This article considers another aspect of overall “Jihadi” doctrine mentioned in those articles in greater detail.
Whilst many today are aware of the verses of the Koran that pertain to fighting, perhaps fewer are aware of how these verses combine to form a “war covenant” between Allah and Muslims, which will be set out in detail in this article.
Tuesday, 15 October 2013 08:19
Dr. Radhasyam Brahmachari
More on Teachings of Guru Nanak: It has been mentioned earlier that one of the principal aims of the leaders of the Bhakti Movement was to unite the Hindus under one God. In northern India, they projected either Lord Krishna or Lord Rama as the Supreme God. In the Sikh Panth, the Sikh gurus admitted a formless Supreme God called Sat Shri Akal, Who manifests Himself in the messages of the Guru Granth Sahib, the Sikh Holy Scripture. Thus, Sikhism abolished idol worship. Like all other leaders of the Bhakti Movement, Guru Nanak discarded existing institutions that stood in the way of unity of the Hindus, for example the caste system. Apart from doing away with the caste system among his followers, he advised his followers to train their mind and all the senses to recognize the Divine Light of Sat Shri Akal within oneself and within the entire creation in order to replace idol-worship as a means of attaining the grace of God. He used to tell his disciples, “Be aware of the Divine in our hearts and the whole creation with every breath we take.”
“A specter is haunting Europe – the specter of Communism,” Karl Marx once famously wrote. It took Europe almost a century to liberate itself from this scourge. Today, another specter is haunting not just Europe, but the entire world – the specter of Islam.
Islam is spread by terror (sword), money (booty), sex (immorality), and the most of all by taqiya (deception, falsehood). While many people know that Islam was spread by these, but they are unaware that “booty” was the main factor.
Zakir Naik, a medical doctor by training, is the founder of the “Islamic Research Foundation” (IRF ) based in Mumbai, India and is a popular Islamic preacher. His preaching of Islam focuses on the peaceful, noble and scientific nature of Islam. He is very popular among Muslims all over the world.
Faithfreedom.org received the following email as part of a chain message from M. Ali, an Indian Muslim, which exposes Zakir Naik's lies, fallacies, deceptions and greeds:
Since the dawn of civilization, man has been making religions and attributing them to God. Democracy can be counted as one of the best of those religions, which we liked so much that we did not attribute to God; we preferred to keep this one to ourselves. Democracy is known and practiced all over the world but is more revered in the West, where people cling to it in a way that reminds us with the Muslims’ obsession with Islam.
Imran Firasat's residency status was revoked by the Spanish government after he released his movie on Muhammad, "The Innocent Prophet". The Spanish court is about to arrive at a decision on Imran's appeal, which may see him being deported to his home country Pakistan, where he faces certain death. Ezra Levant discusses Imran's case on Canada's Sun TV:
The regular readers of Islam-watch and Faithfreedom sites have already read a few superb comics created by 'Abdullah Ibn Abi Sarh. Evidently, all his comics depicting the truth about Islam and Muhammad’s life were outstanding. He is a truth-teller, but in a very special, effective, hilarious, clear and strong language.
Saturday, 28 September 2013 16:56
Dr. Radhasyam Brahmachari
Atrocities and excesses by Muslim rulers in India gave rise to the Bhakti movement. Among all the Hindu cults that sprang up from the Bhakti movement, Sikhism earned displeasure and enmity of the Muslim rulers, including the Mughal Emperors, as it contained an element of militancy to save the Hindus from Muslim atrocities and also taking revenge for the same.
Nihad Awad, executive director and founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, declared that the Nairobi Mall Massacre was "An attack on my religion". He also compared the al-Shabaab Muslim Jihadis with Islamophobes by saying:
“The common denominator between the extremists and advocates of Islamophobia (creating fear of Islam) is that both believe that a perverted view of Islam is the foundation of religion.”
The idea of a legal ban of the Quran, because of its incitement of hatred, violence and terrorism, may sound incredible today. But trends in recent decades would suggest that it may become a reality in the not-too-distant future.
Calcutta Quran Petition, 1985
It may be said that the modern campaign for a legal ban of the Quran started with a petition filed on 29 March, 1985 in the Calcutta High Court in West Bengal, India, asking the Government to confiscate the Quran—whether in Arabic or any other language. The petition—moved by Chandmal Chopra, advocate of Calcutta High Court, Hamangshu Kumar Chakraborthy and Sital Singh under Article 226 of the Constitution of India—asked the court to direct the State of West Bengal to declare the Quran as forfeited to the government on grounds such as below:
You are a good moderate Muslim living in the land of the kafirs. One day you entered a busy shopping mall. As you are browsing around, suddenly the air is filled with thunderous explosions followed by booms of gunshots. For a moment you don't know what to make of all this. You would perhaps think it is some kind of sinful kafir celebration, or maybe the mall is celebrating its 20th year of operation.
Suddenly the sound of gunshots comes closer and you see hundreds of kafirs are scurrying for cover like the cockroaches – yelling and screaming in fear and terror. You see some of the kafirs get hit by bullets and fall on the floor with blood pouring out of their wounds. For some, heads are blown off, stomachs are torn open.
You wonder maybe a gun-trotting crazy kafir gone berserk again and you start running, risking yourself of being shot by the murderer on rampage.
Then suddenly you hear the screams of “Allahu Akbar” as the murderers unleash their bullets.
The first part of this article—in reference to Major Nidal Hasan’s claim that he grew beard because his Muslim faith required him to do so, not to show disrespect to US Army regulations—listed a number of impractical hadiths, which ‘clever’ Muslims today conveniently ignore or refuse to practice, because of the little bit of commonsense left in them. There are hundreds of such idiotic hadiths scattered in the Islamic sources, which we cannot discuss in detail in a short article like this.
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been made victorious with terror” [Bukhari 4:52:220]
Al-Shabab, a Jihadi Islamist militia from Somalia in an attack, reminiscent of the Mumbai and Boston Marathon Massacres, on a Nairobi shopping mall in Kenya killed 59 and wounding 175. According to eye witnesses, al-Shabab Jihadists targeted only the non-Muslims by declaring: “All Muslims leave, we only want to kill non-Muslims!” Well, that's exactly what Allah teaches Muslims in the Quran [48:29]: "...Those who follow him are harsh to the unbelievers but merciful to one another"
The killing was indiscriminate. They didn't care about whom they murdered, whether women and children.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations has released its 2013 report on Islamophobia, titled “Legislating Fear”. The report constitutes one big pity party over the abject failure of CAIR (and other Islamist organizations) to convince Americans that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. Although the report is 162 pages long, much of it was cut and pasted from their previous 2009-2010 report.
The word “Sitr” itself is related to the Arabic word for a curtain or a veil, and carries the meaning of drawing a blind over something that is not to be revealed.
The doctrine of Sitr is related to the concept of “Aurah” or “dishonour / shame”.
In simple terms, when a person does something “shameful” or “dishonourable” within the Muslim community, it should be hushed up and only repeated offenders should be brought to (Islamic) justice. This is justified on the grounds that in the Hadith a duty is laid on Muslims to protect each other and each other’s honour.
Sitr developed in a primitive culture where the concept of a crime had not been fully developed into a formalised system. Muslims adhere to Sitr because of their religious belief. But times have surpassed this concept.
Aasma Riaz: "Thank you so much for your book "Islamic Jihad" and showing me the "Big Picture". For 7-8 days, I was glued to your book, absorbing so much information that I did not know existed. You have crisply covered so much in your book and quoted historical references extensively. I am just overwhelmed with different emotions after reading your book..., a priceless tome."