Islam Watch: Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Authors Ibn Kammuna Was Muhammad Purely Evil or in-between ‘Good’ and ‘Evil’?

Was Muhammad Purely Evil or in-between ‘Good’ and ‘Evil’?

E-mail Print PDF

Muslims often point to Muhammad's good deeds and sayings. Well, every individual does and says good things. Even Hitler was good to some people.


Following video gives a rendering of Muhammad as a mix of good and evil:

But, is the truth about Muhammad being a genuinely evil person or somewhere in-between ‘Good’ and ‘Evil’?

True, Muhammad did and said certain good things. Who of us do not do or say good things? Did Hitler not do good things? He was deeply in with a woman. He had close friends. Does that make Hitler a good person?

If someone complains about the Second World War and Hitler’s role in it, shouldn’t we say? No, No. Hitler is not that bad. The truth is somewhere in the middle. Yes, Hitler caused the death of millions. But he was not as evil as you think he is. He was kind to his girlfriend. He was generous with his close friends. He wasn’t that bad after all!!!

Do you see the fallacy involved in this video? The fact that Muhammad did and said some good things does not make him a good person. We look at the degree of evil a person does in judging him/her.

True, Muhammad did good things and taught some nice things. Any decent person should follow and teach good behaviors/manners. Any one of us can and does teach nice things that Muhammad said. It does not take a genius to know that stealing is wrong, that taking care of your parents is an honorable thing, etc. Muhammad taught such things.

So, what is the difference between our practice of morals and Muhammad’s morals? We are much better than Muhammad. That is all.

I did not commit genocide against a whole tribe, such as on Bani Qurayza. Muhammad did.

I did not attack peaceful tribes unprovoked. Muhammad did that numerous times (i.e. Bani Al-Mutaliq).

I did not kill a man and then rape his wife the very day I killed him. Muhammad did that many times.

I did not consider attacking and killing other people as a monthly ‘picnic’ (as one of the researchers wrote). Muhammad did.

So, No Sir, the truth about Muhammad was not somewhere in-between Good and Evil. He was an EVIL man. Period!

One more important thing one must bear in mind that Hitler's evil committed during the five-year period of WWII, and it was over with his death. Compare that to the scale of Muhammad's evil that continued through 1,400 years, continues fullsteam today, and will go on until do not when.

M. A. Khan's book "Islamic Jihad" documents the continuation of Muhammad's evil through his followers during the last 1,400 hundred years. For example, in 1366 Muhammad Shah massacred more than 200,000 Hindus (p. 208). Every claim in Khan's book is documented with historical references. It shows how evil Islam has been in its 1,400 years history.

When one compares the blood-trenched hands of Islam, which is mainly influenced by Muhammad's ideals of "looting" the whole earth, Hitler’s evil fall short, very very short, in comparison to Muhammad's...

Comments (16)add
0
nice short article good
written by nice short article good , October 22, 2009
nice short article good
0
...
written by good one , October 22, 2009
good one
0
Good or Evil
written by balam , October 22, 2009
Very true appraisal of Mohammad,who had a split
personality,with both sides being bad.Have you ever
come across a good satan.Mohammad was a Satan personified.If
you want to meet satan,see in Mohammad.He was a
holy satan like holy allah a.k.a Mohammad who
was a gangster but never a prophet from God.It
would be a blasphemy to the name of Holy God
to call Mohammad His Prophet.He was only the
massenger of Satan-THE DESPICABLE called
Allah.

0
...
written by Archpagan , October 22, 2009
Muhammad said nothing new. Even the concept of divine revealation is Hindu one. All others copied it.
0
yes archpagan u r right,its a kafir concept copied
written by yes archpagan u r right,its a , October 22, 2009
yes archpagan u r right,its a kafir concept copied by jews-christians-muzzies.

onlydiff,the kafis did not get revelations on killing
ppl who worshipped other gods,bcoz for them all gods and even humans r part of same divinity.

wow !!!

there goes muhamed's last fancy !!!!


now islam and arabs r stripped bare !!!!
0
...
written by duh_swami , October 22, 2009
Mahound was a good guy...he never left his buddies behind...Anyone who hates dogs and old folks, can't be all bad...
0
Mo was deceiver
written by Madmullah , October 22, 2009
Mo was too cunning used carrot and stick to get bandits. To make fools, he created some good verses and then when in looting created all bad verses and when he cant debate the intelligent jews, asma bint marwan etc , the thug killed them.
0
...
written by berq , October 22, 2009
Mo was not a prophet but he was a clever guy.He always solved his problems with revelatin.Allah is anxious to please the prophet as exclaimed by his little darling wife Aisha,Allah hurriesin pleasing you.
0
Apologetica
written by Apologetica , October 22, 2009
I find it kinda funny when i read what some muslim friends wrote here before me...It's all getting old now: you took it out of context(then what's the context), the ahadith are not true(these are the earliest writings about mohammad), the ahadith is weak (bukhari gathered over 300 000 ahadith but he chose only 6 000 for his book because he wanted to bring the best, but today the muslims say that more than 25% of those are false, weak or invented by jews..) After you are done with the ahadith and consider all of them weak, then can you also start saying about verses in the quran that those are weak too, and eventually maybe you will come to realise the truth: THE WHOLE QURAN IS WEAK...

