After a murderous jihad at Fort Hood or the Christmas day airplane bombing attempt, did you hear: "Of course, not all Muslims are bad?" That brings up the question of how do you even tell if a Muslim is bad? Or good?
First off, what is a Muslim? A Muslim is a person who follows the doctrine of Islam. When that same person, does something that does not follow the doctrine of Islam, they are not a Muslim. The common idea is that anyone who says that they are a Muslim has their every action and word dictated by Islam. Put another way, every Muslim is seen as perfect follower of Islam at all times and circumstances. However, the truth is that a "Muslim" is not always a Muslim. When they do not follow Islamic doctrine, they are no longer a Muslim, but are a kafir (non-Muslim).
Now, how do we know if a Muslim is good or bad? If they are following the Koran and the Sunna (the perfect example of Mohammed), they are a good Muslim. If they don't follow the doctrine, then they are not a Muslim. That means that from the stand point of Islam there is no such thing as a good or bad Muslim. You either are a Muslim or you are not. When anyone follows the Koran and the Sunna, they are Muslim. When anyone does not follow the doctrine of Islam then they are a kafir.
This means that a person called a Muslim has two modes of being-Muslim and kafir, or kafir-Muslim. The same person can be a Muslim in one moment and a kafir in the next.
What do kafirs mean by a good Muslim? Simple, the same way we judge all other people as good and bad-the Golden Rule. Do they follow the Golden Rule when they are with us? If so, then they are a good person.
Since the Koran and the Sunna do not have the Golden Rule, how are Muslims to treat us? Islamic doctrine lays out an alternative to the Golden Rule. Those who do not believe Mohammed are kafirs, and kafirs are treated differently from Muslims.
Islamic doctrine says a great deal about the kafir. Most of the Koran is about kafirs, 61%, only 39% is about Muslims. About 20% of the Hadith is about kafirs and 98% of the Sira is about kafirs. Mohammed was fixated on kafirs and annihilated every kafir by violence, exile or conversion. When Mohammed died, there was not a person alive in Arabia who would argue with him.
Mohammed's actions are pure Islam; therefore, annihilating kafirs and kafir culture is pure Islam. A Muslim has to be, in some way, in some form of action, eliminating kafirs and their world. The action against kafirs is jihad. There are four flavors of jihad and murder is only one. Deception, conversation, articles and TV appearances can be jihad of speech and writing. There is always the option of giving to an Islamic charity, since one of the Koranic uses of charity is jihad.
Every Muslim believes that all nonbelievers are kafirs. The Koran says that kafirs may be hated, plotted against, deceived, murdered, raped, enslaved, mocked and tortured. All of those actions are Islam and perfect doctrine. When a person is being a good Muslim, they are following Islam and that means that you are a kafir. Hate, deception, murder, mockery and torture are bad for kafirs, but good for Muslims.
Kafirs are pure other. Muslims treat other Muslims as brothers and sisters, but they can treat a kafir well or they can treat them as less than an animal. Islam has dualistic ethics, one set of rules for Muslims and another set of rules for kafirs. Dualism is bad. When a Muslim practices dualism, they are bad. There is no good in Islam for a kafir and therefore, there is no good in a Muslim for a kafir.
Does this mean that the Muslim at work is bad? Yes, when they are following the doctrine of Islam. Whenever they are not following Islam, that person can be as good as any other. It is not about people, but about doctrine. It is the doctrine of Islam to be bad to kafirs. When anyone is practicing Islam around a kafir they must be bad, since Mohammed was never good to kafirs.
Wait! What about the nice, pious Muslim at work? He is good, isn't he?
Is he nice because of the Golden Rule or is he practicing the Sunna of the charming Mohammed we find in the early Meccan days? Mohammed could be very polite with kafirs, however, if charm did not work, then other methods were used. Islam is a process of increasing force that can start out pleasantly.
We are left with an ethical confusion around any Muslim. They can seem pleasant, but nothing changes the fact that they see Mohammed as the perfect person to imitate. Nothing changes the fact that we are kafirs. Kafir is the worst word in the human language.
Whom are we to believe-the Muslim at work or Mohammed? Every Muslim wants to imitate Mohammed; every Muslim is a Mohammedan. The problem is that Mohammed annihilated every kafir he ever met. It was a process. The process started out nice and when nice did not work, it ended in annihilation of the kafir. In Islam, nice is the beginning of bad for the kafir.
So how do you tell if a nice Muslim is good or bad? From the kafir point-of-view, there is only the fact that a Muslim is following Mohammed's example. And that is bad, very bad.
Bill Warner is a scholar and author on Islam. This article appeared in the Political Islam blog.
