those who choose to undermine our society
Wake up to this evil, people...
For Christians, the bible was once chanted in latin to all people, and the majority of illterates understood no latin.
Translations liberated the text.
Try that with the Koran, let everyone judge Islam for hat it is in a language they understand, then lay the challenges at tolenerance at Mohammed's door.
We have today muslims illiterate in their understanding of arabic, and yet spouting death threats to Jews and Christians and non-believers whilst purporting moderate Islam, whatever that is...
In Islam, many clerics will say that the Western translations are mischievious works that twist the wordsof Allah, so it's okay to chant so-called prayer (no matter how illiterate it is) in a language you won't understand, and as Insee it the biggest losers are those liberals of us in the West trying yo find noble reasons to accomodate these well meanings simpletons...
The educated of the simpletons want us dead, want Democracy dismantled and shariah law to,replace it, they want subservient western and democratic values, women first... to,go
I have been shown Allah and reject him..
Check out what the koran says about me and my fate...
written by vbv , March 27, 2012
Sharia is a stone-age code of the meddle-east zombies . Muhamad had actually adopted the jewish crap from the book of Deutronomy mainly and also from other Old Testament books for the socalled "sharia law" . Proir to the introduction of Muhamad's concocted crap called 'islam' , the Arabian peninsula had people with some civilisation and human norms. But Islam destroyed all that and brought in uncouth, uncivilised and barbaric practices taken from the jewish muck that jews themselves had long since abandoned. It is good to learn that most muslim countries themselves have abandoned this barbaric cruel code ,except Saudi Arabia, which implements it fully and a few other countries that use it partially and selectively like Pakistan, Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria,Malaysia,etc. The irony is that muslims who have grown in free societies in the west and have secured good education there crave for this barbaric code - perhaps frustrated by too much good things that they can barely stomach that they have a death-wish to wall,ow in islamic misery and nightmares.
written by Amboyduke , March 28, 2012
Very well said.
The ones (muslims) on here that spout their drivel know what you say about their koran is right, but they don't have the guts to bale...
because nobody but an inbred simpleton can be stupid enough to believe that shit.
The muslims on here never answer anything straight. They always bluster and deflect.
It does appear that islam might be ready to self destruct...we can only hope.
The ones (muslims) on here that spout their drivel know what you say about their koran is right, but they don't have the guts to bale...
because nobody but an inbred simpleton can be stupid enough to believe that shit.
The muslims on here never answer anything straight. They always bluster and deflect.
It does appear that islam might be ready to self destruct...we can only hope.
written by HARKAT UL JIHAD EI KAFIROON , March 28, 2012
la pigdogla il pigdogla muhamed ur rasul pigodla
there is no dogpigallah but pigdogallah and muhamed is his pet pigdogpoopoo
kamasutra created by humans over 2000 yrs ago is better than arab book-koran.
it etaches to love women and does not contain hate,so all follow kamasutra.
there is no dogpigallah but pigdogallah and muhamed is his pet pigdogpoopoo
kamasutra created by humans over 2000 yrs ago is better than arab book-koran.
it etaches to love women and does not contain hate,so all follow kamasutra.
written by Gnostic , March 28, 2012
Even the islamic moderates in Tunisia decided not to vote for sharia law in the upcoming new constitution. Perhaps it will take decades, but on the long term, islamism and sharia will fade away because there is no foundation any more in the modern world.
written by Yibel , March 28, 2012
Your anti-semitism is showing.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of hapiness." - Declaration of Independence of what was to become the United States of America - founded by Christians!
"I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation [by propagating] to all mankind the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise, almighty sovereign of the universe, which I believe to be the great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization." -- John Adams
The 19th century jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court was bracketed by ideas such as the following:
"I verily believe Christianity necessary to the support of civil society. One of the beautiful boasts of our municipal jurisprudence is that Christianity is a part of the Common Law... There never has been a period in which the Common Law did not recognize Christianity as laying its foundations." Joseph Story [Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States p. 593]
And, in the majority opinion in Church of the Holy Trinity v. US (from the 1890's), Chief Justice Brewer stated that America was a "Christian nation" in that its laws presuppose the Christian faith.
