Apostasy in Islam
24 Jan, 2008
Part 1: The Hadith references
- This article discusses seven hadiths in Sahih El-Bukhari about
apostacy in Islam. I start by pointing out Islam’s decision
regarding apostacy, then I introduce certain implications in the
quoted hadiths. A discussion with a substantive conclusion follows
that. The last part of this article contains the actual hadiths
quoted.
Islam’s Decision Regarding Apostates
Apostates as well as atheists are to be put to death according to the Islamic religion. The first hadith below shows that Muhammad ordered the killing of anyone who changes his/her Islamic religion.
Other issues that seem to be implicated
- The first hadith below seems to imply that hell or God’s
punishment in the end of time had a physical existence. Fire and
burning are viewed in the physical sense.
- Early muslims had no tolerance to anyone who became a muslim
then changed his mind and believed differently. The second hadith
below clarifies this point. As a side but useful point here, note
that Muhammad is using a “siwak” to brush his teeth. So, I say to
you westerners why waste your money on dental floss, toothpicks,
toothbrushes, toothpaste, even dentists. Forget about all of that
and just get yourself a good quality “siwak” (or any other tree
stick of your choice!). This is sunnah folks.
- The third hadith shows that muslims will go to war to fight a
group of apostates. There is also some economic benefits to
muslims out of such war.
- The fourth hadith shows that those who leave their religion
(Islam) are to be killed. Not only that, but the killers will be
also rewarded on resurrection day.
- The fifth hadith is a validation that early muslims had no
problem chopping off heads of apostates.
- The sixth hadith below shows Muhammad telling his followers
that there are three groups of people who should be killed:
murderers, adulterers, and apostates. Do not worry about out
current moral values that are tolerant and allows people to change
their beliefs and religions. Under Islam, you do not have to worry
about all that tolerance Jargon. Everyone gets killed but the
muslims. See, the tolerance problem becomes nonexistent. Also, if
you plan to become an apostate, go ahead and kill the people you
don’t like, and commit adultery. Islam has one punishment fits all
policy on this matter. I think it was the clear air of Arabia that
prompted Muhammad to equate Apostasy with murder and adultery.
- I added the last hadith; number 7, to show how the punishment
is to be done to people who commit a combination of apostasy,
murder and theft. The way the prophet Muhammad reacted to such
crimes is sunnah to be followed by all muslims! It was not enough
for Muhammad to kill them. He had to do it in a brutal, slow and
painful way.
Discussion
Humans believing anything is a continuous and dynamic process. It is
ever changing. I may believe that the God of Islam (or any other
religion for that matter) exists at one point in my life. Later on I
may encounter new evidence or questions and become agnostic. Later
on I may encounter new experiences and change some of my beliefs
again. The fact of the matter is this: humans are liable to change
some or many of their beliefs during certain intervals of their
lifetime. This change is, in a sense, similar to what Carl Popper
calls a paradigm shift. Such a process of belief change is
inconsistent with the Islamic beliefs about apostasy. Islam and I
mean true Islam, does not allow any individual in the Muslim
community to change their beliefs by rejecting Islam and/or
believing something else, say Buddhism or Christianity. Because of
this intolerance that exists in Islam, one has to reject the basic
Islamic beliefs about apostates, or better yet, reject all of the
Islamic creeds altogether.
Quotations
All quotations are from Sahih El-Bukhari
1. Volume 9, Book 84, Number 57:
Narrated 'Ikrima:
Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to 'Ali and he burnt them. The
news of this event, reached Ibn 'Abbas who said, "If I had been in
his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah's Apostle forbade
it, saying, 'Do not punish anybody with Allah's punishment (fire).'
