• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Muhammad: A Prophet or a Pretender?

E-mail Print PDF

A true prophet should possess utmost humility of the biblical prophets, but Muhammad was an utmost arrogant, self-possessed and self-righteous man. Truly Muhammad was nothing but a pretender, seduced by his own rebellious heart...

[Note: Islam-watch, being a nontheistic forum, does not endorse the theological statements in this article. It's published just because Islam claims it belongs to the biblical succession of prophethood and faith, and just for the sake of making a fair comparative assessment of this claim.]

There are three legs upon which Islam stands its grounds:

  1. The Koran
  2. Allah
  3. Muhammad

Likewise, let's take the example of a three-legged milking stool: If one leg is broken off, the whole stool would fall down. Some old farmers from Missouri, USA, will tell you that there is such a thing as ‘one-legged milking stool’! A clever farmer provides the other two legs with his own and the stool works, though there is a constant struggle to stay in balance.

Once dealt with the counterfeit Koran and the Pagan moon-god of Islam, Allah, we now find that Islam's milking stool is actually down to one leg. We have seen that Islam is very vulnerable in its puerile and contradictory Koran. Allah also turns out to be a big fraud. Nevertheless, the Mullahs will prop up the Islamic stool by sheer force in the hope that Muhammad will survive our basic scrutiny.

With a feeble mind's help, one shall now knock the last leg off of the stool of Islam and see how fragile the structure of Islam really is! I shall avoid stealth; rather, I shall simply quote Muhammad, and give you the known history of the man they call a Prophet. You may then decide if you wish to follow this alleged prophet/messenger of Allah.

Ahadith will be used heavily since they show the real Muhammad, who is well concealed to students of holy Koran alone. Again, I remind you that ahadith, or sayings of Muhammad, are 100% authoritative and genuine, since the Mullahs effective use them to control and guide the everyday lives of Muslims worldwide.

Also, to our Muslim readers, please bear with me. I know that many of these sayings in the ahadith have been hidden from you or have been concealed in taqiya, but it is urgent that you see just what kind of a prophet you are following. If you are a devout Muslim, this will be the hardest part for you to hear, but it can also be the way finally to truth so as to liberate yourself from the ‘deceptions of Islam’. May the Truth give you light to know it.

Muhammad’s Claims for himself as a ‘Prophet’ of God!

All prophets must establish who they are and where they came from. If they are prophets, they must be very convincing to get attention of potential followers. A prophet, who calls men to himself alone, is called a ‘guru’. A prophet, who calls men to a supreme being, is called a ‘true prophet’, or a "prophet of god" etc.

Islam's first pillar is to declare the true faith of Islam. That is done by repeating a single statement, which is: "There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the prophet of Allah."

Is Muhammad a true prophet of God, as he claimed? We shall soon see.

H. G. Wells says that Muhammad claimed that the prophets before him, particularly Abraham and Jesus, were divine teachers of Allah, but he, Muhammad, was the crowning and final prophet, who completed the line of prophetic succession. The reason Muhammad failed to include Buddha, Krishna, and the Vedas in his list of Allah's prophets is because he was isolated from the rest of the world by his Arab geography.

We note that all modern-day prophets made similar and repeated claims of being the last and the best. Montinus (circa 250 AD) claimed to be a Christian prophet; he had quite a following until Christ failed to come back by his man-made schedules. Joseph Smith, who encouraged his men to marry an old maid's sanitarium, claimed to be the last and the best of the prophets. Charles Taz Russell, a lazy loser of a salesman, founded the Jehovah's Witnesses, and claimed the same, as did Rajneesh, Jim Jones, Father Divine, and Willy Frampton. (Willy prophesied in the 1960s on Pershing Square in downtown Los Angeles something about 35-foot grasshoppers coming to destroy the earth if we didn't repent. He even had photos of the grasshoppers in a shoe box, which he refused to open?)