But Islamofascism has an entirely different god:
“As the essential principle of his (Muhammad’s) faith is the subjugation of others by the sword; it is only by force, that his false doctrines can be dispelled, and his power annihilated.” John Quincy Adams writing in about 1829
Every Muslim is a jihadist, as Islam cannot be propagated without the use of force. Violence is a means, but not the only means; and with or without the use of violence, the objective is the same: to bring the masses/world under the rule of Islam. We may not be at war with Islam but Islam is at war with us. It may not be war as we know it, but the goals are the same. Remember what Muhammad said: "war is deceit."
I am a Gharkad Tree
"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of hapiness." - Declaration of Independence of what was to become the United States of America - founded by Christians!
"I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation [by propagating] to all mankind the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise, almighty sovereign of the universe, which I believe to be the great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization." -- John Adams
The 19th century jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court was bracketed by ideas such as the following:
"I verily believe Christianity necessary to the support of civil society. One of the beautiful boasts of our municipal jurisprudence is that Christianity is a part of the Common Law... There never has been a period in which the Common Law did not recognize Christianity as laying its foundations." Joseph Story [Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States p. 593]
And, in the majority opinion in Church of the Holy Trinity v. US (from the 1890's), Chief Justice Brewer stated that America was a "Christian nation" in that its laws presuppose the Christian faith.
But Islamofascism has an entirely different god:
“As the essential principle of his (Muhammad’s) faith is the subjugation of others by the sword; it is only by force, that his false doctrines can be dispelled, and his power annihilated.” John Quincy Adams writing in about 1829
Every Muslim is a jihadist, as Islam cannot be propagated without the use of force. Violence is a means, but not the only means; and with or without the use of violence, the objective is the same: to bring the masses/world under the rule of Islam. We may not be at war with Islam but Islam is at war with us. It may not be war as we know it, but the goals are the same. Remember what Muhammad said: "war is deceit."
I am a Gharkad Tree
written by Rzq , March 28, 2012
Your islamophobia is showing
Are we doing US president quotes
Among the critics of Paul the Apostle was Thomas Jefferson who wrote that Paul was the "first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus."
Thus making 33% of the new testament void!
Christians have completely different GODS.
They like to spread their gospels via deceptions:
http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/christianity_child_abuse.html
Massive study done.
Let's not forget the evangelical food for cock programme around the world.
Are we doing US president quotes
Among the critics of Paul the Apostle was Thomas Jefferson who wrote that Paul was the "first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus."
Thus making 33% of the new testament void!
Christians have completely different GODS.
They like to spread their gospels via deceptions:
http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/christianity_child_abuse.html
Massive study done.
Let's not forget the evangelical food for cock programme around the world.
written by Malem , March 28, 2012
You stated "All I see is rude Muslims who have never seen any kind of good teaching or any kind of good manner in their live ." So are you indicating there are no such Muslims or just the ones located neaer you? All I see are very well behaved and civil Muslims near me, very successful, and always helping out their fellow man.
written by Archpagan , March 28, 2012
Violence, debauchery and deceit are ingrained in Muslim psyche and life. Muslims constitute 15% of the total population in India. But, they constitute 60% of the prison population. Same is the case with many other democratic non-Muslim countries. If a good Muslim is found, then he is either ignorant or non-believing Muslim, if not ex-Muslim. Their role-model, as described in Hadith is a super-criminal. How can one be honest and civilized while adoring the most uncivilized highway robber?
If you argue that Hadith is false, then Islam is false. Because Hadith is recognized by every Muslim society in the world. What matters here is the recognition not authenticity.
If you argue that Hadith is false, then Islam is false. Because Hadith is recognized by every Muslim society in the world. What matters here is the recognition not authenticity.
written by The Fog Horn , March 28, 2012
My comment has not been published. I do hope ex-muslims are not doing what they complain muslims do....censoring thought and debate.
written by Malem , March 28, 2012
Your wrong, Hadith is not recognized by every Muslim, secondly Prison population doesnt mean much, look at the west the majority in Prison are African and Hsipanic....maybe there is a bit of a bias to put them in jail
written by Yibel , March 29, 2012
Since a phobia is an illogical or irrational fear, there is no such thing as
"islamophobia." Therefore, I have NO "islamophobia" to show.
