Sweden's Collaboration Then with Communist, Now with Islamists
11 Jun, 2007
Swedish Security Service Säpo has confirmed that it has identified a number of Swedes who informed for the East German secret police, but has refused to make their names public. A book published in June claims that Säpo has a list of 900 Swedes who had contact with the Stasi. Björn Cederberg, author of the book ‘Kamrat Spion: Om Sverige i Stasi Arkiven’ (Comrade Spy: Sweden in the Stasi Archives), told The Local that that the list came to Sweden from the CIA: “In 1993 a list became available containing the names of around 900 Swedes with some connection to the Stasi. The people at the German archives reckon that only around 50 of these actually worked on behalf of the East Germans.” Sweden has long been known as home to a significant core of East German sympathisers. Former Left Party leader Lars Werner had close ties to GDR diplomats, who paid for the drinks for his fortieth birthday party.
This pattern of collaboration with the enemies of the West and of freedom is, sadly, still alive. The Swedish Social Democratic Party, like many other Labor parties, have decided to cooperate with Muslims and import voters while ignoring the violence caused by these Muslims against the native population.
According to this post from the website of Broderskapsrörelsen (“The Brotherhood”), an organization of Christian members of the Swedish Social Democratic Party, the party has decided to establish a network for people of other faiths (which largely seems to mean Muslims). “This is a historic decision for the Brotherhood,” says leader Peter Weiderud. “I’m incredibly happy that a unanimous congress now lets the door open for Muslims and others to work together with us in the Brotherhood; this is going to enrich us all and help the [Social Democratic] Party to better influence the Swedish society.”
For Abdulkader Habib, active within the Muslim Brotherhood, the decision is a historic step which shows that the dividing lines in society do not go between religions, but within religions. “As a Muslim Social Democrat I have more in common with the Christian Social Democrats than I have with those within the Muslim Right,” says Habib. “Faith and politics is intertwined for many Muslims, which is why the decision to create this network is a key to the crucial work for integration that we need to do, and I believe that the Brotherhood is the right organization to do this within.”
“We shouldn’t disregard the importance of people's [religious] faith,” says deputy leader Cecilia Dalman-Eek. “When we now get the opportunity to open the doors to people with another faith it is obvious that we should contribute with our experience. At the same time, this is both instructive and inspiring for us Christians within the Brotherhood. This is about an exciting growth of new mass movements and is a part of the new Sweden.”
The Social Democrats are now following the line of reasoning put forward by Jens Orback, former Cabinet Minister for the Social Democrats, who said during a radio debate that: “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.” The Swedish Social Democrats narrowly lost the elections last year, and appear to have decided that the way to regain and maintain power is to import Muslim voters, a strategy followed by several of their sister parties.
Background information on Swedish collaborationism:
Muslim Journalist: ‘Stockholm’s Great Mosque Sympathizes with Muslim Brotherhood’
The Muslim Brotherhood has condemned the 9/11 attacks, but justifies... suicide attacks against Israelis. The organization is also close to the Palestinian movement Hamas – whose ideology is very similar to Nazism, and which is guilty of many brutal terror attacks. For the Muslim Brotherhood, Sweden is in many ways an ideal country, [and it] shares the ideals of the [Swedish] Social Democrats in their view of the welfare society. Leading figures in Muslim congregations are also active within the Social Democratic [Party], and have very good relations with Sweden's Christian Social Democrats – Broderskapsrörelsen [the Brotherhood Movement]. The Social Democrats have, in turn, and perhaps as thanks for the support they receive from the mosque leadership, shown a tendency to shy away from the fact that there is extremism in some of our mosques. This has given the Muslim Brotherhood the freedom to force its ideology upon [the mosque's worshippers].
The Social Democratic party has started fishing for votes with the help of radical Muslims clergies. For several years the Christian wing of the Social Democratic party, called The Brotherhood, has been working with the influential Muslim leader Mahmoud Aldebe, president of Sweden's Muslim Association. In 1999, Aldebe went on radio proposing that Sharia – the Islamic law – be introduced in Sweden. In addition, Aldebe has in a letter to the Swedish minister of Justice in 2003 involved himself in a heated debate regarding an incident of honor-related murder where a Kurdish girl was murdered by her two uncles. Aldebe did not condemn the murderers – rather he forcefully defended the perpetrators. Aldebe sees the entire debate regarding honor-related murders as an attack against the Islamic religion and claims in his letter that a public debate regarding these acts of murder risk to “encourage immigrant girls to revolt against the tradition of the families and their religious values.” The Social Democrat Ola Johansson referred to the book Social Justice in Islam by the Islamic ideologue Sayyid Qutb as proof that the social democratic ideology could find common ground with Islamic ideas.
