www.islam-watch.org

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Islam's Working to World Domination

E-mail Print PDF

How Islam works and is working, right now, in its quest to world domination...


Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well…

Here's how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States -- Muslim  0..6%

Australia -- Muslim 1.5%

Canada -- Muslim  1.9%

China --  Muslim 1.8%

Italy -- Muslim 1.5%

Norway -- Muslim  1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

This is happening in:

Denmark -- Muslim  2%

Germany --  Muslim 3.7%

United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%

Spain -- Muslim 4%

Thailand -- Muslim  4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France  -- Muslim 8%

Philippines -- 5%

Sweden -- Muslim 5%

Switzerland -- Muslim  4.3%

The  Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%

Trinidad & Tobago --  Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:

Guyana --  Muslim 10%

India --  Muslim 13.4%

Israel --  Muslim 16%

Kenya --  Muslim 10%

Russia  -- Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia  -- Muslim 40%

Chad -- Muslim 53.1%

Lebanon -- Muslim  59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania -- Muslim  70%

Malaysia --  Muslim 60.4%

Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%

Sudan -- Muslim  70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some  genocide, as these nations drive out the  infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as  has been experienced and in some ways is  on-going in:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%

Egypt -- Muslim 90%

Gaza -- Muslim  98.7%

Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%

Iran -- Muslim 98%

Iraq -- Muslim 97%

Jordan -- Muslim  92%

Morocco --  Muslim 98.7%

Pakistan -- Muslim 97%

Palestine -- Muslim  99%

Syria -- Muslim  90%

Tajikistan --  Muslim 90%

Turkey  -- Muslim 99.8%

United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

 

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' – the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan -- Muslim  100%

Saudi  Arabia -- Muslim 100%

Somalia -- Muslim  100%

Yemen --  Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'.

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To 

Even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.

---

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.

Comments (30)Add Comment
0
...
written by Machmoed elchalid , January 25, 2010
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large.

It maybe true, but seriously, If France is a coward in their own backyard, then we can't blame those muslim people for their ignorance. They live in France and France should look after the law is been respected and if not...punishment by the law of France and not some desert-law called sharia. France should not allow this kind of ownmade laws. Can you blame those ghetto muslims believing non-muslims are bad from their point of view and i'm not talking about islam but social-politics.
0
Your conclusion is very scary
written by Clement , January 25, 2010
How can we avoid the world population becoming 50% by the end of the censury? As long as the world continue to protect islam under religious right instead of a hostile political system that should be eliminated like Hitlers' Nasism and Kalmarx communism the target will be achieve. I only hope the civilised world will soon wake up from the slumber and eliminate the rattle snake before destroy the whole of humanity.Someone said I am used to misdirecting my comments from the main topic but let me tell why Christian reject Quran and Mohammed as scriptures or prophet of GodThe God of the Jews and Christians has never inspired anyone outside his covenant people Israel before of which Mohammed himself agreed. All God’s prophets are commanded to keep God’s commandment, but Mohammed broke all of them at the approval of his Allah. The Angel Gabriel who revealed the Quran was ignorant of the name of the father of Marry the mother of Jesus calling her Merriam the daughter of iAaron,Q19:26 and claim that Jesus was born under a palm tree instead of a Manger according to the Bible records. The Quran’s Angel told Mohammed that Alexander the Great followed the sun and saw where it set in the puddle of murky water Q18;83 an impossibility. His account of creation was contradictory, and exhorting Friday instead of Sabbath of the day of rest The Mohammed’s Gabriel said the name of Abraham’s father as Azar, instead of Terah Q6:74 and Mohammed Gabriel refuse to reveal his message to any other person in order to confirm the truth as required by the Bible. It was easy for Mohammed to prove this fake Angel Gabriel wrong by reading Torah and the Injeel that was in circulation then but he did not do so why? The Angel Gabriel of the Bible when he appeared to the wife he would also appear to husband or another person so that at the mouth of two or three witnesses every truth shall be established. But this he did not do not one of his numerous wives not even Aisha the child bride and the favourite saw any Gabriel. So you see there are no single proof that those self-serving and made to order verses of the Quran are from the God of the Christians and Jews so you cannot blame them if they say that Mohammed was a false prophets especially when their God has never used a pirate, a polygamist, a rapist, a slave trader and a Mass murderer as a prophet before. So stop parading your Allah and his partner Mohammed together with ka’aba the Blackstone completing the Islamic trinity as the same as Yahweh the only wise God. To worsen the situations Allah was an impotent god without any power to perform miracles like Yahweh the omnipotent, omniscience and the omnipresence God. To Him alone are the glory and honour and majesty for ever and ever Amen.The purpose of using familiar names of Bible in the Quran was to beguile the ignrant and to simple to believing that Islam is a religion so as to achieve his goal of amassing political power, wealth and women.Islam is fake
0
...
written by Machmoed elchalid , January 25, 2010
But this he did not do not one of his numerous wives not even Aisha the child bride and the favourite saw any Gabriel.

