Women
in Islam: An exegesis - Part 7
by
Abul Kasem
[
Part 1 - Part
2 - Part 3 - Part
4 - Part 5 - Part
6 ]
Women
taken as captives in a war
Islam
permits unlimited sex with women taken as prisoners in a war. This
was (or is) the practice of the Muslims including Muhammad during
the 'golden' days of early Islam.
Muhammad himself took Raihana a pretty young thing, who happened
to be a married Jewish woman, captive (after the slaughter of Bani
Quraiza male captives) as his concubine when she refused to marry
him. Muhammad even
presented many of his friends as well as his own sons-in-law (Ali
and Othman) with pretty young captive women to be used as sex slaves.
You talk about morality and good judgment! This was the respect
and kindness that the Prophet of "mercy" had for the helpless
women! Besides Raihana, Muhammad also took Jurawyirah (from the
raid on Bani al Mustaliq) and Saffiya (a Bani Nadir Jewess from
the raid on Khaibar) as his mistresses. Islamic apologists can't wait to announce that Muhammad
was so merciful that he married these two helpless women to free
them from being sold as slaves. They will even let you believe that
those helpless women, whose relatives were killed, were actually
very happy to marry Muhammad as they fell in love with him after
the slaughter. Was Muhammad a virile man in his early fifties? How
disgusting and revolting it is that the prophet of Islam had inured
this filthy practise of using the captives to satiate his libidinous
urge! The apologist
will most certainly give you the impression that marrying them absolves
all the culpability of Muhammad in slaughtering their male relations.
What is the big deal in marrying a captive woman?
What kind of bravery and chivalry is this?
In fact, it is an act of great cowardice and absolute meanness
and an exposition of uncontrolled lust of the highest order.
What choice did those pitiful women had?
Even if Muhammad wanted to kill them or sell them as sex
slaves, what could they do?
Practically, they could do nothing.
What
do the Muhammad's followers are supposed to do today?
Are they not supposed to emulate him to the letter in every
respect? No wonder
that we witness such beautiful treatment of women in all the Islamic
Paradises as I pen this essay in the dawn of the twenty first century.
You
see, whenever, the Muslim army conducted a raid, they always had
the thirst for the succulent body of infidel women. Their desire
to have sex with those captured women was so compelling that even
Allah had to intervene to decree that these women could be raped
after their menstrual periods were over. This uncivilized and despicable
sexual urges of those Islamic soldiers were so barbaric that they
would not even show sense of decency by having sex with their women
prisoners in privacy. They would not hesitate to copulate with these
hapless women right in the presence of their husbands who were infidels.
How outrageous! How despicable!
Read
the following two hadith and judge for yourself the divinity in
Islamic rules when you compare those with the rights of the POW
as conferred by the Geneva Convention.
The
first hadith indicates that some Muslim soldiers were quite ashamed
to perform sexual act with the captive women while their husbands
were present. Are we not supposed to assume that most of the Jihadis
were having sexual intercourse with the captive women right in front
of their fallen (prisoner) husbands? How beautiful!! In recent times,
we have seen this type of sexual perversions perpetrated by the
Islamic army of Pakistan on their captive booties (captured women)
in the genocide of Bangladesh in 1971. Isn't it that the Pakistan
army was just carrying out the contents of these ahadith?
Some
Jihadis had sex with the captive women in the presence of their
husbands and some were reluctant to do so (Sunaan Abu Dawud 11.2150)
Abu
Said al-Khudri said: "The apostle of Allah sent a military
expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They
met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took
them captives. Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were
reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence
of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent
down the Qur'anic verse, "And all married women (are forbidden)
unto your save those (captives) whom your right hand possesses".
That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their
waiting period."" [The Qur'an verse is 4:24].
One
can have sexual intercourse with a captive woman after she is clear
of her period and/or delivery. If she has a husband then her marriage
is abrogated after she becomes a captive (Ref. 4:24)-(Shahih Muslim
8.3432)
Book
008, Number 3432:
Abu
Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the
Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) sent
an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them.
Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of
Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) seemed to refrain from
having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands
being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:"
And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess
(iv. 24)
One
might think that this type of sexual predatory practice was limited
only to the ordinary Muslim soldiers who were sexually starved due
to the war. The holiest of the holy men of Islam could have never
indulged in such kind of depravity. Well, let us have a serious
look at the following hadith that says that the holiest of the holy,
Hazrat Ali, did do sexual intercourse with captive women even when
he himself was married to Fatima, the daughter of Muhammad, the
Prophet of Islam. What a beauty!
In fact, the prophet of mercy and tolerance, instead of condemning
and reprimanding Ali, even said that his son-in-law deserved more
than that, perhaps meaning to say that he (Ali) deserved more sex
from captive slave-women! The banality of Muhammad's foray into
sex with captive women knows no bounds and still then, the Muslims
all over the world even today think that he is the ideal person
whose life should be emulated by all Muslims.
Ali
had sex with booty captive women...(Shahih Bukhari 5.59.637)
Volume
5, Book 59, Number 637:
Narrated
Buraida:
The
Prophet sent 'Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and
I hated Ali, and 'Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with
a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, "Don't you
see this (i.e. Ali)?" When we reached the Prophet I mentioned
that to him. He said, "O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?" I
said, "Yes." He said, "Do you hate him, for he deserves
more than that from the Khumus."
A
natural question is, what happens if a captive woman gets pregnant
as a result of having sex with the Jihadis? Many of those Islamic
Jihadis did ponder over this unwanted pregnancy and wanted to practice
coitus interruption (withdrawing before ejaculating) but Muhammad
was quite against it, at times and was neutral at other times. Here
are some beautiful ahadith. If you read these ahdith carefully,
you will notice that the Jihadis did do coitus interruption not
only to avoid unwanted pregnancy but it was also a method of giving
them intense sexual pleasure and that was why they loved doing that!
This means that those hapless captive women were meant not only
to satisfy the normal sexual urge but were also a means to satisfy
their captor's sexual fantasies and perversions, which, perhaps
they could not do with their married wives.
Muhammed
did not approve coitus interruption with the captive women of Banu-al-Mustaliq,
but he allowed the women to be raped...(Shahih Bukhari 5.59.459)
Volume
5, Book 59, Number 459:
Narrated
Ibn Muhairiz:
I
entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him
and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said,
"We went out with Allah's Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq
and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired
women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus.
So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said, 'How can
we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Apostle who is present
among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better
for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection)
is predestined to exist, it will exist."
Some
Jihadis practiced coitus interruption with captive women...(Shahih
Bukhari 7.62.137)
Volume
7, Book 62, Number 137:
Narrated
Abu Said Al-Khudri:
We
got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus
with them. So we asked Allah's Apostle about it and he said, "Do
you really do that?" repeating the question thrice, "There
is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence,
till the Day of Resurrection."
Muhammad's
followers used to practice coitus interruption while the Qur'an
was being revealed-( Shahih Muslim 8.3386)
Book
008, Number 3386:
Jabir
(Allah be pleased with him) reported: We used to practise 'azl while
the Qur'an was revealed (during the days when the Holy Prophet was
alive).
Many
Islamists are ashamed of the provision of taking captive women as
sex slaves. They try to soften this barbaric practice by pretending
to say something like, 'you
must consider the time and the context. There is a misconception
on this. Those days it was all right to have captive women and to
have sex with them because many Muslim soldiers were despatched
to the war zones. So, to satisfy their sex appetite God permitted
them to have such sex. The captive women also needed sex. So it
was a win-win situation. See how beautiful the Islamic rules are!'
If we ask them whether this provision still applies today or not,
they simply try to evade this question by saying something like,
'You see, we must look at the context, when the Muslims conquer
any nation they will always treat the vanquished fairly with Islamic
laws. Islam will surely protect their women and children-. etc.'
They simply avoid a straightforward answer.
Have
you ever thought about what will happen to the infidel American
women if the 'Great Satan' is defeated in an Islamic Jihad?
Let
us hear what the 'real Islam' has to offer on this matter.
This is what a well-learned Mullah says about the captive women:
From an Islamic
Q & A site:
Right Hand Possessions
http://www.binoria.org/q&a/miscellaneous.html#possessions
Question:
What is the meaning
of right hand possession and what was the purpose of having them.
Some brothers in America think it is okay
to have right hand possessions now in the USA.