I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah's
Apostle, 'Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'"
2. Volume 9, Book 84, Number 58:
Narrated Abu Burda:
Abu Musa said, "I came to the Prophet along with two men (from the
tribe) of Ash'ariyin, one on my right and the other on my left,
while Allah's Apostle was brushing his teeth (with a Siwak), and
both men asked him for some employment. The Prophet said, 'O Abu
Musa (O 'Abdullah bin Qais!).' I said, 'By Him Who sent you with the
Truth, these two men did not tell me what was in their hearts and I
did not feel (realize) that they were seeking employment.' As if I
were looking now at his Siwak being drawn to a corner under his
lips, and he said, 'We never (or, we do not) appoint for our affairs
anyone who seeks to be employed. But O Abu Musa! (or 'Abdullah bin
Qais!) Go to Yemen.'" The Prophet then sent Mu'adh bin Jabal after
him and when Mu'adh reached him, he spread out a cushion for him and
requested him to get down (and sit on the cushion). Behold: There
was a fettered man beside Abu Muisa. Mu'adh asked, "Who is this
(man)?" Abu Muisa said, "He was a Jew and became a Muslim and then
reverted back to Judaism." Then Abu Muisa requested Mu'adh to sit
down but Mu'adh said, "I will not sit down till he has been killed.
This is the judgment of Allah and His Apostle (for such cases) and
repeated it thrice. Then Abu Musa ordered that the man be killed,
and he was killed. Abu Musa added, "Then we discussed the night
prayers and one of us said, 'I pray and sleep, and I hope that Allah
will reward me for my sleep as well as for my prayers.'"
3. Volume 9, Book 84, Number 59:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
When the Prophet died and Abu Bakr became his successor and some of
the Arabs reverted to disbelief, 'Umar said, "O Abu Bakr! How can
you fight these people although Allah's Apostle said, 'I have been
ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah, 'and whoever said, 'None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah', Allah will save his property and his life
from me, unless (he does something for which he receives legal
punishment) justly, and his account will be with Allah?' "Abu Bakr
said, "By Allah! I will fight whoever differentiates between prayers
and Zakat as Zakat is the right to be taken from property (according
to Allah's Orders). By Allah! If they refused to pay me even a kid
they used to pay to Allah's Apostle, I would fight with them for
withholding it." 'Umar said, "By Allah: It was nothing, but I
noticed that Allah opened Abu Bakr's chest towards the decision to
fight, therefore I realized that his decision was right."
4. Volume 9, Book 84, Number 64:
Narrated 'Ali:
Whenever I tell you a narration from Allah's Apostle, by Allah, I
would rather fall down from the sky than ascribe a false statement
to him, but if I tell you something between me and you (not a Hadith)
then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may say things just to cheat my
enemy). No doubt I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "During the last
days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the
best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e.
they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion
as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where-ever you find them, kill
them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of
Resurrection."
5. Volume 5, Book 59, Number 632:
Narrated Abu Burda:
That the Prophet sent his (i.e. Abu Burda's) grandfather, Abu Musa
and Mu'adh to Yemen and said to both of them "Facilitate things for
the people (Be kind and lenient) and do not make things difficult
(for people), and give them good tidings, and do not repulse them
and both of you should obey each other." Abu Musa said, "O Allah's
Prophet! In our land there is an alcoholic drink (prepared) from
barley called Al-Mizr, and another (prepared) from honey, called
Al-Bit"' The Prophet said, "All intoxicants are prohibited." Then
both of them proceeded and Mu'adh asked Abu Musa, "How do you recite
the Quran?" Abu Musa replied, "I recite it while I am standing,
sitting or riding my riding animals, at intervals and piecemeal."
Muadh said, "But I sleep and then get up. I sleep and hope for
Allah's Reward for my sleep as I seek His Reward for my night
prayer." Then he (i.e. Muadh) pitched a tent and they started
visiting each other. Once Muadh paid a visit to Abu Musa and saw a
chained man. Muadh asked, "What is this?" Abu Musa said, "(He was) a
Jew who embraced Islam and has now turned apostate." Muadh said, "I
will surely chop off his neck!"
6. Volume 9, Book 83, Number 17:
Narrated 'Abdullah:
Allah's Apostle said, "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none
has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle,
cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married
person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who
reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims."