I do, however, find all things Islamic to be nauseating, so the correct term would be ISLAMONAUSEA - a very strong aversion to the vile and totally repugnant creed known as Islam - where the very mention of the word brings on a feeling of needing to vomit.
"What proper person can be partial to all those nauseous Muhammadan verses?" (a slight rewrite of Byron)
rzq, YOUR Christianophobia is showing!
"islamophobia." Therefore, I have NO "islamophobia" to show.
I do, however, find all things Islamic to be nauseating, so the correct term would be ISLAMONAUSEA - a very strong aversion to the vile and totally repugnant creed known as Islam - where the very mention of the word brings on a feeling of needing to vomit.
"What proper person can be partial to all those nauseous Muhammadan verses?" (a slight rewrite of Byron)
rzq, YOUR Christianophobia is showing!
written by Rzq , March 29, 2012
I wouldn't say christianophobia! I have no phobia of Christians!
It's more yibelonausea- a very strong aversion to the vile and totally repugnant creed of a first class bigot where the very mention of the word he typed brings on a feeling of needing to vomit.
It's more yibelonausea- a very strong aversion to the vile and totally repugnant creed of a first class bigot where the very mention of the word he typed brings on a feeling of needing to vomit.
written by Clement-Islam-Watch Pastor , March 29, 2012
1.How many sons has Abraham?.
A 8 B. 2 C. 4 D. 6
2.Which of the sons of Abraham inherited all his properties but gave gifts to the remaining sons
A.Isaac , B. Mohammed, C. Ishmael D. Esau
3.Which of the sons of Abraham was the father of Jewish nation?
A.Isaac Abdullah, B. Ishmael, C. Yahaha D. Mohammed
4.Which of the sons of Abraham that Allah regarded as the only son of Abraham which was to be sacrificed in the land of Moriah as a type of the only begotten son of God sacrifice later on the same spot then called mount Calvary.
A.Isaac B. Abubakar , C. Jesus, D. Mohammed
5.Which of the sons of Abraham whose descendants produced all the prophets and kings that ever lived in the Bible and in the Quran apart from Mohammed?
6.A. Isaac, B. Ishmael, C. Moses, D. Jacob
7.What was the significant of Blood sacrifice as demanded by God for all sins committed?
A.Because it is the blood that make atonement for the souls of men.
B.Because Abel first made sacrifice with sheep.
C. Because blood is as red as Sin.
D. Because heaven is under the shed of blood
8.Why did God Provide a ram as a substitute for Isaac not to be sacrificed but allowed Jesus to be killed on the same spot Isaac was saved by the gift of a ram from God?
A. Jesus was the real Lamb of God whose blood atones for the sin of the world, so God allow his sinless blood to atone our sins. God was unwilling to save Jesus,
B. Jesus needed to atone for his sins
C.God wants humans to wait for Mohammed to come and show them how to slice the throat of men for jihad.
D. God wanted to teach a lesson on sin
8.Why were animal sacrifices allow in the Old Testament but not allowed in the New Testament of the Bible?
A.Jesus sinless blood replaces all animal sacrifices for all mankind who believe in Him.
B. Animal are now very expensive for the common man.
C. Animals beg God to forgive them and allow them to live without harassment.
D. God want Mohammed to come and show how Abraham did his sacrifice.
9.Which of the following is not true of a true prophet of God.
A.A true prophet is made victorious through terror and war
B.A true prophet loves people, care and preaches the word of God to his people.
C. A true prophets predict the future accurately and recall history correctly
D. A true prophet intercedes for the people he was sent to guide.
10.One of the following did not say why Mohammed was rejected by Christian and Jews as a Prophet from God.
A. He was kind to everybody and loves women especially.
B. He lead by terror, a mass murder, deceitful and multiplied wives and concubines
C. He was a black stone worshiper and sanctions all pagan rituals of his time
D. He was powerless to perform miracle and could not predict the future.
Finally the first Mohammadan to get 10/10 will get a surprise gift from me.
