Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims

Eternal Vigilance against Islam and its Useful Idiots

November 14 is Day of Respect Day in Holland. It’s a kind of cultural diversity thing got up by the Day of Respect Foundation, a leftwing group subsidized by the Dutch government. On November 14, students in two thousand Dutch schools were to be told that Geert Wilders was comparable to Adolph Hitler and Wilder’s film Fitna would be the worst thing to happen to the Netherlands since the Nazis went ‘klompen’ across the land the Little Dutch Boy saved from the North Sea. Viewing Fitna would be like reading Mein Kampf. Sig Heil! A booklet that included an attack on Wilders and the Dutch Freedom party would be passed out to the students along will other relevant information.
Geert Wilders as Adolph Hitler; Fitna as Mein Kampf; the Dutch Freedom Party as the National Socialist German Workers Party? Could Muslims be the Jews of the 21st Century? This was the intimation. Ridiculous? Of course! Only in the cross-pollinated mind of someone sunk to the neck in political correctness, self-loathing and spineless dhimmitude could such an idea take hold. Unfortunately there are many of that type in today’s Holland.

Nazism—that’s the charge that is made whenever someone tries to plug the hole in the immigration dike that has flooded the Netherlands with mosques, anti-Western attitudes, rapes, assaults on the freedom of speech, the freedom of religion, the freedom of association, the freedom of being. Pim Fortuyn tried to stem the tide. He took a look around one day and wasn’t pleased with what he saw. Maybe it was two days. He identified the problem as Muslim immigration. He would restrict it—perhaps put an end to it. It wasn’t because he was afraid of hijabs and nikabs. It was what they represented. He was gay and as far as anyone knew he wasn’t a cross dresser. What troubled him more than anything else were the debates in the radical mosques about what to do with homosexuals—should they be thrown from the tops of buildings or should they have the buildings collapsed on them. Pim felt he would not be able to survive either. Maybe if he were Hulk Hogan and the buildings under discussion had been one-story tarpaper shacks—perhaps, but the Imams had other ways to make life miserable for people like Pim. They were hanging gays in Iran.

Pim got involved in politics. He had been a Communist and then a Social Democrat. He was nominated by a new party, the Leefbaar Nederland Party (Livable Netherlands Party) to stand for election to the Dutch Parliament in May 2002. But when he came out in favor of ending Muslim immigration Leefbaar tossed him from the party. Undaunted, Pim created his own organization, the LPF (Lijst Pim Fortuyn). And he continued to speak out.

Fortuyn told the Rotterdam Dagblad, “I am also in favor of a cold war with Islam. I see Islam as an extraordinary threat, as a hostile religion.” How could he see something so clearly that has escaped the notice of George W. Bush, John McCain and Barack Obama? Well, for one thing he was gay and he was living cheek to jowl with Islam. Actually that’s two and should be more than enough to satisfy just about anybody except maybe Dennis Kucinich and Jon Corzine.

In an interview with Volksrant, Fortuyn was as blunt as he could be. “I don’t hate Islam,” he said. “I consider it a backward culture. I have traveled much in the world. And wherever Islam rules, it’s just terrible. All that hypocrisy.” He said he wanted to keep the Netherlands something to be proud of, “thank you very much.”

He wasn’t Shane calling Wilson a “dirty lowdown Yankee liar; he was Thomas Jefferson telling the Redcoats to get back on the boat, they were no longer welcome in the land of freedom, “thank you very much.”

Fortuyn was assassinated on May 6, 2002, by Volkert van der Graaf for—among other things—‘exploiting Muslims as scapegoats.’ Van der Graaf was an Environmentalist. Nine days later, Fortuyn’s party won 26 seats in the Dutch parliament.

Then came Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Theo van Gogh. They would try their hand at plugging the immigration dike. Hirsi Ali was a former Muslim, a brilliant woman’s rights activist on the order of Lucretia Mott and Lucy Stone who was cold-shouldered by the Gloria Steinem crowd when she visited the United States. For shame! Van Gogh was a movie producer with an unsavory reputation. Using a script written by Ms Ali, van Gogh produced a ten-minute movie called Submission. The film infuriated Muslims far and wide though few if any took the time to actually view the film.

Pay attention now, Mohammed…and you too, Mahmoud. The film is full of naked ladies. They are on their knees praying to Allah. Their only coverings are quotations from the Qur’an unfavorable to women. On November 2, 2004, Mohammed Bouyeri murdered van Gogh in Amsterdam. Pim Fortuyn was one of the few Dutch politicians that were not critical of van Gogh. To Fortuyn van Gogh was the “divine baldhead.”