7. Volume 9, Book 83, Number 37:
Narrated Abu Qilaba:
Once 'Umar bin 'Abdul 'Aziz sat on his throne in the courtyard of
his house so that the people might gather before him. Then he
admitted them and (when they came in), he said, "What do you think
of Al-Qasama?" They said, "We say that it is lawful to depend on Al-Qasama
in Qisas, as the previous Muslim Caliphs carried out Qisas depending
on it." Then he said to me, "O Abu Qilaba! What do you say about
it?" He let me appear before the people and I said, "O Chief of the
Believers! You have the chiefs of the army staff and the nobles of
the Arabs. If fifty of them testified that a married man had
committed illegal sexual intercourse in Damascus but they had not
seen him (doing so), would you stone him?" He said, "No." I said,
"If fifty of them testified that a man had committed theft in Hums,
would you cut off his hand though they did not see him?" He replied,
"No." I said, "By Allah, Allah's Apostle never killed anyone except
in one of the following three situations: (1) A person who killed
somebody unjustly, was killed (in Qisas,) (2) a married person who
committed illegal sexual intercourse and (3) a man who fought
against Allah and His Apostle and deserted Islam and became an
apostate." Then the people said, "Didn't Anas bin Malik narrate that
Allah's Apostle cut off the hands of the thieves, branded their eyes
and then, threw them in the sun?" I said, "I shall tell you the
narration of Anas. Anas said: "Eight persons from the tribe of 'Ukl
came to Allah's Apostle and gave the Pledge of allegiance for Islam
(became Muslim). The climate of the place (Medina) did not suit
them, so they became sick and complained about that to Allah's
Apostle. He said (to them ), "Won't you go out with the shepherd of
our camels and drink of the camels' milk and urine (as medicine)?"
They said, "Yes." So they went out and drank the camels' milk and
urine, and after they became healthy, they killed the shepherd of
Allah's Apostle and took away all the camels. This news reached
Allah's Apostle , so he sent (men) to follow their traces and they
were captured and brought (to the Prophet). He then ordered to cut
their hands and feet, and their eyes were branded with heated pieces
of iron, and then he threw them in the sun till they died." I said,
"What can be worse than what those people did? They deserted Islam,
committed murder and theft."
Part II: The Quranic references
In a previous
article I have tried to show that apostates are to be killed in
Islam. I have quoted hadiths from Sahih El-Bukhari to prove my
point. Some Muslim readers of the previous article had a valid
criticism which is not using the Qur’an to prove my point. I had
assumed that the readers know that the hadith is an important
element in Islam. Hadiths guide Muslim on “how to” in their daily
lives. It is not always the case that the Qur’an will give them
enough details on how to do things, and hence hadiths are of
critical importance. They tell the Muslim many details that are not
available in the Qur’an. They inform anyone on how Muhammad and the
Sahaba actually practiced their belief.
The order of this paper will be as follows: I will first introduce
the valid criticism to my previous article regarding not quoting the
Qur’an on apostasy. I will then introduce the evidence from the
Qur’an on Apostasy. I will supplement the evidence from the Qur’an
with some quotes from some of the great Imams in the history of
Islam. Finally I will introduce a story to the reader that shows
Islam in action with regard to Apostasy. This story happened in the
great Islamic Umma of Sudan; the same great Muslim nation that
wanted to kill a decent human being who took an honorable profession
of teaching in a poverty stricken country just because she allowed
her students to name a teddy bear “Muhammad”.
A note from one of the readers of my previous article said: “The
article is solely based on some fabricated hearsay (i.e., Hadith)
that majority Muslims no longer believe!”
Alhamdulilah.. Alhamdulilah.. Now Bukhari and Muslim and many others
are things of the past. They are not worth a hell of beans. I wonder
if the writer of the above quote knows that the majority of Muslims
everywhere will not agree with him on rejecting the Hadiths. In any
case, this is good for me. I only have to show him the evidence from
the Qur’an, and hopefully he will then decide that the Qur’an is
“solely based on some fabricated hearsay”.
There were other comments from readers claiming that the Qur’an does
not have any verse “which prescribes an earthly punishment for
apostasy”. Some even quoted the some of the earlier Qur’anic verses.