I am waiting to mark your answers
A 8 B. 2 C. 4 D. 6
2.Which of the sons of Abraham inherited all his properties but gave gifts to the remaining sons
A.Isaac , B. Mohammed, C. Ishmael D. Esau
3.Which of the sons of Abraham was the father of Jewish nation?
A.Isaac Abdullah, B. Ishmael, C. Yahaha D. Mohammed
4.Which of the sons of Abraham that Allah regarded as the only son of Abraham which was to be sacrificed in the land of Moriah as a type of the only begotten son of God sacrifice later on the same spot then called mount Calvary.
A.Isaac B. Abubakar , C. Jesus, D. Mohammed
5.Which of the sons of Abraham whose descendants produced all the prophets and kings that ever lived in the Bible and in the Quran apart from Mohammed?
6.A. Isaac, B. Ishmael, C. Moses, D. Jacob
7.What was the significant of Blood sacrifice as demanded by God for all sins committed?
A.Because it is the blood that make atonement for the souls of men.
B.Because Abel first made sacrifice with sheep.
C. Because blood is as red as Sin.
D. Because heaven is under the shed of blood
8.Why did God Provide a ram as a substitute for Isaac not to be sacrificed but allowed Jesus to be killed on the same spot Isaac was saved by the gift of a ram from God?
A. Jesus was the real Lamb of God whose blood atones for the sin of the world, so God allow his sinless blood to atone our sins. God was unwilling to save Jesus,
B. Jesus needed to atone for his sins
C.God wants humans to wait for Mohammed to come and show them how to slice the throat of men for jihad.
D. God wanted to teach a lesson on sin
8.Why were animal sacrifices allow in the Old Testament but not allowed in the New Testament of the Bible?
A.Jesus sinless blood replaces all animal sacrifices for all mankind who believe in Him.
B. Animal are now very expensive for the common man.
C. Animals beg God to forgive them and allow them to live without harassment.
D. God want Mohammed to come and show how Abraham did his sacrifice.
9.Which of the following is not true of a true prophet of God.
A.A true prophet is made victorious through terror and war
B.A true prophet loves people, care and preaches the word of God to his people.
C. A true prophets predict the future accurately and recall history correctly
D. A true prophet intercedes for the people he was sent to guide.
10.One of the following did not say why Mohammed was rejected by Christian and Jews as a Prophet from God.
A. He was kind to everybody and loves women especially.
B. He lead by terror, a mass murder, deceitful and multiplied wives and concubines
C. He was a black stone worshiper and sanctions all pagan rituals of his time
D. He was powerless to perform miracle and could not predict the future.
Finally the first Mohammadan to get 10/10 will get a surprise gift from me.
I am waiting to mark your answers
written by vbv , March 29, 2012
In India ,most criminals are muslims . There are umpteen instances of these slaves of islam are upto no good. They are involved in smuggling drugs, arms, human-trafficking of girls and boys for prostitution or to export them to the middle-east for the 'camel races', money-laundering, 'supari-killers',robberies, rapes,brigandry ,bootlegging,etc. ... you name it ,these worthy muslims ,slaves of islam, are in it with their hands full. There are muslim ghettoes ( no go areas for nonmuslims) where these worthy muslims find safe havens.
Surely malem cannot deny these facts. What about Pakistan ? Any crime that gets painted with 'islam' and 'sharia' is game enough for muslims there to kidnap hindu girls ,rape them and forcibly "marry" them to a muslim rake in which the muslim clergy has a hand , or accuse anyone of 'blasphemy' to settle scores or murder them , demand "jizzya" or protection money from nonmuslims ( the typical muhamadan way to make a living).... This is islam - a perfect mafia code for criminals and delinquents who acn indulge in criminal activities under the cover of "religion".
