Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called the movie, Innocence of Muslims, "disgusting and reprehensible", "inflammable and despicable"?

Is that so? I guess it is. After watching the movie, I too found it disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and offensive. Although this is no academy award winning movie to say the least, the acts of Muhammad as seen in the movie are indeed horrifying. The only thing Clinton didn't probably realize is that the movie, disgusting and horrifying as it is, is a rather a true portrayal of the life of Prophet Muhammad, a monster of history.

(If your government has blocked access to youtube, use these
proxies to access it: ;

1)  The movie would arouse disgust for the way Muhammad is shown to murder Jewish chieftain Kinana of Khayber in front of his 17-year-old wife, then taking her as his sex-slave. But that was a fact as sacred Islamic texts tell us. In fact, Kinana was tortured by setting a fire on his chest to force him to reveal the location of the treasure under his care, and after the treasure was found, he was murdered by beheading. But in the movie, Muhammad’s cruelty is somewhat softened by simply showing Kinanah being killed by stab on the neck with a sword. Of course, Kinana’s beautiful young wife Safiyah taken to bed by Muhammad and raped on the same night. Here is the story (Sahi Buchari Hadith #143, page-700):

Sulaiman Ibne Harb… Aannas Ibn Malek (ra) narrated, “in the war of Khayber after the inhabitants of Banu Nadir were surrendered, Allah’s apostle killed all the able/adult men, and he (prophet) took all women and children as captives... Among the captives Safiyya Bint Huyy Akhtab was taken by Allah’s Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her freedom was her Mahr.

For a man, believed to be the final and finest prophet of God by the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims, committing murder of a man in such barbaric manner and then raping the poor man’s wife on the same night is despicable and reprehensible indeed, probably more than that.

2)  The movie also shows the Prophet of Islam murdering a 120-year-old woman by tearing her apart by camels for daring to defy him. Nothing could be more disgusting and horrifying that this. But that’s what happened in reality as sacred Islamic texts inform us. Here’s the story from al-Tabari, VIII:96:

"A raiding party led by Zayd set out against Umm in Ramadan. During it, Umm suffered a cruel death. Zyad tied her legs with rope and then tied her between two camels until they split her in two. She was a very old woman. Then they brought Umm's daughter and Abdallah to the Messenger. Umm's daughter belonged to Salamah who had captured her. Muhammad asked Salamah for her, and Salamah gave her to him."

3)  Mrs. Clinton should be commended for calling the movie disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and offensive, given it shows Prophet Muhammad lusting for his adopted son's wife, and abolishing the noble tradition of adoption forever in Islam in order to marry her. The fact is: This is also what happened in reality, and that’s what should be deemed disgusting and horrifying. Here’s the story:

The name of Muhammad’s adopted son was Zayd bin Harithah, who, upon adoption by pagan Muhammad ca. 696 AD, became Zayd bin Muhammad. Zayd’s wife was Zaynab bint Jahsh. The Arabs regarded an adopted son as their son. Thus, sexual relations with the wife of someone’s adopted son was deemed incest and disgusting. However, when Muhammad took Zaynab as his wife, raising disgust and criticism amongst the Arabs, he came up with a solution to kill the criticism, at least within his own community, by banning the noble custom of adoption in Islam. So, he brought out the following verse (Quran 33:37):

“And when thou saidst unto him on whom Allah hath conferred favour and thou hast conferred favour: Keep thy wife to thyself, and fear Allah. And thou didst hide in thy mind that which Allah was to bring to light, and thou didst fear mankind whereas Allah hath a better right that thou shouldst fear Him. So when Zeyd had performed that necessary formality (of divorce) from her, We gave her unto thee in marriage, so that (henceforth) there may be no sin for believers in respect of wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have performed the necessary formality (of release) from them. The commandment of Allah must be fulfilled.”

In the verse, Islamic God states that this revelation is not to apply only to the case faced by Muhammad, but for the Muslim community at all times. Therefore, by bringing in this verse, Muhammad not only destroyed a very noble age-old Arab custom, but also legalized his lust for his daughter-in-law, which the Muslim society can practice for eternity. Disgusting indeed!

4)  The movie shows the prophet of Islam ordering Jews and Christians to convert to Islam or pay the jiza tax (extortion) or be murdered. And it should be called disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and offensive, because that is what happened in reality. This is what the Islamic God says about it in the Quran (9:29):

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.”

5)  The movie shows the prophet of Islam ordering his followers to murder kafir men, enslave their their women and children, sell the elderly women and children for horses, camels and arms for future war and use the younger captive women as sex-slaves. Nothing can be more disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and offensive than this. And the sad thing is: that is exactly what happened as sacred Islamic scriptures and texts inform us:

  • Quran 8:41: “And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah, - and to the Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer, - if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing, - the Day of the meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.”

    Quran 33:27: “And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And Allah has power over all things.” [Merciful Allah asked Prophet Muhammad to confiscate entire properties of surrendered Jews] (Banu Qurayza)
  • Quran 8:67: “It is not for any prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land. Ye desire the lure of this world and Allah desireth (for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is Mighty, Wise.”  (Allah insisting Prophet to kill all the prisoners, and should not keep any surrendered prisoners alive until He (Prophet) occupied entire Arabia.
  • Quran 8:17: “It is not ye who Slew them; it is God; when thou threwest a handful of dust, it was not Thy act, but God’s…..” (Allah said, the killing of surrendered soldiers were done by the wish of Allah)

There are many more things in the movie, shown to be committed by the prophet of Islam, will be found disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and offensive by civilized people. But the sad reality is also that those are no fictions if the Quran, hadiths and biographies of Prophet Muhammad, which have been held as the sacred texts of Islam by Muslims for the past 1400+ years, are to be believed in. And the movie should be deemed truly disgusting, despicable, reprehensible and offensive, because such horrifying atrocities and immoralities were committed by the prophet of Islam, thereby perpetuating in Islamic societies.

In sum: Yes, Hillary is correct. This movie is disgusting, despicable, and reprehensible. And despite poor production, Mrs Clinton and every American, indeed all civilized people of the world, should watch it and condemn the fact that Muhammad committed those barbaric atrocities and immoralities. Civilized people of the world must also unite in condemnation of the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian President Mursi, and the wider Muslim community for not condemning those horrible and immoral actions of their prophet. They should be condemned even more strongly for not only attacking the movie despite true portrayal of the life of Muhammad, but for inciting the Muslim masses for attacking American embassies and killing Americans, who had absolutely nothing to do with the making of the movie. It’s also unfortunate, if not disgusting, that President Obama and Hillary Clinton, as if in compliance with the Sharia Law, asked Google to review its policies regarding the movie, that is, telling Google to shut down the Youtube sites showing the movie, thereby violating the First Amendment of the US Constitution.


Jake Neuman is the author of “Islam and Sharia Law Are Treason: Jihad Is Treason” and “Prophet Muhammad (AKA ALLAH): Monster of History.” (free download)

Comments powered by CComment

Joomla templates by a4joomla