Comments (33)
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by ALLAtappa , January 24, 2010
It is simple common sense . Never, ever trust a practicing Moslem or a person who says that he is a Moslem - period. A practicing Moslem means - is like a BOMB ready to explode and kill you as and when the situation and opportunity available to the Moslem. This is happening all over the world, again and again and again and again and ......... There are hundreds of times Moslems killed nonmoslems/Hindus in INDIA - even during the recent past. Did anybody count the number of times Moslems exploded bombs in INDIA ?
written by Truth Detector , January 24, 2010
An authentic Muslim is a person who takes his evil religion of Islam seriously. A so-called Muslim, who is a good person, isn't practicing the evil doctrine of Islam. Our job is to continue informing so-called Muslims who are good that they are not authentic Muslims. Once they learn to differentiate, they will no longer call themselves Muslims.
written by filthykafir , January 24, 2010
Easy to Know says: "Our job is to continue informing so-called Muslims who are good that they are not authentic Muslims. Once they learn to differentiate, they will no longer call themselves Muslims."
I see a problem with this approach. Once they learn to differentiate, it is entirely possible (probable?) they will, instead, study to better understand Mohammed's directives and become "real" Muslims. Then, of course, they will practice jihad and seek to kill or enslave us.
I think it is wiser to just not trust Muslims at all.
I see a problem with this approach. Once they learn to differentiate, it is entirely possible (probable?) they will, instead, study to better understand Mohammed's directives and become "real" Muslims. Then, of course, they will practice jihad and seek to kill or enslave us.
I think it is wiser to just not trust Muslims at all.
written by antomod , January 24, 2010
Beware, a socalled good muslim may mutate and become a bad muslim. Good muslim is the one who has subdued feelings and doesnot show up his real intent. He believes in taqiyya and waits for his time to strike. Good muslims are beneficieries of bad muslim's actions. Look out for the snare he lays for a nonmuslim. They cannot be convinced through logic or dialogue. All secular nations should declare islam as a cult and not to be allowed to practice in their land. If this cannot not become possible there should be international pressure on all islamic countries like Saudi Arabia to become secular and allow other religion ists to practice their faith. There is no other alternative.
written by Mohammad.A.khan , January 24, 2010
I agree with what Bill has said in his article. a good muslim is a staunch follower of koran and Muhammad, on the other hand, who are less voilent and so called peace-maker muslims have no place for in Islam for them.
Thus the latters are kafirs, from Islamic law. However, they keep telling others that they are good muslims and Islam is the religion of peace. those who are less-voilent they are kafirs for sure.
Thus the latters are kafirs, from Islamic law. However, they keep telling others that they are good muslims and Islam is the religion of peace. those who are less-voilent they are kafirs for sure.
written by to antomod , January 24, 2010
I am a MUSLIM SHIA and i want to tell you that I am so happy to follow the religion Islam and the Prophet Muhammed (p.b.u.h) and the Shia sect of Islam. As i have said before in a comment that was not posted (not like this one will be posted but anyway) Imam Hussien was killed by people who claimed to be muslims and Christians were killed with him because they saw in him the Spirit of Jesus(p.b.u.h) he was asking for what Prophet Muhammed wanted peace and social justice not the social freedom that you claim which only leads to destruction and corruption of families. By the way America is one of the most countries that claims freedom and it has got one of the highest divorce rates in the world and many of the population live under the poverty line and it is one of the biggest weapon producing country in the world and alot of stuff like the Columbine murdering incident happen there because of there pathetic weapon and machinery laws.
written by The Infidel Alliance , January 24, 2010
Dear "to antomod",
If you are a "Muslim Shia", you are still a follower of Muhammed.
***
The hard truth about Muhammed is that by any objective standard, Muhammed was far from being a 'holy' man, or ‘Uswa-e-Hasana’ (an excellent example of conduct), or ‘al-insan al-kamil’ (the perfect man).
***
Muhammed, was simply a sadistic sociopath, a murderer, a looting thief, a torturer, a slaver, a human trafficker, a mutilator, an amputator, a decapitator, a rapist, a sexual deviant, a sex trafficker, a child rapist, a perfidious liar, a genocidist and a self proclaimed terrorist.
***
Muhammed was motivated by unquenchable sexual lust, material greed and oppressive power. Far from being a ‘holy man’, Muhammed was perhaps one of the most vile, repugnant men in the pantheon of human history.
***
Muhammed was simply a successful Charles Manson, and like Manson Muhammed should be reviled, not revered.
***
It was Muhammed who set the standard of violence for Islam and who established its ‘morality’. It was Muhammed who himself engaged in jihad and mandated jihad for his minions.
***
Today, it is Muhammed who inspires simple men to turn into suicide bombers. It is Muhammed who inspires educated men like Major Dr. Nidal Hassan to turn into mass killers of infidels. It is Muhammed who inspires wealthy, priviledged men like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to blow off his genitals in an attempt to slaughter infidels.