So, here is what Muhammad said about ‘himself’ as we compare him with the prophets and writers of the Bible. The copy of the ahadith I am using is, Al Hadis by Al Haji Maulana Fazlul Karim, The Book House, Lahore, Pakistan, in five volumes. Every ahadith has a reporter, who heard Muhammad say the ahadith. Then at the end of each ahadith there are renowned Muslim scholars, who attest that it was said by Muhammad. This is actually a better authority than that of the Koran, in which only Muhammad speaks, purported as Allah's words.

Muhammad Exalts Himself!

Al Hadis, Vol. 4, p. 316:

Abu Hurairah reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "I have been sent in the best of the generations of the children of Adam, one generation after another generation, until I am born in the generation in which I am born." (Attested by Bukhari)

This means that ‘the generations of the world have been constantly improving, and Muhammad is the pinnacle of all men, humbly no doubt’. Again, listen to him defy entropy.

Al Hadis, Vol. 4, p. 323:

Abbas reported that he came to the Holy Prophet while he was in such a condition as he heard something (about his linage from unbelievers). The Holy Prophet got up to the pulpit and asked, "Who am I?" They replied, "You are the messenger of Allah." Muhammad said, "I am Muhammad, son of Abdullah, son of Abdul Muttaleb. Allah created creations and made me the best of them. Then he divided them into two groups and made me the best of the two. Then he divided them into tribes and made me the best of the tribes. Then he made them into families and made me the best of the families. I am the best of them as a member and the best of them as a family." (Attested by Tirmizi)

Al Hadis, Vol 4, p. 328:

Jaber reported that the Holy Prophet said, "Allah sent me to complete the excellent virtues and to perfect the good actions". (Attested Sharhi-Sunnat)

We are reminded at once of Muhammad’s "virtue" as he consummated his battlefield "marriage" to a Jewish captive, Safiyah, in a sand dune with the gore and filth of battle all over him. Virtuous actions no doubt, though it is today called ‘rape-virtuous’, even though he broke his own ahadith Sharia’h Law to wait until after her next monthly!

Al Hadis, Vol. 4, p. 326:

Obai-b-Ka'ab reported from the Holy Prophet who said: "When here will come the resurrection Day, I shall be the leader of the Prophets and their spokesman and one who will intercede for them without boast." (Attested by Tirmizi)

Muhammad is claiming by inference that he will intercede for Jesus Christ! He was good at slapping Christ's face. In another ahadith of the same passage, according to Abu Hurairah, Anas, and Abdullah-b-Salam, Muhammad claimed he would be at the right hand of Allah, and that Jesus would return to earth, live forty years, then be buried with him. These are direct contradictions of Jesus Christ, which Muhammad used to degrade Christ and exalt himself to guru-istic heights! Muhammad's claim, that ‘he was the prophet of the God of the Bible and also a fellow prophet with Jesus, is really preposterous.

Biblical Prophets Exalt God or Christ and Not Themselves!

Jesus speaking of the prophet John the Baptist said in the Bible (Matthew 11:11): “verily I say unto you, among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he”.

Jesus is saying that any man can be great in God's eyes. The self-exaltation of Muhammad is totally out of character with Prophets of the Bible.

Earlier John the prophet said about himself in the Bible (Matthew 3:11): “I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire”.

Like John the Baptist, a true prophet of God thinks of himself with only humility while he exalts The Lord Jesus Christ.

Here is what the Apostle to the Jews and Arabs, Paul, thought of himself in the Bible (I Timothy 1:15): “This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief”.

Now, how is it that he spoke that way about himself, yet God let him write much of the New Testament of the Bible? Could it be that humility is required in the prophets of the God of the Bible? Answer: YES!

Listen to Isaiah speak of himself. This is the prophet that wrote the longest book of prophecy in the Bible (Isaiah 6:5): “Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts”.

It is obvious that Muhammad heard from Allah, a pagan god from Babylon, for ‘if’ he had heard from Jehovah, he would have found no room to boast of himself.

Prophet Amos, whose book is in the Bible, thought he wasn't even qualified to be a prophet. The Bible, Amos 7:14: “Then answered Amos, and said to Amaziah, I was no prophet, neither was I a prophet's son; but I was an herdsman, and a gatherer of sycamores fruit (figs)”.

Thus, God could use him because he was at first humble and self-effacing.