Surely malem cannot deny these facts. What about Pakistan ? Any crime that gets painted with 'islam' and 'sharia' is game enough for muslims there to kidnap hindu girls ,rape them and forcibly "marry" them to a muslim rake in which the muslim clergy has a hand , or accuse anyone of 'blasphemy' to settle scores or murder them , demand "jizzya" or protection money from nonmuslims ( the typical muhamadan way to make a living).... This is islam - a perfect mafia code for criminals and delinquents who acn indulge in criminal activities under the cover of "religion".
written by Archpagan , March 29, 2012
Malem, you said -' Hadith is not recognized by every Muslim.' But I have yet to hear any Muslim clergy/leader ever say in a congregation of Muslims that Hadith in not authoritative. Only some taqquiya artists operating in the web world say such thing. In the mainstream media nobody raises any doubt regarding authority of Hadith. Rather, Hadith is believed to be complementary to Koran. Commonly held belief is that without Hadith, the Koran is a lame-duck.
Rzq, Yible is a scholar like Machmoed. You may feel existential crisis at his revelations, which may be causing nausea to you. But, I really feel nausea to think of a dirty 54-year old man having sex with a 7-year old girl.
Rzq, Yible is a scholar like Machmoed. You may feel existential crisis at his revelations, which may be causing nausea to you. But, I really feel nausea to think of a dirty 54-year old man having sex with a 7-year old girl.
written by Yibel , March 29, 2012
Here's some more "bigotry," and it's from another US president. So Enjoy!!!
Islamic definition of murder:
"The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mohamed is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force." - John Quincy Adams
To the Muslim, murdering Infidels is not really murder at all. He/she is merely doing his duty to his sacred stone god to rid the world of all the non-believers. Chopping off the Infidels heads is not murder at all, because it is sanctioned by Muhammad, aka Allah.
Islamic definition of murder:
"The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mohamed is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force." - John Quincy Adams
To the Muslim, murdering Infidels is not really murder at all. He/she is merely doing his duty to his sacred stone god to rid the world of all the non-believers. Chopping off the Infidels heads is not murder at all, because it is sanctioned by Muhammad, aka Allah.
written by Malem , March 29, 2012
Your wrong again, in the mosque where I go it is pure quran teachings only. So unless the several hundred other people that attend are jsut imaginary, your way off base. Again I know its tought, but actually READ the Quran, it clearly says it is the ONLY word of Allah, and jsut because you "believe" Hadith is needed doesnt make it right, in fact since you are not a Muslim, you really have no say in the matter. As for your comment to RZQ, my advice to you would be to find women your old age, that is much too young for you.
written by Yibel , March 30, 2012
@ Malem
"...in fact since you are not a Muslim, you really have no say in the matter." ROTFLOL - THAT IS THE POINT!!!
THANK YOU FOR SHOWING WHAT TRUE MUSLIMS ARE LIKE. Like the good muslim you are, you blatantly disregard and devalue the opinions and contributions of all those who are not Muslims. A non-Muslim's opinion holds no value. A non-Muslim's contribution to society holds no value. A non-Muslim's life holds no value. *SIGH*
Of course I know what I'm talking about. You are the one in denial. You simply don't want to face the fact that you've bought into a sucky political ideology and pseudo-religion. So you try to get by though ignorance of the aHadith and all the biographical evidence that shows just what a horrible human being Muhammad really was. Just because some book says that it is the ONLY word of "so-and-so" doesn't mean a thing. Anybody can write a book claiming to be getting messages from a god, or whatever Allah is. Do you believe everything in the Qur'an?
Or do you just read the easy to digest passages?
The fact is, the Qur'an is factually and spiritually WRONG!!!
In the Hiddah it relates a discussion with Mo'...he was asked what things beyond prayer and Jihad benefited a man in life til he went to Heaven... Mo' said, 'Nothing, all else in life is just SPORT"
As for this comment:
"As for your comment to RZQ, my advice to you would be to find women your old age, that is much too young for you. "
What the BLANK are you talking about?
"...in fact since you are not a Muslim, you really have no say in the matter." ROTFLOL - THAT IS THE POINT!!!