***
Muhammed - the man responsible for 1,400 years of Muslim and 'infidel' death and suffering.
***
Muhammed - the man responsible for EVERY pathology that afflicts Islam.
***
~ The Infidel Alliance
If you are a "Muslim Shia", you are still a follower of Muhammed.
***
The hard truth about Muhammed is that by any objective standard, Muhammed was far from being a 'holy' man, or ‘Uswa-e-Hasana’ (an excellent example of conduct), or ‘al-insan al-kamil’ (the perfect man).
***
Muhammed, was simply a sadistic sociopath, a murderer, a looting thief, a torturer, a slaver, a human trafficker, a mutilator, an amputator, a decapitator, a rapist, a sexual deviant, a sex trafficker, a child rapist, a perfidious liar, a genocidist and a self proclaimed terrorist.
***
Muhammed was motivated by unquenchable sexual lust, material greed and oppressive power. Far from being a ‘holy man’, Muhammed was perhaps one of the most vile, repugnant men in the pantheon of human history.
***
Muhammed was simply a successful Charles Manson, and like Manson Muhammed should be reviled, not revered.
***
It was Muhammed who set the standard of violence for Islam and who established its ‘morality’. It was Muhammed who himself engaged in jihad and mandated jihad for his minions.
***
Today, it is Muhammed who inspires simple men to turn into suicide bombers. It is Muhammed who inspires educated men like Major Dr. Nidal Hassan to turn into mass killers of infidels. It is Muhammed who inspires wealthy, priviledged men like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to blow off his genitals in an attempt to slaughter infidels.
***
Muhammed - the man responsible for 1,400 years of Muslim and 'infidel' death and suffering.
***
Muhammed - the man responsible for EVERY pathology that afflicts Islam.
***
~ The Infidel Alliance
written by Mo-Suck , January 24, 2010
You mention that the U.S has the high divorce rate....well seems that saudi arabia is top of the pops now with a 60% rate now that they have allowed woman to file.
I agree with the Infidel Alliance with what he says.
I agree with the Infidel Alliance with what he says.
written by wagamama , January 24, 2010
A good Muslim is one who emulates the horrors of Muhammad. A moderator Muslim is one who supports good Musims clandestinely in their fight against kaffirs. A Bad Muslim does not exist on earth.
written by Jew Lover , January 24, 2010
To those who think Islam is peaceful, they are either ignorant of the Koran, or willfully lying.
What other "religion" allows/condones/requires slavery, sex slavery, death for people who leave the 'religion", extortion (jizya), death for failing to convert, robbery, theft, lying, omission of truth, amputation, requires 4 male witnesses for rape, honor killing, honor rape, and almost every other vile and violent act known to man.
Crazy Islam
What other "religion" allows/condones/requires slavery, sex slavery, death for people who leave the 'religion", extortion (jizya), death for failing to convert, robbery, theft, lying, omission of truth, amputation, requires 4 male witnesses for rape, honor killing, honor rape, and almost every other vile and violent act known to man.
Crazy Islam
written by kafir , January 24, 2010
just want to mention to you that the 'high divorce rate' (which, if i am not mistaken, hovers around 50% or so). i would su*gest that BECAUSE of america's freedoms, people are not required to maintain their marriage if it is unpleasant or dangerous.
and the columbine incident- the club that every anti-gun, anti-american person uses in an arguement- had nothing to do with our 'pathetic gun laws'. indeed, the kids who commited that massacre already violated more than 20 laws as it were! we have plenty of gun laws! too many, if you ask me, but that is another discussion.
now, antomod, explain to me again how many slaves mohammed owned? and how many tribes and caravans he attacked, robbed, and gave the women out to his followers as 'war booty'? and who, again, was his favorite wife? for the life of me, i cannot remember how old she was...
and the columbine incident- the club that every anti-gun, anti-american person uses in an arguement- had nothing to do with our 'pathetic gun laws'. indeed, the kids who commited that massacre already violated more than 20 laws as it were! we have plenty of gun laws! too many, if you ask me, but that is another discussion.
now, antomod, explain to me again how many slaves mohammed owned? and how many tribes and caravans he attacked, robbed, and gave the women out to his followers as 'war booty'? and who, again, was his favorite wife? for the life of me, i cannot remember how old she was...