Here is one of them: “.. There is no compulsion in religion. ..”.
It is important to know that the earlier dated verses of the Qur’an,
before the Hijra, had a softer tone to them than later Qur’anic
verses. The reason is simple: In Mecca, Muhammad had a small number
of followers. He and his followers could not protect themselves if
his Qur’anic tone was too harsh. Later on, after the Hijra, and
especially after his gruesome act of Bani Qurayza’s genocide, his
fortunes changes. He had the economic resources and the strength to
have “harsher” Qur’anic revelations.
Now, Let us look at some of the Qur’anic apostasy jewels that were
revealed to Muhammad when he was strong enough:
002.217
YUSUFALI: They ask thee concerning fighting
in the Prohibited Month. Say: "Fighting therein is a grave
(offence); but graver is it in the sight of Allah to prevent access
to the path of Allah, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred
Mosque, and drive out its members." Tumult and oppression are worse
than slaughter. Nor will they cease fighting you until they turn you
back from your faith if they can. And if any of you Turn back from
their faith and die in unbelief, their works will bear no fruit in
this life and in the Hereafter; they will be companions of the Fire
and will abide therein.
Al-Shafi’i, the founder of one of the four Sunni Islam schools of
law, interprets the above verse to mean that an apostate is to get
the death penalty. [Source: Zwemer, The Law of Apostasy in Islam,
pages 34-5.]. And as a bonus here, it is worth mentioning that Al-Razi
and Al-Tha’alibi reach a similar conclusion and state that the
apostate should be killed.
Here is even a clearer Qur’anic jewel regarding the fate of the
apostates (I am quoting all three reliable translations of the
Qur’an to insure clarity of the meaning of the verse:
004.089
YUSUFALI: They but wish that ye should
reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they):
But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of
Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize
them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no
friends or helpers from their ranks;-
PICKTHAL: They long that ye should
disbelieve even as they disbelieve, that ye may be upon a level
(with them). So choose not friends from them till they forsake their
homes in the way of Allah; if they turn back (to enmity) then take
them and kill them wherever ye find them, and choose no friend nor
helper from among them,
SHAKIR: They desire that you should
disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all)
alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly
(their homes) in Allah's way; but if they turn back, then seize them
and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a
friend or a helper.
And there it is folks: if you become an apostate, a true Muslim is
not allowed to be a friend to you anymore. Rather, Muslims should
kill those apostate kafirs. It is worth mentioning here that Baydawi,
in his commentary on the Qur’an, interprets the above verse to mean
that the apostate should be killed openly or secretly, and no
intercession will be accepted in this case.[Source: Zwemer, The
Law of Apostasy in Islam, pages 33-4.]
Abu Al’Ala’ Almawdudi, the influential Islamic thinker of the
twentieth century (considered by many the spiritual leader of the
Muslim brothers movement) clearly interprets the Qur’an commanding
the death penalty for apostates. He uses the following Qur’anic gems
to drive his point home:
009.011
YUSUFALI: But (even so), if they repent,
establish regular prayers, and practise regular charity,- they are
your brethren in Faith: (thus) do We explain the Signs in detail,
for those who understand.
009.012
YUSUFALI: But if they violate their oaths
after their covenant, and taunt you for your Faith,- fight ye the
chiefs of Unfaith: for their oaths are nothing to them: that thus
they may be restrained
Al-Mawdudi takes into consideration the occasion of the revelation
in interpreting those two verses. His “The punishment of the
Apostate according to Islamic Law” is available on line at
www.answering-islam.org.
Well, it is evident that the claim that “There is no single verse in
the Qur’an which prescribes an earthly punishment for apostasy”, as
one reader of my previous article claimed, is baseless. As you have
seen above, there are more than just a “single verse” in the Qur’an
that prescribe murdering an innocent human being who just wanted to
practice her/his basic right of freedom and ability to change some
of her/his beliefs.