Ali Sina is a hero...
0
...
written by vbv , October 23, 2009
Muhamad was a psychopath, a criminal, a sexual-pervert, a deluded scoundrel, a brigand, a womaniser, a rapist , a mass-murderer , a vengeful thug, a liar ,etc. Tell me ,with all those wonderful qualitiesin one person ,where is the good in him? He is absolute evil bastard ,a remorseless vagabond who created a cuilt that harbours such like-minded criminals.

0
I THINK U ALL ARE Fools
written by Peter , October 23, 2009
This is JUst a Cartoon made by Jews which everything falls u fools
0
U Fool
written by Peter , October 23, 2009
That is falls yar its just a cartoon made by jews which already banned
0
Love Jihad
written by Partho , October 24, 2009
Nowadays Muslims in India are following Love Jihad wherein Young Hindu and Christain girls are first converted to Islam by Muslim boys and then married. In Kerala and Karnataka this term of LOVE JIHAD is very famous.
These lusty Muslims under instructions of Maulanas and Muslim religious leaders are trapping young Hindu girls and christain girls and then converting them to Islam. In one of the case a Hindu girl got love trapped in Love of an boy called Atif who converted this Hindu girl to Islam, married her, had two children and then sold her to an Arab Sheikh in Dubai. Beware of this new form of Jihad called LOVE JIHAD:
0
The Truth
written by Saara , November 01, 2009
Not all islam is bad. you may think so and each to his own, but muhammad taught of peace and fighting for your honor, dignity and integrity. you might like to think back to the crusades. Richard the 'lionheart' ordered 30,000 muslim women and children to slaughtered. the people of the holy land walked ankle deep in blood. and that is only on the english records. the arabian records suggest that the blood was up to the knees of the horses. and when Salah Al-deen was fighting richard and he fell off of his horse, Salah al-deen got off of his own horse, helped him back up and then resumed fighting and when richard was dying, salah al-deen risked his own life to enter richard's tent to give him medicine and when the christian troops were dying of starvation and thirst, non other than salah al-deen ordered food and water to be sent to them. That is what islam represents. it represents honor, fairness, integrity, faith and decency. not deciept and murder as you seem to think. and for those of you who think the qur'an is weak, it's NOT. there are thousands of scientific facts in there that muhammad did not have the technology to know about. for instance

a) The superheated nature of the bottoms of certain seas and oceans (implying intensive submarine volcanic activity associated with sea floor spreading) (LII:6).

b) The complete separation of different bodies of water (fresh and saline, as well as saline waters of different compositions) that do not mix completely or immediately due to the constant pres ence of impassable barriers in between (XXV:53; L V:19,20).

c) The multitude of darkness produced in the greatest depths of oceans by deep currents, topped by surface currents, topped by clouds (XXIV:40).

A group of verses that reflect on the earth’s hydrosphere and atmosphere, which are both clearly stated to have been outgassed from within the earth(LXXIX: 30, 31), a fact that is only very recently discovered. Other verses in this group comment on the protective nature of the atmosphere for life on earth (XX LXXXVI: 11), the absolute darkness of the outer space (XV: 14, 15), the reduction of atmospheric pressure with elevation (VI: 125) and the glowing nature of the early nights of our planet before the formation of its protective atmospheric spheres (XVII: 12).

Such knowledge was not available before the turn of the present century, and most of it has just started to be understood through the painstaking analysis of massive amounts of scientific observations. The Qur’anic precedence with such precise and comprehensive knowledge points to only one of the multifarious miraculous nature of this Glorious Book, being the last Divine message, and the only one that has been kept intact with exactly the same language of revelation word to word and letter to letter for more than 14 centuries. I will repeat.

THE QUR'AN IS NOT WEAK.

The Bible Is. Almost every copy of the bible differs, either in the message being delivered or the words that are used. and the bible was written by some random guy who found a bunch of quotes AFTER jesus. The Qur'an was written WORD FOR WORD of what Muhammad pbuh said.
0
...
written by jck , November 06, 2009
The Truth is in self denial, one of muhammeds closest companions converted to christinaty after muhammed died, this companion saw everything muhammed did and said, and he left islam,,, hahahahahahahahah ISlam is so fucked, the only reason islam is the fastest growing religon is because, muslims wont stop fucking, one male marries 11 females and has 6 kids with each one, its disgusting you all muslims should be ashamed and flush the koran
0
...
written by chandrabhan , November 07, 2009
@Sara,
Salahdin and Richard never met in battle face to face. Check your facts, yes he was chivalrous and he sent two horses for Richard when he lost his. He offered to send his physician for Richard.

have you ever cared to read Indian mythology? try it. It talks about no battles after sunset, No harming of women and children. Enemies tending to enemies after the sunset and visiting each other in evenings. So it is nothing new and great. Mohammed was benign, yes ( to believers only) and extremely cruel to non believers.
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

About the book | Abul Kasem's Review | Khan's Interview at FPM
Islamic Jihad
Slant Right Blog: "Islamic Jihad is so incredibly documented that it was leaves little room to criticize the book for the accuracy of the Islamic exposé. So do not tackle this book for reading enjoyment, rather engulf the book to educate your self on the actual nature of Islam’s past to understand its present and predict its future."

Total Views

Total Views: 414

Editor: M A Khan | Site design: Dan Zaremba


User Login