written by Free from Pro Moe (Prophet Moham ....) , January 25, 2010
Not all Muslim are terrorist, but all terrorist are muslim
written by Clement , January 25, 2010
The Critiques of the Bible and the Quran have sited some links between them but those links are purely sited out of ignorant or deliberate distortion of the facts and the substance of the matter. They said Yahweh ordered the killing of unbelievers in the Old Testament just like the Quran. Abraham committed incest with his sister Sarah by marrying her just like Mohammed committed incest by marrying his daughter in-law. David, Solomon married more than one wife just like Mohammed. I believe the understanding of these three scenarios sited above will be the key to understanding the Bible inspiration as against the Quran. The only link between the Bible and the Quran is in the area of faith in the oneness of God even at that the concept of trio unity of the Judeo-Christian God is alien to the Quran. Other faith related issues that appear similar are, resurrection of the dead, Satan, Angel, hell, heaven but again the Islamic hell and heaven differ greatly with the Judeo-Christian teaching on the subject but let agree that they all believe in the hereafter life which will be spent in the place of eternal suffering and torment or eternal bliss and happiness. It is because of these apparent similarities that made people to classify Islam as a religion in the class Judaism and Christianity but in actual facts it is not. It is a political system under the cover of religion.
Now let me address the misunderstanding of example of link between the Bible and Quran as sited above.
1. Killing in the Old Testament. The killing in the Bible are carried out By God Himself or at his instruction after he has proved himself to the children of Israel that He was the almighty God and beside him there was no god in Power and in Might. Besides those violence are time bound and to specific people for specific reasons. It is not the case with the Quran, the killing was not done by Allah but humans and no single proof that Allah was God almighty and the instruction to kill is open end till all in the world become Muslims.
2. Incest of Abraham. There was nothing like incest until God said incest was bad in his law. So the standard of morality is the law of God. For where there is no law there is no sin. Abraham’s action was before the law was given on mount Sinai more than 400 years later but the action of Mohammed was more than 2000 years after the law was given
3. Polygamy in the Old Testament. Marrying more than one wife was not approved by God. It was a disobedience to God Law but that did not mean that if one have right attitude towards his sins God will not use him like the case of David God still used him because he had repentant heart and right attitude toward God. None of this polygamist in the Bible or in our time will point at the scriptures that God gave them approval to do so. But in the case of the Quran Allah approve 4 wives and even more for the prophets. He even legalised prostitution where you can marry for one hour, two hours, a day a month even some years and divorce provided money exchange hands. What do you call this the civilised world (Prostitution).The Bible call any sexual relationship outside one wife adultery or fornication, Even lust in the heart other than your wife is counted act of adultery what more of 4 wives and unlimited slave girls that the Quran approves.
Therefore, based on this facts , no unbiased mind that will classify the Bible in the same level with the Quran in the matter of moral standard because these few instances that are quoted out of context.
Now let me address the misunderstanding of example of link between the Bible and Quran as sited above.
1. Killing in the Old Testament. The killing in the Bible are carried out By God Himself or at his instruction after he has proved himself to the children of Israel that He was the almighty God and beside him there was no god in Power and in Might. Besides those violence are time bound and to specific people for specific reasons. It is not the case with the Quran, the killing was not done by Allah but humans and no single proof that Allah was God almighty and the instruction to kill is open end till all in the world become Muslims.
2. Incest of Abraham. There was nothing like incest until God said incest was bad in his law. So the standard of morality is the law of God. For where there is no law there is no sin. Abraham’s action was before the law was given on mount Sinai more than 400 years later but the action of Mohammed was more than 2000 years after the law was given
3. Polygamy in the Old Testament. Marrying more than one wife was not approved by God. It was a disobedience to God Law but that did not mean that if one have right attitude towards his sins God will not use him like the case of David God still used him because he had repentant heart and right attitude toward God. None of this polygamist in the Bible or in our time will point at the scriptures that God gave them approval to do so. But in the case of the Quran Allah approve 4 wives and even more for the prophets. He even legalised prostitution where you can marry for one hour, two hours, a day a month even some years and divorce provided money exchange hands. What do you call this the civilised world (Prostitution).The Bible call any sexual relationship outside one wife adultery or fornication, Even lust in the heart other than your wife is counted act of adultery what more of 4 wives and unlimited slave girls that the Quran approves.
Therefore, based on this facts , no unbiased mind that will classify the Bible in the same level with the Quran in the matter of moral standard because these few instances that are quoted out of context.
written by Wondering , January 25, 2010
Funny how he works, same tune everytime. Oh well I'm sure I'm not the only one who observes his 'non-observations'.
I see the problem going a good bit deeper, If a Muslim is observed acting like a human being, and actually interacting in a non-violent way with the rest of the world, he is a terriffic tool for the 'GOOD MUSLIMS'.
As it will be only a matter of time before the GOOD MUSLIMS take a member of his family hostage, and ask him to use his good name to do something that the GOOD MUSLIMS want.
I dont see any solution other than education, the regular folk need to be educated as to what being a GOOD MUSLIM is. So long as we keep buying their oil at the rate of 2 or 3 billion dollars a week, they can keep buying off public officials with Campaign Contributions. Buying large interests in Non Islamic Media outlets and buying weapons and ammunition, all the way from AK 47's to Nukes.