Answer:
Right hand possessions
(Malak-ul-Yameen) means slaves and maids, those came in possession
of Muslims through war or purchase. After having the possession
of slave maid it is lawful and correct to have sexual relation with
them. Even today if Muslims get possession
over infidel country, this condition is possible, lawful and correct.
Please
peruse the above statement once again. What is the implication of
this Mullah's opinion? I must appreciate the Mullah for his utter
honesty with respect to 'real Islam.' He did not beat around
the bushes. He has given a straightforward, unadulterated, pure
and unambiguous answer that clearly conforms to the rules of Qur'an
and hadith. May I ask
the Islamic apologists to say a few words about this honest reply
from this Mullah?
Now,
let us look at the wider implications of this 'Islamic rule.'
Imagine that Islamic army invades America, Britain and all infidel
lands. Also, imagine
these infidels being defeated in a catastrophic war. What do you
think the Islamic soldiers will do to all the male infidels?
What do you think the Islamic soldiers would do to all the
pretty/young women they would capture as captives?
Do you think that these Islamic soldiers will honour the
covenants of the Geneva Conventions on POW?
You must be out of your mind if you thought so. The soldiers
of Islam will do exactly what the above Mullah has said.
Yes, they will sell all the male captives as slaves and take
the young/pretty women as sex slaves to satisfy their sexual urge.
The old women would probably be killed, as they become a burden
to the Muslim invaders. For
married women, their marriage will be immediately made null and
void. To humiliate the great 'Satan' further, the Islamic
Jihadis will probably do sexual act with the captive women right
in front of their men who were just a short while ago their husbands.
You
may still think this to be impossible. But, wait!
The Pakistani Islamic army did just this in Bangladesh in
1971. They killed about 3 million Bangalees terming them as not
so good Muslims, took 250,000 Bengali women as concubines, and raped
them, many of them repeatedly and not very far off from their near
and dear ones. In recent times, we have heard many such reports
from the Taliban ruled Afghanistan. These disturbing acts may enrage
a lot of people, including many Muslims. Think again. Have the Islamic
soldiers committed any crime/sin as far as Islam is concerned. The
answer is a simple "NO."
Therefore, doesn't it make sense to realise that it is
the Islam itself that is the motivating factor for the rape of the
captive women? In Iran
a woman charged with adultery/blasphemy/apostasy carrying death
penalty become a captive of the Islamic state. Therefore, an Islamic
guard is appointed to have sex with her repeatedly before she is
executed. This is a beautiful and "humane" treatment of infidel
women prisoners in Islam!
Sex
with slave women
This
one is also a hot topic worthy of discussion.
So far, we learnt the truth about the sexual exploitation
of women taken in a war. This
is not the only means by which unlimited sexual gratification is
possible in a 'halal' way.
Buying and selling of women as sex slaves are absolutely
permitted in Islam. It
is a perfectly legitimate way to acquire as many sex-slaves as possible.
Sky is not the limit, though.
The only limitation is the affordability.
One may say that this type of trading in slave is no more
practiced today. This
is true. Why is it not practiced today?
Did Islam ban this vile and disgusting trade in female flesh
trade? Nope.
It was because of the propagation of liberal and secular
idea of human rights and the realization of the rights of women.
If Islam conquered the world, slavery could have never been
eradicated because Islamic laws are written on granite stone and
are absolutely unchangeable.
The entire population of a nation may perish; the Islamic
laws must prevail, nonetheless. So, if Islam conquers the infidel countries, there is nothing
that could prevent the Islamic zealots from re-introducing the slavery
system and the slave markets around the globe for trading in female
bodies of infidel women.
Here
are a few more gems from ahadith. Please peruse the following divine
sanctions and judge for yourself the mercy, blessing, tolerance,
and last but least, fairness towards women in Islam.
You
can have sexual intercourse with two slave girls at a time without
ghusl (bath) but can't do like this with free women-(Malik's
Muwatta 2.23.90)
Book
2, Number 2.23.90:
Yahya
related to me from Malik from Nafi that the slave girls of Abdullah
ibn Umar used to wash his feet and bring him a mat of palm leaves
while they were menstruating.