A few years ago, Bruce Bawer wrote an article for the Partisan Review. Bawer, a homosexual, had immigrated to the Netherlands in 1998 to enjoy the sexual freedom of the lowlands. Islam was a rude awakening. It hadn’t been covered in the Baedeker. Bawer would have to learn on his own—and learn he did. In his article for the Review, he put his finger on the problem.

“The disinclination of social-democratic leaders to properly address such matters,” he wrote, “has doubtless contributed to the recent growth of conservative parties in many European countries. In the Netherlands, where gay bashings by Moroccan and Turkish youths have been on the rise, and where the government cracked down in February on the teaching of anti-Western hate in state-supported Muslim schools (one of which was raising money by selling calendars featuring a photo of the New York skyline ablaze), a Rotterdam politician named Pim Fortuyn gained widespread support by speaking frankly about the threat that fundamentalist Islam poses to Western liberties. ‘In Rotterdam,’ he (Fortuyn) told the New York Times, ‘we have third generation Moroccans who still don’t speak Dutch, oppress women and won’t live by our values.’”

“Fundamentalist Islam, ”continued Bawer, “is not a race or an ethnicity; it is an ideology. It’s critics are not racist any more than critics of Nazi or Stalinist ideology are racists…those…that…are unwilling or unable to adapt…must be sent home…at stake in all this ultimately, are the basic freedom of all Westerners…including Muslims and former Muslims who wish to live in a place where they can be themselves. At stake, indeed, is Western civilization.”

Yes, indeed.

Yesterday, the Dutch Cabinet, under pressure from the Freedom Party, forced the Day of Respect Foundation to withdraw the offensive matter—it amounted to one page—from their booklet. One page—it doesn’t sound like much. Replacement pages are being sent to the schools. Will they get there in time? Will the teachers use them? What will they do with the no-longer authorized pages? Will they throw them out or save them as souvenirs—perhaps use them later? One wonders. Dhimmitude is a terrible disease.

In the debate in the Dutch parliament, Martin Bosma of the Freedom Party accused the Day of Respect Foundation of being a leftwing multicultural organization set up to re-educate the Dutch people.

It was a victory for the good guys—a small one, but nevertheless a victory.

“In the end,” wrote Bawer, “Europe’s enemy is not Islam or even radical Islam. Europe’s enemy is itself—its self-destructive passivity, its softness toward tyranny, its reflexive inclination to appease, and its uncomprehending distaste for America’s pride, courage and resolve in the face of a deadly foe.”

Eternal vigilance is the watchword.


If you like this essay: Stumble it   Stumble Upon Toolbar digg it reddit

Denis Schulz was prospective convert to Islam (read his testimony: How I Almost Became a Muslim?) before changing his mind after the 9/11. He actively writes on the threats of Islam and terrorism. Contact him at

Name:      closed

Comments Notes: Keep comments short. Our system cannot separate paragraphs. Comments must be relevant to the topic of the article. Irrelevant comments, materials, adds of other websites, pasting external articles etc. are not allowed. We may ban the IP addresses of such nuisance posters.

Name: From a die hard muslim to die-hard believer in karma < but never believing in any organised relegion >
Date: Sunday November 09, 2008
Time: 06:26:29 -0500


i was born, muslim raised muslim, and a professed muslim in the entire sence of words. After a manyfold inquisitions and having read and heard a huge material both against and for islam. On the totality of my findings i am of the view that islam is never a faith it is a mafia like death-cult and ultimaytely is evil and have enslaved large chunk of humanity as more cultist than the original cultist himself and muhammad himself was an Iblees, or shaitan enthroned as second-self of it and able to command his alter-ego in the both negative counterpart of evil as Ibless < to share all blame > AND positive counterpart unmistakably is none other than himself. he was possesed of most extreme strains of sorcery and pshychotic powers that some of his garbles are now proven to be scientific miraclesby by islamic zeolots. but many of them have diproven and one of them is this quranic myth of days period. if you have any grain of intelectual integrity left in you when casting critical eye on islam you cant help seeing through this shicanery of muslims. Just watch the vidio link below mentioned. but remeber i am never adovcate of any relegion . i have become a free soul without any mechanisam of brain disabling and brain washing. Return to the form.