Clement: when Muhammad was visited by Gibriel according to orthodoxvision, he only had one wife. He practiced polygamy after Khadija died when he was over 50 years old and it was a christian (uncle of Khadija) who told Muhammad that it was the holy ghost/gabriel. The uncle lied lied or wasn't a christian at all i guess.
0
...
written by Mulhid , January 25, 2010
Of course Islam is working toward world domination. Allah revealed it to Muhammad the conqueror: Qur'an 033.027
YUSUFALI: And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And Allah has power over all things.
PICKTHAL: And He caused you to inherit their land and their houses and their wealth, and land ye have not trodden. Allah is ever Able to do all things.
SHAKIR: And He made you heirs to their land and their dwellings and their property, and (to) a land which you have not yet trodden, and Allah has power over all things. "
0
Facts.
written by Healer_999 , January 25, 2010
Hey Guys,

Check the facts. Lets look at the facts. Take Iran. Total Fertility Rate is 1.72. Less than some European countries. Some Arab countries like Tunisia and Algeria also have a TFR of around 1.75. While Egypt and Syria have have a TFR of 2.8. Morocco has 2.5. Turkey has 1.92.

I don't know how with these TFR it will become 50% of the world population. Even TFR in Pakistan has come down to 2.2 ( people say it is the second fastest come down). Never the less it will have a huge population but mostly old people.

It is not easy to maintain such population growth, you have to take economics, esp. see 50% hike in food prices in recent years. They do feel the pressures.

Of course In Saudi Arabia TFR might be around 4. But its population is small. I think they are already worrying about supply of water and coming shortages.
It is not going to be that rosy to maintain massive growth rates.

In Europe I found about certain things. Some people were predicting Netherlands will be a Islamic country in 30 years. But it is false. What happened is that people collected the samples from and around Amsterdam and extrapolated it to whole country. In fact they were taking the whole data likely in 1990's. They did't take emigration in to consideration. New immigrants are from eastern European nations.
If you take these factors, it will be impossible for 1 million people to become 9 million people in just 30 or 40 or 80 years. Exact population of Muslims is 8,50,000.

Some people just go for dooms day scenario. We should strict to facts and reasoning to defeat this evil cult. Of course there will troubles even with these small percentages. But if the push comes to shove you can always have a judgement day. I don't think any Islamic country is going to be a advanced nation in science and technology even by 2050.

But you should look at some facts. Median age in Iran is around 27. With TFR about 1.72 median age will increase meaning percentage of younger generation
will decrease from around 55% now. With out youth Islamist movements will not make any progress. In fact if regime in Iran falls , it will be a matter of time Islamist movement will die so fast that, some people might compare it to collapse of communism. But it is not possible for now. But it can happen.