Malik
was asked whether a man who had women and slave girls could have
intercourse with all of them before he did ghusl. He said, "There
is no harm in a man having intercourse with two of his slave girls
before he does ghusl. It is disapproved of, however, to go to a
freewoman on another's day. There is no harm in making love first
to one slave girl and then to another when one is junub."
Malik
was asked about a man who was junub and water was put down for him
to do ghusl with.Then he forgot and put his finger into it to find
out whether it was hot or cold. Malik said, "If no filth has
soiled his fingers, I do not consider that that makes the water
impure."
Here
is something that will break your conscience as it did even the
conscience of stonehearted, cruel Hazrat Umar.
This hadith tells us that before banning by Umar, it was
okay to have sex with a slave mother and her young daughter one
after the other. How
disgusting! How revolting!!
If
a woman and her daughter were both slave (or captive) then you can't
have sex with one of them after the other. Umar forbade this practice-(Malik's
Muwatta 28.14.33)
Book
28, Number 28.14.33:
Yahya
related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Ubaydullah ibn Abdullah
ibn Utba ibn Masud from his father that Umar ibn al-Khattab was
asked about a woman and her daughter who were in the possession
of the right hand, and whether one could have intercourse with one
of them after the other Umar said, "I dislike both being permitted
together." He then forbade that.
How
about having sex with two slave-girls who are sisters.
Read this despicable hadith. Where is your conscience?
Has it died?
If
both sisters are slave (or captives) then you may or may not have
sex with them depending on the interpreter-(Malik's Muwatta 28.14.34)
Book
28, Number 28.14.34:
Yahya
related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Qabisa ibn Dhu'ayb
that a man asked Uthman ibn Affan whether one could have intercourse
with two sisters who one owned. Uthman said, "One ayat makes
them halal, and one ayat makes them haram. As for me, I wouldn't
like to do it." The man left him and met one of the companions
of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace,
and asked him about it, and he said, "Had I any authority and
I found someone who had done it, I would punish him as an example."
Ibn
Shihab added, "I think that it was Ali ibn Abi Talib. "
And
here are a few more gems from Islam
Father
can give his slave-girl to his son to do conditional things-(Malik's
Muwatta 28.15.38)
Book
28, Number 28.15.38:
Yahya
related to me from Malik from Ibrahim ibn Abi Abla from Abd al-Malik
ibn Marwan that he gave a slave-girl to a friend of his, and later
asked him about her. He said, "I intended to give her to my
son to do such-and-such with her." Abd al-Malik said, "Marwan
was more scrupulous than you. He gave a slave-girl to his son, and
then he said, 'Do not go near her, for I have seen her leg uncovered
.' "
A
master can have sex with the slave-girl of his male or female slave-(Malik's
Muwatta 29.17.51)
Book
29, Number 29.17.51:
Yahya
related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar said,
"If a man gives his slave permission to marry, the divorce
is in the hand of the slave, and nobody else has any power over
his divorce. Nothing is held against a man who takes the slave-girl
of his male slave or the slave-girl of his female-slave."
Slave-girls
are like fields if you wish then water it by ejaculating inside
them or leave it thirsty i.e. coitus interruption with slave-girls
is optional-(Malik's Muwatta 29.32.99)
Book
29, Number 29.32.99:
Yahya
related to me from Malik from Damra ibn Said al-Mazini from al-Hajjaj
ibn Amr ibn Ghaziya that he was sitting with Zayd ibn Thabit when
Ibn Fahd came to him. He was from the Yemen. He said, "Abu
Said! I have slave-girls. None of the wives in my keep are more
pleasing to me than them, and not all of them please me so much
that I want a child by them, shall I then practise coitus interruptus?"
Zayd ibn Thabit said, "Give an opinion, Hajjaj!" "I
said, 'May Allah forgive you! We sit with you in order to learn
from you!' He said, 'Give an opinion! 'I said, 'She is your field,
if you wish, water it, and if you wish, leave it thirsty. I heard
that from Zayd.' Zayd said, 'He has spoken the truth.' "
Contract
(M'uta) marriages: The best kept secret in Islam!
In
part 4/7 of this essay I briefly mentioned about Imam Hasan to have
obtained up to 300 wives. How was that possible?