We need to get off the OIL and on to alternatives only then will we begin to starve this beast. Prior to Oil being discovered in the Middle-east Islam was dying, and not hurting much of anyone, the last 100 years of the Otoman empire was a sad joke. It is time to turn off the money and stop financing the murder, rape, enslavement and extortion of our children and grandchildren.
I see the problem going a good bit deeper, If a Muslim is observed acting like a human being, and actually interacting in a non-violent way with the rest of the world, he is a terriffic tool for the 'GOOD MUSLIMS'.
As it will be only a matter of time before the GOOD MUSLIMS take a member of his family hostage, and ask him to use his good name to do something that the GOOD MUSLIMS want.
I dont see any solution other than education, the regular folk need to be educated as to what being a GOOD MUSLIM is. So long as we keep buying their oil at the rate of 2 or 3 billion dollars a week, they can keep buying off public officials with Campaign Contributions. Buying large interests in Non Islamic Media outlets and buying weapons and ammunition, all the way from AK 47's to Nukes.
We need to get off the OIL and on to alternatives only then will we begin to starve this beast. Prior to Oil being discovered in the Middle-east Islam was dying, and not hurting much of anyone, the last 100 years of the Otoman empire was a sad joke. It is time to turn off the money and stop financing the murder, rape, enslavement and extortion of our children and grandchildren.
written by Machmoed elchalid , January 25, 2010
@antomod,
By the way America is one of the most countries that claims freedom and it has got one of the highest divorce rates in the world and many of the population live under the poverty line and it is one of the biggest weapon producing country in the world and alot of stuff like the Columbine murdering incident happen there because of there pathetic weapon and machinery laws.
You still can believe whatever you believe but comparing a nation (U.S.) with an ideology is not fair. The U.S. is not absolute. The islam is. A nation allow itself to develop and if it's necessary it will change some laws or something like that. But an ideology that's absolute, even if you know some details are very wrong, you can't change them. If a muslim wants to enlighten islam, he must become a non-muslim in order to do that. Conclusion: islam=jail. You can't do anything exept accepting the backwardness of the 7th centurie desert. Muslim: Yes I believe in Allah and his books etc. and yes i believe Allah swears to his creation (la oeqsimoe bihatha'lbalad) (translation: I swear to this city) etc etc. and yes i believe some verses were not perfect and had to be changed because it could be better (concept of abrogation). I believe that moses helped muhammad to reduce the amount of prayers because Allah didn't knew it's to hard to pray 50 times. Yes, i believe that stars are tiny lights set on the lowest heaven. I believe that Gibriel told muhammad 7 different koran pronounciations (7 qiraats). I could go like this for a long time. Everybody muslim knows that these doctrines are a part of islam. We also know this is not entirely true. We've already seen the universe (not all of it) and it's a lie to believe stars are tiny. All these summed doctrines are completely lies, so how could you (if you're truthfull to yourself) believe this crapdoctrines and call yourself a muslim? I don't get it. Would you explain to me how you could believe this doctrines and why?
By the way America is one of the most countries that claims freedom and it has got one of the highest divorce rates in the world and many of the population live under the poverty line and it is one of the biggest weapon producing country in the world and alot of stuff like the Columbine murdering incident happen there because of there pathetic weapon and machinery laws.
You still can believe whatever you believe but comparing a nation (U.S.) with an ideology is not fair. The U.S. is not absolute. The islam is. A nation allow itself to develop and if it's necessary it will change some laws or something like that. But an ideology that's absolute, even if you know some details are very wrong, you can't change them. If a muslim wants to enlighten islam, he must become a non-muslim in order to do that. Conclusion: islam=jail. You can't do anything exept accepting the backwardness of the 7th centurie desert. Muslim: Yes I believe in Allah and his books etc. and yes i believe Allah swears to his creation (la oeqsimoe bihatha'lbalad) (translation: I swear to this city) etc etc. and yes i believe some verses were not perfect and had to be changed because it could be better (concept of abrogation). I believe that moses helped muhammad to reduce the amount of prayers because Allah didn't knew it's to hard to pray 50 times. Yes, i believe that stars are tiny lights set on the lowest heaven. I believe that Gibriel told muhammad 7 different koran pronounciations (7 qiraats). I could go like this for a long time. Everybody muslim knows that these doctrines are a part of islam. We also know this is not entirely true. We've already seen the universe (not all of it) and it's a lie to believe stars are tiny. All these summed doctrines are completely lies, so how could you (if you're truthfull to yourself) believe this crapdoctrines and call yourself a muslim? I don't get it. Would you explain to me how you could believe this doctrines and why?
written by Guy Macher , January 25, 2010
I asked a man who had been in the Nazi SS if he believed Hitler's doctrine of evil. "Hell no!" But when I asked him if he followed orders, he said, "Hell yes!"