Louis Palme wrote a funny article on Islam dominating the world. It may not happen but you can never the less read the article at

http://www.annaqed.com/en/content/show.aspx?aid=16262

and you can even analyse it.
0
Islamic Domination?
written by Anti Clot , January 25, 2010
Perhaps more than half of the worlds muslim population belong to to the least developed world aka the fourth world such as Bangla Desh, Pakistan, Muslim minority in India is also very poor, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, Mali, Burkina Faso and many others with illiteracy rates amongst the highest in the world. The other half is not so much better. They have GDP similar to some Newly Industrialised Countries but in most cases they are not industrialised at all but they depend heavily on oil. Only 5% of all muslims live in wealthy countries, half of them in very oil rich countries and the other half as low paid foreign workers in western countries. How can these people dominate the world? In Nigeria, for example, they account for about half of the population and they introduced sharia in the northern prefectures. However, they cannot dominate the country as a whole because they are to poor and too uneducated. The same is true for the whole world. Maybe we all depend on islamic oil for now but this will change in the near future. In contrast, the islamic world depends on almost everything from the developed world and I dont think that this will change. Or consider Haiti. Haiti is the poorest country of the western hemisphere and what happened there is the worst thing that could happen in the western world. But in the islamic world there are so many Haitis like Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan etc and many more to come. The question is not that islam could dominate the world because I dont expect this to happen. But what will we do if there are 10 Afghanistans and 10 Iraqs and 10 Somalias and so many Pakistans and fire almost everywhere? In my scenario I see something like a Thirty Years' World War III within the Third World and nobody has an answer how to solve these conflicts. Who will feed them? Imagine a world as poor as Haiti with 1.5 Billion people! This is how the islamic challenge looks like.
0
try as they might
written by Kohi , January 25, 2010
But this group inbreeds and thinks the 7th century was the end all to be all How can they dominate what they fear? Progress hopfully will stamp these numbnuts out.
0
...
written by Wincent campbell , January 26, 2010
Can anybody tell me what is hadis.
0
...
written by Wincent campbell , January 26, 2010
can anybody tell me what is hadis?
0
...
written by Reed Wilsonl , January 26, 2010
Muslims do not know the names of Mohammads wives as they do not know the names of wives of other messengers of Allah. Not mentioned in Quran. The names are from Hadis or Talmud which is not authentic/not scripture. Christian uncle of Khudeja is unfounded. The verse 33/27 quoted above is not essentially for Mohammad. Hadis are human reports attributed to Mohammad which were made 300 years after demise of Mohammad. They are unverifiable/unbelievable. This I am telling Wincent Campbell.
0
Hadith: Ask a Mullah?
written by Healer_999 , January 26, 2010
With out hadith today's koran has no meaning? Koran becomes more violent as there are no contexts to support violent verses , which Koran has many. Most importantly Koran has about 200 violent verses attributed to Kuffar 9infidels). So much for religion of peace.
Whether hadiths are reliable or not one should ask a Mullah? They knew it better. That is precisely they love to implement Shari a law. Muslims love to argue from both sides and in complete foolish manner, and when it runs out, they resort to abuse and threats.
0
...
written by abu Abdullah , January 26, 2010
"Allah orders you for justice and kindness and giving to kins folk and forbids feeling of disgust and hatred, lewdness and wickedness" Quran, 16/90. Quran is not a voluminous book. It is originally in Arabic but good English translations are available. Same teachings of Gospel and Turah are repeated for all human beings to ponder
0
Thrash Od Semitism.
written by Healer_999 , January 26, 2010
Yeah, all three Judaism, Christianity and Islam are comprehensively hate manuals. They are curse on humanity. Ever since these (esp last two) came world has witnessed many wars. Their concept of very God , whether it is fucked up Allah or fucked up Jesus, is narrowly limited and feel theirs is a one true religion. Before these two East Asia is used to be a wonderful place. Now it is filled with bigotry.
The gospel truth is both Bible and Koran promote violence, violence, violence, violence and violence .......
0
abu Abdullah:From where is quotation coming from? Meccan Or Medina period?
written by Clement , January 26, 2010
You know the Meccan verses were like the Old Testament of Bible where you find some moral instructions sometime you would even mistake them for Bible. At this time Mohammed was courting the Meccans to recognise him as a prophet so that his uncle Abumutalib can bring him into the Kaa'ba Inc so that he could participate in sharing of family business of watering and feeding the pilgrims, which was the main reason for creating Islam. It was not for souls of men but for the money of men if not tell me what did he remove from the belief of polytheism and the kaa'aba rituals. Nothing except that he pruned them from 360 gods to only one unmolested Blackstone the god of his father symbolise by the moon. But when they refused to accommodate him into the family business he migrated to Medina prepare himself by recruiting gangsters or Jihadist according Islamic parlance to come and take the Kaaba by force. Of course as you will expect the tone of revelation change to warmongering, hatred to the polytheist, Jews and Christians and any allusion to Bible was only if it would stare up passion for violence and killing. The reason why he loves to story Noah and the flood, Moses and Pharaoh repeated several times in the Quran just to serve his selfish end. That is why we want to know where was Mohammed when the heavens open the tablet and drop this verse you quoted to us so that we can know the context. Unlike the Bible the Medina verses which can be liken to New Testament of the Bible they are mostly abrogating verses because according to Mohammed if he contradicted his earlier pious verses of Mecca with his violence hatemongering verses of Medina, the Medina verses take the precedence just like Christian always explain the Old Testament in the light of New Testament. But unlike Bible which transit from what looks like a little violence to the Canaanite pagans in the Old Testament to the peace and love for all in people in the New Testament. In the Case of the Quran it is the opposite. What looks like peaceful verses in the Mecca period were replaced with hatred and violence to all mankind? Abu Abdullah checks your scriptures it appears something is wrong somewhere. You know the Quran message does not fit in the modern world, even in the 7th century no one accepted Islam except by the sward but this is old fashion you must change your message of the Quran or else you perish with it. The Bible says he that lives by the sward shall perish by the sward. The sward of Islam all over the world will soon turn against it and will perish by it except it repent and believe and take to the part of love and honour as preached by the Bible it will perish. Cheers.
0
Responding to try as they might
written by tanstaafl (JW) , January 26, 2010
Go to consang.net. Interestingly, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have the highest rates of incest.
0
...
written by Machmoed elchalid , January 26, 2010
Muslims do not have the courage to study their sources and that's why they always turn to a mullah or imam. If muslims in general studied the sources, we wouldn't be here telling them to come out of the darkness. I think they believe we don't tell the truth. read the sources yourself, then maybe you'll see it too.