Prophet Moses, whom Muhammad blessed, couldn't even speak properly. Bible, Exodus 4:10: “And Moses said unto the LORD, O my LORD, I am not eloquent, neither heretofore, nor since thou hast spoken unto thy servant: but I am slow of speech and of a slow tongue”.

But, no man has been more loved and his autographs imprinted in the world's legal structure, than those of Moses. Humility preceded his ministry.

Regarding Muhammad’s attempts to humanize Christ's deity, here is where Jesus Christ is NOW! Bible, Acts 2:33-35: “Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this... For David... saith himself, The Lord (Jehovah) said unto my Lord (Jesus Christ), Sit thou on my right hand, until I make thy foes thy footstool”.

Rather than Muhammad interceding for Jesus, Muhammad should have cried out to Jesus Christ to intercede for him. Since he didn't, Muhammad is now burning in Hell! The Apostle Paul said in the Bible (I Timothy 2:5): “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus”; and in II Timothy 4:1, “I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom”.

Muhammad is in trouble. He will soon meet the Judge, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will put His foot on Muhammad’s neck and send him back to Hell. Muhammad had a very exalted view of himself, while the biblical prophets did not. Here is what Paul, the Bible writer, admonished men and prophets to think about themselves:

Bible, Romans 12:3: “For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith”.

Bible, Galatians 6:3-4: “For if a man thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself. But let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another”.

Bible, I Corinthians 14:37: "If any man thinks himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord."

Now, we see that a truly godly man does not even notice himself. In the I Corinthians text, we see that those, who are "spiritual", agree with the teachings of Apostle Paul. This is why the Mullahs, especially Ahmed Deedat, hate Paul. It was Apostle Paul, who also said (Bible, II Timothy 3:13): “But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived”.

Muhammad and Islam have no problem with evolution. They believe Muhammad was the pinnacle of all human evolution, and things will get better and better as Islam takes over the world. The coming section on Muhammad's libido should be sufficient to show that he wasn't quite as lofty as he imagined. As to Islam, the wars between the Sunni and Shiite Muslims show how they cannot tame the human instinct, and the wars between Iraq and Iran proved Apostle Paul to be correct rather than Muhammad. Jesus said (Matthew 23:12): “And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted”.

Such attitude of utmost humility may only be fitting for a true "Prophet of God".

But it is very clear that Muhammad was an utmost arrogant, self-possessed and self-righteous man. Truly Muhammad was a pretender, seduced by his own rebellious heart, and has turned the world's 1.4b Muslims victim of the same.

Comments (30)Add Comment
All together now...
written by duh_swami , July 04, 2010
'Oh yes, I'm the great pretender
Pretending I'm doing well
My need is such
I pretend too much
I'm lonely but no one can tell'

Sustained pretending...
If you pretend to be something your not long enough, you will no longer need to pretend...This is because as was noted by one of the rich Rothschild guys...'If you pretend like you have power, people will soon give it to you...'