He thought of himself as a moderate Nazi.
Any adherence to evil is evil.
He thought of himself as a moderate Nazi.
Any adherence to evil is evil.
written by Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari , January 25, 2010
For a kafir, a good (i.e. pious) Muslim is extremely dangerous thing. At the first opportunity he will slit his throat to earn the title of Ghazi. At the first opportunity that good Muslim will rape his sister, daughter and mother, loot his riches and valuables, occupy his land and properties to please Allah in this life and secure a good place in Allah's brothel called paradise, in the other. It better to trust a venomous snake but not a good pious Muslim.
written by balam , January 25, 2010
The only link between the Bible and the Quran is that Mohammad stole the stories from the Holy Bible ,distorted them and introduced them in Quran.The Bible is the Inspired word of God for the errant mankind.Whereas Quran is the word of Mohammad,attributed to Pre-Islamic pagan god allah.I was revealed by Mohammad to his followers as the situation and need arose.If Mohammad lusted after his daughter-in-law,he produced the verse to justify his Immoral act.There is nothing divine about Allah,Mohammad or Quran. All the three are fake.Now coming towards SARAH,she was ABRAHAMS first cousin.Muslims are not Mono-theists but Mono-Pagan DEISTS because Allah is the pre-Islamic Pagan moon god.Mohammad,s father,s name was ABED ALLAH.Was he a mono-theist?He was a pagan and named after pagan god Allah as his slave.In fact Mohammad put the mask of Allah on himself to deceive his followers and still doing that.
written by duh_swami , January 25, 2010
A 'moderate' Muslim is an apostate...A good Muslim is a pious Muslim...A pious Muslim is a 100%'er...Anything less than 100% is apostasy...Jihad is an 'obligation' on all Muslims...There are then two types of Pious 100%'er's...Active jihadists and inactive jihadists in reserve...The reserves can be activated at any time...
written by Razors Edge , January 25, 2010
An easy way to let everyone know that your not a muslim would be to wear this T-shit that I saw for sale on line, the guy who made it claims that it’s the symbol of the new crusaders and its very popular among the troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.
http://www.zazzle.com/Lion_of_Kabul*
http://www.zazzle.com/Lion_of_Kabul*
written by balam , January 25, 2010
Without social freedom,there can be no justice,peace and prosperity.Imam Hussain did not have the Spirit of Jesus-the-The Christ.There is no comparison what so ever.Immam Hussain was an Arabian war- lord who wanted power and died in its pursuit.How can a blind person tell the difference between darkness and light.All the Muslims happen to be Anti-Christian because of Mohammad,who was foretold to come after Jesus as an enemy in the Gospel of St.Mathew Chapter13 and verses24-31 and certainly not as a prophet from God.Mohammad led a sinful life and Immam Huassain was not much of a saint either.My challenge to 1.5 billion Muslims is:PROVE ANY SIN COMMITTED BY JESUS-THE CHRIST AND ALSO PROVE IF YOU CAN:IF MOHAMMAD LEFT ANY SIN UNCOMMITTED:If you can not ,then you have to admit that JESUS is THE LORD AND SAVIOUR OF the world.He is alive and can save you not the dead MOHAMMAD or IMMAM HUSSAIN.
written by The Rational Fool , January 25, 2010
Dr. Rafiq Zacharia, an educationist and father of Fareed Zakaria, wrote this article about former President of India, Dr. Abdul Kalam - What's Muslim about Kalam. The article originally appeared in the Asian Age, and later redacted.
A couple of excerpts:
About why Dr. Kalam is not a Muslim:
A couple of excerpts:
[Two former Muslim Presidents of India, Dr Zakir Husain and Mr Fakruddin Ali Ahmed] were also Muslims in the real sense of the word; they believed in the tenets of the Quran and faithfully followed the traditions of the Prophet.
About why Dr. Kalam is not a Muslim:
Namaz does not appeal him [sic] nor has he ever fasted in the month of Ramzan. He is a strict vegetarian and a life-long brahmachari. His roots are really in Hinduism and he enjoys all the sacred Hindu scriptures.
written by The Rational Fool , January 25, 2010
And this definition of a Muslim from Dr. Zakaria:
"A Muslim is one who declares publicly: 'There is no God but God and Muhammad is His Prophet.' He must also accept that Muhammad is the last of God's prophets on this earth..... A Muslim must also accept the Quran as the word of God, immutable and unalterable; it contains guidelines which a Muslim must follow."
(Rafiq Zakaria, "The Stru*gle within Islam" Penguin Books, 1988, pp.302)
written by Demsci , January 25, 2010
Attention; several posters mistook TO Antomod for Antomod him/ herself. And I think she really was the Fathima from whom we saw posts earlier here.