Why does an other human has to be killed when he/she using what he/she has got from the source/God/Allah and is it a law made by God. Why insulting your intelligence. I've seen what islam can do to people...they turn into zombies and i never met a muslim who actually could think. They all think within the boundaries of what islam has dictated. Jemen shouldn't be poor, but the poverty is all over the place and people still live their lives as it was in the 7th century. How come Allah does not help these people? is the oil of Jemen only for the rich and gouvernment? Why bother, the poor illeterate people have Allah, so they already are rich, a ruler/imam/mullah might say. Islam=backwardness=onethical=paganism.
0
ISLAM is most primitive,most cruel,most barbaric,most ugly system of life.
written by ALLAtappa , January 26, 2010
IS all this elaborate discussion about ISLAM , necessary ? NOt needed. Once you read QQURRAN,SIRA, HADITHS and look at ISLAMIC countries, ISLAMIC societies and the brutal way they live keeping the women in dark, in BURQA, with SHARIA , with most fascist,totalitarian and dictatorial way - then you analyze the QQURRAN 's capacity and whether any knowledge or spirituality is present in there - then you will conclude that ISLAM is the most uncivilized, brutal,wicked,backward system of life imposed by the ISLAMIC profiteer MO / ALLA on moslems ,ruthlessly .Now the entire MOSLEM world is like a dark world of their own. Unless the moslems renounce ,denounce ISLAM / MO , in order to come out of darkness engulfed by ISLAM, there wont be peace, progress and prosperity in the world.
0
Note To Village Atheist Healer
written by Truth Detector , January 26, 2010
I don't know who hates more, you or the evil Islamists. Healer, where are your good fruits? You have none because hatred never produces good fruit. On the contrary, Dear Jesus has motivated millions of Christians to build hundreds of thousands of hospitals, clinics, schools, colleges, burn centers, universities, homes for the aged. On the contrary, village atheists produce only vomit and Islamic hatred. Why do you hate a person, Jesus Christ in this case, who motivated more than a billion people to produce good fruit?
0
To Truth Detector
written by Healer_999 , January 26, 2010
Can there be Islam without Christianity? Koran without Bible? Does't Bible contain hateful verses towards non believers?