Here is what an Islamic web site writes about this holy man
of Islam. , "Hasan often married
4 wives in one sitting and then divorced 4 wives in one sitting"
(http://www.al-islam.org/al-serat/imamhasan.htm)
(Please note that the above information has recently been expunged
from this Islamic website) So, how is it possible to acquire up
to 300 wives in ones lifetime? This is not impossible when we consider
the system of M'uta marriage in Islam. This type of contract marriage
is based on verse 4:24
004.024
YUSUFALI: Also (prohibited are) women already married,
except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained
(Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful,
provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,-
desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from
them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after
a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no
blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
Although
the Sunnis have banned the M'uta system, it is very much in practice
among the Shias. It is quite possible to have a M'uta marriage every
night and kick out the woman next morning. There is no need of divorce
in a M'uta marriage. For
all practical purposes, this type of marriage is a contract to sleep
together and that is all.
Also, remember that though there is a restriction of up to
four permanent wives at any time, there is no such restriction on
the number of temporary wives that one can have at any time.
In modern language, we call this 'one night stand.'
M'uta marriage has absolutely no time limit. So, "one-night's
play" is perfectly Islamic. M'uta marriage is the Islamic version
of 'one night stand.' See,
Islam has the solution even for the playboys of the Muslim World. How about that?
Imam Hasan was definitely an Islamic 'Playboy' of his time.
Is it a fair assessment of him?
Readers,
please think for a while how does M'uta marriage differ from
common prostitution except some utterance of some "holy"
words? There is no
difference. Allowing
it by the prophet or anybody is a serious blow on the philosophy
of a family with wife and kids.
So,
how much one needs to pay to buy the sexual organs of a woman for
a short duration in Islamic way?
It can be very cheap indeed.
Read the following ahadith and you would be wondering whether
you should move to Iran to enjoy women.
The
dower for contract marriage can be as little as a handful of flour-(Shahih
Muslim 8.3249)
Book
008, Number 3249:
Jabir
b. 'Abdullah reported: We contracted temporary marriage giving a
handful of (tales or flour as a dower during the lifetime of Allah's
Messenger (may peace be upon him) and durnig the time of Abu Bakr
until 'Umar forbade it in the case of 'Amr b. Huraith.
Recently,
I read a news despatched by AFP (Monday, July 29, 2002 - 2002 IranMania.com
)
that the Islamic government of Iran is
considering legalising prostitution (a la m'uta style) because
of immense poverty amongst the women there. The number of women
turning to sell their body under the Islamic regime has become incredible.
Three hundred thousands in Tehran alone! According to this news report, the Islamic name of the whorehouses
will be 'decency house.' These 'decency' houses can
be located in hotels, motels-etc., wherever suitable.
This is what Islam has done to the women of Iran; reduced
them to destitute and prostitutes all at the same time.
Enjoy
women in Paradise
The
use of women for carnal gratification does not end in this mortal
world. The unlimited
orgy of sex, drinking, and pleasure continues in the life hereafter.
Here also we find blatant gender discrimination.
Only the men are allowed to have such pleasures.
For women it is a no go.
As we have seen in the previous sections that most women
will be in hell, we wonder where this unlimited supply of sexy,
young, and petite virgins (houris) will be from.
This non-stop pleasure is reserved only for those believers
who will go to paradise. Allah
has to create such female pleasure machines to satisfy the lust
of the pious believers and the Jihadis who have sacrificed their
lives in the process to kill the innocent unbelievers.
What
would these sex maniacs do with the shapely, young virgin girls
in paradise? Many Islamic
apologists often try to hide the extreme graphic description of
sexual ecstasy in Islamic paradise by saying something like, 'you
see, there are a lots of misconceptions about these houris. These
houris are actually symbolic and the wine is not really the kind
of wine we find in this world. The meaning of drinking wine is actually
purifying the soul'. How laughable those explanations are!
Here
are some verses from Qur'an that explicitly describes the sensuality
of the paradise that is reserved for men.
036.055
YUSUFALI: Verily the Companions of the Garden shall
that Day have joy in all that they do;
What
will the companions of the garden enjoy?
Will the believers in paradise really have sexual intercourse with houris
besides their wives? That is to say, they will have sex orgies in
paradise with 72 houris (Tirmidhi 4.21.2687)?
How come the wives
accompanying their husbands are not allowed the same rights?