I would like to end this article with a story that ought to make any
true Muslim ashamed of the Islamic beliefs about apostasy: The late
Sudanese theologian Mahmud Muhammad Taha tried to reform Islam by
attempting to minimize the role of the Qur’an as a source of law in
Sudan. He wanted to devise new laws to better accommodate the
Sudanese people of the twentieth century. Needless to say that the
religious authorities in Khartoum did not take kindly to his
attempts. He was declared an apostate in 1968. Under Islamic law,
his punishment was the death penalty. His writings were burned and
he managed to escape execution for seventeen years. When he was
seventy six years old, he was tried again and was hanged publicly in
Khartoum in January of 1985. [Source: Daniel Pipes, The Rushdie
Affair: The Novel, the Ayatollah, and the West (New York: Birch
Lane Press, 1990), pages 75-6]
The grim reality for a modern Muslim regarding apostasy is that its
death penalty is rooted in the Qur’an and in the Hadith. I have
shown that this is the case in this article as well as in the
previous one. Such a punishment for a behavior that is not at all a
crime but rather a right that any human being of our time should
enjoy, cannot be a justified punishment. One should be able to
change religious beliefs if one wants to without the threat of being
killed.
| If you like this essay: |
Stumble it
|
digg it |
Name: good article...pls write more and expose islam faster
Date: Wednesday January 23, 2008
Time: 22:33:38 -0700
Comment
Name: good article pls write more n expose islam more n faster
Date: Wednesday January 23, 2008
Time: 22:34:42 -0700
Comment
good article,pls write more and expose islam faster. i hear islam is trying to get nukes and first target will be india or israel or usa. so better detsory islam before it destroys us.
Name: muslim
Date: Thursday January 24, 2008
Time: 10:15:43 -0700
Comment
you are so low to call him just Muhammad he is MUHAMMAD the MESSENGER of GOD -pbuh- you must be very ignorant because at that time there was no touthpaste or touthbruchs but MUHAMMAD -pbuh- used some thing to clean his mouth when your ancestors mouth smells. please write more about islam it a very good publicity . thanks
Name:
Date: Thursday January 24, 2008
Time: 18:48:43 -0700
Comment
As far as your Muhammed 'the messenger of god' is concerned, I go along with the eighteenth British historian Edward Gibbon concerning him. He may have believed the voices in his head were divine, as a young man but by the time of Khadijah's death he had become a brutal autocrat and an imposter who received messages which happened to of great convenience to his own personal whims. Whole populations being taught to use him as a model of behaviour has caused untold misery. Many still use some sort of tree root to clean their teeth - I'm sure western people used something equally efficient in the 7th century. Mohammedans just assume there must always be something about Muslim practice that makes them superior to others. The truth is there hardly ever is - perhaps never.
Name:
Date: Thursday January 24, 2008
Time: 18:49:00 -0700
Comment
Name: kafir/infidel ( & Ex-communist ).
Date: Thursday January 24, 2008
Time: 22:00:07 -0700
Comment
Unfortunately , since long , the word religion has acquired to mean some thing good or can be the words of good people from the God . Even then , giving all the benefit of doubt , ISLAM will not qualify as a religion. ISLAM is the death cult , most primitive,most backward, most savage, most intolerant, most fascist, most dogmatic theology filled with hate , terror, fear, slavery,discrimination, and evil ideas, ill will etc. There is nothing good about ISLAM. ISLAM is incompatible with modern values ( or any good values for that matter) . ISLAMIC countries are the worst violaters of all human rights. ISLAM is a regressive ,reactionary preachings. So please, let this plague -ISLAM , go to hell fire and consign it to dust heap of history which it deserves in every way. There will not be peace,progress,prosperity,equality,equal justice ,freedom as long as ISLAM rules in Moslem countries.
Name: Ananda
Date: Thursday January 24, 2008
Time: 23:55:31 -0700
Comment
Is this Apostasy law scaring European Muslims from leaving Islam? I don't think so. Islam is providing a cultural identity to them at least for the Arabs in Europe. They don't say I am Syrian, or Saudi, or Egyptian, they say I am Muslim. This Islamic identity of Arabs is a stumbling block to their integration to local culture.