The only difference is there is no concept of Jihad in Bible. I do admire Jesus, despite little violence in New Testament. But lest talk about Church. You think they are doing those services, you mentioned above, for nothing in return. No. They want to save souls. See here it comes on par with Islam. You say Jesus motivated them? Bullshit. Arrogance, Lack of respect for others and money motivated the Church to do those things? Like you say if Jesus motivated , we would have seen Church doing these things from the beginning of Christianity.
Do you know what Sister Nirmala, successor to Mother Teresa, said about poverty?
She said that it is good that poverty is there , so it gives them a chance to serve?
So typical of Church?

Other thing is did Church ever work against Antisemitism? If it ever did there would have been no Holocaust. I still respect western civilization for its contribution in Science most importantly in Political Ideas.But then it has evolved. At the same you can not deny excessive s committed by them i.e in North America or Philippines. But I still hold western civilization in high esteem. But you equally should admit, it is classical Greek civilization which has provided inspiration for renaissance.
Role of Church apart from accepting secularism, separation of state and God, is nothing. But that it self is high worth.

So you moron , detector, stop trying to be innocent and put all the blame on Islam. All abrahamic faiths are inherently violent. When I speak for Christianity, it is because If Islam exists in Europe or USA , with their total disregard for freedom expression, we would have never been here. That is precisely I speak against Islam and its impact on West.

I am an Indian. It will be good if you split your venom on Left liberals who are mostly responsible for degeneration in West.
0
let's get it over with
written by Machmoed , January 27, 2010
I will say it one more time (x 1000).

Using other faiths to ridiculate others is childish and selfish. It would be more appropriate to mention other faiths like boedhism, manicheism, judaism etc and not only christianity. But if we are going to do this, then we'll never make our point about islam. Is it that hard to understand people!
0
Healer...
written by duh_swami , January 27, 2010
All abrahamic faiths are inherently violent.

This is accurate but not precise...It is more properly that many of the believers and practitioners are inherently violent...The purpose of most religions is to calm the beast that resides just below the surface in most humans, not all humans are so inflicted, but most are...Islam is a religion that does not calm the beast, but feeds and encourages it...There really is no moral equivalence between Islam and any other religion...Islam has nothing like Yana yoga, or ahimsa, so you can expect little wisdom from it...Where wisdom is lacking, and ahimsa is absent, violence is not only possible, it's immanent...

0
Healer
written by Non believer , January 28, 2010
Healer is partially right. Both Christianity and Islam need leftists to preach plurality when they are attacked. But they have a sinister desire to establish only their religion. Look at Indian electronic media. The so called secularists join with Christians and Muslims to demand plurality and secularism. I am for secularism where Atheists also have the freedom to ridicule all religions. That would be true plurality. Christians and Muslims want to denigrate other religions but do not want their religions debated. It hurts their sentiments and hence beyond critical analysis. But christians day in and day out ask poor tribals not to believe monkey gods and elephant gods and embrace christianity for a paltry sum of money. Once that is achieved they leave them high and dry and the government will have to extend reservation for Christian Dalits. It is just not Islam that has to be eradicated but all religions which want their God's hegemony on earth
0
Christianity and Islam.
written by Healer_999 , January 28, 2010
I am not a theologist, but I say this Christianity is far better than Islam. On a scale of 0 to 10, if islam is 0.1 then Christianity is 9.9. One of the finest things about Christianity is secularization that occurred with protestant reformation. Separation of Church and State. Today church is the most peaceful one, it has its agenda, but it is completely non violent. Church accepts criticism with dignity. My association with it is completely because of central figure of Jesus. It is sad that he is pulled in to absurd old testament and Bible.