Let us hear from some authorities
of Islam and you would surely discover the dishonesty of the Islamic
apologists to fool those who have very little knowledge about the
'real Islam.'
(Please note that the
following passages were obtained from an Islamic
website that answers questions on Islam. The passage is quite lengthy.
I have included those portions that are relevant to my essay.
Please visit the following website if you want to read the
full text. Also note that the houris are virgin, as it is specifically
mentioned that no Jinn or men has opened their hymen.)
or this
one
Will
men in Paradise have intercourse with al-hoor aliyn? - Islam
Questions
& Answers
http://www.islam-qa.com/
(or http://6.175.194.25) Question Reference Number:: 10053
Title:
Will men in Paradise have intercourse with al-hoor aliyn?
Question:
I'm
wondering will the men from amongst the human race that enters paradise,
will they have sexual intercourse with the "HOURIS" women
in the paradise.
Answer:
Among
the blessings that Allaah has prepared for His slaves are al-hoor
al-'iyn. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
"So
(it will be). And We shall marry them to Hoor (fair females) with
wide lovely eyes" [al-Dhukhaan 44:54]
"They
will recline (with ease) on thrones arranged in ranks. And We shall
marry them to Hoor (fair females) with wide lovely eyes
[al-Toor
52:20]
Al-hoor
al-'iyn are extremely beautiful, such that the marrow of their shins
will be visible from beneath their garments. Every man who enters
Paradise will have two wives from among al-hoor al-'iyn. Allaah
says, describing them (interpretation of the meaning):
"Therein
(Gardens) will be Khayraatun‑Hisaan [fair (wives) good
and beautiful];
Then
which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinn and men)
deny?
Hoor
(beautiful, fair females) guarded in pavilions;
Then
which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinn and men)
deny?
With
whom no man or jinni has had Tamth [opening their hymens with sexual
intercourse] before them.
Then
which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinn and men)
deny?
Reclining
on green cushions and rich beautiful mattresses."
[al-Rahmaan
55:70-76] "And (there will be) Hoor (fair females) with wide
lovely eyes (as wives for Al-Muttaqoon - the pious).
Like
unto preserved pearls" [al-Waaqi'ah 56:22-23]
It
was narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him)
that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:
"The first group will enter Paradise looking like the moon
on the night when it is full, and those who follow them will be
like the brightest shining star in the sky.
Their
hearts will be as one, and there will be no hatred or jealousy among
them. Each man will have two wives from among al-hoor al-'iyn, the
marrow of whose calves can be seen from beneath the bone and flesh."
(Narrated by al-Bukhaari,
no. 3014)
It
was narrated that Anas ibn Maalik (may Allaah be pleased with him)
said: "I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) say: 'Going out and coming back for the sake
of Allaah is better than this world and all that is in it. And a
spot the size of the bow of one of you in Paradise - or a spot the
size of his whip - is better than this world and all
that
is in it. If a woman from among the people of Paradise were to look
at the people of this earth, she would light up all that is in between
them and fill it with fragrance. The veil on her head is better
than this world and all that is in it.'" (Narrated by al-Bukhaari,
no. 2587)
A
man will have intercourse in Paradise with his wives from among
al-hoor al-'iyn and his wives from among the people of this world,
if they enter Paradise with him. A man will be given the strength
of a hundred men to eat, drink, feel desire and have sexual intercourse.
It was narrated from Anas (may Allaah be pleased with him)
that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:
"The believer in Paradise will be given such and such strength
for sexual intercourse." He was asked, "O Messenger of
Allaah, will he really be able to do that?" He said, "He
will be given the strength of one hundred (men)." (Narrated
by al-Tirmidhi, no. 2459. He said, (it is) saheeh ghareeb).
The
mufassireen said concerning the phrase "busy in joyful things"
(Yaa-Seen 36:55 - interpretation of the meaning): 'Abd-Allaah ibn Mas'ood and Ibn 'Abbaas (may Allaah
be pleased with them both), and Sa'eed ibn al-Musayyib, 'Ikrimah,
al-Hasan, Qutaadah, al-A'mash, Sulaymaan al-Taymi and al-Oozaa'i
said concerning the aayaah (interpretation of the meaning), "Verily,
the dwellers of Paradise, that Day, will be busy in joyful things"
[Yaa-Seen 36:55] they said, (it means) they will be busy deflowering
virgins. Ibn 'Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) said, according
to a report narrated from him, that "busy in joyful things"
means listening to stringed instruments.