And that's how it got started...Mohammad was pretending, and the people around him made his pretending solid, and real...This is exactly how Obama got elected in America...
written by waterwillows , July 04, 2010
Mohammad's idea of what is holy and sacred was to give in to TOTAL self-gratificiation of all that is base and carnal. Hence, Islam is a mockery and an insult to the High and Holy One.
What Mo preached to his group of murdering theives and rapists greatly appealed to their base nature. That is why they can not stand anyone to critique their beliefs of mockery and debauchery. They were all weak men of much brutality.
By enforcement with the sword, they spread their evil into many cultures in order to destroy what is decent with what is impure. So they are Cursed with ignorance, injustice, poverty and mindlessness. They will always be a backward people. The west can not save them. They have degraded themselves beyond repair on this earth. There are no moderates. There is just what is filthy and what is clean. Evil is a filth on the soul and on the actions of men. They are like unto a beast.
The only hope they have is to leave Islam completely. To turn away.
The full measure is quickly approaching. Their time is running out.
written by moko , July 04, 2010
أيها الكذاب الأهبل
written by Yasmine , July 04, 2010
Support T.J Joseph a professor whose right hand was chopped off by Muslim Fanatics because he set a question paper that defamed Muhammed in the state of Kerela in India. http://www.expressindia.com/la...ff/642261/
written by vbv , July 05, 2010
All prophets and messengers or son of god coming from monotheistic cults are immoral frauds. They are scamsters ,immoral thugs who live off other peoples' labour without shame or honour. Thety are delusional idiots and conmen who do not work to earn their living honestly like any other ordinary human beings . They are just criminals, fucked up bastards.
written by Balam , July 05, 2010
An excellent article by L.James.Muslims can only respond with violence like their mad prophet who was never a prophet sent by God.If you wish to see SATAN personified,you can see in Mohammad.It is an INSULT to the HOLY GOD to call MOHAMMAD-a HOLY prophet.What holy thing he did in his life?Jesus-THE CHRIST did foretell the coming of an enemy who would sow a tare and it was no other than Mohammad.Read Gospel of St.Mathew Ch.13 Verses 24-31.
Moko is joko!
written by Guy Macher , July 05, 2010
The comment from Moko is written in hillbilly Arabic but basically he says the hadiths quoted are bullshit. He could have written in English, of course, but he is a Muslim barrow, after all.
written by duh_swami , July 05, 2010
The comment from Moko is written in hillbilly Arabic but basically he says the hadiths quoted are bullshit.

You don't think Moko is Reed Wilson in drag do you? He thinks hadith are BS also...
Mohammed was not only a pretender but also an impostor
written by Clement- The Islam-watch Pastor , July 05, 2010
The articles title is a question and based on humility test alone as illustrated Mohammed was a pretender. What of fruits test which Jesus said by their fruits you shall know them, Mohammed was a false prophets not even in sheep clothing because only the ignorant, the blind, the womanizers, the wicked will see the character of Mohammed as exemplified in the hadiths and the Quran would take him for a prophet.
About 98% of world terrorism was inspired by him in his terrorist manual the Quran and the hadiths yet 1.5billion people still worship and accept him as the best of all the prophets of God. If somebody wants a prophet to guide him to heaven should one choose a rapist, a pedophile, a mass murderer, a mad man and demon possessed? Should one look for an illiterate pagan in the midst of 360 idol gods from which he chose one of them to be his god to be his prophet?. Sometimes I wonder whether Muslims do have brains at all?
Even the self-serving verses in the Quran alone in which he excused himself from obeying the commandment Allah are enough to put one on the enquiry. I have not known of blind faith before except in Islam I have seen one.
Islam Jihadi - Muhammad has chopped off hands
written by Mathews , July 05, 2010
Printed from

Alleging blasphemy, fanatics hack lecturer's hand
5 Jul 2010, 0351 hrs IST,ET Bureau & Agencies
TalibanMuslim League
KOCHI: A private college lecturer, out on bail after being arrested for preparing a question paper with objectionable reference to the Prophet which triggered protests by Muslims, was attacked and his right hand severed by unidentified persons at Muvattupuzha on Sunday.

Mr T J Joseph was dragged out of his car and hacked with sharp weapons by assailants while he was returning from a church along with his family, including his sister and mother. His right hand was severed while he suffered cuts in his left leg, they said. 52-year-old Joseph was rushed to a private hospital here where he is undergoing a surgery.

A Malayalam lecturer at Newman College in Thodupuzha in Idukki district, Mr Joseph was arrested in April last after the question paper which he had set for the BCom II year internal exams sparked protests by Muslim outfits who said it had hurt their religious sentiments.

He was later suspended from the college, whose authorities also apologised for the mistake. Police said they were searching for the assailants, numbering around eight.

The gang, came in a vehicle with knives, swords and other weapons. The gang first pushed the family members out of the car and later severed Mr Joseph’s right hand. Both his hands from the wrist have been severely damaged. According to his sister, the attackers were young men. There had been three attacks against Mr Joseph earlier too.

The lecturer was on the run after various Muslim groups protested in Thodupuzha, a town near here. Thodupuzha remained tense after clashes broke out in the town and district authorities ordered a ban on the assembly of people.