Name:
Date: Monday January 28, 2008
Time: 14:36:27 -0700
Comment
Why they didn´t kill Obama yet?
Name:
Date: Friday February 01, 2008
Time: 08:27:44 -0700
Comment
Is Killing An Apostate in the Islamic Law? by Ibrahim B. Syed, Ph. D. President Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc. 7102 W. Shefford Lane Louisville, KY 40242-6462, U.S.A. E-mail: IRFI@INAME.COM Website: http://WWW.IRFI.ORG Ridda or Irtidãd: Literally means "turning back". The act of apostasy -- leaving Islam for another religion or for a secular lifestyle. Murtadd: Literally means "one who turns the back." An apostate. Murtad Fitri: Literally means apostate - natural. A person born of a Muslim parent who later rejects Islam. Murtad Milli: Literally means apostate - from the community. A person who converted to Islam and later rejected the religion. Due lack of education and critical thinking several myths have taken root in the Muslim world over the ages, and there have not been any efforts in the past to clear these doubts. On the contrary, there has been a sort of effort to strengthen these myths and misconceptions. These misinterpretations of Islamic teachings have taken their toll on the Muslim world and have strengthened a misplaced perception that Islam is a symbol of obscurantism, a religion of intolerance and answers everything with the sword. And there is no bigger misconception-strengthened with misunderstanding of Islamic beliefs over the years-other than the belief that Islam doesn't tolerate apostasy. The Christian missionaries and the Western world are cashing in on it. Ulama have tried to strengthen their point of view and several leading Muslim reformists have failed to tackle the issue. This misconception has also presented Islam as a medieval and killer religion. Islam bashers have time and again tried to carry the point by pointing out that Islam orders the killing of a person if he or she reverts to another religion from Islam. No body is forthcoming to challenge this widely held belief as well as put forth a convincing argument about the misinterpretation of Qur'anic teachings by Ulama. The Qur’an is completely silent on any worldly punishment for apostasy and the sole Tradition that forms the basis of rulings is open to many interpretations. Prophet (pbuh) is reported to have said: ‘Whosoever changes his religion, Kill Him (man baddala Dinahu faqtuluhu)’”. It is this last quote from the Prophet that forms the basis of the said ruling. While jurists are agreed on the authenticity of this tradition, they differ very widely on the appropriate interpretation and thus, the law concerning apostasy. Understanding the different viewpoints, and arriving at the truth is crucial to our discussion of this subject. This tradition does not refer to Muslims who leave the religion of Islam for other religions. Finally, there is the crucial dispute over the nature of the punishment and the crime. Al-Nakha’ee and, according to Sha’rani, al-Thawri, hold that the apostate is a grave sinner who should however be continuously called back to the fold for the rest of his life, and not killed. By implication, they do not consider the offence a hadd (fixed penalty) offence with a fixed punishment that must be carried out. This view is similar to the view that apostasy is a sin that carries no fixed punishment, and any penalty for it is discretionary (ta’zeer). This is a view held by the Hanbali scholar, Ibn Taimiya and he attributes it as well to the Maliki Imam al-Baji. Among Hanafites, the jurist Shamsuddeen al-Sarakhshi holds the same view. He says in al Mabsut that the fixed penalties or hudud are generally not suspended because of repentance, especially when they are reported and become known to the Imam. He then adds in the case of apostasy “renunciation of the faith and conversion to disbelief is admittedly the greatest of offences, yet it is a matter between man and his Creator, and its punishment is postponed to the day of Judgement. (“fa’l jaza’ ‘alayha mu’akhkhar ila dar al-jaza”). If repentance is accepted, then apostasy is not a hadd offence with a fixed punishment. Secondly, once scholars accept that a Muslim apostate has the right to be given the opportunity to repent, they lose the right to set a time limit for his repentance. Allah (SWT) says in the Glorious Qur’an (39: 53-54: Say: “ O you servants of Mine who have transgressed against your own selves! Despair not of God’s mercy. Behold God forgives all sins, for verily He is much forgiving, a dispenser of grace! Hence, turn toward your sustainer and surrender yourselves unto him before the suffering (of death and resurrection) comes upon you for then you will not be succored.” Any scholar who says the death sentence applies to leaving the faith, then the convict is to be given a life-time to repent, and this is the view of Sufyan al-Thawri, Ibrahim al-Nakha’ee, Shamsuddeen al-Sarakhshi, Imam al-Baji and, by strong implication, Ahmad Ibn Taimiya. One must conclude that the death sentence is not for “simple apostasy” (mujarrad al-ridda), but for apostasy accompanied by treason and sedition, or by the abuse and slander (sabb) of the Noble Prophet. Freedom to convert to or from Islam "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance." Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Glorious Qur'an says, "Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Surely the Right Path is clearly distinct from the crooked path." Al Baqarah, 2:256. "Those who believe, then disbelieve, then believe again, then disbelieve, and then increase in their disbelief - Allah will never forgive them nor guide them to the path." Surah An-Nisa', 4:137. For example, the Qur'an says: "Let him who wishes to believe, do so; and let him who wishes to disbelieve, do so." (Al-Kahf: 29) In another verse, Allah Almighty says: "Yours is only the duty to convey the message; you are not a guardian over them." (Al-Ghashiyah: 21- 22) The quotation from Surah An-Nisa', 4:137, shown above, seems to imply that multiple, sequential apostasies are possible. That would not be possible if the person were executed after the first apostasy. From the above verses it can be argued that religious freedom and the absence of compulsion in religion requires that individuals be allowed adopt a religion or to convert to another religion without legal penalty. Hence the death penalty is not an appropriate response to apostasy. The former Chief Justice of Pakistan, SA Rahman, has written that there is no reference to the death penalty in any of the 20 instances of apostasy mentioned in the Qur'an. Muslims who support the death penalty for apostasy use as their foundation the above cited hadith, in which the Prophet (pbuh) is reported to have said: "Kill whoever changes his religion." But this is a weak foundation because this hadith was only transmitted from Muhammad (pbuh) by one individual. It was not confirmed by a second person. According to Islamic law, this is insufficient confirmation to impose the death penalty. The Shari`ah has not fixed any punishment for apostasy. The hadith is so generally worded that it would require the death penalty for a Christian or Jew who converted to Islam. This is obviously not the prophet's intent. The hadith is in need of further specification, which has not been documented. Many scholars interpret this passage as referring only to instances of high treason. (e.g. declaring war on Islam, Muhammad (pbuh), God, etc.). There is no historical record, which indicates that Muhammad (pbuh) or any of his companions ever sentenced anyone to death for apostasy. The issue of killing a murtad or the apostate is not a simple one. Scholars have debated it from various angles and it is not simply an issue of killing someone for choosing one religion or another. The question of apostasy has been debated among scholars based on their interpretations of some hadiths since the Qur'an does not specify any worldly punishment for it. For example, there was a case at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) where a man came to him in three consecutive days and told him that he wanted to apostate. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) never took any action against him, and when the man finally left Madina, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) never sent anyone to arrest him, let alone kill him. This is why some scholars distinguished between individual apostasy and apostasy which is accompanied by high treason. So, it cannot be confused with the freedom of conscience for every individual, which has been guaranteed in the Qur'an through hundreds of verses. For example, one version of a hadith narrated by `A'isha (RA) concerning apostasy relates to one who left his religion and fought against Muslims. QUR'ANIC VIEWS The Qur’an has referred to the issue of apostasy at more than one place (for example see Al-Baqarah 2: 217, Al-Baqarah 2: 108, A’l Imra’n 3: 90, Al-Nisa’ 4: 137 and Al-Nahl 16: 106). But at none of these places does the Qur’an mention the punishment of death for such people who change their religion. The Qur’an does mention that such people shall face a terrible punishment in the hereafter but no worldly punishment is mentioned at any of these instances in the Qur’an. This situation obviously raises a question mark in the mind of the reader that if Allah had wanted to give the punishment of an apostate a permanent position in the Shari`ah, the punishment should have been mentioned, at least at one