Shia Muslima, you say you have posted before and have doubts all your posts are being posted here and you spell the name Hussein as Hussien. This makes me think you are the same as Fathima, also a Shia Muslima.
You write:
“he (Hussein) was asking for what Prophet Muhammed wanted peace and social justice not the social freedom that you claim which only leads to destruction and corruption of families. By the way America is one of the most countries that claims freedom and it has got one of the highest divorce rates in the world and many of the population live under the poverty line and it is one of the biggest weapon producing country in the world and alot of stuff like the Columbine murdering incident happen there because of there pathetic weapon and machinery laws.”
Thank you for showing us what propaganda is told in mosques and in Islamic Media. But you have been gullible and duped. Sure, democratic societies are not perfect, no societies are. I don’t know about how well and how long families function in both Democratic and Islamic countries, but researchers found that the happiest people live in Denmark, the happiest children live in Holland, and these countries are followed in happiness and also prosperity by a lot of Western countries and Japan, and in general a clear advantage of free democratic countries can be seen over unfree Islamic societies.
About the poverty line; the poverty figures of the USA are measured every year and now stand at approx. 12,5-15 % poor people, while the rest of the 305 million Americans are either reasonably well off or rich. And this while America attracts many poor people every year too!!! Why do you think these poor people flock to America in vast numbers anyway?
Only other Western countries + a few tiny Islamic or other countries are per capita as wealthy as America. Certainly virtually ALL the Islamic countries are per capita much, much poorer. How can you not see the blatant lies in the mosques in this respect?
About violent deaths in America; 1 in 200 Americans in their whole life has a chance to get murdered. A much better rate than all peoples in the past had and still a considerably better rate than the Eastern European and African countries. About the Islamic countries no reliable statistics yet exist, as the UN tells us.
And even if what I say is not proven, it certainly is not proven either that Islamic countries perform any better than Democratic ones in respect to: Violence and rape.
So for now I conclude: Please don’t believe the Islamic propaganda that Allah’s laws work better than democratic man-made laws. Man-made laws certainly made democratic countries more prosperous, free and happy than Islamic ones and the disadvantages of democratic countries are almost certainly matched or worse in Islamic countries. Any way, you know from where to where the vast majority of people want to migrate, don't you? From Islamic to Democratic countries! What does that tell you?!
Shia Muslima, you say you have posted before and have doubts all your posts are being posted here and you spell the name Hussein as Hussien. This makes me think you are the same as Fathima, also a Shia Muslima.
You write:
“he (Hussein) was asking for what Prophet Muhammed wanted peace and social justice not the social freedom that you claim which only leads to destruction and corruption of families. By the way America is one of the most countries that claims freedom and it has got one of the highest divorce rates in the world and many of the population live under the poverty line and it is one of the biggest weapon producing country in the world and alot of stuff like the Columbine murdering incident happen there because of there pathetic weapon and machinery laws.”
Thank you for showing us what propaganda is told in mosques and in Islamic Media. But you have been gullible and duped. Sure, democratic societies are not perfect, no societies are. I don’t know about how well and how long families function in both Democratic and Islamic countries, but researchers found that the happiest people live in Denmark, the happiest children live in Holland, and these countries are followed in happiness and also prosperity by a lot of Western countries and Japan, and in general a clear advantage of free democratic countries can be seen over unfree Islamic societies.
About the poverty line; the poverty figures of the USA are measured every year and now stand at approx. 12,5-15 % poor people, while the rest of the 305 million Americans are either reasonably well off or rich. And this while America attracts many poor people every year too!!! Why do you think these poor people flock to America in vast numbers anyway?
Only other Western countries + a few tiny Islamic or other countries are per capita as wealthy as America. Certainly virtually ALL the Islamic countries are per capita much, much poorer. How can you not see the blatant lies in the mosques in this respect?
About violent deaths in America; 1 in 200 Americans in their whole life has a chance to get murdered. A much better rate than all peoples in the past had and still a considerably better rate than the Eastern European and African countries. About the Islamic countries no reliable statistics yet exist, as the UN tells us.
And even if what I say is not proven, it certainly is not proven either that Islamic countries perform any better than Democratic ones in respect to: Violence and rape.
So for now I conclude: Please don’t believe the Islamic propaganda that Allah’s laws work better than democratic man-made laws. Man-made laws certainly made democratic countries more prosperous, free and happy than Islamic ones and the disadvantages of democratic countries are almost certainly matched or worse in Islamic countries. Any way, you know from where to where the vast majority of people want to migrate, don't you? From Islamic to Democratic countries! What does that tell you?!
written by Kohi , January 25, 2010
sorry to say no muslim can really be trusted deny it all you want but truth is truth
written by Machmoed 2 shia-muslima , January 27, 2010
2 shia-muslim,
Could you explain to me why shia-muslims have to beat themself almost to death on the day of Ashura? Do they do this because of imam hoessein who was murdered or do they this because they did it before even muhammad was born? Ashura was already there before Muhammad and they used not to fast on this day. See the hadith! They lied to you about this. They do not do this because of imam Hoessein, but they used his death, so you wouldn't know what the real reason is. It's because of an other God, so he would bring life to earth again...it's a paganistic ritual.