The New York Times and Sweden: The Dark Side of Paradise
In the spring of 2006, Sweden’s largest Muslim organisation demanded in a letter, signed by its leader Mahmoud Aldebe, that Sweden introduce separate laws for Muslims. The letter was a list running over several pages with aggressive demands for just about everything; separate family laws for Muslims, regulating marriage and divorce, that public schools should employ imams to teach homogeneous classes of Muslims children in their religion and the language of their original homeland, and a “mosque in every municipality to be built through interest-free loans made available by the local municipalities.” This to “demonstrate” Islam’s right to exist in Sweden” and to “heighten the status of and respect towards Muslims.” The demands were rejected then. After the last election in 2002, Sweden’s Muslim Association sent a congratulation letter to the re-elected Social Democratic Prime minister Göran Persson, congratulating him on his victory and hoping that his Party would work for implementing some of the demands of the Association in the future.
| If you like this essay: |
Stumble it
 |
digg it |
Fjordman is based in Norway. He contributes in Brussels Journal, Gates of Vienna and Faith Freedom International amongst other Websites. His personal blog (currently inactive): www.fjordman.blogspot.com
Name: Robert A
Date: Saturday August 11, 2007
Time: 05:27:28 -0700
Comment
I always thought the Swedes were pretty bright.
Name: railcoop
Date: Saturday August 11, 2007
Time: 05:37:28 -0700
Comment
The Swedes may be thinking that they arte having a deal with another Hitler and could live comfortable in isolation as the world burns. Little do the Sedes realise that their compassion for the refugees, dissenters, etc is being grossly misunderstood. It is already clear that Sweden is undergoing a massive change in its character with nearly 70,000 Swedes emigrating to other countries. Possibly the day is soon coming when the Islamic Republic of Svenska will have a new National Flag with the Crescent moon. The Swedish must wake up and use a clear head to realise the danger that is in their midst at least for the sake of the future generation of Swedish children. It is distressing to hear that there are more rapes of Swedish girls by foreigners than before but it appears that most Swedes are taking it as a pleasant foregone experience. Oh. You Swedish people. Where have the God given brains gone to. Too much illegal schnappes may have damaged the senses.
Name: agnostic
Date: Saturday August 11, 2007
Time: 16:38:09 -0700
Comment
Sweden's leaders have been preparing their people for the evil Mo's 7th century life for some time and the people accept and go along with it to make their life easier when muslims and islam takes over. Muslim youths in Sweden wear T-shirts that says "2030 Sweden is ours" and muslim youths are wont to say proudly and menacingly "we will have you (swedes) kiss our feet" and the swedes will be very very proud to do so. It's all in the name of political correctness and multicultarilsm. Don't be surprised if thighing of babies, raping/sodomising toddlers, incest, raping swedes as a past time is legalised. The swedes would be only too willing and too happy to appease, acquiesce, grovel so long as they are not termed "racist" the catchword that muslims sping on every now and then. Bye bye Sweden.
Name: Gurcharan
Date: Sunday August 12, 2007
Time: 00:24:19 -0700
Comment
Bye-bye Sweden.Good-bye nice knowing you. Auld lang syne Sweden. In 4-5 generations passing, children will ask - was there a country named Sweden. People of Sweden wake up, what is happening to your country. There is a limit to everything, don't kill yourselves. Sometimes the people need to show the governemnt the path. If Sweden becomes Muslim, then all of EU you are next. Islam will succeed to dominate the world only to fail, that is my promise.
Name: ralfus
Date: Sunday August 12, 2007
Time: 05:05:54 -0700
Comment
"We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and muslims, because when we become a minority, they will be so to us." Sick, thats just f*#king sick.
Name: suherman
Date: Sunday August 12, 2007
Time: 05:51:25 -0700
Comment
oh well, i m tired with argument because all of you just not listening. yes our political goal is to dominate the world, to establish syariah around the globe, to make one ummah (is it possible ? yes. how ? i have no idea).....that is ISLAM. we want achieve it through poll and peace :) whats wrong with that? isn't that is the goal of all ideology ?
Name: El Guapo El Nacho muy grande!
Date: Sunday August 12, 2007
Time: 12:37:44 -0700
Comment
Great article! Thanx, Fjordman!
Name: Marie
Date: Tuesday August 14, 2007
Time: 13:30:46 -0700
Comment
Every time Swedes and Islam are in the same article I wanna puke! Europe is a goner.