Name: reply
Date: Sunday November 09, 2008
Time: 21:49:11 -0500


To the die hard muslim to die-hard believer in karma , why people like you want to hate Muslims? Why? After all, is it because they live in a land that has resources and your land does not? You labeled them as terrorist, but you forgot that the terrorist are now ruling the world! If any wants, they can criticize Islam, since you have gone through the entire Koran how come you have forgotten to mention the part where the prophet mentions that he is only a Warner. You try that in your land, The Koran says in verse that Mohammad was sent only to warn and guide, not to force people to be Muslims. In that case how come missionaries and NGO are set in in develop countries and people are npaid to follow the new religions. In order to conclude, If you people want to end up in the fire, that’s your problem, A very few of us love to be with our creator, so we will highlight your wrongs and depart when are time is done in this world, while you execute us and burn and destroy us and maim and rape us we know where people like your will end for promoting these evil deeds. 109:1 "I worship not that which you worship, 109:2 "Nor will you worship that which I worship. 109:3 "And I shall not worship that which you are worshipping. 109:4 "Nor will you worship that which I worship. 109:5 "To you be your religion, and to me my religion (Islamic Monotheism)." Let me elaborate more Going by this definition, the British Raj referred to Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad and many other Indian freedom fighters as terrorists. These were Hindu and Sikh. Guerrilla fighters from Mao Zedong to Ho Chi Minh and Fidel Castro killed civilians during their revolutionary campaigns. They too were called terrorists until they triumphed. In Palestine, after World War II, Jewish groups (the Haganah, Irgun and Stern Gang) fought for the creation of a Jewish state, bombing hotels and installations and killing civilians. The British, who then governed Palestine, rightly called these Jewish groups terrorists. Many of these terrorists later became leaders of independent Israel — Moshe Dayan, Yitzhak Rabin, Menachem Begin, Ariel Sharon. Ironically, these former terrorists then lambasted terrorism, applying this label only to Arabs fighting for the very same nationhood that the Jews had fought for earlier.

Name: To diehard Islamist above
Date: Tuesday November 11, 2008
Time: 03:18:12 -0500


Examine yourself in the mirror. Are you blind what Islam had done to the world?

Name: to both die hard and reply
Date: Tuesday November 11, 2008
Time: 09:20:19 -0500


You need to read these articles and any one wrote by ex-muslims. They are the only ones telling the truth. They have read this book, they KNOW this book, you have not. Go and read a translation (and believe it or not, "God" can understand ALL languages) and see for your self. Read several if you don't believe it. I can guarantee you that they all say the same thing. Besides, can you really read the "book" since it's written in Classical Arabic?

Name: To 'reply'
Date: Tuesday November 11, 2008
Time: 19:41:57 -0500


You claimed "The Koran says in verse that Mohammad was sent only to warn and guide, not to force people to be Muslims." Wake up to reality. Muslims are being forced into Islam the day they are born. Many Muslim countries kill those who leave Islam or are strongly discouraged them from leaving Islam. WHY YOU MUSLIMS TELL LIES ABOUT MUSLIMS BEING FREE TO LEAVE ISLAM?

Name: DH
Date: Friday November 14, 2008
Time: 05:51:39 -0500


"he was Thomas Jefferson telling the Redcoats to get back on the boat, they were no longer welcome in the land of freedom" The "land of freedom" at that time was a land of slaveholders including George Washington. Please keep on topic and spare us the irrelevent mythologising about US history.

Date: Friday November 14, 2008
Time: 06:12:42 -0500


"since you have gone through the entire Koran how come you have forgotten to mention the part where the prophet mentions that he is only a Warner." That's right. He was allegedly "sent" by Allah to warn people of a "painful punishment" if they refused to accept he was the messenger of Allah. The Koranic order to issue this warning is binding on all Muslims in perpetuity. The "painful punishment" is of 2 types: 1) the punishment awaiting kafirs in the hereafter ie burning horribly for all eternity 2) the punishment in this world The second of these can be subdivided in to two kinds: a) worldly punishment inflicted by Allah directly eg earthquakes, tornados and other such "acts of God" b) worldly punishment inflicted by Allah at the hands of his truest and most devoted followers the Muslims. The Koran itself says that Allah uses the hands of the Muslims to inflict his worldly punishments upon the Kafirs as a matter of preference: "And if Allah has so pleased, he could have punished them [kafirs] himself, but that he may try some of you by means of others" (Koran 47:4) So if you individually or your country are ever on the receiving end of such a "warning" from Muslims, however politely framed, you would be fully justified in regarding it as a threat of attack - impending or deferred - by the Muslims.

Date: Sunday November 16, 2008
Time: 22:09:37 -0500


Did you ever make a comparative cross examination of makkan surahs with madinite suras ?? did you ever study them with an open mind, not with islamic tainted mind ?? And to top it all just study the accompnying most authentic ahadith collections of four muslim exegetes i know being a muslim is to live in a perpatual world of denials, self-agrandisement, satanic stubberness, and pathological gilefull deception practised upon not only oneself but also on other potential victums, this is how Ibless has enslaved large chunk of humanity as his ego alter is visited upon we all so called monothiestic abrahamic relegious followers, but all the same jue/christian have abandoned much of their eveil past , it is we the muslim who are hell-bent on self-axioms of evil due to life long brain disabling

Date: Monday November 24, 2008
Time: 23:52:37 -0500

Comment Everything you need to understand the Danger of Islamic Domination Plan....

Hit Counter