To non believer,

You misunderstood me. I accept your points of criticism and I agree with you. But left liberals. The reason I criticized them because these people are responsible for political situations that are existing in democratic countries. They are miserably responsible for growth of Islamism. They and their political correctness. Self righteous bastards.

They can not learn from History. Lets go back to 1979 Iranian Revolution. People say Islamists overthrew Government. But it is partially true. Left liberals and communists equally contributed to the fall of Shah regime, they worked side by side with Islamists. But when Islamists took over, majority of them were imprisoned and probably in 1988, I think, they were summarily executed. They do not get the point that under Islam there is no free speech and no democracy. You can not reach their senses with this message.

One wrong quote from any religion other than Islam, they literally pounce on people who said that. But when it comes to Islam they stay silent. What ever they stand for, women's rights (feminism), secularism, freedom expression Islam directly stands opposite to those. Even then they act ignorant. We attribute it to political correctness. I think it is coward ism.
0
Koran is unreliable
written by Mustafa , January 28, 2010
If there are unreliable hadith, then we must also consider the possibility of unreliable passages in the Koran. It is not possible to consider either body of work as anything other than hearsay.
0
...
written by Yorkshire Miner , January 28, 2010
I think we get too depressed, I am always reminded of the english saying that it went up like a rocket but came down like the stick. I am afraid that more of you learned people here must correct me if I am wrong but the no of 200 million is a figure that sticks in my mind as the no. of Muslims at the beginning of the last century. It is now I gather somewhere in the region of one and half billion, now that really is some growth rate. We now have somewhere in the region of 7-8 times as many muslims as we did 100 years ago. It seems to have been forgotten that all this growth has been caused by Western technology, the green revolution and western medicine, to name but two. The Muslim of cause don't appreciate this, they ascribe it too the will of Allah, we kuffers are worth nothing and I am certainly destined to have my throat cut being an Atheist. This can only continue if there is continual growth. We can only have continual growth if we have more energy, to sustain the growth. It seems that from all the statistics and facts that the world has reached Peak oil. This does not mean that the world is running out of oil only that we cannot produce any more than the amount we are producing now and it will eventually go into decline what ever we do. America's oil production peaked in 1970. there was a spate of drilling to find more, they sank a hell of a lot of holes but production steadily declined. America could of cause buy oil from abroad, which is what in fact they did. This of cause cannot happen if the worlds oil production goes into decline. There is no way we will be able to import it from Alpha Centura or Titan. Oil is not only used for transport but also as feedstock for the plastics industry and the Pharmaceutical industry. The other thing that is also missed is that it is a vital component of our food it is estimated that for every calories of food we eat we consume 10 calories of oil. I know it sounds crazy but it drives our mechanised farming the food processing industy the transport of the food and most importantly it is the main ingredient in our pesticides and fertilizers. I have often pondered the fact that there were food riots in 30 countries at the same time that the price of oil went through the roof, is this a coincidence? Bangladesh and Pakistan the land of the Pure have a population greater than the U.S.A. The point I am trying to make is that they have difficulty in feeding themselves, the middle east certainly can't and most of the rest of the Islamic world is also in the same boat. I ask a simple question how are they going to feed themselves when the oil shortages, which are inevitable send up the price of oil which in turn will send up the price of fertilizers which will price them out of the market. High fertilizer usage is what keeps Bangladesh feed. They use 37 tons per hectare. Let us think of a senario. What would happen if the price of fertilizer doubled, in Bangladesh. The piss poor farmers in the delta wouldn't not be able to afford it unless it was subsidized by the government. This is what most likely will happen for the first few years until the government runs out of money and the IMF refuses to lend them any more. Food production then drops by 30% I leave you to imagine the consequences. Saudi will of course be able to buy food on the world market but where does that leave them politically, will they have the political clout they have now. There is no way they can feed there burgeoning population which well over 25 million and growing. The funny thing is that most of the world surplus food is in the Anglo sphere. America Canada Australia, they will most certainly cut back if the price of fertilizers rise and therefore production will also fall, so they will also have less too export. I expect the Saudies will try to blackmail the west with keeping back oil, thinking that the west will be brought too its knees, They will certainly forget that the west can last longer without oil than the Saudis can without food. Another point I would like to make is that when world oil production peaks and oil is a scarce commodity it does not necessary mean that the price will rise into the stratosphere. When the price of oil is 5% of the Gross National Product of an economy, it goes into recession which means that less oil is used and the price sinks. We have seen this over the last couple of years with oil hitting $147 a barrel and plummeting too $35 and then back up too around $75 now. It will make no sense for OPEC to try and raise the price of oil to pay for the cost of food imports because it will mean that demand will drop which will bring down the price again. There is of cause no restriction on the price of food, because we all need it and will pay any price when it is short supply. It must also be remembered that no Western Government will export food if there own population is going to starve. It should be very interesting to see over the next few years how these lines converge if the price of food rises faster than the price of oil, at some point in the future the Saudi's will have to pay more for its food imports than it receives in oil revenues. In the mean time the poor islamic countries will be starving. If they had had any sense they would have read the works of Malthus instead of the Koran, unfortunately all of us here know that that is and was impossible. We live in interesting times. I would like to take the time to thank all of you here from a Caucasian Kuffer. I read this Blogg every day, you have certainly enlighten me, thank you. Islam has risen because of oil but you must remember that coal will still be plentiful when the oil has run out and is running out, no islamic states have any substantial coal reserves. Energy determines who decides what happens but food decides if they are alive to decide it. Islam might have its hands on our economic testicles by oil but remember the West has it hand on Islams throat, it controls its stomach. Squeezing you balls might hurt but squeezing your throat can be fatal.