Political leaders condemned the incident. In a strongly-worded statement, the Indian Union Muslim League said two wrongs did not make a right and it was macabre way of reacting to what the lecturer had done
mohammad "prophet"
written by John , July 06, 2010
Did ever this mad man prophetized anything? I wish to hear at least one his prophecy which come true.
mohammad the child fcuker's prophecy
written by proudestkafir , July 06, 2010
is that there will be idiots who will be in large number and they will follow me and kill each other and bring an end to islam!
written by duh_swami , July 07, 2010
What of fruits test which Jesus said by their fruits you shall know them...'

I have looked at a lot of fruits, but I don't know any of them...

I'm just kidding Clement...Welcome back, I hope you have been well...
Skunk of the Planet Earth
written by Washitah , July 07, 2010
I do not blame you for how you and your kind think, you are merely serving the purpose for which you were created. To give expression and form to what was inside of the Aboriginal(God's) people. You and your kind are the essence and personification of all evil in the cosmos and all that have sought to enslave the true owners of the planet Asia. Your time on the planet is just about finished and few of you will escape the Judgement. Genetic recessives have had their appointed time to rule, the aboriginal people must take back control of the planet and remove the grafted germ.
written by duh_swami , July 08, 2010
Who are you talking to? What are you talking about?

'You and your kind are the essence and personification of all evil in the cosmos and all that have sought to enslave the true owners of the planet Asia'.

You must be talking about Islam...Yes Islam is an evil oozing of the cosmos...
And Islam 'has' sought to enslave the true owners of the planet... Asia and the rest of it...That is the essence of Islam...A good thing to stay away from...
The Prediction and Warning
written by Walter Sieruk , July 09, 2010
Jesus predicted and warned of the coming of men such as Muhammad. For Jesus said "Beware of false prophets which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." Matthew 7:15. [KJV]
The False Prophet
written by Walter Sieruk , July 10, 2010
It might be that Muhammad was a prophet, but NOT a prophet sent by God but a deceptive prophet of the devil. For in the Bible it reads "many false prophets arwe gone out into the world." First John 4:1 [KJV]
Was Muhammad A Prophet?
written by Truth Detector , July 10, 2010
If Muhammad was a prophet, he was certainly the most evil prophet ever created: Muhammad was a paedophile; a child molester; a rapist of a child; a slave owner; a wife beater; a murderer; a polygamist and subsequently an adulterer; an owner of a private whorehouse because of his many playmates; the most arrogant prophet ever created; self centered; selfish; incestuous since he married his son's wife; a criminal; a thug; a liar; a blasphemer since he considered himself better than Jesus Christ; a deceiver; a false prophet; the greatest sinner.
The Truth About Muhammed
written by The Infidel Alliance , July 12, 2010
The Koran 68:4 upholds Muhammed as “…an exalted [standard of] character.” Islamic tradition upholds Muhammed as ‘al-insan al-kamil’ or ‘the perfect man’, to be emulated by all Muslims.

But the hard truth about Muhammed, as recorded in the Islamic ‘holy’ texts, is that far from being a a ‘holy prophet’ Muhammed was a sadistic sociopath, a 7th century Arabian Hitler – only worse, a successful Charles Manson, only creepier and more evil.

Muhammed was a murderer, torturer, amputator, decapitator, mutilator, slaver, looting stealing thief, rapist, human trafficker, sex trafficker, child rapist, sexual deviant, misogynist, perfidious liar, genocidist and self proclaimed terrorist.

By any objective standard, Muhammed was one of the most vile and disgusting men in the pantheon of human history, a brutal barbarian, a self important narcissistic consumed by unquenchable sexual lust, greed and power. Muhammed should have been incarcerated not venerated, and he should be reviled not revered.

Every pathology that afflicts Islam comes directly from this sick man, Muhammed, and the world suffers because of him.

Muhammed and his cult of Islam is the greates fraud ever perpetrated on humanity. We must expose this fraud and destroy Islam with its own words, and with the truth. The destruction of Islam will not only give relief to the 'Infidel' world, but will liberate aver a billion human beings, Muslims, from the violent, hateful, intolerant, oppressive yoke of Muhammeds cult.