Name: AnoraCawAwase
Date: Tuesday May 13, 2008
Time: 05:13:45 -0700
Comment
Questol vale per tutte le ruote..Se poi vi vengono i umeri in sogno allora siete proprio frtunati ,provate a chattare i nukejri che vi danno speriamo di far felice qualcuno che non h possibiilità di tirare avanti .Io lo farei giocaee questo dicei al Bawri per almeno rte etsarzinoi e vsdiamo come va a finire. Il Papa uan volta xisse che sono esseri viventi anche loro,perciòò bisognaq volerli bee,chatyare coh loro abbassa anche la pressione. _____________ <a href=http://www.neochat.info/>chattare</a>
Name: Ideodyhaida
Date: Wednesday May 14, 2008
Time: 16:32:20 -0700
Comment
ma mica parlpiamo del medio evo,a noi ci insegnavqno ad ubbiider loro penssano che già sono natri iimparati,nn gogloono consili ifnchè erano piccolo ancora ancora ,ma adesso non sentono più nessuno,voglinoo fraer loro e di ettsa olro. Miaz nonna non ne ha avuti di questi problemi perchè ai tempi suoi i trucchi nonm esistevano e poi i loro genitori nonn glieli facevano comperare perchè v'era da pensare prima al mangiare e poi al vestire,prmia non si poteav campare senza mangjare daesso non ci manca inente eppure non siamo mai ddiosftatti di quello ceh mamma ci cucina,mamma lo dife semnpre chs uqelli del terzo mondo dovrebbewro venire qui a mngiare per frcai vedsere come xono sccheletrici e che mangewrebbero anche pane ed acqua senza pensarci ue volte invece noi scegeliamo sempre e non ci va bene mai nienet perchè diciamok ched ci cucina sempre le stessecose. _____________ <a href=http://chattare-gratis.blogspot.com/>chat</a>
Name: Ideodyhaida
Date: Saturday May 17, 2008
Time: 17:58:45 -0700
Comment
Mi piace andare lì ,ho un cavallo ,una capretta,i coingli,ed altri animas,lima la coas pù belpa è stare in mezzo alla natura,altro che andare z xcuola,mi saa che mi ritiro da scuola no,n fa per e,è solo il terxo anno ,nr avrei ancora due ,ma sonop stuaf. L'acqua dello stagno è invecce immobile e risente delle variazioni teemich,e non è perciò come il vai vai che 'cè in chat,la lude inoltre vi penetra con diffcilotà,l''abbondante vegerazione ofvre cibo e rifugio a molti anfibi, ucceelli,mammfeeri avquatici e a numerosissimi invertebrati. _____________ [url=http://gratis-chattare.blogspot.com/]chat[/url
Name: Fredrik Fegerley
Date: Wednesday June 25, 2008
Time: 16:29:50 -0700
Comment
How to organise a major terrorist scare The Big Dummy’s guide to security booga-booga By Gavin Gatenby, Possum News Network 15 August 2006 How easy is it to organise a major terrorist scare like the one that’s currently gridlocking the world’s airports? Dead easy. If you follow a few simple points you can panic the populace and stampede the media with virtually no risk of getting caught. All it takes is a little confidence. Here’s a simple “how-to” for aspiring top-level spooks: 1. The politicians don’t want to know Have confidence that the government really doesn’t want to know what it is you’re getting up to, as long as the effect benefits them. By their very nature, secret police intelligence and espionage organizations operate in secret and often do, “in the national interest”, illegal things or stuff which ordinary folk would regard as grossly unethical – things that would embarrass the government if they were to be exposed. If anything goes wrong the politicians want to be able to “plausibly deny” they were involved. This relationship hands enormous, uncontrolled, power to your small, ultra-secretive, self-governing elite clustered at the top of the nation’s security “service”. Your colleagues are invariably drawn from the upper reaches of the political and economic elite and of course you know better than anybody what’s in “the national interest” and you have a God-given right to rule. Breaking ranks and talking isn’t in your colleagues’ class nature. 2. Keep things on a need-to-know basis Keep your security organization compartmentalised and discourage specialist sections from talking to each other. You can plausibly plead security reasons for this. Make sure all information gets passed up the line to your small group at the top who compile and “assess” the overall threat and decide when to act. Thus you control the “narrative” and the timing of the scam. The foot soldiers may shake their heads and wonder at some of the things you come up with, but they’ll be in no position to contradict you. And if they do, it’s a very serious offence. It’ll ruin their careers and could land them a very long stretch in gaol. 3. At the right time, get the president or prime minister involved When you’ve decided on the optimum time for your security scare and sorted out who your “plotters” will be, it’s important to involve the head of the government. He’ll want to broadcast to the nation, taking credit for keeping the people safe from the terrible plot. He’ll automatically be followed by the leaders of the mainstream opposition parties, all eager to prove their credibility, responsibility and patriotism. As soon as you’ve made the official line clear, the media and the state apparatus will fall into line. 4. “Prove that we lie” Always remember: it’s breathtakingly easy to claim you’ve “thwarted” something horrible and almost impossible for sceptics to prove that you haven’t. This applies especially if you “thwart” the plot in its early stages. Invariably you’re acting against individuals from a group that’s already been demonised and will be scared to speak up or fight back. The majority will be inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt. Questioning the government in a time of “national emergency” isn’t an easy gig. 5. Don’t worry, they’ll all play their part Complex conspiracies involving lots of people are entirely unnecessary. All that’s needed is for your close knit, unaccountable group to order those lower down the chain to act on “information received”. They don’t even have to know what the information was. They just have to know the addresses to raid and who to arrest. When they do, they’re sure to find some political or religious literature, or something on the hard drives, or some household chemicals that will, under the circumstances you’ve created, look suspicious. If you’re using agents provocateur, they’ll be able to plant “evidence” and report suspicious conversations to “sex-up” the case. Of course, details will never be available officially or in a verifiable form, but fragments and hints of purported “evidence” can be leaked to selected journalists (see below). 6. Feed the chickens Keep information in official news releases to an absolute minimum. There’s a plausible excuse for this: more information will harm ongoing investigations and might prejudice the case when it gets to court. In place of any hard attributable facts, provide a steady stream of small leaks “under condition of anonymity” to selected journalists from politically reliable mainstream news organizations. These people are carefully selected for political conservatism and journalistic “responsibility”. Even if they weren’t, they need a story and they’re totally reliant on you for one. It doesn’t matter if the leaked details are outrageously illogical. Even if they’re suspicious of the story, your contacts will run it rather than lose a scoop. In this way you’ll establish an unofficial official narrative that most members of the public will be inclined to accept as something like the truth. They’ve already been conditioned by the media attack-dogs to thoroughly distrust the group from which your victims come so they’ll figure that if the charges are a fit-up the victims are probably guilty of something and it would be prudent to put them away. 7. Politicians who aren’t 100 per cent with you are friends of terrorists No politician enjoys being attacked as “irresponsible” or accused of being unpatriotic or soft on terrorists. Very few will dare question the allegations in case they’re proved wrong. Most are venal politics junkies making a very good living doing something they enjoy. It’s safer for them to join the chorus condemning terrorism and congratulating you on your vigilance. With any luck, some politicians will show their credentials by loudly criticising you for not acting sooner and more ruthlessly. Those few who are troubled will probably just say nothing. 8. Don’t worry about proving links to real terror groups Once upon a time, not so long ago, it was felt necessary to show that your local “terrorist cell” was recruited by, and in communication with, al-Qaeda, or some group with actual form some time in the not-too-distant past. This requirement brought its own problems, since evidence of the links often failed to convince, or, worse still, unearthed shady figures with a track record of collaboration with the CIA or MI6 or Mossad. It’s still a good idea to hint at such links but it isn’t de rigueur because the problem disappeared with the happy invention of the “spontaneously-forming, self-activating” (SFSA) terror cell theory in the aftermath of the 7/7 London bombings. According to the SFSA theory, terrorists don’t have to be recruited or trained. Wherever any three integrated, happy, and successful young Muslim men get together to discuss politics or religion or even just to play cricket, they spontaneously decide to set up a do-it-yourself terror cell. They scour the internet for recipes for powerful but highly unstable explosives made from sports drinks, peroxide, hair gel, acetone and baby formula. Without outside direction they select targets and decide the day. All you need to “prove” conspiracy was that they met, discussed politics and had in their possession common household chemicals, fizzy drinks and a mobile phone. It doesn’t matter if their conversations show nothing explicit. Just say they were talking in code. If you can show at least one of them has travelled overseas, that’s a plus. If not, assert that they “investigated” booking airline tickets or showed an interest in travelling overseas. The SFSA theory not only relieves you of having to prove connections to international terror groups, there’s a bonus: it also increases public fear. Any group of young Muslims kicking a ball around in the park is actually planning to blow up trains. Or airliners. Anything you do to these people is likely to be “overlooked”, if not vocally supported by patriotic simpletons. 9. It doesn’t really matter if a court finds them innocent Your victims won’t get their day in court for months, maybe years, and if you’ve organised things well, you’ll be operating under laws that ensure that the public and your tame media are prevented from reporting key details or even excluded from court altogether. By the time your victims get to court, the scare you used them to create will have done its job. Even if your victims are found innocent, that fact will get little press attention from a media who are embarrassed by their role in such an obvious scam, and anyway, the accused terrorists’ acquittal will be lost in the next big scare. Good luck, and have fun.