Deep Regards

Yorkshire Miner
0
But wait!
written by Reality , January 28, 2010
In the less than 2% countries, like the USA, no one gives a fuck about brown people, and they are irrationally afraid of both brown people and Muslims. The answer of course, in those places, is to round up their men, and then spend months torturing and beating them to oblivion. The DHS has already shown us that you've got nothing to fear from this sort of thing, Guantanamo has shown us there are 0 repercussions. What's to lose!
0
...
written by Reed Wilson , January 29, 2010
It is a surprising statement from Healer_999 , January 26, 2010. For 300 years after Mohammad, the Hadis was non existant. You mean Koran was meaningless for early 300 years of Islam? I have read Koran. There are no voilent verses. If he does not know the meanings of Hadis and asking me to contact mullah, why it is basis of all his argument? I would su*gest that Healer-999 should investigate the reliability of Hadi. Hadis is comprised of posthumous human reports wronglly
attributed to Mohammad.Islam, in Arabic, means submission or sumitting your will to the will of Allah. Peace is a wrong tanslation.
Whether hadiths are reliable or not one should ask a Mullah? They knew it better. That is precisely they love to implement Shari a law. Muslims love to argue from both sides and in complete foolish manner, and when it runs out, they resort to abuse and threats.
0
...
written by Reed Wilson , January 29, 2010

written by Mustafa , January 28, 2010 How youu establish that if hadith unreliable Korn is also unreliable? These are two different things. Hadith emerged 300 years after Koran. Each report of hadith passed through four five six reporters before it reached to Hadis book. There is no anology in Koran and Hadis.
What's wrong with you Mustafa?
0
Islam and History
written by markk , October 20, 2010
There is a certain amount of wilful fantasy in the idea that the Muslim conquest was "by complete peace." In reality, as even Muslim histories recount it was often a bloody affair.

Indeed, al Andalus, regularly held up as a beacon of tolerance saw numerous pogroms - one of numerous examples being 1066 in Granada. It is also reasonable to suggest that it was the intolerance of the Almohads, who expelled Jews and Christians from Spain and Morocco that drove the final Reconquista that drove Islam from Spain, as the refugees swelled the ranks of the forces arrayed against al Andalus. The reality of al Andalus is not the wonderfully tolerant place that it is described as. The Muslim conquerors showed limited tolerance of Christians and Jews - subjecting them only to broad deprivation of many civil rights (that's nice) - because the Jews and Christians outnumbered their conquerors - it was so to speak a pragmatic policy. It was also one largely thrown over after the initial period, as every history shows. The idea that al Andalus was tolerant of minority religions is a canard, which is based on comparing its regime with that of the subsequent Catholic monarchs, whose bloody history of expulsions and auto da fé admittedly takes some beating.