The destruction of Islam is the greatest human rights imperative in the history of humanity.


~ The Infidel Alliance
written by yasmine , July 13, 2010
'The Infidel Alliance' has a nice ring to it.
Just read this plz
written by Hadi , October 29, 2010
Well, First of all, Im a Muslim and proud to be ^_^

Everyone has his own beliefs and his own religion, so why should each one critisize the others !!!!!
In ur point of, u think Muslims are bad people and r following a "pretender" but the info u have is too superficial and not enough to judge whether we are right or wrong.

Take my word, U should search deep into Islam and btw, many scientists have been into Islam after realizing that most of the high-tech and medicines have been mentioned in Quran.

U r not forced to believe in Islam but at least RESPECT others point of view. :D
written by Zenbo , November 08, 2010
By now any sane human being of 21st century should realize that the religion of Islam is the main source of Islamic terrorism happening today around the world. But sadly, majority of gullible people (Muslim and non-Muslims) tend to ask questions: Does the Islam have anything to do with Terrorism? More precisely-does the Quran anyway responsible for Islamic terrorism, or Islamic suicide bombings? Some hypocritical western educated so called moderate Muslims now started to blame Hadiths (only) for Islamic terrorism/suicide bombings etc. and they are hypocritically claiming that Quran is totally innocent of this crime. These neo-islamists also claim that for all these Islamic suicide bombings and Islamic terrorism-it is the Sunnah (Ahadiths or traditions left by the Prophet Muhammad) which should be blamed, and not the Holy Quran. In this faulty or erroneous line of thinking they got their illusionary vision that, if hadiths could be dump then Islam will be very peaceful and innocent. This essay of mine has been dedicated to refute their (neo-islamists) dishonest claim about the source of Islamic terrorism.

Background story:

Islam is a cultic (brotherhood or ummatic) religion by nature. The very theme of Islam is: Allah is the sole creator of everything on heaven and Earth and Muslims are His only legitimate and righteous people. Remaining all other people (Jews, Christians, Hindus etc.) are simply infidels and hated by Allah. A Muslim is a person who gets his/her life's inspiration primarily from the Quran and secondarily from the Hadiths (the Sunna). The devout Muslims believe that life's all solutions are contained in the Holy Quran and every good Muslim does believe by his heart that the Quran is the immutable divine words of Allah, infallible-unchangeable-eternal book of Allah, and they must follow this (Quran) word by word without any question. Following this line of thinking the Muslims believe that anyone who does not agree with them is kaffir and enemy of Islam; hence enemy of Allah. A Muslim must oppose his/her enemy and kill him/her by any means whenever the opportunity arise
written by Zenbo , November 08, 2010
Islamic terrorists do kill people by their Islamic fanatical zeal which is the prime source of motivation in their killing spree. And these inspirations always come from Holy Quran. Now, question is: dose the Quran contain such verses which can easily inspire/incite devout Muslims to kill people with impunity? Answer is there are plenty of such inciting or inspiring Quranic verses which can turn any simple/innocent minded devout Muslims into a killing monster. In fact, Quran is replete with such horrifically inciting dictums throughout the pages of Quran. Holy Quran repeatedly promised terrestrial handsome rewards for those who can kill kaffirs (enemy of Allah and His messenger) and dreadful punishing hellfire for those who refuse to kill kaffirs. Quran also incite followers to sacrifice their lives in order to kill kaffirs in exchange of much better and lucrative after life. In this line just one Quranic verse (9:111) is most attractive to those jihadis who desperately egger to achieve heavenly rearward of 72 virgins. Here is the master piece from Holy Quran:

Quran: 9:111, Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran.

In addition, a strong support and explanation to the verse: 9:111 was given by Merciful Allah by the following:

Quran-4:74- Let those fight in the cause of Allah Who sell the life of this world for the hereafter. To him who fighteth in the cause of Allah,- whether he is slain or gets victory (i.e. killed or be killed) - Soon shall We give him a reward of great (value).
mohammed the Evil satan
written by sa , November 15, 2010
pls destroy islam and liberate the world and other living beings which are killed and eaten.Only a Beast will kill and eat another living Being.Jesus was a Vegeterian .
written by IAM , April 09, 2011
Its more than this. Islam is the Devil that God has been talking about all along!.