of the above mentioned places. If the Qur’an had kept completely silent about the apostate, the matter would have been different. But the strange thing is that the Qur’an mentions apostasy, and still does not mention the punishment (if any) it wants the apostate to be subjected to. Furthermore, the Qur’an has strictly disallowed the imposition of the death penalty except in two specific cases. One of them is where the person is guilty of murdering another person and the other is where a person is guilty of creating unrest in the country (fasa’d fil-ardh) like being involved in activities that create unrest in a society, for example activities like terrorism etc. The Qur’an says: Whoever kills a person without his being guilty of murder or of creating unrest in the land, is as though he kills the whole of mankind. (Al-Ma’idah, 5: 32) Obviously, apostasy can neither be termed as "murder" nor "creating unrest in the land". Thus, in view of the above facts, we are left with one option only. We can only say that either the saying has been wrongly ascribed to the Prophet (pbuh), as it is clearly contradictory to the Qur’an and the Prophet could not have said anything contradictory to the Qur’an, or that the saying ascribed to the Prophet (pbuh) relates not to all apostates but to a particular and specific people. Shaykh Subhani Shaykh Inayatullah Subhani (author of the Book Apostasy doesn't carry death penalty in Islam) says that neither Islam forces any person to embrace neither Islam nor it forces him to remain within its fold. He writes, "Apostasy has been mentioned several times in Qur'an. It also describes the bad treatment that will be meted out for committing apostasy, but it never talks of punishment for the crime in this world." The learned scholar mentions three Ayaat (verses) from Qur'an on apostasy (Al-Baqara 217, Muhammad 25-27 and Al-Maida 54) and then says that none of these Ayaat prescribes any punishment for that though these Ayaat pass strictures on the people who commit it. There are several other Ayaat on the same issue and none of them prescribes either death penalty or any other punishment for apostasy in this world. He then adds that had there been some punishment in Islam for apostasy there was no reason as to why the issue was mentioned repeatedly in Qur'an but no punishment was prescribed. Misinterpretation of the hadith, Man baddala Dinahu faqtuluh (kill him who changes his religion) has caused the problem. This order has been made to look general and permanent, though it was said in a particular circumstance for a particular group. Shaykh Subhani writes that this order was made to counter a scheme prepared by Jews of Madinah. They had planned that some of them embrace Islam for some time and then return to their old religion. Then some other people do the same. It was aimed to create restlessness among Muslims against their own leadership so that the strong Muslim unity should start crumbling. It was made clear in Qur'an in (Aal Imran, 3: 72-73). To counter this planning the Prophet (SAW) ordered his companions to act in such a manner. Despite this order lengthy investigations were made to ascertain that the case was true and the person concerned was given adequate time to explain before the punishment was carried out. Shaykh Subhani says lack of clear grasp of Qur'an misguided even leading Ulama. Otherwise it was not difficult to understand the hadith. Qur'anic teachings on the issue were not kept in mind. He emphasizes that people who were awarded death penalty for reverting to other religions from Islam during the time of the Prophet (SAW) or during the reign of his caliphs were not given the punishment for the crime of apostasy but for the fact that they were at war with Muslims and Islamic government. Shaykh Subhani regrets that punishment that was prescribed for certain people under special circumstances was made to look like a general order. He says that it was the order for people who posed threat to Islamic state and became at war with Islam and not for any person who reverts to other religion. A number of Islamic scholars from past centuries, Ibrahim al-Naka'I, Sufyan al-Thawri, Shams al-Din al-Sarakhsi, Abul Walid al-Baji and Ibn Taymiyyah, have all held that apostasy is a serious sin, but not one that requires the death penalty. In modern times, Mahmud Shaltut, Sheikh of al-Azhar, and Dr Mohammed Sayed Tantawi have concurred. In conclusion, we must never confuse the issue of killing a murtad with the freedom of conscience guaranteed in the Glorious Qur'an. For a detailed discussion, one should read (1) the Dr. Yusuf Al-Qaradawi's book on this issue: Jareemat ar-riddah wal murtadd (The Crime of Apostasy and Apostate) - published by Ar-Risalah foundation.