Abu
Haatim said: he misheard the phrase iftidaad al-abkaar (deflowering
virgins) and thought it was samaa' al-awtaar (listening to stringed
instruments). In fact the correct phrase is iftidaad al-abkaar (deflowering
virgins). (Ibn Katheer, 3/564)
With
regard to children, the scholars differed as to whether children
would be born as a result of this intercourse or not. Some said
that there would be children if the man wants them, but the pregnancy
and birth would take just one hour. Abu Sa'eed al-Khudri (may Allaah
be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) said: "If the believer wants a child
in Paradise, the pregnancy and delivery will take only an hour,then
the child will be the age that the man wants." (Narrated by
al-Tirmidhi, no. 2487; al-Daarimi, no. 2712; Ahmad, no. 11339; Ibn
Maajah, no. 4329). And Allaah knows best.
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid (www.islam-qa.com)
Final
conclusion:
It
took me a considerable amount of time and energy to write this prolix
essay. The reason for
my involvement in this project was explained quite adequately in
the prologue of my essay.
The writing of this essay was not taken lightly either.
It is not a politically correct essay.
That I know darn well.
It is my understanding that many Muslims (men women alike)
will be greatly shocked reading this essay and will, no doubt, shake
their heads in utter disbelief. There is an element of shock in my article.
I myself was in a state of shock when I learned about the
'real Islam' for the very first time. We cannot bury our head like an ostrich and pretend that everything
is fine and dandy with Islam because some uneducated Mullahs have
said so. It is necessarily
not so. The truth must
be told no matter what price one has to pay.
We
must realize that without women we will not be in this world. They
gave us life; no doubt that male are also involved but without the
nurture of our mothers we would all have perished. Besides this,
we cannot simply dismiss the 50% of humankind as simply pleasure
machines and burdensome. The prospect, of a happy, prosperous, meaningful,
and financially independent life for a woman is indeed impossible
in an ideal Islamic society. If we really care
for those who bore us in their wombs, our sisters, our wives and
daughters, they do not deserve such inhuman treatment espoused in
the Islamic Sha'ria. We need to let our women
folks be aware that there is very little for their advancement in
their lives if Islamic laws are enacted in a society.
Women have everything to lose and nothing to gain from repressive
Islamic Sha'ria, but they have everything to gain and very little
to lose if they become financially independent. Financial
empowerment is the only solution for the women in Islam to break
the chains of Sha'ria tyranny. It is up to
the Muslim women to take charge of their lives. They could achieve
a million things in this mortal world not one of them is sexual
enslavement. The earlier we realize this, the
better it is for an estimated 0.6 billion women a majority of whom
are enslaved in their own home. Is there any
reprieve from this tyranny?
References
1.
The Holy Quran; Translation by A. Yusufali
2.
Shahih Bukhari; Translation by Dr. Muhammad Mohisn Khan
3.
Shahih Muslim; Translation by Abdur Rahman Siddiqui
4.
Sunaan Abu Dawud; Translation by Prof. Ahmad Hasan
5.
Malik's Muwatta Translators A'sha Abdurrahman at-Tarjumana
andYa'qub Johnson
6.
A Dictionary of Islam, 1994 by T.P Hughes; Publisher Kazi Publications,
Inc. 3023-27 West Belmont Avenue, Chicago, IL 60618
7.
Al-Ghazali's Ihya' Ulum al-Din (abridged by Abd el Salam Haroun),
1997; Revised and Translatd by Dr. Ahmad A. Zidan; Published and
Distributed by: Islamic Inc. P.O. Box 1636, Cairo, Egypt.
8.
Reliance of the Traveller (Revised edition), 1999 by Ahmad ibn Naqib
al Misri; Edited by Nuh Ha Mim Keller; Published by Amana Publicatios,
Belltsville, Maryland U.S.A
[
Part 1 - Part
2 - Part 3 - Part
4 - Part 5 - Part
6 ]
-----------------------------------
Abul
Kasem writes from Sydney, Australia. His e-mail address
is - abul88@hotmail.com
|