The Bane of Jihad
24 Jan, 2007
          Some regional experts 
          believe that if we must take any action against Iran, there is no 
          better time than now. Iran’s fascist regime has never been under more 
          pressure, domestically and internationally; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in 
          addition to having been isolated internationally, is also facing an 
          ever widening division within the Iranian society; Tehran, because of 
          the U.S. moves, finds itself struggling to survive economically; 
          Shiite extremism is making Arab governments more willing to back U.S. 
          goals. 
          
           
          Iran’s Arab neighbors, 
          including Egypt and Jordan, faced with the specter of being besieged 
          by majority Shiite states and destabilized by the Shiite minorities 
          within their own territories, find themselves with no choice but to 
          help the U.S. in containing the neo-Nazism promoted by Ahmadinejad. 
          Foreign ministers of eight Arab countries issued a joint communiqué 
          signaling that they supported U.S. goals in Iraq. 
          
           
          U.S. Secretary of State 
          Condoleezza Rice believes that rising fear of Shiite extremism is 
          drawing together moderate Arab governments in a way that would make it 
          easier for the United States to contain Iran. Rice says Sunni-led 
          governments fear that they will be put on the defensive against 
          Shiites at home and in neighboring lands. 
          
           
          But not everyone is in 
          favor of using the military force. U.S. experience in Iraq has taught 
          that a military victory doesn’t always translate into a real victory. 
          The regional analysts argue that if a U.S. military victory against 
          Iran results in the alienation of the Shiite masses in the region, 
          then it will be, in fact, not a U.S. victory but the victory of the 
          anti-American forces and it will definitely have an adverse affect on 
          the ongoing war on Islamist terrorism.
           
          Experts warn against 
          using Sunni Arab help without first satisfying the all important 
          question: Will the Sunni Arabs' help in containing Iran eventually 
          result in the empowerment of Wahhabi global jihad? This question has 
          gained critical importance in view of what happened in Afghanistan 
          during the anti-Soviet Jihad. 
          Wahhabis in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the Persian Gulf States and 
          elsewhere used the cover of their alliance with the U.S. to finance 
          the revival of Global jihad and paved the way for September 11, 2001 
          by reviving the institution of Jihad in the Sunni world – an 
          institution that is aimed at establishing the universal Islamist state 
          (Shariah) by subjugating or murdering the infidels. 
          September 11 attacks were validated by fatwas (edicts) issued by Sunni 
          scholars decreeing a pact to fight "Crusaders and Jews." 
          The military assistance provided by the U.S. was used to create an 
          army of Holy Warriors which was eventually used to stage attacks on 
          New York and Washington. 
          
           
          Will 
          the Arab government’s support for a perceived U.S. cause further 
          alienate the Arab masses, thereby arming Al-Qaeda passions with more 
          tools to recruit more holy warriors? Experts point out that Sunni 
          animosity toward Judeo-Christian values is a part of their psyche. 
          They can’t be trusted. It is a matter of record that Saudi Arabia 
          continues to fund and export its Wahhabi brand of Islam, making it a 
          "strategic threat" to the United States in the worldwide war on 
          terror. The chairman of the U.S. government commission on religious 
          freedom reached the same conclusion as far back as 2003. "It is an 
          ideology that is incompatible with the war on terrorism," said Michael 
          Young, chairman of the State Department's Commission on International 
          Religious Freedom.
          
          http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20031118-113127-4259r.htm
          
          
           
          Another question that 
          has to be answered before taking any military step against Iran is: 
          Will an attack on Iran be considered an attack on Shiites, thereby 
          uniting all the Shiites of the world against the American interests 
          everywhere, which would be a boon for the overall institution of 
          Wahhabi global jihad? Because right now, Shiites are not supporting 
          the Al-Qaeda causes. There is a strong feeling among the Shiites of 
          the world that Al-Qaeda’s global jihad is basically a vehicle to 
          impose a Wahhabi Sharia on the world in which Shiites will find 
          neither safety nor security. 
          
           
          There are two things that have to be 
          kept in mind for all times; Iran’s animosity toward the western world 
          and Judeo-Christian civilization is not a Shia faith but to a large 
          extent, only confined to the clerical establishment that rules Iran 
          today. Whereas Sunni hatred for the West is the direct result of 
          anti-Semitic interpretations of the Holy book and Hadith, Shia don’t 
          share their passion for the Caliphate. Iran’s Shia are more concerned 
          with the historical Sunni animosity toward their faith than with the 
          Wahhabi fanaticism for the global jihad. They know that a predominant 
          portion of Sunnis view Shiites as heretics. Top Saudi Arabian clerics 
          have declared Shiites around the world to be infidels who should be 
          considered worse than Jews or Christians. 
           
          Most recently, in December 2006, 
          Abdul Rahman al-Barak, one of the top Wahhabi clerics in Saudi Arabia 
          and considered close to the Kingdom's royal family, urged Sunnis 
          worldwide to oppose reconciliation with Shiites. "By and large, 
          rejectionists (Shiites) are the most evil sect of the nation and they 
          have all the ingredients of the infidels," Abdul Rahman wrote in a 
          fatwa, or religious edict, that was posted on his web site.
           
          "The general ruling is that they are 
          infidels, apostates and hypocrites," he wrote. "They are more 
          dangerous than Jews and Christians," he wrote in the edict. Like most 
          hardline Sunnis, Abdul Rahman employed the word "rejectionists," used 
          as a derogatory term to describe Shiites because they opted out of the 
          Sunni school of Islamic theology. He also said the sect was the work 
          of a Jewish conspiracy. 
          
          International Herald Tribune
           
          A majority of the 
          Shiites also feel betrayed by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s anti-American 
          diatribes as they believe that September 11, for the first time, made 
          the West aware of the evilness of Wahhabi ideology and thus it was a 
          chance for the Shiites to establish their rightful place among the 
          civilized peoples. That’s why it is of vital importance for the U.S. 
          to find a way to eradicate Khomeinism that fuels Ahmadinejad’s 
          anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism without alienating the Shia. If 
          there is one force that can destroy the Wahhabi institution of global 
          jihad it is Shia. The West will one day need them.
Tashbih Sayyed is the Editor in Chief of Pakistan Today and The Muslim World Today, President of Council for Democracy and Tolerance, an adjunct fellow of Hudson Institute, and a regular columnist for newspapers across the world. He is the author of eight books, including: History Of The World, Left Of The Center, Pakistan - An Unfinished Agenda, Mohammad - A secularist's View, Foreign Policy Of Pakistan, and Shadow Warriors - Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taliban.

	