See this: http://www.muslimsopenyoureyes.blogspot.com

written by No more lies about Muhammad , October 19, 2011
If Muhammad was anti-Christ, why would he go out of his way to claim that Jesus is indeed the Messiah(Christ) (3:45) and amongst the noblest men of God and acknowledged that Mary was the woman above all nations (3:42) when both of them were not even Arabs. He would have certainly gather more support from the Arab majority if he were to favor his own race. Plus, Jesus's name was mentioned no less than 5 times more than Muhammad in the Quran and Muhammad could have instead, talk about his wife, Khadijah, his daughter, Fatimah or his cousin, Ali, but the Quran mentioned about Jesus and Mary instead. In fact, there is a whole chapter dedicated to Mary called Maryam (Mary). And since during those times, while the Jews were denying Jesus as the Messiah and the Christians arguing that he was the Messiah and divine, wouldn't he gain a better advantage if he were to pick one side and gather more support from either the Jews or the Christians? Instead claiming that Jesus is a Messiah and only a man would only put him in a more difficult position. Why would he go out of his way and take a more difficult path if he was a false prophet? Food for thought.
Answering question from No more lies about Muhammad
written by Yibel , October 19, 2011
As you point out the name Isa (not Jesus) is mentioned numerous times in the Qur'an.

However, the stories told therein are not from the Bible (talking baby and bringing clay birds to life) but are from spurious sources available in the 7th century, such as the Proto-evangelion's James the Lesser, a 2nd century C.E. apocryphal Christian fable, and an apocryphal fable from Egypt named The First Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ.

In addition, the Qur'an confuses Miriam, the mother of Isa, with Miriam, the sister of
Moses, and the story of the birth of Isa has a direct parallel to the story of the birth of the Buddha.

Isa is actually Esau in Arabic, not Jesus, which further shows that the author(s) of the
Qur'an were not familiar with the actual Bible which had been canonized by the 7th century.

Furthermore, the Qur'an denies the crucifixion of Isa and, instead, has someone else killed in his place. The Qur'an also places Isa second in line behind Muhammad, making Islam the anti-Christ.

The author(s) of the Qur'an were attemping to justify their attacks on the Jews and Christians of Arabia by claiming that Islam alone was right and the Jews and Christians had perverted their scriptures, that all the prophets before were really Muslims, and that the Bible had predicted Muhammad's coming but the Jews and Christians were lying when they said this was not true.

The Qur'an claims that Jews and Christians were worshiping falsely (shirk) by attaching partners to God; Ezra in the case of the Jews, and Isa and Miriam in the case of the Christians (the Trinity). Here again the author(s) of the Qur'an were wrong. The Jews never worshiped anyone named Ezra, and the Christians believe in one god in three persons (beings): the father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost or Spirit. Mary (the mother of Jesus) was never a part of this 3-persons-in-one concept.

Shirk is a capital punishment crime in Islam! So, by claiming that the Jews and Christians were guilty of shirk, the Muslims felt justified in attacking, killing, enslaving, and plundering the wealth of the people who would never join them.

Muhammad was putting together an army with a mission to conquer the world following the example of Alexander the Great, someone he greatly admired and who he also made into a Muslim (follower and favorite of Allah).
written by No more lies about Muhammad , October 19, 2011
To reply to that, firstly, in language etymology, 'Isa al masih' in the Quran undoubtly refers to Jesus Christ. 'Jesus Christ' is Greek and is both the modification and transliteration from Aramaic. His name in Aramaic was originally, Yeshua and 'Esau' in classical Hebrew. 'Masiha' is a title, meaning 'the annointed one' which translates to Greek as 'Christos'. Mary's name also got 'European-ized' as her name in Aramaic was Maryām which is very similar to Arabic. There were many that went by the name Maryam or Miriam in the ancient world but there is only one who gave a virgin birth to a son named 'Isa' or Yeshua or 'Esau' in what is known as Israel or Palestine today, which is exactly what the Quran refers to - 'Isa son of Maryam', the Messiah.