The ethnic cleansing started at the outset - a major Jewish tribe in Medina, Banu Qurayza, was eliminated when the Muslims besieged their fortifications not long after the fall of the Banu Nadir, an event reported (somewhat boastfully) in Surah 33:25-27 of the Qur'an. Later forced deportation of Jews and Christians occurring in 634 AD, with the last remnants of these two monotheistic religions being removed from the Arabian peninsula by the year 650. From this point onwards the Holy Land of the Hijaz was forbidden to non-Muslims. Only the Red Sea port of Jedda was permitted as a "religious quarantine area" and continued to have a small complement of Jewish merchants. (It is the forbidden nature of the Hijaz to non-Muslims that initially animated Osama bin Laden after the first Gulf War, because of the presence of US troops.)

Ethnic cleansing a large part of the events that took place along the eastern and southern Mediterranean including Palestine. Thus for example the Muslim historian al-Baladhdhuri (died ca. 892) wrote of the cities Gabala, Antarados (Tartus), Trablus (Tripoli), Beirut (Berytos), Tyros (Tyre) and Sidon that the Christian inhabitants were essentially driven out to be replaced with Arab-Muslims, the Caeserea was taken by the sword and its inhabitants were sold into slavery.

One would also be unwise to discount a key economic factor that drove the Muslim Conquest, the opportunity to gather a merchantable good - slaves. Histories of the slave trade are replete with the degree to which in the middle ages it was driven by the desire of Arab merchants to take slaves from among non-Muslim peoples. One might also ask, who burned the Great Library of Alexandria?
0
P2
written by markk , October 20, 2010

The idea that the Arabian peninsula, Persia, Palestine, Central Asia and north Africa happily switched religions from Christianity, Judaism, Zoroastrianism and numerous other religious forms to embrace Islam is a delusion, indeed an idiocy that many seem willing to adopt.

We live in a society that regards religious (and non-religious) tolerance to be a very good thing - and we learned that idea by really knowing the past - and recognising that religious intolerance - from the Muslim world - to the expulsions in Spain (before and after the Reconquista - or the expulsion of the Huguenots from France - cost every expeller dearly and left every country to have expelled a group impoverished. We have also learned that societies that were tolerant, such as the United States, and from time to time the United Kingdom, have prospered from tolerance. But let's not be silly and pretend that Islam has been a particularly tolerant religion - it has been about as bad as all the other great religions, and many (but not all) of its adherents are very intolerant today.

As for the school - there was a time when local Catholics having their own school would have led to rioting in England, even though they formed a large group in this town. If Muslims want a religious school, and we propose to allow denominational schools (an idea that may be debated), then this one should reflect the community provided they offer a real education, not one limited to the Koran, but rather one that includes genuine science, un-spun history and the basic social principles that underpin the modern Western society that the children should live and prosper in.

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

About the book || Reviews by: Steven Simpson | Abul Kasem | Prof Sami Alrabaa | Ibn Kammuna

islamic-jihad-cover


'Islamic Jihad' in Bangla
islamic-jihad-bangla
Aasma Riaz: "Thank you so much for your book "Islamic Jihad" and showing me the "Big Picture". For 7-8 days, I was glued to your book, absorbing so much information that I did not know existed. You have crisply covered so much in your book and quoted historical references extensively. I am just overwhelmed with different emotions after reading your book..., a priceless tome."

Editor: M A Khan | Site design: Dan Zaremba
Founded on 20 November 2005


Announcements

Sign petition:  Grant Imran Firasat Asylum in the USA

imran-firasat

Proxy Server: To view blocked websites, use this: iwebproxy

Syndication