Could you explain to me why shia-muslims have to beat themself almost to death on the day of Ashura? Do they do this because of imam hoessein who was murdered or do they this because they did it before even muhammad was born? Ashura was already there before Muhammad and they used not to fast on this day. See the hadith! They lied to you about this. They do not do this because of imam Hoessein, but they used his death, so you wouldn't know what the real reason is. It's because of an other God, so he would bring life to earth again...it's a paganistic ritual.
written by Shannon , January 29, 2010
The only good muslim is a dead one. Christianity at least had the decency to stop killing people. The Bible is only slightly less violent and disturbing than the Koran. You Jesus freaks need to read the part where God sends a bear to kill 42 children because they teased a prophet for being bald.What a wise god indeed. Just dont piss him off or he will send a bear to kill your kids!Or maybe he will just send his armies to kill every living man,woman,child and beast because he deems you as wicked. God loves to commit genocide! But maybe you can do like Japheth did in the bible and sacrifice your daughter to appease him. Oh and by the way.....God didnt stop him like he supposedly stopped Abraham from killing Isaac.God loves mafia type displays of loyalty........if your a goodfellow then off your boy for me. My only hope as an optimistic agnostic is that when humans finally get over their stupid religions and learn to face uncertainty without making up stupid mythological beings there may be survivors of the war you superstitous idiots are bringing.!1 Long live the Flying Spaghetti Monster!!
written by Fatimah , February 07, 2010
How surprising your posting my comments! Well, yes I am Fatimah I am also the shia muslim and to antomod. Any way this is to do with the shia beating themselves many of the shia scholars including Ayyat Allah Sayyed Mohsan Al- Amine made a fatwa stating such doings were forbidden why do you only take certain perspectives of Islamic scholars and claim it all to be Islam?
written by Machmoed , February 09, 2010
@ Fatimah,
That's what we try to tell you, There is no islam as you believe it. Ayyat Allah Sayyed Mohsan Al-Amine (what a long name) made a fatwa. Come on fatimah, when did he do this fatwah? Did he do a fatwah for worshipping the black stone (stone of ishtar/aphrodite according to Herodotes who wrote about this cult 200 B.C.) i bet he didn't! both are paganistic rituals but the arabs couldn't make this disappear.....it was politics and politics is about winning votes/souls by all means. You see the comparison with religion.
That's what we try to tell you, There is no islam as you believe it. Ayyat Allah Sayyed Mohsan Al-Amine (what a long name) made a fatwa. Come on fatimah, when did he do this fatwah? Did he do a fatwah for worshipping the black stone (stone of ishtar/aphrodite according to Herodotes who wrote about this cult 200 B.C.) i bet he didn't! both are paganistic rituals but the arabs couldn't make this disappear.....it was politics and politics is about winning votes/souls by all means. You see the comparison with religion.
written by Stupid site , February 09, 2010
Do you people have nothing better to do than bashing the 'islam'. So scared/jealous of something y'all know nothing about. Islam is the biggest growning relegion and theres nothing you guys can stop it
PEACE;
PEACE;
written by Punter , February 18, 2010
I doubt you have even read the Sira, Mr. Stupid Site.
That puts you in a the 'lazy Muslim' category, doesn't it? If you had read the Sira, you would realize what you have to worry about. Mo was a demented murderer who killed cultured, peaceful people to grab their earthly goods and make him king of Arabia.
Mo was almost obliterated by the two caliphs who followed him (they probably had him assassinated!) No coin or inscription bears his name until his relatives (the Abbassids) seize the throne. Face it, this is a political movement that got religion one hundred years after the fact and trumped up a legendary figure to support the Abbassid dynasty. They created the Koran, Hadiths and Sira and fashioned Mo in their own barbaric image.
That puts you in a the 'lazy Muslim' category, doesn't it? If you had read the Sira, you would realize what you have to worry about. Mo was a demented murderer who killed cultured, peaceful people to grab their earthly goods and make him king of Arabia. Mo was almost obliterated by the two caliphs who followed him (they probably had him assassinated!) No coin or inscription bears his name until his relatives (the Abbassids) seize the throne. Face it, this is a political movement that got religion one hundred years after the fact and trumped up a legendary figure to support the Abbassid dynasty. They created the Koran, Hadiths and Sira and fashioned Mo in their own barbaric image.
Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.
Quran 98:6 illustrates Allah's basic attitude about disbelievers/kufrs...'They are the worst of creatures'.