Secondly, the Quran has always been from one author and Muhammad had personally arranged the chapters and authorized the contents himself while he was alive.The Quran only claims that it is a divine revelation from God, word for word, to confirm what was sent to the children of Israel in the previous Scriptures. Therefore, when there exist ancient scriptures that mentioned more details about the virgin birth and that Jesus was merely a man and a messenger from God, it only shows that the Quran is confirming that that piece of information is true. There were many books and Gospels that were not included in the bible today, that stated that Jesus was merely a man and a messenger. The council of Nicea in the 4th century was a national debate between religious men who believed that Jesus is part of the trinity and that Jesus only a man sent by God, which goes hand in hand with what the Quran claims. And the Quran never claim that Mary was part of the trinity but however, mentioned that she was being worshipped by people (Chapter 4 & 5). Jesus was eventually 'elected' as being divine and people who believed the contrary were persecuted. Not only were many of these gospels not included in the bible today, it has been well established that the bible was written by multiple authors. The 4 gospels for example, were written by anonymous Greek speaking highly educated authors who do not claim to be matthew mark luke and John in the first place. These titles e.g. 'according to mark' were a later addition by other scribers when bible scholars have studies the development of copies of manuscripts. The earliest Gospel was believed to be written in about 50 AD but the earliest copy of the gospels can only be found centuries later. This means that these authors were not disciples of Jesus to begin with, but got their information through decades of oral traditions, according to bible scholars. Yet among these later copies of manuscripts, no two copies are alike and the later copies of these manuscripts when compared to the earliest copy of manuscripts we have today has proven that scribers have made many additions to it, that made significant changes in the fundamentals of Christianity today. (Bart Erhman)
Oneness of Allah subhanna talla
written by Shahul , February 08, 2012
If you people are so confidence about your religious like chirst and Jews why the hell you not following up,why people become the enemy of ISLAM.
The truth is there is only one religious stand that is ISLAM,The Holy Book is Quran Shareif,The holy messenger Muhammad Nabi (p.b.u.h) still the world end.
Every religious know the truth but they d,NT want accept it.
@ No More lies about Mohammed
written by Cerebrum123 , February 08, 2012
Actually you are incorrect on a lot of your post. Jesus was never "elected" to be divine ,this was known since His resurrection. The earliest fragments of the NT are found between 100-150 B.C ,and not centuries later. Also as for variants ,they do exist ,but they aren't nearly as significant as you make them out to be. In fact they are mostly spelling variations or different ways of saying the same thing. Not one of them affects Christian doctrine. Yeshua would end up as Joshua ,and NOT Esau. The council of Nicea was not deciding on whether or not Jesus was divine ,but one group believed that He was not ETERNALLY DIVINE. This is what they were discussing.The big problem was not "was Jesus deity?" ,but "how can Jesus be both deity and fully human?". You also don't seem to know that certain documents were not even in consideration for the Canon (the Gnostic "gospels") In fact out of the 27 (usually 27 anyway) Canonical NT books there was no problem in accepting 20 of them. As far as I know Bart Erhman isn't exactly the one you should be looking to for information on this. He isn't exactly an expert on Biblical exegesis. I would suggest maybe taking a look at Tekton Ministries website (I don't agree with everything they post ,but they are a good source for historical matters and the Bible.).

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.


About the book || Reviews by: Steven Simpson | Abul Kasem | Prof Sami Alrabaa | Ibn Kammuna


'Islamic Jihad' in Bangla
Aasma Riaz: "Thank you so much for your book "Islamic Jihad" and showing me the "Big Picture". For 7-8 days, I was glued to your book, absorbing so much information that I did not know existed. You have crisply covered so much in your book and quoted historical references extensively. I am just overwhelmed with different emotions after reading your book..., a priceless tome."

Editor: M A Khan | Site design: Dan Zaremba
Founded on 20 November 2005


Sign petition:  Grant Imran Firasat Asylum in the USA


Proxy Server: To view blocked websites, use this: iwebproxy