THANK YOU FOR SHOWING WHAT TRUE MUSLIMS ARE LIKE. Like the good muslim you are, you blatantly disregard and devalue the opinions and contributions of all those who are not Muslims. A non-Muslim's opinion holds no value. A non-Muslim's contribution to society holds no value. A non-Muslim's life holds no value. *SIGH*
Of course I know what I'm talking about. You are the one in denial. You simply don't want to face the fact that you've bought into a sucky political ideology and pseudo-religion. So you try to get by though ignorance of the aHadith and all the biographical evidence that shows just what a horrible human being Muhammad really was. Just because some book says that it is the ONLY word of "so-and-so" doesn't mean a thing. Anybody can write a book claiming to be getting messages from a god, or whatever Allah is. Do you believe everything in the Qur'an?
Or do you just read the easy to digest passages?
The fact is, the Qur'an is factually and spiritually WRONG!!!
In the Hiddah it relates a discussion with Mo'...he was asked what things beyond prayer and Jihad benefited a man in life til he went to Heaven... Mo' said, 'Nothing, all else in life is just SPORT"
As for this comment:
"As for your comment to RZQ, my advice to you would be to find women your old age, that is much too young for you. "
What the BLANK are you talking about?
written by bundypig , March 30, 2012
This is a great expose of sharia...
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/world/acid-victim-fakhra-younus-suicide-shames-all-pakistan/story-e6frev00-1226314038233
I'll like to see malem or the stardust twins talk about this, maybe mis-understanders of islam huh?
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/world/acid-victim-fakhra-younus-suicide-shames-all-pakistan/story-e6frev00-1226314038233
I'll like to see malem or the stardust twins talk about this, maybe mis-understanders of islam huh?
written by someone , March 30, 2012
Islam does not only regulate the vertical relationship (faith, worship) between the slave and his god (Allah), but also the horizontal relationships (human beings). Not only explains the events that will happen in the world until the end of time but also explain the events that will be experienced by humans in the next, whether he will enter the Party of Allah or not.
included in the Party of Allah will be incorporated into paradise while not be put in hell as a place of eternal.
Relations neighbor arranged horizontally in the field of muamalah, muasyarah, morality.
In the Islamic world the West is now a surprising development bank Bank syriah in the Islamic world. Bank Muamalat in Indonesia as the largest bank in Indonesia, Islamic banks made the advance bank national bank to open Islamic bank busy busy work patterns mimic this Islamic bank. Similarly, in malaysia, singapore etc. whereas is derived from the teachings of the prophet Muhammad in the western world are insulted, belittled.
Indeed the western countries, especially English, amirika now follow the teachings of Muhammad, they create a bank of Islamic banks in their countries. as invited expert and founder of the Islamic bank Indonesia DR Syafii Antonio china descendants of converts who had embraced Islam that teaches how to create Islamic banks ..
included in the Party of Allah will be incorporated into paradise while not be put in hell as a place of eternal.
Relations neighbor arranged horizontally in the field of muamalah, muasyarah, morality.
In the Islamic world the West is now a surprising development bank Bank syriah in the Islamic world. Bank Muamalat in Indonesia as the largest bank in Indonesia, Islamic banks made the advance bank national bank to open Islamic bank busy busy work patterns mimic this Islamic bank. Similarly, in malaysia, singapore etc. whereas is derived from the teachings of the prophet Muhammad in the western world are insulted, belittled.
Indeed the western countries, especially English, amirika now follow the teachings of Muhammad, they create a bank of Islamic banks in their countries. as invited expert and founder of the Islamic bank Indonesia DR Syafii Antonio china descendants of converts who had embraced Islam that teaches how to create Islamic banks ..
written by Archpagan , March 30, 2012
Perhaps your above post is addressed to me.
Yes, I need to be a Muslim to know how the Muslims play taqquiya to non-Muslims.
You claim to be doctor, don't you feel that there should be sexual compatibility between husband and wife? Is that possible between a 54-year old man and a 9-year old girl? Please don't duck.
Yes, I need to be a Muslim to know how the Muslims play taqquiya to non-Muslims.
You claim to be doctor, don't you feel that there should be sexual compatibility between husband and wife? Is that possible between a 54-year old man and a 9-year old girl? Please don't duck.
written by Rzq , March 30, 2012
1. There is evidence by the same author you quote
That aisha(ra) was not that age. Now when you get evidence which conflicts, doubt creeps in. Compounded with that there is a bundle of evidence on consummation rules. This is a favourite for the haters and phobes!
That aisha(ra) was not that age. Now when you get evidence which conflicts, doubt creeps in. Compounded with that there is a bundle of evidence on consummation rules. This is a favourite for the haters and phobes!
written by Infidel and More proud , March 30, 2012
There are topics which dies hard muslims do not debate about. They just avoid them.
...But our jestors must debate and jump into every topic even if they have not understood the verses in Quran and read the hadiths.
...But our jestors must debate and jump into every topic even if they have not understood the verses in Quran and read the hadiths.
written by Muhammad (P.B.U.H) , March 30, 2012
My followers are crazy (just like me)....... They only understand the language of violence. So just beat them to submission ! In my Quran, I have told my followers to Kill, Rape, Murder all non-Muslims. If you don't believe it, just read the Quran.
The new Shahada is:
La ilaha Allah
Zakir Naikur Rasulullah
Meaning:
There is no Allah.
Zakir Naik is the Final Prophet.
The new Shahada is:
La ilaha Allah
Zakir Naikur Rasulullah
Meaning:
There is no Allah.
Zakir Naik is the Final Prophet.
written by Infi , March 30, 2012
ZAKIR IS MAKKIR
Go say he is final frofet in saudi and you will realise that he is missing his neck.
Go say he is final frofet in saudi and you will realise that he is missing his neck.
written by vbv , March 31, 2012
Why Muhamad asked his zombies to hate dogs ? Because dogs are friendly ,trusting and grateful creatures . If muslims are made to like dogs ,they might inculcate all those good traits : so felt that false prophet of arabia. Arabia is a desert with hardly any flora and fauna,except a few reptiles, scorpions, insects and camel ,while horses are imported from greener pastures - you cannot expect these barbaric bedouins to be animal lovers especially when they have no love amongst humans ,in the first place. That is why islam is immoral, anticivilisational and barbaric and brutal.
written by someone , March 31, 2012
it's a wonder you say you have no god, why do you hate people (Prophet Muhammad) that introduces the human to human god. you do not deserve to go in the quality of this blog, you should get out of here. the quality of this blog. About a dog should you read someone posting on the treads dog. VBV how low you are, embrace one religion so that you get better. to improve the quality of your misunderstanding about Islam. ok
written by vbv , April 01, 2012
I am an indian and in India there is freedom to reject any and all religion without attracting the 'blasphemy' law or the law aginst apostasy ,like in islam. I feel you acn be a much better person without any religion and its narrow dogmas like islam. Islam is the worst religion that thriveson bigotry ,hate and violence. Just imagine, in Pakistan, a man was gunned down by two 'momins' on a motorcycle just because this man was not at his salat / namaz in a mosque. This happened in Quetta a couple of years back. This is forcing a religion with threats of liquidation. To be able to love a dog, cat or any animal you have to be agood humanbeing , not a narrow minded religious bigot and a fanatic. Islam breeds only zombies who are bigots and extremely intolerant fanatics. First , be a good humanbeing before you pass advice to someone. A muslim can never be a good human being because it is a cult that can corrupt a good human being into a zombie that will kill and torure in the name of islam, and this is happening everywhere.
written by someone , April 01, 2012
xixixixi, itis your problem. hoax news. have you go to indonesia, malaysia, brunaidarussalam?? go there. xixixi you live like the frog under the shell.
written by vbv , April 01, 2012
Indonesia and Malaysia are muslim countries that have elements of 'sharia' like "blasphemy law" , punishment for 'apostasy', and treating nonmuslims not on par with the local muslim population. These countries are not really secular democracies. The whole world knows their conditions.So, you cannot bluff your way out by telling me your taqiyya about these two muslim majority countries.
written by I卐LAM , April 02, 2012
Shar'ia is the empitomization of anti-humanistic subjugation. I contradicts almost every facet of a human being's predisposition.
To live under such torturous statutes would be worse than living under the Damocles of the Spanish Inquisition.
I'd die before I'd let that happen to the free world. ...And KILL long before that.
To live under such torturous statutes would be worse than living under the Damocles of the Spanish Inquisition.
I'd die before I'd let that happen to the free world. ...And KILL long before that.
Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.
